Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review Cover

Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review

By: Lana Bergmame and  Steven Shaw  
Open Access
|Jul 2021

Figures & Tables

cie-2-1-28-g1.png
Figure 1

Literature Search Strategies and Decision Tree.

Table 1

Summary Data for Selected Indicators of Clinical Utility (n = 50 studies).

FEATURE/INDICATORFREQUENCYPERCENT
Problem Base:
      Reference to disease burden3774%
Context Placement:
      Reference to systematic review2856%
      Use of theory2652%
Information Gain:
      Significant reduction in HbA1c (N = 41)1530%
      Adequate power reported (>.80)2142%
      RCT design3876%
      Cited > 50 times1428%
Transparency:
      Open-access publication1938%
      Open access to participant-level data00%
Pragmatism:
      Multi-site recruitment (≥2 sites)2754%
      Sociodemographic information reported3672%
      Intervention costs reported510%
Patient-Centeredness:
      Medical and psychosocial outcomes3672%
      Participant satisfaction assessed2142%
Table 2

Characteristics of the Identified Studies.

#CITATIONSAMPLE SIZE, N (I/C)AGE RANGESTUDY DESIGNINTERVENTION(S)FREQUENCY/DURATIONDELIVERY METHODFACILITATOR/SETTINGMAIN RESULTS: BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH BEHAVIOURMAIN RESULTS: PSYCHOSOCIAL OUTCOMES
1Aguilar et al. (2011)379–16 yearsProspective cohortEducation intervention using One Touch UltraSmart1 session/month over 7 monthsTechnologyNurse or physician/medicalSignificant average reduction of HbA1c.
Significant improvement in dietary habits.
Not assessed.
2Channon et al. (2007)66
(38/28)
14–17 yearsRCTMotivational Interviewing (MI)12 monthsBehaviour change (individual)Health psychologist/
home or community
At 12 months, mean HbA1c in the MI group was significantly lower than in the control group after adjusting for baseline values.
Difference in HbA1c was maintained at 24 months.
At 12 months, the MI group showed a higher degree of positive well-being & improved quality of life (i.e., higher life satisfaction, lower life worry, less anxiety, and more positive well-being.
There were also differences in personal models of illness (e.g., the MI group perceived their diabetes to be more serious and placed greater importance on controlling it).
3Christie et al. (2014)362
(181/!81)
8–16 yearsRCTChild and Adolescent Structured Competencies Approach to Diabetes Education (CASCADE): An intensive competency-driven, motivational, psychoeducational program involving patients and families1 module/month for 4 monthsFamily -focusedPediatric specialist nurse/medicalThe intervention did not improve HbA1c at 12 months or 24 months.Intervention group parents at 12 months and adolescents at 24 months had higher scores on diabetes family responsibility questionnaire.
Adolescents in the intervention group reported reduced happiness with body weight at 12 months.
4Coates et al. (2013)135
(70/65)
13–19 yearsRCTCarbohydrate, Insulin, Collaborative Education (CHOICE)Four 3-hour weekly sessions over 1 monthBehaviour change (Individual)Diabetes specialist nurse and Dietician/communityNo significant difference between groups in HbA1c at 12 months; however, there was a significant difference at 24 months.
No difference in BMI or in reported hyper or hypoglycemia episodes.
Not assessed.
5de Wit et al. (2008)91
(46/45)
13–17 yearsRCTMonitoring and discussing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with adolescent patients3 regularly scheduled visits in 12 monthsBehaviour change (individual)Pediatrician/medicalNo significant differences between groups over time for HbA1c levels.Means scores on psychosocial health, behaviour, mental health and family activities improved in the intervention group, except for adolescents with the highest HbA1c.
Adolescents in the intervention groups reported higher self-esteem at follow-up regardless of HbA1c, and were more satisfied with care than control subjects.
6de Wit et al (2010)81
(41/40)
13–17 yearsRCTMonitoring and discussing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with adolescent patients3 regularly scheduled visits in 12 months
*1 year follow-up study
Behaviour change (individual)Pediatrician/medical12 months post-intervention, HbA1c values had increased significantly.Mean scores on behaviour, mental health and self-esteem had significantly decreased, whereas family activities subscale remained stable.
