References
-
1
Albarracin,
D and
Wyer, RS,
Jr . 2000. The cognitive impact of past behavior: influences on beliefs, attitudes, and future behavioral decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 5–22. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.5 - 2 Alender, B. 2016. Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: a deeper look at water quality monitoring. Jcom-Journal of Science Communication, 15: A04. DOI: 10.22323/2.15030204
- 3 Bonney, R, Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL and Enck, JW. 2016. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25: 2–16. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515607406
- 4 Brossard, D, Lewenstein, B and Bonney, R. 2005. Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27: 1099–1121. DOI: 10.1080/09500690500069483
- 5 Brouwer, S and Hessels, LK. 2019. Increasing research impact with citizen science: The influence of recruitment strategies on sample diversity. Public Understanding of Science, 28: 606–621. DOI: 10.1177/0963662519840934
- 6 Bullock, OM, Colón Amill, D, Shulman, HC and Dixon, GN. 2019. Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: Evidence from metacognition. Public Understanding of Science, 28: 845–853. DOI: 10.1177/0963662519865687
- 7 Christine, DI and Thinyane, M. 2021. Citizen science as a data-based practice: A consideration of data justice. Patterns, 2: 100224. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100224
- 8 Clegg, T and Kolodner, J. 2014. Scientizing and cooking: Helping middle-school learners develop scientific dispositions. Science Education, 98: 36–63. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21083
- 9 Cooper, CB, Hawn, CL, Larson, LR, Parrish, JK, Bowser, G, Cavalier, D, Dunn, RR, Haklay, M, Gupta, KK, Jelks, NTO and Johnson, VA. 2021. Inclusion in citizen science: The conundrum of rebranding. Science, 372(6549): 1386–1388. DOI: 10.1126/science.abi6487
- 10 Crall, AW, Jordan, R, Holfelder, K, Newman, GJ, Graham, J and Waller, DM. 2013. The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 22: 745–764. DOI: 10.1177/0963662511434894
- 11 De Meyer, K, Coren, E, McCaffrey, MS and Slean, C. 2020. Transforming the stories we tell about climate change: from ‘issue’ to ‘action’. Environmental Research Letters, 16: 1. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abcd5a
- 12 Dickinson, JL, Shirk, J, Bonter, D, Bonney, R, Crain, R, Martin, J, Phillips, T and Purcell, K. 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10: 291–297. DOI: 10.1890/110236
- 13 Domroese, MC and Johnson, EA. 2017. Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project. Biological Conservation, 208: 40–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020
-
14
Dunkley,
RA. 2017.
The Role of Citizen Science in Environmental Education: A Critical Exploration of the Environmental Citizen Science Experience . In Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research, 213–230. IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0962-2.ch010 - 15 Dunkley, RA. 2018. Space-timescapes as ecopedagogy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49: 117–129. DOI: 10.1080/00958964.2017.1417223
- 16 Dunkley, RA. 2019. Monitoring ecological change in UK woodlands and rivers: An exploration of the relational geographies of citizen science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44: 16–31. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12258
- 17 Evans, C, Abrams, E, Reitsma, R, Roux, K, Salmonsen, L and Marra, PP. 2005. The Neighborhood Nestwatch program: Participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conservation Biology, 19: 589–594. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00s01.x
- 18 Geoghegan, H, Dyke, A, Pateman, R, West, S and Everett, G. 2016. Understanding motivations for citizen science. Final report on behalf of UKEOF. University of Reading, Stockholm Environment Institute (University of York) and University of the West of England.
- 19 Hart, AG, Carpenter, WS, Hlustik-Smith, E, Reed, M and Goodenough, AE. 2018b. Testing the potential of Twitter mining methods for data acquisition: Evaluating novel opportunities for ecological research in multiple taxa. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9: 2194–2205. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13063
- 20 Hart, AG, Hesselberg, T, Nesbit, R and Goodenough, AE. 2018a. The spatial distribution and environmental triggers of ant mating flights: using citizen-science data to reveal national patterns. Ecography, 41: 877–888. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.03140
- 21 Hobbs, SJ and White, PCL. 2012. Motivations and barriers in relation to community participation in biodiversity recording. Journal for Nature Conservation, 20: 364–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.08.002
-
22
Kotler,
P and
Armstrong,
G. 2020.
Principles of marketing (Eighteenth edition, Global) . Pearson Education. - 23 Mac Domhnaill, C, Lyons, S and Nolan, A. 2020. The citizens in citizen science: demographic, socioeconomic, and health characteristics of biodiversity recorders in Ireland. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5: 16. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.283
- 24 Martin, VY. 2017. Citizen Science as a Means for Increasing Public Engagement in Science: Presumption or Possibility? Science Communication, 39: 142–168. DOI: 10.1177/1075547017696165
- 25 Merenlender, AM, Crall, AW, Drill, S, Prysby, M and Ballard, H. 2016. Evaluating environmental education, citizen science, and stewardship through naturalist programs. Conservation Biology, 30: 1255–1265. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12737
-
26
NASEM 2018: National Academies of
Science, Engineering and Medicine. 2018.
