References
- 1Agyeman, J and Spooner, R. 1997.
Ethnicity and the rural environment . In Cloke, P and Little, J (eds.), Contested Countryside Cultures, 197–217. London: Routledge. - 2Bäckstrand, K. 2003. Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4): 24–41. DOI: 10.1162/152638003322757916
- 3Ballard, HL, Dixon, CGH and Harris, EM. 2017. Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation, 208: 65–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.024
- 4Becker, CD, Agreda, A, Astudillo, E, Costantino, M and Torres, P. 2005. Community-based monitoring of fog capture and biodiversity at Loma Alta, Ecuador enhance social capital and institutional cooperation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(11): 2695–2707. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-8402-1
- 5Berk, RA. 1983. An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48(3): 386–398. DOI: 10.2307/2095230
- 6Bonney, R, Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL and Enck, JW. 2016. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1): 2–16. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515607406
- 7Brouwer, S and Hessels, LK. 2019. Increasing research impact with citizen science: the influence of recruitment strategies on sample diversity. Public Understanding of Science, 28(5): 606–621. DOI: 10.1177/0963662519840934
- 8Burgess, HK, DeBey, LB, Froehlich, HE, Schmidt, N, Theobald, EJ, Ettinger, AK, HilleRisLambers, J, Tewksbury, J and Parrish, JK. 2017. The science of citizen science: exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biological Conservation, 208: 113–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.014
- 9Burke, BJ and Heynen, N. 2014. Transforming participatory science into socioecological praxis: valuing marginalized environmental knowledges in the face of the neoliberalization of nature and science. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 5: 7–27. DOI: 10.3167/ares.2014.050102
- 10Campaign for Science and Engineering. 2014. Improving Diversity in STEM. CaSE Report. Available online:
https://www.sciencecampaign.org.uk/resource/ImprovingDiversityinSTEM2014.html [Last accessed 20th September 2020]. - 11Cho, S, Crenshaw, KW and McCall, L. 2013. Toward a field of intersectionality studies: theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4): 785–810. DOI: 10.1086/669608
- 12Cigliano, JA, Meyer, R, Ballard, HL, Freitag, A, Phillips, TB and Wasser, A. 2015. Making marine and coastal citizen science matter. Ocean & Coastal Management, 115: 77–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.012
- 13Clark, K and Drinkwater, S. 2007. Ethnic minorities in the labour market. Dynamics and diversity. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
- 14Cooper, C and Lewenstein, B. 2016.
Two Meanings of Citizen Science . In Cavalier, D and Kennedy, E (eds.), The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science, 51–62. Tempe, AZ and Washington, DC: Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes. - 15Couvet, D and Prevot, A-C. 2015. Citizen-science programs: towards transformative biodiversity governance. Environmental Development, 13: 39–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.11.003
- 16Coventry, AP, Neale, C, Dyke, A, Pateman, R and Cinderby, S. 2019. The mental health benefits of purposeful activities in public green spaces in urban and semi-urban neighbourhoods: A mixed-methods pilot and proof of concept study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15): 2712. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16152712
- 17Crall, AW, Jordan, R, Holfelder, K, Newman, GJ, Graham, J and Waller, DM. 2013. The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6): 745–764. DOI: 10.1177/0963662511434894
- 18Davies, L, Fradera, R, Riesch, H and Lakeman-Fraser, P. 2016. Surveying the citizen science landscape: an exploration of the design, delivery and impact of citizen science through the lens of the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) programme. BMC Ecology, 16, 17. DOI: 10.1186/s12898-016-0066-z
- 19Department for Culture, Media and Sport. 2018. Community Life Survey Focus on: Diversity 2016/2017. Available online:
www.gov.uk/government/statistics/community-life-survey-focus-on-diversity [Last accessed 20th September 2020]. - 20Dickinson, JL, Shirk, J, Bonter, D, Bonney, R, Crain, RL, Martin, J, Phillips, T and Purcell, K. 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 291–297. DOI: 10.1890/110236
- 21Domroese, MC and Johnson, EA. 2017. Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project. Biological Conservation, 208: 40–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020
- 22Evans, C, Abrams, E, Reitsma, R, Roux, K, Salmonsen, L and Marra, PP. 2005. The Neighborhood Nestwatch program: Participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conservation Biology, 19(3): 589–594. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00s01.x
- 23Everett, G and Geoghegan, H. 2016. Initiating and continuing participation in citizen science for natural history. BMC Ecology, 16: 13. DOI: 10.1186/s12898-016-0062-3
- 24Fairburn, J, Butler, B and Smith, G. 2009. Environmental justice in South Yorkshire: locating social deprivation and poor environments using multiple indicators. Local Environment, 14(2): 139–154. DOI: 10.1080/13549830802522038
- 25Fernandez-Gimenez, ME, Ballard, HL and Sturtevant, VE. 2008. Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: a study of five community-based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society, 13(2): 4. DOI: 10.5751/ES-02400-130204
- 26Fritz, S, See, L, Carlson, T, Haklay, M, Oliver, JL, Fraisl, D, Mondardini, R, Brocklehurst, M, Shanley, LA, Schade, S, Wehn, U, Abrate, T, Anstee, J, Arnold, S, Billot, M, Campbell, J, Espey, J, Gold, M, Hager, G, He, S, Hepburn, L, Hsu, A, Long, D, Maso, J, McCallum, I, Muniafu, M, Moorthy, I, Obersteiner, M, Parker, AJ, Weissplug, M and West, S. 2019. Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(10): 922–930. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0390-3
- 27Ganzevoort, W, van den Born, RJG, Halffman, W and Turnhout, S. 2017. Sharing biodiversity data: citizen scientists’ concerns and motivations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(12): 2821–2837. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1391-z
- 28Geoghegan, H, Dyke, A, Pateman, R, West, S and Everett, G. 2016. Understanding motivations for citizen science. Final report on behalf of UKEOF, University of Reading, Stockholm Environment Institute (University of York) and University of the West of England.
