Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Smartphone Sensors for Citizen Science Applications: Radioactivity and Magnetism Cover

Smartphone Sensors for Citizen Science Applications: Radioactivity and Magnetism

By: Sten Odenwald  
Open Access
|May 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Basic details for the iPhone and Samsung smartphone sensor systems.

iPhone 6SSamsung
Release DateSeptember 9, 2015Note 5: August 13, 2015
Galaxy 8s: April 21, 2017
Phones in circulation773 million (ca 2015)Note 5: 11 million (ca 2017)
Galaxy 8s: Over 20 million
Operating SystemiOS 11.2.5 (2018 release)Note 5: Android v5.1.1 (Lollipop)
Galaxy 8S: Android 8.8.0
Camera12.2 megapixel f/2.2Note 5: 16 megapixel f/1.9
Galaxy 8s: 12.2 megapixel f/1.7
MagnetometerAlps Electric HSCDTD007Note 5: Asahi Kasei AK09911C
Galaxy 8s: AKM: AK09916C
Camera arraySony iSight 1.22 mm pixels A = 18 mm2Note 5: SonyExmor RS-IMX240 1.2 mm pixels A = 23 mm2
Galaxy 8s: LSI S5K2L2 or Sony IMX333, 1.4 mm pixels. A = 24 mm2
Light SensorAMS #TSL2586Note 5: AMS TMD4903
Galaxy 8s: AMS #TMD4906

[i] Note: Data from Costello (2018), TechInsights (2018), Electronic Wiz (2016), Electronic Products (2018), James et al. (2015).

Table 2

Representative environmental radiation dosages with smartphone back cameras.

SourceMazurRadiation CounterSmart Geiger
Indoor table top36 CPM, 0.12 mSv/h2.1 CPM, 0.07 mSv/h1.0 CPM, 0.05 mSv/h
Outdoor back yard49 CPM, 0.14 mSv/h1.6 CPM, 1.5 mSv/h0.1 CPM, 0.05 mSv/h
Airport indoors32 CPM, 0.13 mSv/h1.3 CPM, 0.06 mSv/h0 CPM, 0.05 mSv/h
26,000-foot altitude100 CPM, 1.3 mSv/h2.2 CPM, 0.08 mSv/h6 CPM, 0.54 mSv/h
Granite counter top100 CPM, 0.28 mSv/h3.8 CPM, 0.07 mSv/h1.5 CPM, 0.12 mSv/h
30,000-foot altitude745 CPM, 2.4 mSv/h6.0 CPM, 5.0 mSv/h80 CPM, 2.0 mSv/h
Table 3

Flight measurements and platform comparisons with the back camera.

AltitudeMazuriPhoneSamsung
CPMμSv/hrCPMμSv/hrCPMμSv/hr
0 – SFO30 ± 50.08 ± 0.022.5 ± 0.50.07 ± 0.018.0 ± 1.00.07 ± 0.02
0 – ORD35 ± 50.10 ± 0.023.0 ± 0.50.08 ± 0.0119.3 ± 2.00.5 ± 0.05
31,000 (ORD-SFO)730 ± 1002.7 ± 0.24.0 ± 0.52.7 ± 0.57.0 ± 1.00.08 ± 0.03
31,000 (SFO-ORD)745 ± 252.5 ± 0.29.5 ± 0.28.1 ± 1.028.0 ± 5.01.0 ± 0.3
cstp-4-1-158-g1.png
Figure 1

Radiation measurements with Samsung platform back camera for a temperature change from 29.9°C to 30.8°C.

Table 4

Comparison of ground radiation levels measured by multiple Samsung phones.

RunSamsung Galaxy 8sGalaxy Note 5
ABCDEFGH
Front-18.417.67.29.49.911.637.2
Front-27.914.28.49.611.311.64.27.6
Front-36.914.87.910.210.610.23.66
Ave:7.715.57.89.710.611.13.66.9
Back-150.421.629.334.01.69.92.412.4
Back-256.122.132.636.81.48.43.424.2
Back-362.819.437.452.41.45.84.717.7
Ave:56.421.033.141.11.58.03.518.1
Table 5

Detected counts for the smartphones after 20 minutes with Cs-137 sample.

DeviceCPM (1 minute)CPM (20 minutes)
Samsung Galaxy 8s
Phone 17590.8 ± 0.5
Phone 23091.4 ± 1.0
Phone 34954.6 ± 0.7
Phone 412683.6 ± 0.5
Ave = 70 ± 40Ave = 80 ± 17
Samsung Note 5
Phone 12315.6 ± 0.4
Phone 23926.8 ± 1.0
Phone 32930.3 ± 0.1
Phone 42337.9 ± 0.3
Ave = 29 ± 8Ave = 28 ± 9
iPhone 6s1628.2 ± 0.5
Mazur10501085 ± 20
Table 6

Comparison of CPMs for apps on different platforms.