Learning Through Citizen Science: Enhancing Opportunities by Design . Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press. - 27 Newman, G, Chandler, M, Clyde, M, McGreavy, B, Haklay, M, Ballard, H, Gray, S, Scarpino, R, Hauptfeld, R, Mellor, D and Gallo, J. 2017. Leveraging the power of place in citizen science for effective conservation decision making. Biological Conservation, 208: 55–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.019
- 28 Osei-Frimpong, K. 2019. Understanding consumer motivations in online social brand engagement participation. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 47: 511–529. DOI: 10.1108/IJRDM-08-2018-0151
- 29 Overdevest, C, Orr, CH and Stepenuck, K. 2004. Volunteer stream monitoring and local participation in natural resource issues. Research in Human Ecology, 11: 177–185.
- 30 Pateman, RM, Dyke, A and West, SE. 2021. The Diversity of Participants in Citizen Science. Citizen Science. Theory and Practice, 6: 9. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.369
-
31
Pocock,
MJO,
Tweddle,
JC,
Savage,
J,
Robinson,
LD and
Roy,
HE. 2017.
The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental
citizen science. PLOS ONE,
12:
e0172579 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172579 -
32
Purcell,
K,
Garibay,
C and
Dickinson,
JL. 2012.
A Gateway to Science for All: Celebrate Urban Birds: Public Participation in Environmental Research . In Citizen Science, Dickinson, JL and Bonney, R (eds.). Cornell University Press Comstock Publishing Associates. DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9780801449116.003.0014 - 33 Regenberg, A. 2019. Science and social media. Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 8: 1226–1229. DOI: 10.1002/sctm.19-0066
-
34
Robinson,
LD,
Cawthray,
JL,
West,
SE,
Bonn,
A and
Ansine,
J. 2018.
Ten principles of citizen science . In Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy, 27–40. UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.9 - 35 Shirk, JL, Ballard, HL, Wilderman, CC, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, BV, Krasny, ME, et al. 2012. Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design. Ecology and Society, 17: 29. DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
- 36 Sumner, S, Bevan, P, Hart, AG and Isaac, NJ. 2019. Mapping species distributions in 2 weeks using citizen science. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 12: 382–388. DOI: 10.1111/icad.12345
- 37 Theobald, EJ, Ettinger, AK, Burgess, HK, DeBey, LB, Schmidt, NR, Froehlich, HE, Wagner, C, HilleRisLambers, J, Tewksbury, J, Harsch, MA and Parrish, JK. 2015. Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181: 236–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021
- 38 Trumbull, DJ, Bonney, R, Bascom, D and Cabral, A. 2000. Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science Education, 84: 265–275. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<;265::AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-5
- 39 Tuan, YF. 1974. Topophilia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- 40 Turrini, T, Dörler, D, Richter, A, Heigl, F and Bonn, A. 2018. The threefold potential of environmental citizen science—Generating knowledge, creating learning opportunities and enabling civic participation. Biological Conservation, 225: 176–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024
- 41 West, S and Pateman, R. 2016. Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: What can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(2). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.8
- 42 West, SE, Pateman, RM and Dyke, A. 2021. Variations in the Motivations of Environmental Citizen Scientists. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6: 1–8. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.370
- 43 Wheeler, BW, White, M, Stahl-Timmins, W and Depledge, MH. 2012. Does living by the coast improve health and wellbeing? Health and Place, 18: 1198–1201. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.06.015
- 44 White, MP, Pahl, S, Ashbullby, K, Herbert, S and Depledge, MH. 2013. Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35: 40–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.002
- 45 Wright, DR, Underhill, LG, Keene, M and Knight, AT. 2015. Understanding the motivations and satisfactions of volunteers to improve the effectiveness of citizen science programs. Society and Natural Resources, 28: 1013–1029. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1054976
- 46 Wyles, KJ, Pahl, S, Holland, M and Thompson, RC. 2017. Can beach cleans do more than clean up litter? Comparing beach cleans to other coastal activities. Environment and Behavior, 49: 509–535. DOI: 10.1177/0013916516649412