References
- 1Ahmed, S. 2004. Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2): 117–139. DOI: 10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117
- 2Albus, KH, Thompson, R, Mitchell, F, Kennedy, J and Ponette-González, AG. 2020. Accuracy of long-term volunteer water monitoring data: A multiscale analysis from a statewide citizen science program. PloS ONE, 15(1). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227540
- 3Alender, B. 2016. Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: a deeper look at water quality monitoring. Journal of Science Communication, 15(3). DOI: 10.22323/2.15030204
- 4Asah, ST and Blahna, DJ. 2012. Motivational functionalism and urban conservation stewardship: implications for volunteer involvement. Conservation Letters, 5(6): 470–477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00263.x
- 5Batson, CD, Ahmad, N and Tsang, JA. 2002. Four motives for community involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3): 429–445. DOI: 10.1111/1540-4560.00269
- 6Bell, S, Marzano, M, Cent, J, Kobierska, H, Podjed, D, Vandzinskaite, D, Reinert, H, Armaitiene, A, Grodzińska-Jurczak, M and Muršič, R. 2008. What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(14): 3443–3454. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-008-9357-9
- 7Bennett, NJ, Whitty, TS, Finkbeiner, E, Pittman, J, Bassett, H, Gelcich, S and Allison, E. 2018. Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management, 61: 597–614. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2
- 8Bloom, EH and Crowder, DW. 2020. Promoting Data Collection in Pollinator Citizen Science Projects. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 3. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.217
- 9Bonney, R, Cooper, CB, Dickinson, J, Kelling, S, Phillips, T, Rosenberg, KV, et al. 2009. Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience, 59(11): 977–984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
- 10Bonney, R, Shirk, J, Phillips, TB, Wiggins, A, Ballard, HL, Miller-Rushing, AJ and Parrish, JK. 2014. Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178): 1436–1437. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554
- 11Bruyere, B and Rappe, S. 2007. Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4): 503–516. DOI: 10.1080/09640560701402034
- 12Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2015. Economic News Release. Table 4: Volunteers by type of main organization for which volunteer activities were performed and selected characteristics, September 2015. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/volun.t04.htm . - 13Butt, MU, Hou, Y, Soomro, KA and Acquadro Maran, D. 2017. The ABCE model of volunteer motivation. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(5): 593–608. DOI: 10.1080/01488376.2017.1355867
- 14Campbell, LM and Smith, C. 2005. Volunteering for sea turtles. Characteristics and motives of volunteers working with the Caribbean Conservation Corporation in Tortuguero, Costa Rica. MAST, 3(4): 169–194.
- 15Carballo-Cárdenas, EC and Tobi, H. 2016. Citizen science regarding invasive lionfish in Dutch Caribbean MPAs: Drivers and barriers to participation. Ocean & Coastal Management, 133: 114–127. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.014
- 16Cecere, G, Mancinelli, S and Mazzanti, M. 2014. Waste prevention and social preferences: the role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Ecological Economics, 107: 163–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.007
- 17Cetas, ER and Yasué, M. 2017. A systematic review of motivational values and conservation success in and around protected areas. Conservation Biology, 31(1): 203–212. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12770
- 18Chan, KMA, Balvanera, P, Benessaiah, K, Chapman, M, Díaz, S, Gómez-Baggethun, E, Gould, R, Turner, N, et al. 2016. Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113: 1462–1465. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1525002113
- 19Child, D. 2006.
