References
- 1Adcorp, 2013. Social Media Statistics October 2013, Australia and New Zealand. 11 January 2013. Available at:
http://www.adcorp.co.nz/news-blog/Social-Media-Statistics-October-2013,-Australia-an [Last accessed 5 July 2017]. - 2Alender, B., 2016. Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: A deeper look at water quality monitoring. Journal of Science Communication, 15(3): 1–19.
- 3Alexa, 2016. Top Sites in New Zealand. Available at:
http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/NZ [Last accessed 1 June 2016]. - 4Bateman, P., Gray, P. and Butler, B., 2006. Community commitment: How affect, obligation and necessity drive online behaviors. In: Twenty-seventh International Conference on Information Systems, 983–999. Milwaukee, WI.
- 5Bela, G., Peltola, T., Young, J.C., Balázs, B., Arpin, I., Pataki, G., Hauck, J., Kelemen, E., Kopperoinen, L., Herzele, A., Keune, H., Hecker, S., Suškevičs, M., Roy, H.E., Itkonen, P., Külvik, M., László, M., Basnou, C., Pino, J. and Bonn, A., 2016. Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(5): 990–999. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12762
- 6Bell, S., Marzano, M., Cent, J., Kobierska, H., Podjed, D., Vandzinskaite, D., Reinert, H., Armaitiene, A., Grodzinska-Jurczak, M. and Mursic, R., 2008. What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodiversity Conservation, 17: 3443–3454. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-008-9357-9
- 7Bonney, R., Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V. and Shirk, J., 2009. Citizen Science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11): 977–984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
- 8Bonney, R., Shirk, J.L., Philips, T.B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H.L., Miller-Rushing, A.J. and Parrish, J.K., 2014. Citizen science: Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178): 1436–1437. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554
- 9Bruyere, B. and Rappe, S., 2007. Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4): 503–516. DOI: 10.1080/09640560701402034
- 10Craig, J., Anderson, S., Clout, M., Creese, B., Mitchell, N., Ogden, J., Roberts, M. and Ussher, G., 2000. Conservation issues in New Zealand. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31: 61–78. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.61
- 11Crothers, C., Smith, P., Urale, P.W.B. and Bell, A., 2016. The Internet in New Zealand 2015.
Institute of Culture, Discourse & Communication , Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. Available online at:wipnz.aut.ac.nz . - 12Dickinson, J.L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R.L., Martin, J., Philips, T. and Purcell, K., 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 291–297. DOI: 10.1890/110236
- 13Fredrickson, B.L. and Losada, M.F., 2005. Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7): 678–686. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.678
- 14Geoghegan, H., Dyke, A., Pateman, R., West, S. and Everett, G., 2016. Understanding motivations for citizen science. UK Environmental Obeservation Framework, Wiltshire, UK. Available online at:
http://www.ukeof.org.uk/resources/citizen-science-resources/MotivationsforCSREPORTFINALMay2016.pdf [Last accessed 5 July 2017]. - 15Gray, B., 2004. Informal Learning in an online community of practice. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1): 20–35.
- 16Greenwood, J.J.D., 2007. Citizens, science and bird conservation. Journal of Ornithology, 148(Suppl 1): S77–S124. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-007-0239-9
- 17Grese, R.E., Kaplan, R., Ryan, R.L. and Buxton, J., 2000.
Psychological benefits of volunteering in stewardship programs . In: Gobster, P.H. and Hull, R.B. (eds.), Restoring nature: Perspectives from the social sciences and humanities, 265–280. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. - 18Gunawardena, C., Hermans, M.B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M. and Tuttle, R., 2009. A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1): 3–16. DOI: 10.1080/09523980802588626
- 19Hung, H.T. and Yuen, S.C., 2010. Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6): 703–714. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2010.507307
- 20Jennett, C. and Cox, A.L., 2014. Eight guidelines for designing virtual citizen science projects. In: Second AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, 16–17. Pittsburgh, PA.
3–4 November 2014 . - 21Jennett, C., Kloetzer, L., Schneider, D., Iacovides, I., Cox, A.L., Gold, M., Fuchs, B., Eveleigh, A., Mathieu, K., Ajani, Z. and Talsi, Y., 2016. Motivations, learning and creativity in online citizen science. Journal of Science Communication, 15(3): 1–23.
- 22Johnson, C.M., 2001. A survey of current research on online communities of practice. Internet and Higher Education, 4: 45–60. DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00047-1
- 23Lave, J. and Wenger, E., 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
- 24Lesser, E.L. and Storck, J., 2001. Communities of practice and organisational performance. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4): 831–841. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
- 25Li, L.C., Grimshaw, J.M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P.C. and Graham, I.D., 2009. Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 4(27). DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-27
- 26Liu, C.-C. and Falk, J.H., 2014. Serious fun: Viewing hobbyist activities through a learning lens. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(4): 343–355. DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2013.824130
- 27Longnecker, N., 2016. An Integrated Model of Science Communication – More than Providing Evidence. Journal of Science Communication, 15(5): Y01.
- 28Masters, K., Oh, E.Y., Cox, J., Simmons, B., Lintott, C., Graham, G., Greenhill, A. and Holmes, K., 2016. Science learning via participation in online citizen science. Journal of Science Communication,. 15(3): A07.
- 29Mayes, T. and de Freitas, S., 2007.
