References
- Aceves-Bueno, E, Adeleye, A, Feraud, M, Huang, Y, Tao, M, Yang, Y and Anderson, S. 2017. The accuracy of citizen science data: A quantitative review. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 98(4): 278–290. DOI: 10.1002/bes2.1336
- Agostini, G, SturtzSreetharan, CL, Wutich, A, Williams, D and Brewis, A. 2019. Citizen Sociolinguistics: A new method for understanding fat talk and other sociolinguistic phenomena, PLoS ONE, 14(5):
e0217618 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217618 - Blöbaum, A and Hunecke, M. 2005. Perceived danger in urban public space: The impacts of physical features and personal factors. Environment and Behavior, 37(4): 465–486. DOI: 10.1177/0013916504269643
- Bonhoure, I, Cigarini, A, Vicens, J and Perelló, J. 2019.
Citizen social science in practice: A critical analysis of a mental health community-based project . [internet] OpenSystems Research Group. Universitat de Barcelona. Available at:https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/63aj7/ (Last accessed 24 November 2019). DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/63aj7 - Bonney, R, Cooper, CR, Dickinson, J, Kelling, S, Phillips, T, Rosenberg, KV and Shirk, J. 2009. Citizen science: a developing tool for expandin science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59: 977–984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
- Bonney, R, Shirk, JL, Phillips, TB, Wiggins, A, Ballard, HL, Miller-Rushing, AJ and Parrish, JK. 2014. Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178): 1436–1437. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554
- Brewis, A. 2011. Obesity: Cultural and Biocultural Perspectives. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Brewis, A, Trainer, S, Han, S and Wutich, A. 2017. Publically misfitting: extreme weight and the everyday production and reinforcement of felt stigma. Medical anthropology quarterly, 31(2): 257–76. DOI: 10.1111/maq.12309
- Brewis, A and Wutich, A. 2019.
Lazy, crazy and disgusting: Stigma and the undoing of global health . Baltimore: JH Press. - Brown, E and Williams, B. 2019. The potential for citizen science to produce reliable and useful information in ecology. Conservation Biology, 33(3): 561–569. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13223
- Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
- Byrne, J. 2012. When green is White: The cultural politics of race, nature and social exclusion in a Los Angeles urban national park. Geoforum, 43(3): 595–611. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.10.002
- Cole, T. 1992. The journey of life: A cultural history of aging in America. New York: CUP.
- Collins, PH. 2000. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
- Conrad, CC and Hilchey, KG. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176: 273–291. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5
- Cooper, CB, Shirk, J and Zuckerberg, B. 2014. The invisible prevalence of citizen science in global gesearch: Migratory birds and climate. PLoS One, 9(9):
e106508 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106508 - Dadich, A. 2014. Citizen social science: A methodology to facilitate and evaluate workplace learning in continuing interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(3): 194–199. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2013.874982
- Eckert, P. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4): 453–476. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x
- Falk, S, Foster, G, Comont, R, Conroy, J, Bostock, Salisbury, A, Kilbey, D, Bennett, J and Smith, B. 2019. Evaluating the ability of citizen scientists to identify bumblebee (Bombus) species. PLoS ONE, 14(6):
e0218614 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218614 - Freitag, A, Meyer, R and Whiteman, L. 2016. Strategies employed by citizen science programs to increase the credibility of their data. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.6
- Gruys, K. 2012. Does this make me look fat? Aesthetic labor and fat talk as emotional labor in a women’s plus-size clothing store. Social Problems, 59(4): 481–500. DOI: 10.1525/sp.2012.59.4.481
- Haraway, D. 2001.
Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective . In: Lederman, M and Bartsch, I (eds.), The gender and science reader, 169–188. London: Routledge. - Harro, B. 2000.
The cycle of socialization . In: Adams, M, Blumenfeld, W, Castañeda, CR and Hackman, H (eds.), Readings for diversity in social justice (pp.16–21). New York: Routledge. - Harding, SG. 2001.
Feminist standpoint epistemology . In: Lederman, M and Bartsch, I (eds.), The gender and science reader, 145–168. London: Routledge. - Haklay, M. 2013.
Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation . In: Sui, D, Elwood, S and Goodchild, M (eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge, 105–122. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7 - Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J and Bonn, A. 2018. Citizen Science: Innovation in open science, society, and policy. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2
- Heiss, R and Matthes, J. 2017. Citizen science in the Social Sciences: A call for more evidence. GAIA, 26(1): 22–26. DOI: 10.14512/gaia.26.1.7
- Hooks, B. 1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center. New York: Routledge.
- Hooks, B. 2000. Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Cambridge: South End Press.