Adolescents were also less satisfied with their care.
7Ellis et al. (2005)127
(64/63)
10–17 yearsRCTMulti-Systemic Therapy (MST):
Intensive, family-centered and community-based intervention
6 monthsFamily-focusedFamily therapist/homeParticipation in MST improved HbA1c through regimen adherence (mediator).MST was associated with significant reductions in diabetes-related stress.
8Galler et al. (2020)31,861 (12,326/19,535)11–17 yearsRecord reviewComparison of German adolescents receiving any type of psychological support and those without psychological support2009–2017Short-term and continuous care psychology or psychiatry support (individual)Psyshcologist/variableThose receiving psychological support were significantly worse in HbA1c, BMI, and hospital admission rate. Direction of causality not investigated.Worse metabolic outcomes associated with need for psychological care and receipt of psychiatric diagnosis.
9Garcia-Perez et al. (2010)55
(34/21)
11–18 yearsProspective cohortPsycho-educative intervention implemented in a summer camp consisting of8 daysBehaviour change (group)Diabetes educator and psychologist/summer campNo significant changes in HbA1c, BMI, medical visits or hospital admission from pre- to post-intervention.No significant changes in diabetes knowledge or anxiety after receiving the intervention.
medical, educational, and psychosocial components (e.g., interactive seminars about diet, hygiene, recognition and management of hypo- and hyperglycemia, as well as relax seminars and games)
10Graue
(2005)
101
(55/46)
11–17 yearsRCTStructured educational and counselling program combining group visits and individual computer-assisted consultations15 monthsTechnologyPhysician, diabetes nurse specialist, dietician, clinical psychologist & social worker/medicalNo significant effect on mean HbA1c.Significant age-by-group interactions for diabetes-related impact, worries, mental health and general behaviours, implying that the intervention was effective for adolescents above 13/14 years of age
11Grey et al. (2013)320
(167/153)
11–14 yearsRCTTEENCOPE:
Internet-based Coping Skills Training (CST)
Managing diabetes: Internet-based diabetes education and problem-solving program (comparison group)
1 session per week over 5 weeksTechnologyTechnology/homeAt 12 months, there were no significant differences between intervention groups in terms of HbA1c.
At 18 months, significantly lower HbA1c was noted for youth completing both groups versus just one intervention.
There were no significant differences between intervention groups in relation to QoL at 12 months. Youth in both groups had stable QoL (i.e., no change from pre- to post-intervention).
At 18 months, higher QOL, social acceptance and self-efficacy, as well as lower perceived stress and diabetes family conflict for youth completing both groups.
12Guo (2020)100 (50/50)12–20 yearsRCTCoping skills training
contained sessions on goal setting, communication, social
Six 90-minute sessions presented in a 3-day camp settingBehaviour change (group)Diabetes educators/summer campNo change in HbA1c, perceived stress, coping style, quality of life.Feasible and well accepted. However, the program had no effect on any of the dependent variables.
problem-solving, conflict management, stress management, and positive
self-talk
13Hilliard et al. (2020)80 (55/24)12–17 yearsRCTDoingWell app designed to support parents and reinforce positive teen’s diabetes-related behavioursMean of 106 days using the app at least one time per day for 80% of daysFamily-focusedTechnology/homeNo change in HbA1c, resilience, family conflict, self-management, quality of life, or self-case inventory.Feasible and well accepted. However, the program had no effect on any of the dependent variables.
14Holmes et al. (2014)226 families
(137/89)
11–14 yearsRCTCoping program: Individualized, intensive family teamwork coping skills training
Education program: Psychologically supportive education program to maintain parental involvement and disease care throughout early adolescence
4 quarterly appointments over 1 yearFamily-focusedUniversity-affiliated interventionist/medicalRate of change in HbA1c over time was significantly better for the Education versus Usual Care (UC) group, and for the Education versus Coping group (i.e., glycemic control improved in the Education group over time compared with the other two groups). HbA1c of the Coping and UC groups did not differ from one another.
Education group improved in diabetes adherence across all follow-ups and improved more over time relative to the Coping group. The Coping group demonstrated sustained diabetes adherence.
Both groups showed lower levels of parental monitoring over time, although the Education group tended to have more parental monitoring than the Coping group over time.
