References
- Abe, Y. 2014. Safecast or the production of collective intelligence on radiation risks after 3.11. Japan Focus, 12(7,5). Available at
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Yasuhito-_Abe_/4077 [Last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Abe, Y. 2015.
Measuring for what: networked citizen science movements after the Fukushima nuclear accident . Thesis (PhD), University of Southern California. - Abe, Y. 2019.
Making civic media in the post-Fukushima Japanese media ecology . In: Hunsinger, J and Schrock, A (eds.), Making Our World: The Hacker and Maker Movements in Context, 37–53. New York: Peter Lang. - Abe, Y. 2020.
Citizen before science: R-DAN and its monitorial ethic after the Chernobyl . In: Fathisalout-Bollon, M and Berti Suman, A (eds.), Legal, social and ethical perspectives on health & technology, 55–79. Paris: Sovoie Mont Blanc University Press and Lextenso Editions. - Beraldo, D and Milan, S. 2019. From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data & Society, 6(2). DOI: 10.1177/2053951719885967
- Berti Suman, A. 2020.
Making visible politically masked risks: the haze case of bottom-up data visualization . In: Kennedy, H and Engebretsen, M (eds.), Data visualization in society, 425–440. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvzgb8c7.31 - Berti Suman, A, Schade, S and Abe, Y. 2020. Exploring legitimization strategies for contested uses of citizen-generated data for policy. Journal of Human Rights and Environment, 11: 74–102. DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2020.03.04
- Bonner, S. 2011. RDTN is now Safecast, 24 April. Available at
https://safecast.org/2011/04/rdtn-is-now-safecast/ [Last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Bonner, S. 2020. 150,000,000 Data Points, 23 September. Available at
https://safecast.org/2020/09/150000000-data-points/ [Last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Bonney, R, Ballard, H, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Phillips, T, Shirk, J and Wilderman, CC. 2009. Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education.Washington, DC: CAISE Inquiry Group, Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).
- Brown, A, Franken, P, Bonner, S, Dolezal, N and Moross, J. 2016. Safecast: successful citizen-science for radiation measurement and communication after Fukushima. Journal of Radiological Protection, 36(2): 82–101. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/36/2/S82
- Cabinet Office. 2016.
Fifth science and technology master plan 2016–2020 . Tokyo: Cabinet Office. Available athttps://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/kihonkeikaku/5honbun.pdf [Last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Çalışkan, K and Callon, M. 2009. Economization, Part 1: Shifting Attention from the Economy Towards Processes of Economization. Economy and Society, 38(3): 369–398. DOI: 10.1080/03085140903020580
- Chilvers, J and Kearnes, M. 2016. Remaking Participation. Science, environment and emergent publics. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203797693
- de Waal, M and de Lange, M. 2019.
Introduction – The Hacker, the City and Their Institutions: From Grassroots Urbanism to Systemic Change . In: de Lange, M and de Waal, M (eds.), The Hackable City, 1–22. Springer: Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-2694-3_1 - Epstein, SG. 2000. Democracy, Expertise, and AIDS Treatment Activism. In: Kleinman, D (ed.), Science, Technology, and Democracy, 15–32.
- European Commission (EC). 2020. Citizen Science and Citizen Engagement – Achievements in Horizon 2020 and recommendations on the way forward. Brussels, Belgium: EC Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Available at
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/research_by_area/documents/ec_rtd_swafs_report-citizen_science.pdf [last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Gabrys, J. 2017. Citizen Sensing, Air Pollution and Fracking: From ‘Caring about Your Air’ to Speculative Practices of Evidencing Harm. Sociological Review monograph series, 65(2): 179–192. DOI: 10.1177/0081176917710421
- Gabrys, J, Pritchard, H and Barratt, B. 2016. Just good enough data: figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society, 3(2): 1–14. DOI: 10.1177/2053951716679677
- Geenen, K, Janssens, V and Vermeulen, S. 2019. Het Ringlandboek. Antwerp: Ringland.
