Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Promise of Participation and Decision-Making Power in Citizen Science Cover

The Promise of Participation and Decision-Making Power in Citizen Science

Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
Volume 4 (2019): Issue 1
By: Irene Eleta,  Gemma Galdon Clavell,  Valeria Righi and  Mara Balestrini  
Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. 1Angrist, M. 2009. Eyes Wide Open: The Personal Genome Project, Citizen Science and Veracity in Informed Consent. Personalized Medicine, 6(6): 691–699. DOI: 10.2217/pme.09.48
    Back to article
  2. 2Arnstein, SR. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4): 216–224. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225
    Back to article
  3. 3Arthur, T, Phillips, A, Franks, Z and Pearce, S. 2015. Redesigning Informed Consent: Enhancing Risk Communication Through a Novel Risk Visualization Tool. Journal of Current Surgery, 5(2–3): 160–164. DOI: 10.14740/jcs275w
    Back to article
  4. 4Balestrini, M, Diez, T, Marshall, P, Gluhak, A and Rogers, Y. 2015. IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement? European Alliance for Innovation Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things, 1(1): e7. DOI: 10.4108/eai.26-10-2015.150601
    Back to article
  5. 5Balestrini, M, Rogers, Y, Hassan, C, Creus, J, King, M and Marshall, P. 2017. A City in Common: A Framework to Orchestrate Large-Scale Citizen Engagement Around Urban Issues. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2282–2294. Association for Computing Machinery, New York. DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025915
    Back to article
  6. 6Banks, S, Armstrong, A, Carter, K, Graham, H, Hayward, P, Henry, A, Holland, T, Holmes, C, Lee, A, McNulty, A, Moore, N, Nayling, N, Stokoe, A and Strachan, A. 2013. Everyday Ethics in Community-Based Participatory Research. Contemporary Social Science, 8(3): 263–277. DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2013.769618
    Back to article
  7. 7Bonney, R, Cooper, CB, Dickinson, J, Kelling, S, Phillips, T, Rosenberg, KV and Shirk, J. 2009. Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience, 59(11): 977–984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
    Back to article
  8. 8Bowser, A and Wiggins, A. 2015. Privacy in Participatory Research: Advancing Policy to Support Human Computation. Human Computation, 2(1): 19–44. DOI: 10.15346/hc.v2i1.3
    Back to article
  9. 9Buyx, A, Del Savio, L, Prainsack, B and Voelzke, H. 2017. Every Participant is a PI: Citizen Science and Participatory Governance in Population Studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 46(2): 377–384. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw204
    Back to article
  10. 10Carter, P, Laurie, GT and Dixon-Woods, M. 2015. The Social Licence for Research: Why Care.data Ran into Trouble. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(5): 404–409. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102374
    Back to article
  11. 11Cavoukian, A. 2009. Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles, August 2009. Available at: https://www.ipc.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/Resources/7foundationalprinciples.pdf [accessed 15 August 2018].
    Back to article
  12. 12Cheung, ASY. 2017. Moving Beyond Consent for Citizen Science in Big Data Health Research. Research Paper no. 2017/006, University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2943185
    Back to article
  13. 13CITI-SENSE project website. Available at: https://social.citi-sense.eu/ [accessed 15 August 2018].
    Back to article
  14. 14City of London. 2017. Science in the City. London. First published on 13 October 2013, last modified on 29 September 2017. Available at: https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/business/environmental-health/environmental-protection/air-quality/Pages/Air-Quality-Champions.aspx [accessed 1 May 2018].
    Back to article
  15. 15Evans, BJ. 2016. Barbarians at the Gate: Consumer-Driven Health Data Commons and the Transformation of Citizen Science. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 42(4): 651–685. DOI: 10.1177/0098858817700245
    Back to article
  16. 16Hafen, E, Kossmann, D and Brand, A. 2014. Health Data Cooperatives—Citizen Empowerment. Methods of Information in Medicine, 53(2): 82–86. DOI: 10.3414/ME13-02-0051
    Back to article
  17. 17Haklay, M. 2013. Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation. In: Sui, D, Elwood, S and Goodchild, M (eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, 105–122. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7
    Back to article
  18. 18Henry, J, Palmer, BW, Palinkas, L, Glorioso, DK, Caligiuri, MP and Jeste, DV. 2009. Reformed Consent: Adapting to New Media and Research Participant Preferences. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 3(2): 1–8. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2743865/ [accessed 1 May 2018].
    Back to article
  19. 19International Association for Public Participation. n.d.a. The IAP2 Federation–The P2 Pillars. Available at: https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/iap2.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/files/IAP2_Federation_-_P2_Pillars.pdf [accessed 1 May 2018].
    Back to article
  20. 20International Association for Public Participation. n.d.b. IAP2’s Spectrum of Public Participation. Available at: http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/foundations_course/IAP2_P2_Spectrum_FINAL.pdf [accessed 1 May 2018].
    Back to article
  21. 21Johnson, MF, Hannah, C, Acton, L, Popovici, R, Karanth, KK and Weinthal, E. 2014. Network Environmentalism: Citizen Scientists as Agents for Environmental Advocacy. Global Environmental Change, 29: 235–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.006
    Back to article
