References
- 1Alender, B. 2016. Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: A deeper look at water quality monitoring. Journal of Science Communication, 16(3). DOI: 10.22323/2.15030204
- 2Andow, DA, et al. 2016. Recruitment and Retention of Volunteers in a Citizen Science Network to Detect Invasive Species on Private Lands. Environmental Management, 58(4): 606–618. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0746-7
- 3Baruch, A, May, A and Yu, D. 2016. The motivations, enablers and barriers for voluntary participation in an online crowdsourcing platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 64: 923–931. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.039
- 4Brown, D, et al. 2010. The relationship between Adirondack lake pH and levels of mercury in yellow perch. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, 22(4): 280–290. DOI: 10.1577/H10-005.1
- 5Buytaert, W, et al. 2014. Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: Opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development. Hydrosphere, 2: 26. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2014.00026
- 6Dickinson, JL, Zuckerberg, B and Bonter, DN. 2010. Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41(1): 149–172. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636
- 7Ely, E. 2008. Volunteer monitoring and the democratization of science. The Volunteer Monitor, 19(1): 1–5.
- 8Engel, SR and Voshell, JR. 2002. Volunteer Biological Monitoring: Can It Accurately Assess the Ecological Condition of Streams? American Entomologist, 48(3): 164–177. DOI: 10.1093/ae/48.3.164
- 9ESRI. 2015. ArcGIS Server version 10.2.1.
- 10Firehock, K and West, J. 1995. A Brief History of Volunteer Biological Water Monitoring Using Macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 14(1): 197–202. DOI: 10.2307/1467734
- 11Fondriest Environmental. 2013. pH of Water. Environmental Measurement Systems. Available at:
http://www.fondriest.com/environmental-measurements/parameters/water-quality/ph/ [Accessed August 29, 2017]. - 12Fore, LS, Paulsen, K and O’Laughlin, K. 2001. Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshwater Biology, 46(1): 109–123. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2001.00640.x
- 13Heydarnejad, MS. 2012. Survival and growth of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) exposed to different water pH levels. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 36(3): 245–249.
- 14Hochachka, WM, et al. 2012. Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science. Trends in ecology & evolution, 27(2): 130–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.006
- 15Muenich, R, et al. 2016. The Wabash Sampling Blitz: A Study on the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.1
- 16Newman, G, et al. 2010. User-friendly web mapping: Lessons from a citizen science website. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(12): 1851–1869. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2010.490532
- 17Rounds, SA, Wilde, FD and Ritz, GF. 2013.
Chapter A6 Field Measurements, Section 6.2 Dissolved Oxygen . In: National Field Manual for the Collection of Water-Quality Data, 55. USGS. Available at:http://water.usgs.gov/owq/FieldManual/Chapter6/6.2_ver3.pdf [Accessed June 5, 2014]. - 18Silvertown, J. 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9): 467–471. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017
- 19Stepenuck, K. 2016.
History of Water Action Volunteers (WAV) and Citizen Monitoring in Streams . In: 38th Annual Wisconsin Lakes Partnership Convention. Stevens Point, WI. Available at:http://www.uwsp.me/cnr-ap/UWEXLakes/Documents/programs/convention/2016/FridayConcurrent/Session8/KrisStepenuck_HistoryofWAVandCitizenMonitoringinStreams.pdf [Accessed August 29, 2017]. - 20Sullivan, BL, et al. 2009. eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation, 142(10): 2282–2292. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.006
- 21Thornton, T and Leahy, J. 2012. Trust in Citizen Science Research: A Case Study of the Groundwater Education Through Water Evaluation & Testing Program1 Trust in Citizen Science Research: A Case Study of the Groundwater Education Through Water Evaluation & Testing Program. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48(5): 1032–1040. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00670.x
- 22Wilmes, MK. 2017. DEQ – Cooperative Lakes Monitoring Program. Available at:
http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,4561,7-135-3313_3681_3686_3731-195536--,00.html [Accessed August 29, 2017]. - 23Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2011. Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Phosphorus and Total Suspended Solids in the Rock River Basin. Available at:
http://dnr.wi.gov/water/wsswimsdocument.ashx?documentseqno=58866117 [Accessed February 17, 2018].