Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Enhancing the Psychometric Properties of the Iowa Gambling Task Using Full Generative Modeling Cover

Enhancing the Psychometric Properties of the Iowa Gambling Task Using Full Generative Modeling

Computational Psychiatry
Volume 6 (2022): Issue 1
By: Holly Sullivan-Toole,  Nathaniel Haines,  Kristina Dale and  Thomas M. Olino  
Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. 1Ahn, W.-Y., Busemeyer, J. R., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Stout, J. C. (2008). Comparison of decision learning models using the generalization criterion method. Cognitive Science, 32(8), 1376–1402. DOI: 10.1080/03640210802352992
    Back to article
  2. 2Ahn, W. Y., Dai, J., Vassileva, J., Busemeyer, J. R., & Stout, J. C. (2016). Computational modeling for addiction medicine. In Progress in Brain Research, 224, 53–65. Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.07.032
    Back to article
  3. 3Ahn, W.-Y., Haines, N., & Zhang, L. (2017). Revealing Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Reinforcement Learning and Decision-Making With the hBayesDM Package. Computational Psychiatry, 1(0), 24. DOI: 10.1162/CPSY_a_00002
    Back to article
  4. 4Ahn, W.-Y., Vasilev, G., Lee, S.-H., Busemeyer, J. R., Kruschke, J. K., Bechara, A., & Vassileva, J. (2014). Decision-making in stimulant and opiate addicts in protracted abstinence: Evidence from computational modeling with pure users. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00849
    Back to article
  5. 5Alacreu-Crespo, A., Guillaume, S., Sénèque, M., Olié, E., & Courtet, P. (2020). Cognitive modelling to assess decision-making impairments in patients with current depression and with/without suicide history. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 36, 50–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.04.006
    Back to article
  6. 6Almy, B., Kuskowski, M., Malone, S. M., Myers, E., & Luciana, M. (2018). A longitudinal analysis of adolescent decision-making with the Iowa Gambling Task. Developmental Psychology, 54(4), 689–702. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000460
    Back to article
  7. 7Baeza-Velasco, C. (2020). Decision-making in major depressive disorder_ Subjective complaint, objective performance, and discrepancy between both. Journal of Affective Disorders, 6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.064
    Back to article
  8. 8Bechara, A. (2007). Iowa gambling task professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.
    Back to article
  9. 9Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1–3), 7–15. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3
    Back to article
  10. 10Bishop, S. J., & Gagne, C. (2018). Anxiety, Depression, and Decision Making: A Computational Perspective. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 41(1), 371–388. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-062007
    Back to article
  11. 11Brown, V. M., Chen, J., Gillan, C. M., & Price, R. B. (2020). Improving the Reliability of Computational Analyses: Model-Based Planning and Its Relationship With Compulsivity. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 5(6), 601–609. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.12.019
    Back to article
  12. 12Brown, V. M., Chen, J., Gillan, C. M., & Price, R. B. (2021). Improving the reliability of computational analyses: Model-based planning and its relationship with compulsivity. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 5(6), 601–609. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.12.019
    Back to article
  13. 13Buelow, M. T., & Barnhart, W. R. (2018). Test–Retest Reliability of Common Behavioral Decision Making Tasks. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 33(1), 125–129. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acx038
    Back to article
  14. 14Buelow, M. T., & Suhr, J. A. (2009). Construct Validity of the Iowa Gambling Task. Neuropsychology Review, 19(1), 102–114. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-009-9083-4
    Back to article
  15. 15Buelow, M. T., & Suhr, J. A. (2013). Personality characteristics and state mood influence individual deck selections on the Iowa Gambling Task. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 593–597. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.019
    Back to article
  16. 16Busemeyer, J. R., & Stout, J. C. (2002). A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment, 14(3), 253–262. DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.14.3.253
    Back to article
  17. 17Byrne, K. A., Norris, D. D., & Worthy, D. A. (2016). Dopamine, depressive symptoms, and decision-making: The relationship between spontaneous eye blink rate and depressive symptoms predicts Iowa Gambling Task performance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(1), 23–36. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-015-0377-0
    Back to article
  18. 18Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M., & Lee, D. (2016). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01
    Back to article
  19. 19Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
    Back to article
  20. 20Case, J. A. C., & Olino, T. M. (2020). Approach and avoidance patterns in reward learning across domains: An initial examination of the Social Iowa Gambling Task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 125, 103547. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103547
    Back to article
  21. 21Cauffman, E., Shulman, E. P., Steinberg, L., Claus, E., Banich, M. T., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2010). Age differences in affective decision making as indexed by performance on the Iowa Gambling Task. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 193–207. DOI: 10.1037/a0016128
    Back to article