Both groups had positive parental expectations about involvement.
No significant changes in diabetes-related and general family conflict, or self-efficacy.
15Husted et al. (2014)71
(37/34)
13–18 yearsRCTGuided Self-Determination- Youth (GSD-Y):
A life skills approach to facilitate empowerment in the patient-provider relationship, adapted for adolescents and their parents
8 sessions over 8–12 monthsBehaviour
change
(individual)
Physicians, nurses, dietician/medicalNo significant effect on HbA1c.GSD-Y significantly reduced the motivation for diabetes self-management after adjusting for the baseline value.
16Iafusco et al. (2011)396
(193/203)
10–18 yearsProspective cohortChat line supervised and moderated by a physician; took place once a week. The topic of each session was chosen and voted on by all participants at the beginning of the chat and might concern diabetes management, as well as anxiety about the future and interpersonal and social relationships (sexual life, travels, etc.)1 chat per week over 2 yearsTechnologyPhysician/homeSignificant decrease in HbA1c in patients who participated in chat session compared with the controls. No difference was observed in HbA1c between the two groups.Significant improvement diabetes-related QoL in patients who participated in chat sessions.
17Jaser, Patel et al. (2014)39
(20/19)
13–17 yearsPilot RCTCheck-It!:
A positive psychology intervention designed to increase positive affect (PA) through gratitude, self-affirmation, small gifts, and parental affirmations
Attentional control (Education) condition:
Mailed diabetes educational materials
Every 2 weeks over an 8-week periodBehaviour change (individual)Program facilitator and parent/homeNo main effects for treatment were observed at 6-month follow-up.A significant association between adolescents’ level of positive affect and measures of adherence (including self-report and metered blood glucose monitoring) was found.
18Jaser et al. (2014)320
(167/153)
11–14 yearsRCTTEENCOPE:
Internet-based CST
Managing Diabetes: Internet based diabetes education and problem-solving program
1 session per week over 5 weeksTechnologyTechnology/homeNo significant effects of either intervention on HbA1c.
No significant between-group intervention effects.
Both groups showed significant improvements in QOL over time.
No significant between-group intervention effects.
Self-efficacy mediated the effects on quality of life in both interventions.
19Kassai et al. (2015)77
(39/38)
12–17 yearsRCTNurse counselling intervention1 pediatrician visit per month, 1 nurse visit and phone calls over 3 monthsBehaviour change (individual)Physician and nurse/medicalThe evolution of A1C over the follow-up period was not significantly influenced by the nurse intervention.Participants’ acceptance of the disease did not change over time.
20Katz (2014)153
(50/52/51)
8–16 yearsRCTCare ambassador (CA+) and family-based psychoeducation30-minute quarterly sessions over 2 yearsFamily-focusedResearch assistant/medical and homeNo differences in HbA1c across treatment groups.
Among youth with suboptimal baseline A1c, more youth in the CA+ psychoeducation group maintained or improved their HbA1c.
Among youth with suboptimal baseline A1c, significant increase in parent involvement in the CA+ psychoeducation than in the other groups (i.e., standard care or CA alone) without negative impact on youth QOL or increased diabetes-specific family conflict.
21Kichler (2013)30
(15/15)
13–17 yearsRCTK.I.D.S project:
A synthesis of treatment strategies from diabetes education, behaviour therapy, and family therapy; separate group sessions conducted for adolescents and parents
Six 30–45-minute sessionsFamily-focusedPsychologist/mental health clinicNo statistically significant changes in HbA1c and healthcare utilization from 6 months prior to 6 months post-treatment.At 4 months post-treatment, parents and youth reported increased parent responsibility and parents reported improved youth diabetes-specific quality of life.
22Lawson (2005)46
(23/23)
13–17 yearsRCTRegular standardized telephone contact with a diabetes nurse educator, including a review of blood glucose results and insulin dose adjustments, problem-solving and diabetes education.Weekly telephone contact over 6 monthsTechnologyDiabetes nurse educator/medical – homeIntervention had no immediate effect.
However, 6 months post-treatment, HbA1c levels decreased in 6 out of 21 individuals of the study group and 0/18 of the control group, while Hba1c increased in 4/21 study subjects and 8/18 control subjects.