- Gijsel, L, Huyse, T and Van Hoyweghen, I. 2019. Citizen Science – Hoe burgers de wetenschap uitdagen. Kalmthout: Pelckmans Pro.
- Haklay, M. 2013.
Citizen science and volunteered geographic information – overview and typology of participation . In: Sui, DZ, Elwood, S and Goodchild, MF (eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice, 105–122. Springer: Berlin. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7 - Haklay, M and Eleta, I. 2019.
On the front line of community-led air quality monitoring . In: Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning, 563–580. Springer: Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_27 - Hemmi, A and Graham, I. 2013. Hacker science versus closed science: Buidling environmental monitoring infrastructure. Information, Communication & Society, 17: 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.848918
- Hess, D. 2005. Technology-and product-oriented movements: Approximating social movement studies and science and technology studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30: 515–535. DOI: 10.1177/0162243905276499
- Hess, D, Breyman, S, Campbell, N and Martin, B. 2008.
Science, Technology, and Social Movements . In: Hackett, E, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M and Wacjman, J (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 473–498. Mass.: MIT Press. - Hultquist, C and Cervone, G. 2018. Citizen monitoring during hazards: validation of Fukushima radiation measurements. GeoJournal, 83: 189–206. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-017-9767-x
- Huyse, H, Bachus, K, Merlevede, T, Delanoeije, J and Heidi Knipprath, H. 2019. Societal Impact of the Citizen Science Project “CurieuzeNeuzen Vlaanderen”: Final report. HIVA-KU Leuven: Leuven. Available at
https://hiva.kuleuven.be/nl/onderzoek/thema/klimaatendo/p/projecten/CurieuzeNeuzen_Vlaanderen [last accessed 19/11/2020]. - International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2014. IAEA report on radiation protection after the Fukushima Daiichi accident: promoting confidence and understanding. Vienna, Austria: IAEA. Available at
https://www.iaea.org/publications/11089/iaea-report-on-radiation-protection-after-the-fukushima-daiichi-accident-promoting-confidence-and-understanding-0 [last accessed 19/11/2020]. - Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge: New York.
- Jasanoff, S. 2017. Virtual, visible, and actionable: Data assemblages and the sightlines of justice. Big Data & Society, 4(2). DOI: 10.1177/2053951717724477
- Kasperowski, D and Kullenberg, C. 2019. The many Modes of Citizen Science. Science & Technology Studies, 32(2): 2–7. DOI: 10.23987/sts.74404
- Kenens, J, Van Oudheusden, M, Yoshizawa, G and Van Hoyweghen, I. 2020. Science by, with and for citizens: rethinking ‘citizen science’ after the 2011 Fukushima disaster. Palgrave Communications, 6(58). DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0434-3
- Kolawole, OD. 2019. Science, Social Scientisation and Hybridisation of Knowledges. Science as Culture, 28(3): 391–401. DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2019.1645825
- Kuchinskaya, O. 2019. Citizen Science and the Politics of Environmental Data. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5): 871–880. DOI: 10.1177/0162243919858669
- McFarlane, C. 2009. Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements. Geoforum, 40: 561–567. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.05.003
- Melucci, A. 1996. Challenging Codes. Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511520891
- Mirowski, P. 2017. Against citizen science. AEON, 20 November [online access at
https://aeon.co/essays/is-grassroots-citizen-science-a-front-for-big-business last accessed 19/11/2020]. - Nakayama, S. 1991. Science, technology and society in postwar Japan. London: Kegan Paul International.