- Hoover, E. 2016. ‘We’re not going to be guinea pigs;’ Citizen science and environmental health in a Native American community. Journal of Science Communication, 15(1): 1–21. DOI: 10.22323/2.15010205
- Housley, W. 2018. Conversation analysis, publics, practitioners and citizen social science. Discourse Studies, 20(3): 431–437. DOI: 10.1177/1461445618754581
- Housley, W, Procter, R, Edwards, A, Burnap, P, Williams, M, Sloan, L, Rana, O, Morgan, J, Voss, A and Greenhill, A. 2014. Big and broad social data and the sociological imagination: A collaborative response. Big Data & Society, 1(2): 1–15. DOI: 10.1177/2053951714545135
- Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge Press.
- Janssens, A, Cecile, JW and Kraft, P. 2012. Research conducted using data obtained through online communities: Ethical implications of methodological limitations. PLOS Medicine, 9(1):
e1001328 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001328 - Kasperowski, D and Hillman, T. 2018. The epistemic culture in an online citizen science project: Programs, antiprograms and epistemic subjects. Social Studies of Science, 48(4): 564–588. DOI: 10.1177/0306312718778806
- Kasperowski, D, Kullenberg, C and Mäkitalo, Å. 2016. Embedding citizen science in research: Forms of engagement, scientific output and values for science, policy and society. 27 February 2017. Available at
https://osf.io/e3x4y/ . [20 October 2019]. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/tfsgh - Kosmala, M, Wiggins, A, Swanson, A and Simmons, B. 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14: 551–560. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1436
- Kullenberg, C and Kasperowski, D. 2016. What is citizen science? – A scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(1):
e0147152 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147152 - Kythreotis, A, Mantyka-Pringle, C, Mercer, T, Whitmarsh, L, Corner, A, Paavola, J, Chambers, C, Miller, BA and Castree, N. 2019. Citizen social science for more integrative and effective climate action: A science-policy perspective. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7: 1–10. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00010
- Landis, R and Koch, G. 1977. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33(2): 363–374. DOI: 10.2307/2529786
- Losey, J, Perlman, J and Hoebeke, E. 2007. Citizen scientist rediscovers rare nine-spotted lady beetle, Coccinella novemnotata, in eastern North America. Journal of Insect Conservation, 11(4): 415–417. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-007-9077-6
- Lukyanenko, R, Wiggins, A and Rosser, H. 2019. Citizen science: An information quality research frontier. Information Systems Frontiers, 22: 961–983. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-019-09915-z
- MacKenzie, CM, Murray, G, Primack, R and Weihrauch, D. 2017. Lessons from citizen science: Assessing volunteer-collected plant phenology data with Mountain Watch. Biological Conservation, 208: 121–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.027
- Macnicol, J. 2005. Age discrimination: An historical and contemporary analysis. New York: CUP. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511550560
- Mantyka-Pringle, C, Jardine, T, Bradford, L, Bharadwaj, L, Kythreotis, A, Fresque-Baxter, J, Kelly, E, Somers, G, Lorne, DE, Jones, PD, Lindenschmidt, E, The Slave River and Delta Partnership. 2017. Bridging science and traditional knowledge to assess cumulative impacts of stressors on ecosystem health. Environmental International, 102: 125–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.008
- McKinley, DC, Miller-Rushing, AJ, Ballard, HL, Bonney, R, Brown, H, Cook-Patton, SC, Evans, DM, French, RA, Parrish, JK, Phillips, TB, Ryan, SF, Shanley, LA, Shirk, JL, Stepenuck, KF, Weltzin, JF, Wiggins, A, Boyle, OD, Briggs, RD, Chapin, SF, Hewitt, DA, Preuss, PW and Soukup, MA. 2016. Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208: 15–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015
- Metzl, JM and Petty, J. 2017. Integrating and assessing structural competency in an innovative prehealth curriculum at Vanderbilt University. Academic Medicine, 92(3): 354. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001477
- Muhammad, M, Wallerstein, N, Sussman, A, Avila, M, Balone, L and Duran, B. 2014. Reflections on Researcher Identity and Power: The Impact of Positionality on Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Processes and Outcomes. Critical sociology, 41(7–8): 1045–1063. DOI: 10.1177/0896920513516025
- Mwambari, D. 2019. Local Positionality in the Production of Knowledge in Northern Uganda. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. January. DOI: 10.1177/1609406919864845
- Neff, J, Holmes, SM, Strong, S, Chin, G, De Avila, J, Dubal, S, Duncan, LG, Halpern, J, Harvey, M, Knight, KR, Lemay, E, Lewis, B, Matthews, J, Nelson, N, Satterwhite, S, Thompson-Lastad, A and Walkover, L. 2019.