- 29Hayhow, DB, Eaton, MA, Stanbury, AJ, Burns, F, Kirby, WB, Bailey, N, Beckmann, B, Bedford, J, Boersch-Supan, PH, Coomber, F, Dennis, EB, Dolman, SJ, Dunn, E, Hall, J, Harrower, C, Hatfield, JH, Hawley, J, Haysom, K, Hughes, J, Johns, DG, Mathews, F, McQuatters-Gollop, A, Noble, DG, Outhwaite, CL, Pearce-Higgins, JW, Pescott, O, Powney, GD and Symes, N. 2019. State of Nature Report 2019. The State of Nature Partnership.
- 30Hermoso, MI, Martin, VJ, Gelcich, S, Stotz, W and Thiel, M. 2021. Exploring diversity and engagement of divers in citizen science: insights for marine management and conservation. Marine Policy, 124. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104316
- 31Hobbs, SJ and White, PCL. 2012. Motivations and barriers in relation to community participation in biodiversity recording. Journal for Nature Conservation, 20(6): 364–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.08.002
- 32Hochachka, WM, Fink, D, Hutchinson, RA, Sheldon, D, Wong, W-K and Kelling, S. 2011. Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(2): 130–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.006
- 33Humm, C, Schrögel, P and Leßmöllmann, A. 2020. Feeling left out: Underserved audiences in science communication. Media and Communication, 8(1): 164–176. DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i1.2480
- 34Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- 35Johnson, MF, Hannah, C, Acton, L, Popovici, R, Karanth, KK and Weinthal, E. 2014. Network environmentalism: citizen scientists as agents for environmental advocacy. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 29: 235–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.006
- 36Jordan, RC, Gray, SA, Howe, DV, Brooks, WR and Ehrenfeld, JG. 2011. Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen-science programs. Conservation Biology, 25(6): 1148–1154. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01745.x
- 37Kimura, AH and Kinchy, A. 2016. Citizen science: probing the virtues and contexts of participatory research. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2: 331–361. DOI: 10.17351/ests2016.99
- 38Kullenberg, C and Kasperowski, D. 2016. What Is citizen science? - A scientometric meta-analysis. Plos One, 11(1): 16. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
- 39Lamont, A. 2011. The beat goes on: music, education, identity and lifelong learning. Music Education Research, 13(4): 369–388. DOI: 10.1080/14613808.2011.638505
- 40Levine, R, González, R and Martínez-Sussmann, C. 2009. Learner diversity in Earth system science. Paper prepared for the Committee for the Review of the NOAA Education Program. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
- 41Lidskog, R. 2008. Scientised citizens and democratised science. Re-assessing the expert-lay divide. Journal of Risk Research, 11(1–2): 69–86. DOI: 10.1080/13669870701521636
- 42Mac Domhnaill, C, Lyons, S and Nolan, A. 2020. The citizens in citizen science: demographic, socioeconomic, and health characteristics of biodiversity recorders in Ireland. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 16. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.283
- 43Merenlender, AM, Crall, AW, Drill, S, Prysby, M and Ballard, H. 2016. Evaluating environmental education, citizen science, and stewardship through naturalist programs. Conservation Biology, 30(6): 1255–1265. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12737
- 44MRS Evidence Matters. 2019. Code of conduct October 2019. Available at
www.mrs.org.uk/standards/code-of-conduct [Last accessed 20th September 2020]. - 45MRS Evidence Matters. Undated. Definitions employed in social grading. Available at
https://www.mrs.org.uk/pdf/Definitions%20used%20in%20Social%20Grading%20based%20on%20OG7.pdf [Last accessed 20th September 2020]. - 46National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine. 2018. Learning Through Citizen Science: Enhancing Opportunities by Design. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press.
- 47NCVO. 2019.