  22. 22Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., … Rose, M. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5), S3–S11. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55
    Back to article
  23. 23Cella, M., Dymond, S., & Cooper, A. (2010). Impaired flexible decision-making in major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 124(1–2), 207–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.013
    Back to article
  24. 24Chen, C., Takahashi, T., Nakagawa, S., Inoue, T., & Kusumi, I. (2015). Reinforcement learning in depression: A review of computational research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 247–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.005
    Back to article
  25. 25Chen, G., Pine, D. S., Brotman, M. A., Smith, A. R., Cox, R. W., & Haller, S. P. (2021). Trial and error: A hierarchical modeling approach to test-retest reliability. NeuroImage, 245, 118647. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118647
    Back to article
  26. 26Christakou, A., Gershman, S. J., Niv, Y., Simmons, A., Brammer, M., & Rubia, K. (2013). Neural and Psychological Maturation of Decision-making in Adolescence and Young Adulthood. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(11), 1807–1823. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00447
    Back to article
  27. 27Chung, D., Kadlec, K., Aimone, J. A., McCurry, K., King-Casas, B., & Chiu, P. H. (2017). Valuation in major depression is intact and stable in a non-learning environment. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 44374. DOI: 10.1038/srep44374
    Back to article
  28. 28Clark, L., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(3), 316-336. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.100.3.316
    Back to article
  29. 29Cooper, S. R., Gonthier, C., Barch, D. M., & Braver, T. S. (2017). The role of psychometrics in individual differences research in cognition: A case study of the AX-CPT. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1482. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01482
    Back to article
  30. 30Dombrovski, A. Y., & Hallquist, M. N. (2021). Search for solutions, learning, simulation, and choice processes in suicidal behavior. WIREs Cognitive Science. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1561
    Back to article
  31. 31Ducasse, D., Loas, G., Dassa, D., Gramaglia, C., Zeppegno, P., Guillaume, S., … Courtet, P. (2018). Anhedonia is associated with suicidal ideation independently of depression: A meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety, 35(5), 382–392. DOI: 10.1002/da.22709
    Back to article
  32. 32Frank, M. J., Seeberger, L. C., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2004). By Carrot or by Stick: Cognitive Reinforcement Learning in Parkinsonism. Science, New Series, 306(5703), 1940–1943. DOI: 10.1126/science.1102941
    Back to article
  33. 33Gershman, S. J. (2015). Do learning rates adapt to the distribution of rewards? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1320–1327. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0790-3
    Back to article
  34. 34Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7(4), 457–472. DOI: 10.2307/2246093
    Back to article
  35. 35Jollant, F. (2016). Prefrontal inositol levels and implicit decision-making in healthy individuals and depressed patients. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 26, 1255–1263. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.06.005
    Back to article
  36. 36Haines, N., Kvam, P. D., Irving, L. H., Smith, C., Beauchaine, T. P., Pitt, M. A., Ahn, W.-Y., & Turner, B. (2020). Theoretically informed generative models can advance the psychological and brain sciences: Lessons from the reliability paradox [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/xr7y3
    Back to article
  37. 37Haines, N., Vassileva, J., & Ahn, W.-Y. (2018). The Outcome-Representation Learning model: A novel reinforcement learning model of the Iowa Gambling Task. Cognitive Science, 42(8), 2534–2561. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12688
    Back to article
  38. 38Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
    Back to article
  39. 39Huys, Q. J., Pizzagalli, D. A., Bogdan, R., & Dayan, P. (2013). Mapping anhedonia onto reinforcement learning: a behavioural meta-analysis. Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, 3(1), 12. DOI: 10.1186/2045-5380-3-12
    Back to article
  40. 40Katahira, K. (2016). How hierarchical models improve point estimates of model parameters at the individual level. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 73, 37–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.03.007
    Back to article
  41. 41Khazanov, G. K., & Ruscio, A. M. (2016). Is Low Positive Emotionality a Specific Risk Factor for Depression? A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies. Psychological Bulletin, 142(9), 991–1015. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000059.supp
    Back to article
  42. 42Kildahl, N., Hansen, S., Brevers, D., & Skewes, J. (2020). Individual differences in learning during decision-making may predict specific harms associated with gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 110, 106496. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106496
    Back to article
  43. 43Kvam, P. D., Romeu, R. J., Turner, B. M., Vassileva, J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2021). Testing the factor structure underlying behavior using joint cognitive models: Impulsivity in delay discounting and Cambridge gambling tasks. Psychological Methods, 26(1), 18–37. DOI: 10.1037/met0000264
    Back to article
  44. 44Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Jones, H. A., Richards, J. B., Strong, D. R., Kahler, C. W., & Read, J. P. (2003). The balloon analogue risk task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(1), 26–33. DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.26