- National Diet of Japan (NAIIC). 2012. The official report of the Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission (executive summary). Tokyo, Japan: NAICC. Available at
http://www.nirs.org/fukushima/naiic_report.pdf [last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Ottinger, G. 2010. Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(2): 244–270. DOI: 10.1177/0162243909337121
- Palacin, V, Gilbert, S, Orchard, S, Eaton, A, Ferrario, MA and Happonen, A. 2020. Drivers of Participation in Digital Citizen Science: Case Studies on Järviwiki and Safecast. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 22. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.290
- Renson, I. 2019. ‘CurieuzeNeuzen’ verhuizen voor schonere lucht. De Standaard, 19 December [online access at
https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20191218_04773666 last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Renson, I. 2020. Brussel krijgt eigen CurieuzeNeuzen. De Standaard, 19 October [online access at
https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20201019_95287722 last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Rey-Mazón, P, Keysar, H, Dosemagen, S and Blair, D. 2018. Public Lab: Community-Based Approaches to Urban and Environmental Health and Justice. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24: 971–997. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-018-0059-8
- Rip, A. 1986. Controversies as Informal Technology Assessment. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8: 340–371. DOI: 10.1177/107554708600800216
- Ruppert, E, Isin, E and Bigo, D. 2017. Data politics. Big Data & Society, 1–7. DOI: 10.1177/2053951717717749
- Safecast. 2019. About Safecast. Available at
https://blog.safecast.org/about/ [last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Sanz, FS, Holocher-Ertl, T, Kieslinger, B, García, FS and Silva, CG. 2014. EU White Paper on Citizen Science for Europe. Zaragoza, Spain: Socientize. Available at
https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/socientize_white_paper_on_citizen_science.pdf [last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Schaefer, T, Kieslinger, B and Fabian, CM. 2020. Citizen-Based Air Quality Monitoring: The Impact on Individual Citizen Scientists and How to Leverage the Benefits to Affect Whole Regions. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 6. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.245
- Scivil (Vlaamse Kenniscentrum voor Citizen Science). 2020. About Scivil. Available at
https://www.scivil.be/about-scivil [last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Stad Gent. 2018. Resultaten van CurieuzeNeuzen Vlaanderen voor Gent, 8 October. Available at
https://stad.gent/nl/over-gent-en-het-stadsbestuur/nieuws-evenementen/resultaten-van-curieuzeneuzen-vlaanderen-voor-gent [last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Stevens, M, Vitos, M, Altenbuchner, J, Conquest, G, Lewis, J and Haklay, M. 2014. Taking Participatory Citizen Science to Extremes. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 13(2): 20–29. DOI: 10.1109/MPRV.2014.37
- Stilgoe, J, Irwin, A and Jones, K. 2006. The Received Wisdom: Opening up Expert Advice. London: Demos.
- Tang, V. 2015. Defense advanced research projects agency SIGMA program information page. Available at
www.darpa.mil/program/sigma [last accessed 12 November 2020]. - the_Stig. 2012. TEPCO cheating on radiation levels by using “improved” monitoring posts. Available at
https://safecast.org/2012/07/tepco-cheating-on-radiation-levels-by-using-improved-monitoring-posts-2/ [last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). 2013.
Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes Volume I: Scientific Annex A . New York: UNSCEAR. Available athttps://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2013/13-85418_Report_2013_Annex_A.pdf [last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Van Brussel, S and Huyse, H. 2018. Citizen science on speed? Realising the triple objective of scientific rigour, policy influence and deep citizen engagement in a large-scale citizen science project on ambient air quality in Antwerp. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(3): 534–551. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1428183
- Van Oudheusden, M. 2014. Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1): 67–86. DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882097
- Van Oudheusden, M. 2020. Residents Rallied to Measure Radiation After Fukushima. Nine Years Later, Many Scientists Still Ignore Their Data. Discover, 10 March [online access at
https://www.discovermagazine.com/environment/residents-rallied-to-measure-radiation-after-fukushima-9-years-later-many last accessed on 19/11/2020]. - Van Oudheusden, M, Kenens, J, Yoshizawa, G, Mizushima, N and Van Hoyweghen, I. 2020. Developing pathways for nuclear science, technology and innovation governance: Reflections on a Japanese-Belgian research project on citizen science after Fukushima [in Japanese]. Kagaku Gijutsu Shakairon Kenkyu, 18: 58–72.
- Wynne, B. 2007. Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political-conceptual Category Mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 1(1): 99–110. DOI: 10.1007/s12280-007-9004-7