References
- 1Acker, J, Barry, K and Esseveld, J. 1983. Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. Women’s Studies International Forum, 6(4): 423–435. DOI: 10.1016/0277-5395(83)90035-3
- 2Arnstein, SR. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4): 216–224. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225
- 3Barzyk, TM, Wilson, S and Wilson, A. 2015. Community, state, and federal approaches to cumulative risk assessment: Challenges and opportunities for integration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(5): 4546–4571. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120504546
- 4Baum, F, MacDougall, C and Smith, D. 2006. Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(10): 854–857. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2004.028662
- 5Brandusescu, A and Sieber, RE. 2018. The spatial knowledge politics of crisis mapping for community development. GeoJournal, 83: 1–16. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-017-9784-9
- 6Berke, P, Newman, G, Lee, J, Combs, T, Kolosna, C and Salvesen, D. 2015. Evaluation of networks of plans and vulnerability to hazards and climate change: A resilience scorecard. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(4): 287–302. DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2015.1093954
- 7Berke, P, Smith, G and Lyles, W. 2012. Planning for resiliency: Evaluation of state hazard mitigation plans under the disaster mitigation act. Natural Hazards Review, 13(2): 139–149. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000063
- 8Bonney, R, Ballard, H, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Phillips, T, Shirk, J and Wilderman, CC. 2009a. Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. CAISE Inquiry Group Report, Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education, Washington, DC.
- 9Bonney, R, Cooper, C, Dickinson, J, Kelling, S, Phillips, T, Rosenberg, KV and Shirk, J. 2009b. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience, 59: 977–984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
- 10Bonney, R, Shirk, JL, Phillips, TB, Wiggins, A, Ballard, HL, Miller-Rushing, AJ and Parrish, JK. 2014. Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343: 6178: 1436–37. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554
- 11Boothroyd, P and Anderson, OA. 1983. The Difference Between Corporate and Social Planning, and the Implications for Indian Affairs. Department of Indian and Northern Affairs, Regina, SK.
- 12Boyd, D and Crawford, K. 2012. Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication and Society, 15(5): 662–679. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
- 13Boyer-Villemaire, U, Benavente, J, Cooper, JAG and Bernatchez, P. 2014. Analysis of power distribution and participation in sustainable natural hazard risk governance: a call for active participation. Environmental Hazards, 13(1): 38–57. DOI: 10.1080/17477891.2013.864592
- 14Burby, RJ, Beatley, T, Berke, PR, Deyle, RE, French, SP, Godschalk, DR, Kaiser, EJ, Kartez, JD, May, PJ, Olshansky, R, Paterson, RG and Platt, RH. 1999. Unleashing the power of planning to create disaster-resistant communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(3): 247–258. DOI: 10.1080/01944369908976055
- 15Chaskin, R. 2013.
Neighborhood data and locally driven community change . In: Pettit, KLS, Kingsley, GT and Coulton, CJ (Eds.), Strengthening communities with neighborhood data, 185–204. Lanham, MD: Urban Institute Press. - 16Cities of Service. 2017. Seven American Cities Engage Citizens to Help Prepare for Disasters. Available at
https://citiesofservice.org/stories/seven-american-cities-engage-citizens-help-prepare-disasters-2/ (Last Accessed 14 April 2022). - 17Conrad, CC and Hilchey, KG. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 176(1–4): 273–291. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5
- 18Cooper, CB, Larson, LR, Holland, KK, Gibson, RA, Farnham, DJ, Hsueh, DY, Culligan, PJ and McGillis, WR. 2017. Contrasting the views and actions of data collectors and data consumers in a volunteer water quality monitoring project: Implications for project design and management. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 8. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.82
- 19Corburn, J. 2005. Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/6494.001.0001
- 20Cutts, BB, White, DD and Kinzig, AP. 2011. Participatory geographic information systems for the co-production of science and policy in an emerging boundary organization. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(8): 977–985. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.05.012
- 21Everett, Y and Fuller, M. 2011. Fire safe councils in the interface. Society & Natural Resources, 24(4): 319–333. DOI: 10.1080/08941920903313835
- 22Eisen, A. 1994. Survey of neighborhood-based, comprehensive community empowerment initiatives. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2): 235–252. DOI: 10.1177/109019819402100208
- 23EPA. 2016. Environmental Protection Belongs to the Public: A Vision for Citizen Science at the EPA. EPA 219-R-16-001. Available at