    Back to article
  45. 45Lin, C.-H., Chiu, Y.-C., Lee, P.-L., & Hsieh, J.-C. (2007). Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task? Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3(1), 16. DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-3-16
    Back to article
  46. 46Ly, A., Boehm, U., Heathcote, A., Turner, B. M., Forstmann, B., Marsman, M., & Matzke, D. (2017). A flexible and efficient hierarchical Bayesian approach to the exploration of individual differences in cognitive-model-based neuroscience. In A. A. Moustafa (Ed.), Computational Models of Brain and Behavior (pp. 467–479). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9781119159193.ch34
    Back to article
  47. 47McGovern, A. R., Alexopoulos, G. S., Yuen, G. S., Morimoto, S. S., & Gunning-Dixon, F. M. (2014). Reward-related decision making in older adults: Relationship to clinical presentation of depression: Decision making in older adults with late-life depression. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 29(11), 1125–1131. DOI: 10.1002/gps.4200
    Back to article
  48. 48Miu, A. C., Heilman, R. M., & Houser, D. (2008). Anxiety impairs decision-making: Psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task. Biological Psychology, 77(3), 353–358. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.010
    Back to article
  49. 49Moniz, M., Neves de Jesus, S., Gonçalves, E., Pacheco, A., & Viseu, J. (2016). Decision-making in adult unipolar depressed patients and healthy subjects: Significant differences in Net Score and in non-traditional alternative measures. Neuropsychological Trends, 19, 7–15. DOI: 10.7358/neur-2016-019-moni
    Back to article
  50. 50Moutoussis, M., Bullmore, E. T., Goodyer, I. M., Fonagy, P., Jones, P. B., Dolan, R. J., & Dayan, P. (2018). Change, stability, and instability in the Pavlovian guidance of behaviour from adolescence to young adulthood. PLOS Computational Biology, 14(12), e1006679. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006679
    Back to article
  51. 51Mueller, E. M., Nguyen, J., Ray, W. J., & Borkovec, T. D. (2010). Future-oriented decision-making in Generalized Anxiety Disorder is evident across different versions of the Iowa Gambling Task. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41(2), 165–171. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.12.002
    Back to article
  52. 52Mukherjee, D., & Kable, J. W. (2014). Value-based decision making in mental illness: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychological Science, 2(6), 767–782. DOI: 10.1177/2167702614531580
    Back to article
  53. 53Must, A., Szabó, Z., Bódi, N., Szász, A., Janka, Z., & Kéri, S. (2006). Sensitivity to reward and punishment and the prefrontal cortex in major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 90(2–3), 209–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.12.005
    Back to article
  54. 54Nussenbaum, K., & Hartley, C. A. (2019). Reinforcement learning across development: What insights can we draw from a decade of research? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 40, 100733. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100733
    Back to article
  55. 55Parsons, S., Kruijt, A.-W., & Fox, E. (2019). Psychological Science Needs a Standard Practice of Reporting the Reliability of Cognitive-Behavioral Measurements. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 378–395. DOI: 10.1177/2515245919879695
    Back to article
  56. 56Paulus, M. P., & Yu, A. J. (2012). Emotion and decision-making: Affect-driven belief systems in anxiety and depression. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(9), 476–483. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.07.009
    Back to article
  57. 57Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2000). The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(12), 1465–1475. DOI: 10.1177/01461672002612002
    Back to article
  58. 58Pizzagalli, D. A., Smoski, M., Ang, Y.-S., Whitton, A. E., Sanacora, G., Mathew, S. J., Nurnberger, J., Lisanby, S. H., Iosifescu, D. V., Murrough, J. W., Yang, H., Weiner, R. D., Calabrese, J. R., Goodman, W., Potter, W. Z., & Krystal, A. D. (2020). Selective kappa-opioid antagonism ameliorates anhedonic behavior: Evidence from the Fast-fail Trial in Mood and Anxiety Spectrum Disorders (FAST-MAS). Neuropsychopharmacology, 45(10), 1656–1663. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-020-0738-4
    Back to article
  59. 59Price, R. B., Brown, V., & Siegle, G. J. (2019). Computational modeling applied to the dot-probe task yields improved reliability and mechanistic insights. Biological Psychiatry, 85(7), 606–612. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.022
    Back to article
  60. 60Rinaldi, R., Lefebvre, L., Joachim, A., & Rossignol, M. (2020). Decision-making of patients with major depressive disorder in the framework of action control. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 25(1), 71–83. DOI: 10.1080/13546805.2019.1685481
    Back to article
  61. 61Romeu, R. J., Haines, N., Ahn, W.-Y., Busemeyer, J. R., & Vassileva, J. (2020). A computational model of the Cambridge gambling task with applications to substance use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 206, 107711. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107711
    Back to article
  62. 62Rouder, J. N., & Haaf, J. M. (2019). A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 452–467. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1558-y
    Back to article
  63. 63Schmitz, F., Kunina-Habenicht, O., Hildebrandt, A., Oberauer, K., & Wilhelm, O. (2020). Psychometrics of the Iowa and Berlin Gambling Tasks: Unresolved Issues With Reliability and Validity for Risk Taking. Assessment, 27(2), 232–245. DOI: 10.1177/1073191117750470
    Back to article
  64. 64Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime software. (Pittsburgh, PA) Version 2.0.
