Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Bridging Knowledge Creation and Conservation Practice through Participatory Action Research on Private Lands Cover

Bridging Knowledge Creation and Conservation Practice through Participatory Action Research on Private Lands

Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
Volume 8 (2023): Issue 1
By: Matthew Taylor,  Aidan Davison and  Andrew Harwood  
Open Access
|Feb 2023

References

  1. 1Agnoletti, M and Rotherham, ID. 2015. Landscape and biocultural diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24(13): 3155–3165. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-015-1003-8
    Back to article
  2. 2Almond, RE, Grooten, M and Peterson, T. 2020. Living Planet Report 2020-Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. World Wildlife Fund.
    Back to article
  3. 3Arlettaz, R, Schaub, M, Fournier, J, Reichlin, TS, Sierro, A, Watson, JEM and Braunisch, V. 2010. From publications to public actions: When conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation. BioScience, 60(10): 835–842. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.10.10
    Back to article
  4. 4Baker, JP, Hulse, DW, Gregory, SV, White, D, Van Sickle, J, Berger, PA, Dole, D and Schumaker, NH. 2004. Alternative futures for the Willamette River basin, Oregon. Ecological Applications, 14(2): 313–324. DOI: 10.1890/02-5011
    Back to article
  5. 5Becker-Klein, R, Peterman, K and Stylinski, C. 2016. Embedded Assessment as an Essential Method for Understanding Public Engagement in Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1): 8. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.15
    Back to article
  6. 6Buckles, DJ. 2013. Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. DOI: 10.4324/9780203107386
    Back to article
  7. 7Ceballos, G, Garcia, A, Pringle, RM, Ceballos, G, Ehrlich, PR, Barnosky, AD, García, A, Pringle, RM and Palmer, TM. 2015. Accelerated modern human – induced species losses : Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1(June): 1–6. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1400253
    Back to article
  8. 8Chettiparamb, A. 2007. Interdisciplinarity : a literature review. Southampton: University of Southampton.
    Back to article
  9. 9Chevalier, JM and Buckles, DJ. 2019. Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. In Chevalier, JM and Buckles, DJ (eds.). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351033268
    Back to article
  10. 10Conrad, C and Hilchey, KG. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176(1–4): 273–91. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5
    Back to article
  11. 11Cook, CN, Mascia, MB, Schwartz, MW, Possingham, HP and Fuller, RA. 2013. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary. Conservation Biology, 27(4): 669–678. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12050
    Back to article
  12. 12DeFries, R and Nagendra, H. 2017. Ecosystem management as a wicked problem. Science, 356(6335), 265–270. DOI: 10.1126/science.aal1950
    Back to article
  13. 13Dickman, CR. 2018. Biodiversity in Australia: an overview. Global biodiversity, 513–556. DOI: 10.1201/9780429433634-12
    Back to article
  14. 14Figgis, P. 2004. Conservation on private lands: the Australian experience. IUCN.
    Back to article
  15. 15Fitzsimons, JA and Wescott, G. 2007. Perceptions and attitudes of land managers in multi-tenure reserve networks and the implications for conservation. Journal of environmental management, 84(1): 38–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.009
    Back to article
  16. 16Fortmann, L. 2009. Participatory Research Approaches in Conservation and Rural Livelihoods: Doing Science Together. In Fortmann, L (ed.). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
    Back to article
  17. 17Greiner, R and Gregg, D. 2011. Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: Empirical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy, 28(1): 257–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.006
    Back to article
  18. 18Head, BW and Xiang, WN. 2016. Why is an APT approach to wicked problems important? Landscape and Urban Planning, 154: 4–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.018
    Back to article
  19. 19Henle, K, Firbank, L, Watt, A, Henle, K, Alard, D, Clitherow, J, Cobb, P and Firbank, L. 2008. “Identifying and Managing the Conflicts between Agriculture and Biodiversity Conservation in Europe — a Review.” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 124: 60–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.005
    Back to article
  20. 20Hilty, J and Merenlender, AM. 2003. Studying biodiversity on private lands. Conservation Biology, 17(1): 132–137. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01361.x
    Back to article
  21. 21Iftekhar, MS, Tisdell, JG and Gilfedder, L. 2014. Private lands for biodiversity conservation: Review of conservation covenanting programs in Tasmania, Australia. Biological Conservation, 169: 176–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.013
    Back to article
  22. 22Jenkins, CN, et al. 2015. ‘US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(16): 5081–5086. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418034112
    Back to article
  23. 23Jones, N, Ross, H, Lynam, T, Perez, P, Jones, N, Ross, H, Lynam, T, Perez, P and Leitch, A. 2011. Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1): 46. DOI: 10.5751/ES-03802-160146
    Back to article
  24. 24Krause, B. 2016. Wild soundscapes. Yale University Press.
    Back to article
  25. 25Langpap, C. 2006. Conservation of endangered species: Can incentives work for private landholders? Ecological Economics, 57(4): 558–572. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.007
    Back to article
  26. 26Laurance, WF, Koster, H, Grooten, M, Anderson, AB, Zuidema, PA, Zwick, S, Zagt, RJ, Lynam, AJ, Linkie, M and Anten, NPR. 2012. Making conservation research more relevant for conservation practitioners. Biological Conservation, 153: 164–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.012
    Back to article
  27. 27Leith, P, Warman, R, Harwood, A, Bosomworth, K and Wallis, P. 2018. An operation on ‘the neglected heart of science policy’: Reconciling supply and demand for climate change adaptation research. Environmental Science and Policy, 82(August 2017): 117–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.015
    Back to article