The Essentials of Factor Analysis . (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group. - 20Clary, EG and Snyder, M. 1999. The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5): 156–159. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.00037
- 21Clary, EG, Snyder, M, Ridge, RD, Copeland, J, Stukas, AA, Haugen, J and Miene, P. 1998. Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6): 1516. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516
- 22Cnaan, RA and Goldberg-Glen, RS. 1991. Measuring motivation to volunteer in human services. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(3): 269–284. DOI: 10.1177/0021886391273003
- 23Crall, AW, Jordan, R, Holfelder, K, Newman, GJ, Graham, J and Waller, DM. 2013. The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6): 745–764. DOI: 10.1177/0963662511434894
- 24Davis, LF, Ramírez-Andreotta, MD and Buxner, SR. 2020. Engaging Diverse Citizen Scientists for Environmental Health: Recommendations from Participants and Promotoras. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 1–27. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.253
- 25de Vries, MJ, Land-Zandstra, AM and Smeets, I. 2019. Citizen scientists’ preferences for communication of scientific output: a literature review. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 2, 1–13. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.136
- 26Domroese, MC and Johnson, EA. 2017. Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project. Biological Conservation, 208: 40–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020
- 27Druschke, CG and Seltzer, CE. 2012. Failures of Engagement: Lessons Learned from a Citizen Science Pilot Study. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 11(3–4): 178–188. DOI: 10.1080/1533015X.2012.777224
- 28Fabrigar, LR, Wegener, DT, MacCallum, RC and Strahan, EJ. 1999. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3): 272. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
- 29Fernandes, JP and Guiomar, N. 2016. Environmental ethics: driving factors beneath behavior, discourse and decision-making. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(3): 507–540. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-016-9607-x
- 30Finkelstien, MA. 2009. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivational orientations and the volunteer process. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(5–6): 653–658. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.010
- 31Fisher, DR, Connolly, JJ, Svendsen, ES and Campbell, LK. 2011. Digging Together: Why people volunteer to help plant one million trees in New York City, 1–36. Washington, DC: Environmental Stewardship Project at the Center for Society and Environment of the University of Maryland. White Paper # 1.
- 32Foster, A. 2018. Volunteer Environmental Stewardship and Affective Labour in Philadelphia. Conservation and Society, 16: 52–63. DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_16_49
- 33Gage, RL and Thapa, B. 2011. Volunteer motivations and constraints among college students: analysis of the Volunteer Function Inventory and leisure constraints models. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1–26. DOI: 10.1177/0899764011406738
- 34Galbraith, K. 2009. Environmental Studies Enrollment Soars.
http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/24/environmental-studies-enrollments-soar/ . - 35Ganzevoort, W, van den Born, RJ, Halffman, W and Turnhout, S. 2017. Sharing biodiversity data: citizen scientists’ concerns and motivations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(12): 2821–2837. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1391-z
- 36Garrah, J, Frei, B and Bennett, EM. 2019. Bright spots among lakes in the Rideau Valley Watershed, Ontario. Ecology and Society, 24(3). DOI: 10.5751/ES-11073-240322
- 37Geoghegan, H, Dyke, A, Pateman, R, West, S and Everett, G. 2016. Understanding motivations for citizen science. Final report on behalf of UKEOF, University of Reading, Stockholm Environment Institute (University of York) and University of the West of England.
- 38Grese, R, Kaplan, R, Ryan, R and Buxton, J. 2001.
Psychological benefits of volunteering in stewardship programs . In Gobster, PH and Hull, BR (eds.), Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities, 265–280. Washington, DC: Island Press. - 39Hair, JF, Black, WC, Babin, BJ and Anderson, RE. 2013. Multivariate data analysis (7th international ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
- 40Handy, F, Hustinx, L, Kang, CH, Cnaan, RA, Brudney, J, HaskiLeventhal, D, Holmes, K, Meijs, LCPM, Pessi, A, Ranade, B, Yamauchi, N and Zrinscak, S. 2010. A cross-cultural examination of student volunteering: is it all about résumé building? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39: 498–523. DOI: 10.1177/0899764009344353
- 41Haywood, BK. 2016. Beyond Data Points and Research Contributions: The Personal Meaning and Value Associated with Public Participation in Scientific Research. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(3): 239–262. DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2015.1043659
- 42Herodotou, C, Aristeidou, M, Miller, G, Ballard, H and Robinson, L. 2020. What Do We Know about Young Volunteers? An Exploratory Study of Participation in Zooniverse. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 2, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.248
- 43Hidayat, D and Stoecker, R. 2018. Community-based organizations and environmentalism: how much impact can small, community-based organizations working on environmental issues have? Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8(4): 395–406. DOI: 10.1007/s13412-018-0520-7
- 44Hobbs, SJ and White, PCL. 2012. Motivations and barriers in relation to community participation in biodiversity recording. Journal for Nature Conservation, 20(6): 364–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.08.002
- 45Hu, LT and Bentler, PM. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1): 1–55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
- 46Iacovides, I, Jennet, C, Cornish-Trestrail, C and Cox, AL. 2013. Do Games Attract or Sustain Engagement in Citizen Science? A Study of Volunteer Motivations. In: CHI ‘13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paris, France on
27 April–02 May 2013 . 1101–1106. DOI: 10.1145/2468356.2468553 - 47Isaacs, A. 2017. Why do volunteers participate in water quality monitoring? Motivations of citizen scientists in the Anglers’ Riverfly Monitoring Initiative (Doctoral dissertation), Unpublished thesis (MSc), University of College London.