Intervention had no effect on OoL immediately following or 6 months post-intervention.
23Maranda
(2015)
28
(16/12)
10–17 yearsPilot RCTStructured care of a betta splendens fish:
Participants were instructed to check glucose readings and review glucose logs at times corresponding to the care of the betta fish
3 monthsBehaviour change (individual)Researcher/homeAfter 3 months, participants in the intervention group showed a significant decrease in HbA1c level compared to controls who had an increase.
No significant effects on self-management.
No significant effects for Pediatric QoL.
Younger adolescents (10–13 years) demonstrated a significantly greater response to the intervention than older adolescents (14–17 years).
24Monaghan et al. (2015)30 families11–15 yearsProspective CohortChecking In:
A physician delivered intervention to increase parent-adolescent communication
12 weeksFamily-focusedPhysician/medicalOverall, no significant change in indicators of glycemic control (HbA1c, blood glucose monitoring, mean blood glucose) from pre- to post- intervention.
However, participants who reported adhering to the intervention (n = 15) demonstrated a significant increase in BG-monitoring frequency.
Parent-reported conflict surrounding diabetes management significantly decreased from pre- to post-intervention.
25Mulvaney (2012)46
(23/23)
13–17 yearsProspective cohortSuperEgo:
Text messaging intervention providing a combination of guidance and choice for users via individually tailored messages
3 monthsTechnologyTechnology/home or communityMean HbA1c remained unchanged in the intervention group, but significantly increased in the control group.Not assessed.
26Murphy et al.
(2012)
305
(158/147)
11–16 yearsRCTFamilies and Adolescents Communication and Teamwork Study (FACTS):
A family-centred group education program
1 session per month over 6 months.Family-focusedHealth professionals/medical12 months post-intervention, there was no significant difference in HbA1c in either group and no between group differences over time.Adolescents perceived no changes in parental input at 12 months.
27Murphy et al. (2007)78 children and adolescents
(40/38)
6–11 or 12–16 yearsRCTFamilies and Adolescents Communication and Teamwork Study (FACTS):
A family-centred group education program
4 educational sessions over 1 yearFamily-focusedHealth professionals/medicalNo significant difference in HbA1c between participants randomized to the immediate or delayed program (control group).
For youth who attended ≥ 2, HbA1c fell by 0.29% compared with an increase in non-attenders.
No significant difference between groups in parental responsibility.
However, at 12-month follow-up, families who attended two or more sessions reported a significant increase in parental involvement.
28Nansel et al., 2012390 families
(201/189)
9–15 yearsRCTWE-CAN manage diabetes:
A clinic-integrated behavioural intervention designed to help families improve diabetes management by facilitating problem-solving skills, communication skills, and appropriate responsibility sharing
24 monthsFamily-focusedTrained non-professional/medicalSignificant overall intervention effect on change in Hba1c from baseline to 24-month interval.
A significant intervention-by-age interaction; among participants aged 12 to 14, a significant effect on glycemic control was observed, but there was no effect among those aged 9 to 11.
No intervention effect on child or parent report of adherence.
Not assessed.
29Nansel et al. (2015)136
(66/70)
8–16 yearsRCTFamily-based behavioural intervention integrating motivational interviewing, active learning, and applied problem-solving to improve dietary intake of youth with diabetes12 monthsFamily-focusedTrained non-professional/medicalNo significant difference between groups in HbA1c across the study duration.
There was a positive intervention effect across the study duration for diet quality.
Not assessed.
30Nansel, Thomas, & Liu (2015)390 families
(201/189)
9–15 yearsRCTWE-CAN manage diabetes:
A clinic-integrated behavioural intervention designed to help families improve diabetes management by facilitating problem-solving skills, communication skills, and appropriate responsibility sharing
21 monthsFamily-focusedTrained non-professional/medicalSignificant overall effect of treatment on change in HbA1c from baseline to follow-up.
Baseline HbA1c was significantly poorer in the low-income group.
Interaction for treatment-by-income was not significant.
Not assessed.