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-04/documents/nacept_citizen_science_publication_eng_022318_rf508_508.pdf (Last Accessed 14 April 2022). - 24Estellés-Arolas, E and González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F. 2012. Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information Science, 38(2): 189–200. DOI: 10.1177/0165551512437638
- 25Fang, ML, Canham, SL, Battersby, L, Sixsmith, J, Wada, M and Sixsmith, A. 2019. Exploring privilege in the digital divide: implications for theory, policy, and practice. Gerontologist, 59(1): e1–e15. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny037
- 26FEMA. 1996. Guide for All-Hazards Emergency Operations Planning, September 1996. Available at
https://www.fema.gov/pdf/plan/slg101.pdf (Last Accessed 14 April 2022). - 27FEMA. 2016. Damage Assessment Operations Manual, 5 April 2016. Available at
https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/Damage_Assessment_Manual_April62016.pdf (Last Accessed 14 April 2022). - 28Gibson, J, Hendricks, MD and Wells, JC. 2018. From engagement to empowerment: How heritage professionals can incorporate participatory methods in disaster recovery to better serve socially vulnerable groups. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(6): 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2018.1530291
- 29Granell, C and Ostermann, FO. 2016. Beyond data collection: Objectives and methods of research using VGI and geo-social media for disaster management. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 59: 231–243. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.01.006
- 30Godschalk, DR. 2003. Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4(3): 136–143. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
- 31Godschalk, DR, Kaiser, EJ and Berke, PR. 1998.
Hazard assessment: the factual basis for planning and mitigation . In: Burby, R (ed.), Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities, 85–118. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press. - 32Gustetic, J, Meszaros, JR and Safford, H. 2015.
Calling Citizen Scientists: You Can Help When Disaster Strikes . The White House: President Barack Obama. Archives. Available athttps://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/09/28/calling-citizen-scientists-you-can-help-when-disasters-strike (Last accessed 14 April 2022) - 33Haklay, M. 2013.
Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation . In: Sui, D, Elwood, S and Goodchild, M (eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice, 105–122. New York, NY: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7 - 34Hall, BL. 1992. From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research. The American Sociologist, 23(4): 15–28. DOI: 10.1007/BF02691928
- 35Heipke, C. 2010. Crowdsourcing geospatial data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(6): 550–557. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.06.005
- 36Hendricks, MD and Meyer, MA. 2021. Modeling long-term housing recovery after technological disaster using a virtual audit with repeated photography. Journal of Planning Education and Research. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X211002910
- 37Hendricks, MD, Meyer, MA, Gharaibeh, NG, Van Zandt, S, Masterson, J, Cooper, JT,
Jr. , Horney, JA and Berke, P. 2018. The development of a participatory assessment technique for infrastructure: Neighborhood-level monitoring towards sustainable infrastructure systems. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38: 265–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.039 - 38Holifield, R. 2012. Environmental justice as recognition and participation in risk assessment: Negotiating and translating health risk at a superfund site in Indian country. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(3): 591–613. DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2011.641892
- 39Houston, JB, Hawthorne, J, Perreault, MF, Park, EH, Goldstein Hode, M, Halliwell, MR, Turner-McGowen, SE, Davis, R, Vaid, S, McElderry, JA and Griffith, SA. 2015. Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1): 1–22. DOI: 10.1111/disa.12092
- 40Israel, BA, Schulz, AJ, Parker, EA and Becker, AB. 1998. Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1): 173–202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
- 41Jacobs, F. 2018. Black feminism and radical planning: New directions for disaster planning research. Planning Theory, 18(1): 24–39. DOI: 10.1177/1473095218763221
- 42Kawasaki, A, Berman, ML and Guan, W. 2013. The growing role of web-based geospatial technology in disaster response and support. Disasters, 37(2): 201–221. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01302.x
- 43Liang, Y, Caverlee, J and Mander, J. 2013. Text vs. images: on the viability of social media to assess earthquake damage. In: WWW’13 Companion: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, 1003–1006. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on
13–17 May 2013 . DOI: 10.1145/2487788.2488102 - 44Lue, E, Wilson, JP and Curtis, A. 2014. Conducting disaster damage assessments with Spatial Video, experts, and citizens. Applied Geography, 52: 46–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.04.014
- 45Mallakpour, I and Villarini, G. 2015. The changing nature of flooding across the central United States. Nature Climate Change, 5(3): 250–254. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2516