- 48Jacobs, AP. 2018. Exploring the Relationship Between Volunteer Motives, Satisfaction, Commitment, and Intention to Leave the Mississippi Master Gardener Program. Unpublished thesis (PhD), Mississippi State University.
- 49Jacobson, SK, Carlton, JS and Monroe, MC. 2012. Motivation and satisfaction of volunteers at a Florida natural resource agency. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 30(1).
- 50Jennet, C, Kloetzer, L, Schneider, D, Iacovides, I, Cox, AL, Gold, M, et al. 2016. Motivations, learning and creativity in online citizen science. Journal of Science Communication, 15(3): A05. Available at:
jcom.sissa.it/archive/15/03/JCOM_1503_2016_ A05 [Last accessed 01 May 2020]. DOI: 10.22323/2.15030205 - 51Johnson, ML, Campbell, LK, Svendsen, ES and Silva, P. 2018. Why count trees? Volunteer motivations and experiences with tree monitoring in New York City. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 44(2): 59–72.
- 52Kaiser, HF. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1): 31–36. DOI: 10.1007/BF02291575
- 53Katz, D. 1960. The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2): 163–204. DOI: 10.1086/266945
- 54Kimura, AH. 2019. Citizen science in post-Fukushima Japan: the gendered scientization of radiation measurement. Science as Culture, 28(3): 327–350. DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2017.1347154
- 55Kollmuss, A and Agyeman, J. 2002. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental action? Environmental Education Research, 8(3): 239–260. DOI: 10.1080/13504620220145401
- 56Land-Zandstra, AM, Devilee, JLA, Snik, F, Buurmeijer, F and van den Broek, JM. 2016. Citizen science on a smartphone: Participants’ motivations and learning. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1): 45–60. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515602406
- 57Larson, LR, Cooper, CB, Futch, S, Singh, D, Shipley, NJ, Dale, K, Takekawa, JY, et al. 2020. The diverse motivations of citizen scientists: Does conservation emphasis grow as volunteer participation progresses? Biological Conservation, 242:
108428 . DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108428 - 58Leopold, A. 1886–1948. 1949. A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University Press.
- 59Lewandowski, E, Caldwell, W, Elmquist, D and Oberhauser, K. 2017. Public perceptions of citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.77
- 60Lopez, CW. 2020a. Community geography as a model for improving efforts of environmental stewardship. Geography Compass,
e12485 . DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12485 - 61Lopez, CW. 2020b. Toward a “first law of environmental stewardship”: How organizations bring volunteers together in social and geographic space(s). Conference presentation, American Association of Geographers,
April 6–10, 2020 . Virtual. - 62Louv, R and Fitzpatrick, JW. 2012. Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research. New York: Cornell University Press. DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9780801449116.001.0001
- 63Martinez, TA and McMullin, SL. 2004. Factors affecting decisions to volunteer in nongovernmental organizations. Environment and Behavior, 36(1): 112–126. DOI: 10.1177/0013916503256642
- 64Maslow, AH. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4): 370. DOI: 10.1037/h0054346
- 65McDougle, LM, Greenspan, I and Handy, F. 2011. Generation green: understanding the motivations and mechanisms influencing young adults’ environmental volunteering. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4): 325–341. DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.431
- 66Measham, TG and Barnett, GB. 2008. Environmental volunteering: Motivations, modes and outcomes. Australian Geographer, 39(4): 537–552. DOI: 10.1080/00049180802419237
- 67Moskell, C, Broussard Allred, S and Ferenz, G. 2010. Examining volunteer motivations and recruitment strategies for engagement in urban forestry. Cities and the Environment, 3(1): 9. DOI: 10.15365/cate.3192010
- 68Mueller, MP and Tippins, D. 2011. The future of citizen science. Democracy and Education, 20(1).
- 69Neves, K. 2009. Botanical gardens and the aesthetics of discussion learning: a theoretical ecological and preliminary insights from Montreal’s botanical garden. Anthropologica, 51(1): 145–157.