  22. 22Kullenberg, C and Kasperowski, D. 2016. What Is Citizen Science?–A Scientometric Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(1): e0147152. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
    Back to article
  23. 23Making Sense Project. Available at: http://making-sense.eu/ [accessed 24 August 2018].
    Back to article
  24. 24Mapping for Change. Available at: http://mappingforchange.org.uk/ [accessed 15 August 2018].
    Back to article
  25. 25Nature Editorial. 2015. Rise of the Citizen Scientist. Nature, 524(7565): 265. August 2015. DOI: 10.1038/524265a
    Back to article
  26. 26Newman, G, Wiggins, A, Crall, A, Graham, E, Newman, S and Crowston, K. 2012. The Future of Citizens Science: Emerging Technologies and Shifting Paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 298–304. DOI: 10.1890/110294
    Back to article
  27. 27Overdevest, C, Huyck Orr, C and Stepenuck, K. 2004. Volunteer Stream Monitoring and Local Participation in Natural Resources Issues. Human Ecology Review, 1(2): 177–185. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707677 [accessed 1 May 2018].
    Back to article
  28. 28Resnik, DB, Elliott, KC and Miller, AK. 2015. A Framework for Addressing Ethical Issues in Citizen Science. Environmental Science & Policy, 54: 475–481. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.008
    Back to article
  29. 29Saltelli, A and Funtowicz, S. 2017. What is Science’s Crisis Really About? Futures, 91: 5–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.010
    Back to article
  30. 30SalusCoop. 2016. Towards Citizen Governance and Management of Health Data. Barcelona. Available at: http://saluscoop.org [accessed 1 May 2018].
    Back to article
  31. 31Serrano Sanz, F, Holocher-Ertl, T, Kieslinger, B, Sanz García, F and Silva, CG. 2015. White Paper on Citizen Science. Socientize project. Available at: http://www.socientize.eu/sites/default/files/white-paper_0.pdf [accessed 1 May 2018].
    Back to article
  32. 32Shirk, JL, Ballard, HL, Wilderman, CC, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, BV, Krasny, ME and Bonney, R. 2012. Public Participation in Scientific Research: A Framework for Deliberate Design. Ecology and Society, 17(2): art. 29. DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
    Back to article
  33. 33Skinner, HG, Calancie, L, Vu, MB, Garcia, B, DeMarco, M, Patterson, C, Ammerman, A and Schisler, JC. 2015. Using Community-Based Participatory Research Principles to Develop More Understandable Recruitment and Informed Consent Documents in Genomic Research. PLoS ONE, 10(5): e0125466. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125466
    Back to article
  34. 34Smart Citizen Project. Available at: https://smartcitizen.me/ [accessed 24 August 2018].
    Back to article
  35. 35Sterckx, S, Cockbain, J, Howard, H, Huys, I and Borry, P. 2012. Trust Is Not Something You Can Reclaim Easily: Patenting in the Field of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(5): 382–387. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.143
    Back to article
  36. 36Taylor, N, Cheverst, K, Wright, P and Olivier, P. 2013. Leaving the Wild: Lessons from Community Technology Handovers. Proceedings of the 2013 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1549–1558. Association for Computing Machinery, New York. DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2466206
    Back to article
  37. 37UCL News. 2010. Mapping for Change: New Social Enterprise to Support Sustainable Communities. University College London News, 1 July 2010. Available at: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/1007/10070101 [accessed 1 May 2018].
    Back to article
  38. 38US Environmental Protection Agency. 2018. Public Participation Guide: Selecting the Right Level of Public Participation. 22 February 2018. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/public-participation-guide-selecting-right-level-public-participation [accessed 1 May 2018].
    Back to article
  39. 39Vitos, M, Stevens, M, Lewis, J and Haklay, M. 2013. Making Local Knowledge Matter: Supporting Non-Literate People to Monitor Poaching in Congo. Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium on Computing for Development, Association for Computing Machinery, Bangalore, India. DOI: 10.1145/2442882.2442884
    Back to article
  40. 40Welch, BM, Marshall, E, Qanungo, S, Aziz, A, Laken, M, Lenert, L and Obeid, J. 2016. Teleconsent: A Novel Approach to Obtain Informed Consent for Research. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 3: 74–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.03.002
    Back to article
  41. 41Wiggins, A. 2016. Citizen Science: Beyond the Laboratory @ 4S/EASST 2016, blog post, 3 September 2016. Available at: http://andreawiggins.com/citizen-science-beyond-the-laboratory/ [accessed 1 May 2018].
    Back to article
  42. 42Wiggins, A and Crowston, K. 2012. Goals and Tasks: Two Typologies of Citizen Science Projects. Proceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 3426–3435. IEEE, Maui. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.295
    Back to article
  43. 43Woolley, JP, McGowan, ML, Teare, HJA, Coathup, V, Fishman, JR, Settersten, RA, Sterckx, S, Kaye, J and Juengst, ET. 2016. Citizen Science or Scientific Citizenship? Disentangling the Uses of Public Engagement Rhetoric in National Research Initiatives. BMC Medical Ethics, 1(1): art. 17. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.171 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: May 2, 2018
Accepted on: Aug 28, 2018
Published on: Mar 8, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
informed participation,
privacy by design,
informed consent,
data governance,
collective governance

© 2019 Irene Eleta, Gemma Galdon Clavell, Valeria Righi, Mara Balestrini, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 4 (2019): Issue 1Next article