- 46McCall, MK. 2003. Seeking good governance in participatory-GIS: A review of processes and governance dimensions in applying GIS to participatory spatial planning. Habitat International, 27(4): 549–73. DOI: 10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00005-5
- 47Meyer, MA, Hendricks, M, Newman, GD, Masterson, JH, Cooper, JT, Sansom, G, Gharaibeh, N, Horney, J, Berke, P, Van Zandt, S and Cousins, T. 2018. Participatory action research: Tools for disaster resilience education. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(4/5): 402–419. DOI: 10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2017-0015
- 48Mileti, DS. 1999. Disaster by Design. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
- 49Neal, DM and Phillips, BD. 1995. Effective emergency management: Reconsidering the bureaucratic approach. Disasters, 19: 327–337. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1995.tb00353.x
- 50Osborne, N. 2015. Intersectionality and kyriarchy: A framework for approaching power and social justice in planning and climate change adaptation. Planning Theory, 14(2): 130–151. DOI: 10.1177/1473095213516443
- 51Oti, IC, Gharaibeh, NG, Hendricks, MD, Meyer, MA, Van Zandt, S, Masterson, J, Horney, JA and Berke, P. 2019. Validity and reliability of drainage infrastructure monitoring data obtained from citizen scientists. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 25(3):
04019018 . DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000495 - 52Pearce, L. 2003. Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: How to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 28(2): 211–228. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022917721797
- 53Reinharz, S and Davidman, L. 1992.
Feminist methods in social research . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. - 54Renn, O, Webler, T and Johnson, BB. 1991. Public participation in hazard management: the use of citizen panels in the US. Risk, 2: 197.
- 55Sadd, JL, Pastor, M, Morello-Frosch, R, Scoggins, J and Jesdale, B. 2011. Playing it safe: Assessing cumulative impact and social vulnerability through an environmental justice screening method in the south coast air basin, California. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(5): 1441–1459. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8051441
- 56Scheerder, A, van Deursen, A and van Dijk, J. 2017. Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second-and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8): 1607–1624. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
- 57Schwab, JC. 2014. Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery: Next Generation. American Planning Association Vol. PAS Report 576 978-1-61190-150-4, Chicago, IL.
- 58Sierra Club. 2018. Adopt-A-Drain Houston. Available at
https://www.sierraclub.org/texas/houston/blog/2018/04/adopt-drain-houston (Last accessed 14 April 2022) - 59Smith, G. 2014. Involving land use planners in pre-event planning for post-disaster recovery. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(4): 306–307. DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2014.990789
- 60Van Deursen, AJ and Van Dijk, JA. 2019. The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media and Society, 21(2): 354–375. DOI: 10.1177/1461444818797082
- 61Villegas, C, Martinez, M and Krause, M. 2018. Lessons from Harvey: Crisis Informatics for Urban Resilience, August 2018. Available at
https://scholarship.rice.edu/bitstream/handle/1911/105229/KI_2018_LessonsHarvey.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Last accessed 14 April 2022) - 62Wallerstein, N and Duran, B. 2010. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, 100(S1): S40–S46. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036
- 63Weber, S. 2018. Participatory visual research with displaced persons:”Listening” to post-conflict experiences through the visual. Journal of Refugee Studies, 32(3): 17–435. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fey038
- 64Whittaker, J, McLennan, B and Handmer, J. 2015. A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 13: 358–368. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.010
- 65Wilson, SM, Murray, RT, Jiang, C, Dalemarre, L, Burwell-Naney, K and Fraser-Rahim, H. 2015. Environmental justice radar: A tool for community-based mapping to increase environmental awareness and participatory decision making. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 9(3): 439–446. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0066
- 66Wing, OE, Pinter, N, Bates, PD and Kousky, C. 2020. New insights into US flood vulnerability revealed from flood insurance big data. Nature Communications, 11(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15264-2
- 67World Bank. 2013. Building Resilient Communities: Risk Management and Response to Natural Disasters through Social Funds and Community-Driven Development Operations. The World Bank, Washington DC.
- 68Zou, L, Lam, NS, Cai, H and Qiang, Y. 2018. Mining Twitter data for improved understanding of disaster resilience. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(5): 1422–1441. DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1421897