The structural competency working group: Lessons from iterative, interdisciplinary development of a structural competency training module . In Hansen, H and Metzl, J (eds.), Structural competency in mental health and medicine, 53–74. New York: Springer Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-10525-9_5 - Pasquini, MW and Olaniyan, O. 2004. The researcher and the field assistant: a cross-disciplinary, cross-cultural viewing of positionality. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 29(1): 24–36. DOI: 10.1179/030801804225012446
- Phillips, C, Walshe, D, O’Regan, K, Strong, K, Hennon, C, Knapp, K, Murphy, C and Thorne, P. 2018. Assessing citizen science participation skill for altruism or university course credit: A case study analysis using cyclone center. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(1): 6. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.111
- Puhl, R and Brownell, K. 2001. Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obesity Research, 9(12): 788–805. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2001.108
- Purdam, K. 2014. Citizen social science and citizen data? Methodological and ethical challenges for social research. Current Sociology, 62(3): 374–392. DOI: 10.1177/0011392114527997
- Renault, H. 2018. New spider species discovered by citizen scientists using Australian conservation app, 4 January 2018. Available at
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-05/seven-new-spider-species-discovered-by-gamers/9303710 . (Last accessed 20 October 2019]. - Rosa, J. 2018.
Community as a campus: From “problems” to possibilities in Latinx communities . In Castañeda, M and Krupczynski, J (eds.), Civic engagement in diverse Latinx communities: Learning from social justice partnerships in action, 111–123. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. - Ruiz-Gutierrez, V, Hooten, MB and Campbell Grant, EH. 2016. Uncertainty in biological monitoring: a framework for data collection and analysis to account for multiple sources of sampling bias. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7: 900–909. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12542
- Ruth, A, SturtzSreetharan, CL, Brewis, A and Wutich, A. 2020. Structural competency of pre-health students: Can a single course lead to meaningful change? Med Sci Educ. e-ISSN 2156–8650. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00909-9
- Silverstein, M. 1976.
Shifters, Linguistic Categories and Cultural Description . In: Basso, K and Selby, H (eds.) Meaning in Anthropology, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. - Smith, D. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: NUP.
- Steger, C, Butt, B and Hooten, MB. 2017. Safari science: assessing the reliability of citizen science data for wildlife surveys. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(6): 2053–2062. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12921
- Strobl, B, Etter, S, van Meerveld, I and Seibert, J. 2019. The CrowdWater game: A playful way to improve the accuracy of crowdsourced water level class data. PLoS ONE, 14(9):
e0222579 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222579 - SturtzSreetharan, CL. 2020. Citizen Sociolinguistics: A data collection approach for hard-to-capture naturally-occurring language data. Field Methods, 32(3): 327–334. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X20912211
- SturtzSreetharan, CL, Agostini, G, Brewis, AA and Wutich, A. 2019. Fat talk: A citizen sociolinguistic approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 23(3): 263–283. DOI: 10.1111/josl.12342
- Sultana, F. 2007. Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An international journal for critical geographies, 6(3): 374–385. Available at
https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/786 (Last accessed 5 August 2021). - Svendsen, B. 2018. The dynamics of citizen sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 22(2): 137–60. DOI: 10.1111/josl.12276
- Tauginienė, L, Butkevičienė, E., Vohland, K, Heinisch, B, Daskolia, M, Suškevičs, M, Portela, M, Balázs, B and Prūse, B. 2020. Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: The power of interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications, 6: 89. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0471-y
- Turner, S. 2010. Research Note: The silenced assistant. Reflections of invisible interpreters and research assistants. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 51(2): 206–219. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2010.01425.x
- van der Velde, T, Milton, DA, Lawson, TJ, Wilcox, C, Lansdell, M, Davis, G, Perkins, G and Hardesty, BD. 2017. Comparison of marine debris data collected by researchers and citizen scientists: Is citizen science data worth the effort? Biological Conservation, 208: 127–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.025
- van Strien, AJ, van Swaay, CA and Termaat, T. 2014. Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(6): 1450–1458. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12158
- Voosen, P. 2018. Update: NASA confirms amateur astronomer has discovered a lost satellite, 31 January 2018. Available at
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/01/amateur-astronomer-discovers-revived-nasa-satellite (Last accessed 20 October 2019]. DOI: 10.1126/science.aat1319 - Wacquant, LJ. 1993. Urban outcasts: stigma and division in the black American ghetto and the French urban periphery. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 17(3): 366–83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1993.tb00227.x
- Williams, DR, Yu, Y, Jackson, JS and Anderson, NB. 1997. Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socioeconomic status, stress, and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2(3): 335–351. DOI: 10.1177/135910539700200305