  28. 28Lindenmayer, DB, Franklin, JF and Fischer, J. 2006. General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 131(3): 433–445. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.019
    Back to article
  29. 29Lindenmayer, DB, Morton, S and Dovers, S. (eds.) 2014. Ten Commitments Revisited: Securing Australia’s Future Environment. CSIRO PUBLISHING. DOI: 10.1071/9781486301683
    Back to article
  30. 30Maffi, L. 2012. Biocultural Diversity and Sustainability. The SAGE Handbook of Environment and Society, 267–278. DOI: 10.4135/9781848607873.n18
    Back to article
  31. 31Mason, TH, Pollard, CR, Chimalakonda, D, Guerrero, AM, Kerr-Smith, C, Milheiras, SA, Roberts, MR, Ngafack, P and Bunnefeld, N. 2018. Wicked conflict: Using wicked problem thinking for holistic management of conservation conflict. Conservation letters, 11(6): e12460. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12460
    Back to article
  32. 32Maund, PR, Irvine, KN, Lawson, B, Steadman, J, Risely, K, Cunningham, AA and Davies, ZG. 2020. What motivates the masses: Understanding why people contribute to conservation citizen science projects. Biological Conservation, 246(April): 108587. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108587
    Back to article
  33. 33Mertens, DM. 2015. Mixed Methods and Wicked Problems. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(1): 3–6. DOI: 10.1177/1558689814562944
    Back to article
  34. 34Milich, KM, Sorbello, K, Kolinski, L, Busobozi, R and Kugonza, M. 2021. Case study of participatory action research for wildlife conservation. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(2): p.e347. DOI: 10.1111/csp2.347
    Back to article
  35. 35Moon, K, Guerrero, AM, Adams, VM, Biggs, D, Blackman, DA, Craven, L, Dickinson, H and Ross, H. 2019. Mental models for conservation research and practice. Conservation Letters, 1–11. February. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12642
    Back to article
  36. 36Nuno, A and St. John, FAV. 2014. How to ask sensitive questions in conservation: A review of specialized questioning techniques. Biological Conservation, 189: 5–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.047
    Back to article
  37. 37Pannell, DJ, Marshall, GR, Barr, N, Curtis, A, Vanclay, F and Wilkinson, R. 2006. Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian journal of experimental agriculture, 46(11): 1407–1424. DOI: 10.1071/EA05037
    Back to article
  38. 38Pecl, G, Araujo, MB, Bell, JD, Blanchard, J and Bonebrake, TC. 2017. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosytems and human well-being. Science, 355 (6332), 1–9. DOI: 10.1126/science.aai9214
    Back to article
  39. 39Pecl, GT, Stuart-Smith, J, Walsh, P, Bray, DJ, Kusetic, M, Burgess, M, Frusher, SD, Gledhill, DC, George, O, Jackson, G, Keane, J, Martin, VY, Nursey-Bray, M, Pender, A, Robinson, LM, Rowling, K, Sheaves, M and Moltschaniwskyj, N. 2019. Redmap Australia: Challenges and successes with a large-scale citizen science-based approach to ecological monitoring and community engagement on climate change. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6(JUN): 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00349
    Back to article
  40. 40Pijanowski, BC, Farina, A, Gage, SH, Dumyahn, SL and Krause, BL. 2011. What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landscape ecology, 26(9): 1213–1232. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-011-9600-8
    Back to article
  41. 41Rayner, L, Lindenmayer, DB, Wood, JT, Gibbons, P and Manning, AD. 2014. “Are Protected Areas Maintaining Bird Diversity?” Ecography, 37(1): 43–53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00388.x
    Back to article
  42. 42Rittel, HWJ and Webber, MM. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning (original wicked issues). Policy Sciences. 4: 161. DOI: 10.1007/BF01405730
    Back to article
  43. 43Safford, HD, Sawyer, SC, Kocher, SD, Hiers, JK and Cross, M. 2017. Linking knowledge to action: the role of boundary spannders in translating ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(10): 560–568. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1731
    Back to article
  44. 44Seymour, V and Haklay, M. (Muki), 2017. Exploring Engagement Characteristics and Behaviours of Environmental Volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 5. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.66
    Back to article
  45. 45Shirk, JL, Ballard, HL, Wilderman, CC, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, BV, Krasny, ME and Bonney, R. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and society, 17(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
    Back to article
  46. 46Strasser, BJ, Baudry, J, Mahr, D, Sanchez, G and Tancoigne, E. 2019. Citizen Science? Rethinking Science and Public Participation. Science & Technology Studies, 32(2): 52–76. DOI: 10.23987/sts.60425
    Back to article
  47. 47Tilman, D, Clark, M, Williams, DR, Kimmel, K, Polasky, S and Packer, C. 2017. Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention. Nature, 546(7656): 73–81. DOI: 10.1038/nature22900
    Back to article
  48. 48Toomey, AH, Knight, AT and Barlow, J. 2017. Navigating the Space between Research and Implementation in Conservation. Conservation Letters, 10(5): 619–625. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12315
    Back to article
  49. 49Wallis, PJ, Bosomworth, K, Harwood, A and Leith, P. 2017. Charting the emergence of a ‘knowing system’ for climate change adaptation in Australian regional natural resource management. Geoforum, 84(June): 42–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.002
    Back to article
  50. 50Wenger, E. 2000. Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2): 225–246. DOI: 10.1177/135050840072002
    Back to article
  51. 51Wossink, GAA and Van Wenum, JH. 2003. Biodiversity conservation by farmers: Analysis of actual and contingent participation. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(4): 461–485. DOI: 10.1093/erae/30.4.461
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.428 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 13, 2021
Accepted on: Dec 11, 2022
Published on: Feb 8, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
citizen science,
wildlife monitoring,
participatory action research,
nature conservation,
socio-ecological systems,
private lands

© 2023 Matthew Taylor, Aidan Davison, Andrew Harwood, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 8 (2023): Issue 1Next article