ModelAppCPM-1CPM-2CPM-3CPM-4Averageσ
iPhoneRadioactivity Counter35313733341.9
Smart Geiger26222324240.5
Note 5Radioactivity Counter34324738386.7
Smart Geiger22232923243.2
Galaxy 8sRadioactivity Counter1151171278411118.6
Smart Geiger14182318183.7
cstp-4-1-158-g2.png
Figure 2

Glitch artifacts, DC level jumps, and asymptotic settling seen in side-by-side tests of the iPhone and Samsung platforms. Samsung data (solid line), iPhone data (dots). Credit Odenwald (2018).

cstp-4-1-158-g3.png
Figure 3

Display of continuous 2-hour Bz data for smartphones: Samsung Note 5 (Top four) and Samsung 8S (Bottom four). Bz values are shifted by arbitrary amounts to improve display visibility.

cstp-4-1-158-g4.png
Figure 4

Samsung phone data showing dissimilar measurement values under identical conditions. Plot symbols A–D are for the four Samsung Galaxy 8S phones. Symbols E–H are for the Samsung Note 5 phones.

Table 7

Comparison of magnetic bearings with eight Samsung phones.

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)
Cardinal AngleBx (μT)By (μT)Bz (μT)|Bh| (μT)|B| (μT)θxy (deg)Magnetic (deg)True-Mag (deg)
Samsung Note 5
0N–0.821.4–36.221.542.13623611
90E–26.1–3.3–35.826.344.497955
180S4.1–29.2–36.529.647.11871855
270W24.70.6–35.524.743.4271265–5
Galaxy 8s
0N1.524.4–43.124.449.6357355–6
90E–22.60.1–42.122.647.89090–1
180S3.9–25.6–42.625.949.91881877
270W26.74.4–42.427.150.32802788

[i] Note: The values in each cell are the averages of the four phone measurements. The 1-σ uncertainties in the magnetic measurements in each table cell are ±2.5 μT (Note 5) and ±1.8 μT (Galaxy 8s). The uncertainties in the angular measures for each cardinal direction are ±3.8° (Note 5) and ±4.7° (Galaxy 8s).

Table 8

Comparison of Platforms and Apps with the FRD Absolute Measurement.

iPhone:BzBh (H)|B| (F)
Teslameter 11th–46.920.251.1
Sensor Kinetics–46.920.351.1
Teslameter–46.820.351.0
Magnitude–47.120.151.2
Magnetscape–47.220.351.4
Tesla Field Recorder–46.920.151.0
Average–47.020.251.1
Samsung:
Teslameter 11th–41.320.846.2
Sensor Kinetics–40.920.145.6
Physics Toolbox–41.320.446.1
Richi AMI Magnetometer–41.520.346.2
Advance Sensor–4120.645.9
MagLog–41.520.346.2
Average–41.320.446.0
FRD–45.521.651.0
IGRF at FRD–46.121.050.8
Table 9

Comparison of Samsung magnetic field values in Kensington, MD.

PhoneBzBh|B|
Samsung Note 5 – Copy 1–39.9222.2045.67
Samsung Note 5 – Copy 2–47.2417.4250.35
Samsung Note 5 – Copy 3–26.3716.1030.90
Samsung Note 5 – Copy 4–43.4022.3848.84
Average–39.23 ± 9.019.52 ± 3.243.94 ± 8.9
Samsung Galaxy 8s – Copy 1–49.3423.9754.85
Samsung Galaxy 8s – Copy 2–44.2422.3349.56
Samsung Galaxy 8s – Copy 3–43.3917.9546.95
Samsung Galaxy 8s – Copy 4–44.3321.9249.46
Average–45.32 ± 2.721.54 ± 2.650.20 ± 3.3
IGRF-Kensington–46.621.151.1
Estimated Actual Kensington–46.021.751.3
Table 10

Comparison of smartphone measurement accuracy.

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
ParameterModelAppsσ(A-to-A)
RadiationGround-level (cpm)Flight (cpm)Cs-137 (cpm)
iPhone 6s±2.0±0.5±0.5Radioactivity Counter34 ± 1.9
Smart Geiger24 ± 0.5
Note 5±2.3 (±7)±1.0±2 (±7)Radioactivity Counter38 ± 6.7
Smart Geiger24 ± 3.2
Galaxy 8s±5.4 (±18)N/A±5 (±18)Radioactivity Counter111 ± 18
Smart Geiger18 ± 3.7
MagnetismGeomagnetic (mT)
iPhone 6s±0.2Teslameter 11–44.15 ± 0.21
Sensor Kinetics–43.88 ± 0.13
Magnetometer–42.48 ± 0.13
Magnetscope–42.85 ± 0.13
Teslameter–44.10 ± 0.13
Note 5±0.42 (±4.6)Teslameter 11–44.33 ± 0.42
Advance Sensor–43.73 ± 0.36
Sensor Kinetics–43.38 ± 0.32
Tesla Recorder–44.25 ± 0.24
Magnetometer–43.93 ± 0.17
PhyPhox–43.98 ± 0.33
Galaxy 8s±1.54 (±2.3)Teslameter 11–43.98 ± 1.54
Sensor Kinetics–43.65 ± 0.69
PhyPhox–43.50 ± 0.71
Advance Sensor–43.58 ± 0.80
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.158 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 9, 2018
Accepted on: Jan 7, 2019
Published on: May 17, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Sten Odenwald, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.