Time well spent. A national survey on the volunteer experience . London: NCVO. Available athttps://www.ncvo.org.uk/images/documents/policy_and_research/volunteering/Volunteer-experience_Full-Report.pdf [Last accessed 20th September 2020]. - 48Nederhof, AJ. 1985. Methods of coping with social desirability bias—a review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3): 263–280. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420150303
- 49Ockenden, N. 2008. Environmental volunteering in North East of England. London, UK: Institute of Volunteering Research.
- 50Overdevest, C, Orr, CH and Stepenuck, K. 2004. Volunteer stream monitoring and local participation in natural resource issues. Research in Human Ecology, 11: 177–185.
- 51Pandya, RE. 2012. A framework for engaging diverse communities in citizen science in the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 314–317. DOI: 10.1890/120007
- 52Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL, Lewenstein, BV and Bonney, R. 2019. Engagement in science through citizen science: moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3): 665–690. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21501
- 53Pocock, MJO, Roy, HE, Preston, CD and Roy, DB. 2015. The Biological Records Centre: a pioneer of citizen science. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 115(3): 475–493. DOI: 10.1111/bij.12548
- 54Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1): 1–24. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
- 55Purcell, K, Garibay, C and Dickinson, JL. 2012.
A gateway to science for all: Celebrate Urban Birds . In Dickinson, JL and Bonney, R (eds.), Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research, 191–200. Cornell University Press Comstock Publishing Associates. DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9780801449116.003.0014 - 56R Core Team. 2017.
R: A language and environment for statistical computing . Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. - 57Ramirez-Andreotta, MD, Brusseau, ML, Artiola, J, Maier, RM and Gandolfi, AJ. 2015. Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The Gardenroots case study. International Public Health Journal, 7(1): 13.
- 58Rutherford, AC, Bu, F, Dawson, A and McCall, V. 2019. Literature review to inform the development of Scotland’s Volunteering Outcomes Framework. University of Stirling Report for the Scottish Government.
- 59Sorensen, AE, Jordan, RC, LaDeau, SL, Biehler, D, Wilson, S, Pitas, J-H and Leisnham, PT. 2019. Reflecting on efforts to design an inclusive citizen science project in West Baltimore. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 13. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.170
- 60Southby, K, South, J and Bagnall, A-M. 2019. A rapid review of barriers to volunteering for potentially disadvantaged groups and implications for health inequalities. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30: 907–920. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-019-00119-2
- 61Stedman, R, Lee, B, Brasier, K, Weigle, JL and Higdon, F. 2009. Cleaning up water? Or building rural community? Community watershed organizations in Pennsylvania. Rural Sociology, 74(2): 178–200. DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.tb00388.x
- 62Stone, J. 2015. The roles of participatory monitoring in reducing risk around volcanoes. Unpublished thesis (PhD), University of East Anglia.
- 63The Royal Society. 2014. A picture of the UK scientific workforce. Diversity data analysis for the Royal Society. Summary report. The Royal Society.
- 64Theobald, EJ, Ettinger, AK, Burgess, HK, DeBey, LB, Schmidt, NR, Froehlich, HE, Wagner, C, HilleRisLambers, J, Tewksbury, J, Harsch, MA and Parrish, JK. 2015. Global change and local solutions: tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181: 236–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021
- 65Trumbull, DJ, Bonney, R, Bascom, D and Cabral, A. 2000. Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science Education, 84(2): 265–275. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<;265::AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-5
- 66Turbé, A, Barba, J, Pelacho, M, Mugdal, S, Robinson, L, Serrano-Sanz, F, Sanz, F, Tsinaraki, C, Rubio, J-M and Schade, S. 2019. Understanding the citizen science landscape for European environmental policy: an assessment and recommendations. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(4): p.34. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.239
- 67Venables, WN and Ripley, BD. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. New York, USA: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
- 68Ward-Thompson, C, Bell, S, Satsangi, M, Netto, G, Morris, N, Travlou, P, Chapman, M, Raemaekers, J and Griffiths, A. 2003. Diversity review: options for implementation - final report. OPENspace.
- 69West, SE, Büker, P, Ashmore, M, Njoroge, G, Welden, N, Muhoza, C, Osano, P, Makau, J, Njoroge, P and Apondo, W. 2020. Particulate matter pollution in an informal settlement in Nairobi: using citizen science to make the invisible visible. Applied Geography, 114. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102133
- 70West, SE and Pateman, RM. 2016. Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: what can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(2): 15. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.8
- 71Woolley, AW, Chabris, CF, Pentland, A, Hashmi, N and Malone, TW. 2010. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004): 686–688. DOI: 10.1126/science.1193147
- 72Wright, DR, Underhill, LG, Keene, M and Knight, AT. 2015. Understanding the motivations and satisfactions of volunteers to improve the effectiveness of citizen science programs. Society & Natural Resources, 28(9): 1013–1029. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1054976