    Back to article
  65. 65Shahar, N., Hauser, T. U., Moutoussis, M., Moran, R., Keramati, M., NSPN consortium, & Dolan, R. J. (2019). Improving the reliability of model-based decision-making estimates in the two-stage decision task with reaction-times and drift-diffusion modeling. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(2), e1006803. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006803
    Back to article
  66. 66Smoski, M. J., Lynch, T. R., Rosenthal, M. Z., Cheavens, J. S., Chapman, A. L., & Krishnan, R. R. (2008). Decision-making and risk aversion among depressive adults. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39(4), 567–576. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2008.01.004
    Back to article
  67. 67Snaith, R. P., Hamilton, M., Morley, S., Humayan, A., Hargreaves, D., & Trigwell, P. (1995). A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry: Journal of Mental Science, 167(1), 99–103. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.167.1.99
    Back to article
  68. 68Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101. DOI: 10.2307/1412159
    Back to article
  69. 69Stan Development Team. (2017). RStan: the R interface to Stan. R package version 2.16.0. http://mc-stan.org
    Back to article
  70. 70Suhr, J. A., & Tsanadis, J. (2007). Affect and personality correlates of the Iowa Gambling Task. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 27–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.004
    Back to article
  71. 71Turner, B. M., Forstmann, B. U., Love, B. C., Palmeri, T. J., & Van Maanen, L. (2017). Approaches to analysis in model-based cognitive neuroscience. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 76, 65–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.001
    Back to article
  72. 72van Honk, J., Hermans, E. J., Putman, P., Montagne, B., & Schulter, D. J. (2002). Defective somatic markers in subclinical psychopathy. Neuroreport, 13, 1025–1027. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200206120-00009
    Back to article
  73. 73Vandekerckhove, J. (2014). A cognitive latent variable model for the simultaneous analysis of behavioral and personality data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 60, 58–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2014.06.004
    Back to article
  74. 74Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3397865
    Back to article
  75. 75Watson, D., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J. S., Clark, L. A., et al. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(1), 3–14. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843X.104.1.3
    Back to article
  76. 76Weiss, N. A. (2019). wBoot R package. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wBoot
    Back to article
  77. 77Worthy, D. A., Pang, B., & Byrne, K. A. (2013). Decomposing the roles of perseveration and expected value representation in models of the Iowa gambling task. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00640
    Back to article
  78. 78Xu, S., Korczykowski, M., Zhu, S., & Rao, H. (2013). Assessment of risk-taking and impulsive behaviors: A comparison between three tasks. Social Behavior and Personality, 41(3), 477–486. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2013.41.3.477
    Back to article
  79. 79Yechiam, E., Busemeyer, J. R., Stout, J. C., & Bechara, A. (2005). Using cognitive models to map relations between neuropsychological disorders and human decision-making deficits. Psychological Science, 16(12), 973–978. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01646.x
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.89 | Journal eISSN: 2379-6227
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 12, 2022
Accepted on: Aug 3, 2022
Published on: Aug 26, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Iowa Gambling Task,
psychometrics,
reinforcement learning,
test-retest reliability,
hierarchical Bayesian analysis,
internalizing

© 2022 Holly Sullivan-Toole, Nathaniel Haines, Kristina Dale, Thomas M. Olino, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 6 (2022): Issue 1Next article