Learning and e-learning: the role of theory . In: Beetham, H. and Sharpe, R. (eds.), Designing and delivering e-learning, Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge. - 30McCaffrey, R.E., 2005. Using Citizen Science in Urban Bird Studies. Urban Habitats, 3(1): 70–86.
- 31McLoughlin, C. and Lee, M.J.W., 2010. Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Exucational Technology, 26(1). DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1100
- 32Measham, T.G. and Barnett, G.B., 2008. Environmental Volunteering: motivations, modes and outcomes. Australian Geographer, 39(4): 537–552. DOI: 10.1080/00049180802419237
- 33Nicolini, D., Scarbrough, H. and Gracheva, J., 2016.
Communities of Practice and Situated Learning in Health Care . In: Ferile, E., Montgomery, K. and Pedersen, A.R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Health Care Management, 255–278. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198705109.001.0001 - 34Nielsen, 2016. Nielsen Connected Consumer Report 2016.
- 35Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D. and Preece, J., 2006. Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1): 7–20. DOI: 10.1007/s10660-006-5985-x
- 36Peters, M., Eames, C. and Hamilton, D., 2015. The use and value of citizen science data in New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 45(3): 151–160. DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2015.1051549
- 37Price, C.A. and Lee, H.S., 2013. Changes in particpants’ scientific attitudes and epistemological beliefs during an astronomical citizen science project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7): 773–801. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21090
- 38Ranmuthugala, G., Plumb, J.J., Cunningham, F.C., Georgiou, A., Westbrook, J.I. and Braithwaite, J., 2011. How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Services Research, 11: 273. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-273
- 39Rieder, B., 2013. Studying Facebook via Data Extraction: The Netvizz Application. Proceedings of WebSci ’13, the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 346–355. DOI: 10.1145/2464464.2464475
- 40Rieder, B., Abdulla, R., Poell, T., Woltering, R. and Zack, L., 2015. Data critique and analytical opportunities for very large Facebook Pages: Lessons learned from exploring “We are all Khaled Said.” Big Data Society, 2. DOI: 10.1177/2053951715614980
- 41Roy, H.E., Pocock, M.J.O., Preston, C.D., Roy, D.B., Savage, J., Tweddle, J.C. and Robinson, L.D., 2012.
Understanding Citizen Science & Environmental Monitoring. Final Report on behalf of UK-EOF . NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and Natural History Museum. - 42Ryan, R.L., Kaplan, R. and Grese, R.E., 2001. Predicting Volunteer Commitment in Environmental Stewardship Programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(5): 629–648. DOI: 10.1080/09640560120079948
- 43Salesforce.com Inc., 2013. Strategies for Effective Wall Posts: A Timeline Analysis. Available at:
http://www.salesforcemarketingcloud.com/resources/ebooks/strategies-for-effective-wall-posts-a-timeline-analysis/ [Last accessed 23 June 2016]. - 44Silvertown, J., Buesching, C.D., Jacobson, S. and Rebelo, T.G., 2013.
Citizen science and nature conservation . In: Macdonald, D.W. & Willis, K.J. (eds.), Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2, 127–142. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9781118520178 - 45Skoric, M.M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D. and Pang, N. 2015. Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review. New Media & Society, 18(9): 1817–1839. DOI: 10.1177/1461444815616221
- 46Snäll, T., Kindvall, O., Nilsson, J. and Pärt, T., 2011. Evaluating citizen-based presence data for bird monitoring. Biological Conservation, 144(2): 804–810. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.010
- 47Sociograph.io. Analytics for Facebook Groups and Pages.
http://sociograph.io [Last accessed 5 July 2017]. - 48Spurr, E.B., 2012. New Zealand Garden Bird Survey – analysis of the first four years. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 36(3): 1–13.
- 49Star, P., 2002. Native bird protection, national identity and the rise of preservation in New Zealand to 1914. New Zealand Journal of History, 36(2): 123–136.
- 50Stepenuck, K.F. and Green, L.T., 2015. Individual- and community-level impacts of volunteer environmental monitoring: A synthesis of peer-reviewed literature. Ecology and Society, 20(3): 19. DOI: 10.5751/ES-07329-200319
- 51Sullivan, M. and Longnecker, N., 2014. Class Blogs as a Teaching Tool to Promote Writing and Student Interaction. Australasian Journal for Education Technology, 4(30): 390–401. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.322
- 52Tinati, R., Van Kleek, M., Simperl, E., Luczak-Roesch, M., Simpson, R. and Shadbolt, N., 2015. Designing for citizen data analysis: a cross-sectional case study of a multi-domain citizen science platform. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4069–4078.
18 April 2015 . DOI: 10.1145/2702123.2702420 - 53Triezenberg, H.A., Knuth, B.A., Yuan, Y.C. and Dickinson, J.L., 2012.
Internet-based social networking and collective action models of citizen science . In: Dickinson, J.L. and Bonney, R. (eds.), Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research, 214–225. Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell University Press. DOI: 10.7591/9780801463952 - 54Wenger, E., McDermott, R.A. and Snyder, W.M., 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
- 55Wenger, E. and Wenger-Traynor, B., 2011. Levels of Participation. Available at:
http://wenger-trayner.com/project/levels-of-participation/ [Last accessed 22 June 2016]. - 56Zhang, W., Johnson, T.J., Seltzer, T. and Bichard, S.L., 2010. The revolution will be networked – The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1): 75–92. DOI: 10.1177/0894439309335162