- 70Newman, G, Wiggins, A, Crall, A, Graham, E, Newman, S and Crowston, K. 2012. The future of citizen science: Emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 298–304. DOI: 10.1890/110294
- 71Nov, O, Arazy, O and Anderson, D. 2014. Scientists@ Home: What Drives the Quantity and Quality of Online Citizen Science Participation? PloS ONE, 9(4): e90375. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090375
- 72Omoto, AM, Snyder, M and Martino, SC. 2000. Volunteerism and the life course: investigating age-related agendas for action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(3): 181–197. DOI: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2203_6
- 73Pain, R. 2004. Social geography: participatory research. Progress in human geography, 28(5): 652–663. DOI: 10.1191/0309132504ph511pr
- 74Penner, LA. 2002. Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3): 447–467. DOI: 10.1111/1540-4560.00270
- 75Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL, Lewenstein, BV and Bonney, R. 2019. Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3): 665–690. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21501
- 76Rehberg, W. 2005. Altruistic individualists: motivations for international volunteering among young adults in Switzerland. International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations, 16(2): 109–122. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-005-5693-5
- 77Ries, L and Oberhauser, K. 2015. A Citizen Army for Science: Quantifying the Contributions of Citizen Scientists to our Understanding of Monarch Butterfly Biology. BioScience, 65(4): 419–430. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biv011
- 78Riesch, H, Potter, C and Davies, L. 2013. Combining citizen science and public engagement: The Open Air Laboratories Programme. Journal of Science Communication, 12(3). DOI: 10.22323/2.12030203
- 79Robinson, J. 2010. Syracuse community geography: Evaluating a new approach to public participation geographic information systems. Unpublished thesis (PhD), University of North Carolina.
- 80Robinson, LW, Bennett, N, King, LA and Murray, G. 2012. “We Want Our Children to Grow Up to See These Animals:” Values and protected areas governance in Canada, Ghana and Tanzania. Human Ecology, 40: 571–581. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-012-9502-7
- 81Roggenbuck, JW, Haas, SC, Hall, TE and Hull, RE. (2001). Motivation, Retention, and Program Recommendations of Save Our Streams Volunteers. Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A.: Virginia Water Resources Research Center at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. URL:
https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/49465 . - 82Rotman, D, Preece, J, Hammock, J, Procita, K, Hansen, D, Parr, C, Lewis, D and Jacobs, D. 2012. Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, 217–226.
ACM . DOI: 10.1145/2145204.2145238 - 83Ryan, RL, Kaplan, R and Grese, RE. 2001. Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(5): 629–648. DOI: 10.1080/09640560120079948
- 84Shirk, J, Ballard, H, Wilderman, C, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, B, Krasny, M and Bonney, R. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
- 85Sommer, R. 2003.
Trees and human identity . In: Identity and the natural environment (eds. Clayton, S. and S. Opotow), 179–204. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. - 86Taylor, DE. 2018. Racial and ethnic differences in the students’ readiness, identity, perceptions of institutional diversity, and desire to join the environmental workforce. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8(2): 152–168. DOI: 10.1007/s13412-017-0447-4
- 87U.S. Census Bureau. 2019. “Quick facts.”
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/TX . Accessed August 30, 2020. - 88Ward-Fear, G, Pauly, GB, Vendetti, JE and Shine, R. 2020. Authorship Protocols Must Change to Credit Citizen Scientists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35(3): 187–190. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.007
- 89Welty Peachey, J, Lyras, A, Cohen, A, Bruening, JE and Cunningham, GB. 2014. Exploring the motives and retention factors of sport-for-development volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(6): 1052–1069. DOI: 10.1177/0899764013501579
- 90West, SE and Pateman, RM. 2016. Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: What can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. ISSN 2057–4991. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.8
- 91Winniford, JC, Carpenter, DS and Grider, C. 1995. An analysis of the traits and motivations of college students involved in service organizations. Journal of College Student Development, 36(1): 27–38.
- 92Wright, DR, Underhill, LG, Keene, M and Knight, AT. 2015. Understanding the motivations and satisfactions of volunteers to improve the effectiveness of citizen science programs. Society & Natural Resources, 28(9): 1013–1029. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1054976
- 93Wu, Y, Li, C and Khoo, S. 2016. Predicting future volunteering intentions through a self-determination theory perspective. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(3): 1266–1279. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-015-9570-6
- 94Yeung, AB. 2004. The octagon model of volunteer motivation: results of a phenomenological analysis. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(1): 21–46. DOI: 10.1023/B:VOLU.0000023632.89728.ff
- 95Yong, AG and Pearce, S. 2013. A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for psychology, 9(2): 79–94. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079