31Nansel et al. (2007)81
(40/41)
11–16 yearsRCTDiabetes “Personal Trainer” intervention designed to enhance motivation and capability for diabetes management6 sessions over 2 monthsBehaviour change (individual)Trained non-professional/home or communityAt both short-term and 1 year follow-up, there was a significant intervention-by-age interaction, indicating a greater effect on HbA1c among older than younger youth; no treatment group differences among pre-/early adolescents (11–13 years), but a significant difference among middle adolescents (14–16 years).No treatment group differences in parent or youth report of adherence.
32Nansel et al. (2009)81
(40/41)
11–16 yearsRCTDiabetes “Personal Trainer” intervention –designed to enhance motivation and capability for diabetes management6 sessions over 2 monthsBehaviour change (individual)Trained non-professional/home or communitySignificant intervention effects on HbA1c among middle adolescents maintained at 1-year follow-up.Not assessed.
33Newton & Ashley (2013)59
(25/25)
13–18 yearsRCTDiabetes Teen Talk: Web-based intervention that provides teens with opportunities to discuss solutions to psychosocial problems that make treatment compliance difficult7 weeksTechnologyTechnology with moderator/homeNot assessed.Marginally significant difference between groups on combined outcome measures: Diabetes-related QoL, self-efficacy and outcome expectations.
Effect of the treatment condition was predominantly carried by a significant difference between treatment conditions on the Positive Outcomes Expectations (with those in the control group reported higher outcome expectations).
34Newton et al. (2009)78
(38/40)
11–18 yearsRCTUse of an open pedometer & motivational text messages reminding users to wear the pedometer and be active12 weeksTechnologyHome and communityNo significant differences in secondary measures: HbA1c, blood pressure, BMI.
At 12 weeks, there was no significant difference in change in physical activity measures between the groups.
No significant differences in QoL.
35Nicholas et al. (2012)31
(15/16)
12–17 yearsRCTOnline education and support website intervention combining three key components: diabetes-based information, interactive learning activities, and discussion topics relevant to adolescents8 weeksTechnologyTechnology with moderator/home and communityNot assessed.Pre-post intervention gains approaching significance (at .05 level) in perceived social support (i.e., awareness of relationships with others outside of participants’ family).
36Noyes et al. (2020)308 (190/103) with significant attrition6–18 yearsRCTStandardized self-management kits6 monthsTechnologyFamily with diabetes educator support/medicalStandardised kits showed no evidence of benefit, inhibited diabetes self-management and increased worry.Information-only kits resulted in no change. Many participants were unwilling to pay the cost of the kits.
37Price et al. (2016)396
(199/197)
11–16 yearsRCTKICk–OFF:
A group education course designed to meet the learning styles of adolescents. It employs interactive and practical learning activities focusing on carbohydrate counting and insulin adjustment in everyday life
5 daysBehaviour change (group)Nurse and dietician/communityHbA1c was no different at 24 months.Significantly improved total QoL scores within 6 months.
38Ramírez-Mendoza et al. (2020)1218 –13 yearsProspective cohortPANDA: interdisciplinary
care plan to empower children in self-management
6 monthsBehavior change (group)Interdisciplinary
care plan includes three integrative areas: social work, pediatric
nursing and endocrinology
Improvements in HbA1c and glycemic variability.The program resulted in improvements over time.
39Serlachius et al. (2016)147
(73/74)
13–16 yearsRCTBest of Coping (BOC) program:
A cognitive behaviour-therapy-based program to improve glycemic control and psychosocial well-being
Five 2-hour long weekly sessionsBehaviour change (group)Health psychologist/hospitalNo difference in HbA1c between groups at follow-up.Psychosocial well-being improved in the intervention group compared to the control group.
40Spiegel et al. (2012)66
(33/33)
12–18 yearsRCTNutrition education intervention, which involved attending an educational class offered by a registered dietician/certified diabetes educator and keeping 3-day food recordsOne 90-minute class, and the completion of 2 sets of 3-day food recordsBehaviour change (group)Dietician and diabetes educator/medicalAt 3-month follow-up, the overall intervention effect was not statistically significant for change in HbA1c or carbohydrate counting accuracy.Not assessed.
41Verbeek et al.(2011)2511–17 yearsProspective cohortPsycho-educational intervention focusing on importance of adequate BG monitoring, difficulties to achieving good glycemic control, importance of good diet, and the psychological aspects of coping with diabetesFour 1.5-hour sessions over
3 months
Behaviour change (group)Diabetes nurse/medicalHbA1c levels decreased by 0.65 % after 9-month follow-up.
