Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Arts and Humanities Research in the Innovation System: The UK Example Cover

Arts and Humanities Research in the Innovation System: The UK Example

Open Access
|Dec 2009

References

  1. Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998) „Capital Accumulation and Innovation as Complementary Factors in Long-Run Growth‟ Journal of Economic Growth, 3/2, 111-130
  2. Abramovsky, L., Harrison, R. and Simpson H. (2007) „University research and the location of business R&D‟, Economic Journal, Vol. 117, No. 519, 114-141
  3. Antelman, A. (2004) „Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?‟, College & Research Libraries News, 65(5), 372-382
  4. Arthur, W. B. (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
  5. Bakhshi, H. and McVittie, E. (2009) „Creative Supply-Chain Linkages and Innovation: Do the creative industries stimulate business innovation in the wider economy?‟, Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, Volume 11:2
  6. Bauer, M. ed. (1995) Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology and Biotechnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  7. Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines, Second Edition. Maidenhead: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press
  8. Benz, M. (2007) „The Relevance of Procedural Utility for Economics‟ in Frey B. and Stutzer A. eds., Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field. Cambridge. Mass: MIT Press
  9. Besley, T. and Ghatak, M. (2003) „Competition and Incentives with Motivated Agents‟, LSE Discussion Paper No.TE/03/465
  10. Bijker, W. (1997) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge,Mass: MIT Press
  11. Bougrain, F. and Haudeville, B. (2002) „Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities‟, Research Policy, 31, 735-747
  12. Bourke, P. (1997) Discipline Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Canberra, Australia: Academy of the Social Sciences, Occasional Paper Series 1.
  13. Bound, K., Briggs, R., Holden, J. and Jones, S. (2007) Cultural Diplomacy. London: DemosBuchanan, R. (1992) „Wicked Problems in Design Thinking‟ Design Issues, 8.2, 5-21
  14. Bullen, E., Robb, S., and Kenway, J. (2004) „“Creative destruction”: knowledge economy policy and the future of the arts and humanities in the academy‟, Journal of Education Policy, 19/1, 3-22
  15. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990) „Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation‟, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152
  16. Cosh, A., Hughes, A., Lester, R. (2006) „UK PLC: just how innovative are we? Findings from the Cambridge- MIT Institute International Innovation Benchmarking Project‟ Working Paper MIT-IPC-06-009.
  17. Crossick, G. (2006) Knowledge transfer without widgets: the challenge of the creative economy, lecture to the Royal Society of Arts in Leeds on 31 May 2006. London: Goldsmiths, University of London
  18. Dasgupta P. and David P. A. (1994) „Toward a new economics of science‟, Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521.
  19. Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2007) Objectivity. New York: Zone Books
  20. Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (2008) Innovation Nation. London: DIUS
  21. Dill, D. (2008) „Capacity building as an instrument of institutional reform: Improving the quality of higher education through academic audits in the UK, New Zealand, Sweden, and Hong Kong.‟ Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 2/2, 211-234
  22. Dodgson, M., Gann, D. and Salter A. (2005) Think, Play, Do: Innovation, Technology and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  23. Dworkin, R. (1986) Law’s Empire. London: Fontana Etzkowitz, H. (2008) The Triple Helix: University- Industry-Government Innovation in Action. New York & London: Routledge
  24. Edwards, D. (2008) ArtScience: Creativity in the post-Google Generation. Cambridge. Mass: Harvard University Press
  25. Fleischacker, S. (2005) A Short History of Distributive Justice. Cambridge. Mass: Harvard University Press
  26. Foray, D. and Hargreaves D. (2003) „The Production of Knowledge in Different Sectors: a model and some hypotheses‟ London Review of Education 1.1, 7-19
  27. Frey, B. S. and Jegen, R. (2001) „Motivation crowding theory: A survey of empirical evidence‟ Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589-611.
  28. Furman, J. and Stern, S. (2004) „Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research‟ NBER Working Papers 12523
  29. Galenson, D. W. (2005) „The Greatest Artists of the Twentieth Century‟ NBER Working Papers 11899
  30. Gamman, L. and Pascoe, T. (2004) „Design Out Crime? Using Practice-based Models of the Design Process‟, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, 6 (4), 9-18
  31. Garfield, E. (1980) „Is information retrieval in the arts and humanities inherently different from that in science? The effect that ISI‟s citation index for the arts and humanities is expected to have on future scholarship,‟ Library Quarterly, 50, 40-57.
  32. Georghiou, L. (2007) Demanding innovation: lead markets, public procurement and innovation, London: NESTA
  33. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Cotemporary Societies. London: Sage
  34. Habermas, J. (2003) The Future of Human Nature, Cambridge: Polity
  35. Hamalainen, T. J. and Heiskala, R. (2007) Social Innovations, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Making Sense of Structural Adjustment Processes in Industrial Sectors, Regions and Societies, Chetenham: Edward Elgar
  36. Hargrave, T. and Van de Ven, A. H. (2006) „A collective action model of institutional change‟, Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864-888.
  37. Harris, J., Bortolotti, J. and Irving, L. (2005) „An Ethical Framework for Stem Cell Research in the European Union‟, Health Care Analysis, 13/3, 157-162
  38. Heath, M., Jubb, M. and Robey, D. (2008) „E-Publication and Open Access in the Arts and Humanities in the UK‟,Ariadne, 54. Available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue54/heath-et-al/ [accessed 23 June 2008]
  39. Herbert, J. (2008) Creating the AHRC: An Arts and Humanities Research Council for the United Kingdom in the Twenty-first Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press/The British Academy
  40. HM Treasury (2002) SET for success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. The report of Sir Gareth Roberts’ Review. London: HM Treasury.
  41. HM Treasury (2003) Lambert Review of Business- University Collaboration. London: HM Treasury
  42. HM Treasury (2007) The Race to the Top: A Review of Government’s Science and Innovation Policies by Lord Sainsbury. London: HM Treasury
  43. Howells, J. (2006) „Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation‟, Research Policy, 35, 715-728
  44. Hussler, C. and Rondé, P. (2007) „The impact of cognitive communities on the diffusion of academic knowledge: Evidence from the networks of inventors of a French university.‟ Research Policy, 36, 288-302
  45. Johnson, B., Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B-Å. (2002) „Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge?‟ Industrial and Corporate Change, 11/2, 245-262
  46. Kaufman, A. and Tödtling, F. (2001) „Science-industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems‟, Research Policy, 30, 791-804
  47. KEA (2009) The Impact of Culture on Creativity: A Study Prepared for the European Commission
  48. Kelly, M., Arnold, D., Brooksbank-Jones, A., Hudswell, E.,Quince, E., and Wood, R. (2007) Research Review in Modern Languages. Bristol: AHRC.
  49. Kenway, J., Bullen, E. and Robb, S. (2004) „Global Knowledge Politics and “Exploitable Knowledge”‟ in Kenway, J., Bullen, E. and Robb, S. eds. Innovation and tradition: the arts, humanities and the knowledge economy. New York: Peter Lang
  50. Kline, S. (1995) Conceptual Foundations of Multidisciplinary Thinking, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press
  51. Knight, F. (1931, 2002) ) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, New York: Beard Books
  52. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2003) Metaphors we live by. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  53. Lerner, J. and Tirole J. (2002) „Some simple economic of open source,‟ Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197234.
  54. Lester, R. and Piore M. (2005) Innovation: The Missing Dimension, Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press
  55. Lucas, R.E. (1988) „On the Mechanics of Development‟, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42
  56. Lundvall, B-Å. ed. (1992) National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter
  57. Lundvall, B-Å., Johnson, B., Anderson, E. S. and Dalum, B. (2002) „National systems of production, innovation and competence building‟, Research Policy, 31, 213-231
  58. Muller, K., Rammer, C., and Truby, J. (2009) „‟The role of creative industries in industrial innovation‟, Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, Volume 11:2
  59. Nederhof, A. (2006) „Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: Areview‟ Scientometrics, and Springer, Dordrecht Vol. 66(1), 81–100
  60. Nelson, R. (2005) Technology, Institutions and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press
  61. Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V. and van der Oord, A. (2007) „Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity‟, Research Policy, 36, 1016-1034
  62. Oakley, K., Sperry, B. and Pratt, A. (2008) The art of innovation: How fine arts graduates contribute to innovation. London: NESTA
  63. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007i) Innovation and Growth: Rationale for an Innovation Strategy. Paris: OECD
  64. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007ii) Understanding the Brain: The Birth of a learning Science. Paris: OECD
  65. Page, S. E. (2007) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press
  66. Pierson, P. (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions,and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press
  67. Plomer, A. (2005) The Law and Ethics of Medical Research: International Bioethics and Human Rights.London: Cavendish
  68. Research Councils UK (2006) Increasing the economic impact of Research Councils. Swindon: RCUK
  69. Research Councils UK (2008) RCUK Expectation for Societal and Economic Impact. Available at www.rcuk.ac.uk/cmsweb/downloads/rcuk/innovation/expectationssei.pdf
  70. Rogers, E. M. (1995) Diffusion of innovations: 4th edition .New York: Free Press
  71. Romer, P. (1986) „Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth‟ Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-37
  72. Romer, P. (1990) „Endogenous Technological Change‟ Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102
  73. Root-Bernstein, R. (2001) „Music, Creativity and Scientific Thinking‟ Leonardo, 34.1, 63-68
  74. Rust, C., Mottram, J. and Till, J. (2007) Practice-led Research in Art, Design and Architecture. Bristol: AHRC
  75. Savulescu, J. (2006) „Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings‟ in Steinbock, B. ed. The Oxford Handbook on Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  76. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H. (1999), Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
  77. Sharif, N (2006), „Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept‟, Research Policy 35:5, 745-766
  78. Smits, R. and Kuhlmann, S. (2004) „The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy‟, International Journal of Foresight and innovation Policy, 1, 1/2, 4-32
  79. Stein, J. (2007) „Conversations Among Competitors‟, NBER Working Paper No. W13370
  80. Stoneman, P. (2009) Soft Innovation: Towards a more complete picture of innovative change. London: NESTA
  81. Sunstein, C. (2001) „Academic Fads and Fashions (With Special Reference to Law)‟ John M. Olin Law & Economics working paper
  82. Sunstein, C. (2006) Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  83. Thackara, J (2005) In the Bubble – Designing in a Complex World. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press
  84. Yusuf, S. and Nabeshima, K. eds. (2007) How Universities Promote Economic Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank
  85. Zahra, S. A. and George, G. (2002) „Absorptive Capacity:A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension,‟ Academy of Management Review 27:2, 185-203.
  86. Zaltman, G. (2003) How Customers Think: Essential Insights into the Mind of the Market. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
  87. Ziman, J. ed. (2000) Technological Change as an Evolutionary Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.19 | Journal eISSN: 1836-0416
Language: English
Published on: Dec 2, 2009
Published by: Tallinn, Erfurt University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2009 Hasan Bakhshi, Philippe Schneider, Christopher Walker, published by Tallinn, Erfurt University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.