A subgroup of 15 patients showed a clinical significant HbA1c reduction at 9-month follow-up with a mean reduction of 1.6 %.
Not assessed.
42Viklund et al.(2007)32
(18/14)
12–17 yearsRCTEmpowerment education program involving group sessionsSix 2-hour sessions over approximately 6 weeksBehaviour change (group)HbA1c was similar in the intervention and control group 6 months after the intervention.
HbA1c significantly increased among adolescents in the intervention at 6- and 12-month follow-up but returned to baseline levels 18 months after the program.
At 6-month follow-up, there was no difference between the groups in terms of empowerment.
43Von Sengbusch et al. (2005)104 youth & 95 parents8–16 yearsProspective cohortProvision of a mobile diabetes education and care team to families who have limited access to specialized diabetes care in rural areas1 or 2 educational sessions/week over 2 yearsFamily-focusedPhysician and nurse/medicalHbA1c values significantly improved and rate of hospitalization fell, from baseline to follow-up.Youth reported significantly better diabetes-specific quality of life and higher self-esteem after the intervention.
Theoretical diabetes knowledge increased at both short- and long-term follow-up.
44Waller et al. (2008)4811–16 yearsProspective cohortKids in Control of Food (KICk-OFF):
A modular educational program providing information on carbohydrate counting and insulin adjustment
6 courses delivered over 5 school daysBehaviour change (group)Pediatric diabetes nurse and dietician/schoolNo changes in HbA1c, BMI, or episodes of hypoglycemia.Youths and parents reported significantly improved QoL (generic and diabetes-specific) as well as satisfaction with treatment at 6-month follow-up.
Youth reported improved self-efficacy, and both youth and their parents reported greater child responsibility for a range of management tasks.
No significant changes in either youth- or parent-reported family conflict.
45Wang et al. (2010)43
(21/22)
12–18 yearsRCTMotivational Interviewing (MI) in Education
Structured Diabetes Education (SDE)
2–3 sessions over a 3- to 4-month periodBehaviour change (group)Diabetes educator/medicalAt 6-month follow-up, youth participating in SDE had significantly lower mean HbA1c than youths in the MI group.No between-group differences on any psychosocial measures (i.e., QoL, stress, self-efficacy, self-perception, or family conflict).
46Whittemore et al. (2012)320
(167/153)
11–14 yearsRCTTEENCOPE: Internet-based CST
Managing Diabetes: Internet-based diabetes education and problem-solving program
6 monthsTechnologyTechnology/home and communityHbA1c significantly increased in the Managing Diabetes group.
No significant between-group treatment effects 6 months post-intervention on HbA1c.
At 6 months, no significant between-group treatment effects on QoL.
47Whittemore et al. (2016)124
(64/60)
11–14 yearsRCTTeens.Connect:
Combines Managing Diabetes & TEENCOPE – an interactive Internet program aimed at increasing teens’ coping and social self-efficacy
Planet D + discussion board:
An open-access diabetes website for youth providing age- appropriate diabetes education
1 session per week over 5 weeksTechnologyTechnology/home and communityAfter 6 months, there were no significant differences in HbA1c between groups.No significant between-group differences in QoL or secondary outcomes (i.e., self-efficacy, self-care, perceived stress, depression) at 6 months.
Teens in the Teens.Connect group reported lower perceived stress over time (p < 0.01).
48Wysocki et al. (2006)104 families
(36/36/32)
11–16 yearsRCTBehavioural Family Systems Therapy for Diabetes (BFST-D):
A modified BFST intervention to achieve greater impact on diabetes-related family conflict, treatment adherence, and metabolic control
Multifamily educational support (ES)
12 sessions over 6 monthsFamily-focusedPsychologist or social worker/medicalBFST-D and ES significantly improved HbA1c compared to standard care among those with poorer metabolic control at baseline.BFST-D significantly improved family conflict and adherence compared to ES and standard care, especially among those with poorer metabolic control.
49Wysocki et al. (2007)104 families
(36/36/32)
11–16 yearsRCTBehavioural Family Systems Therapy for Diabetes (BFST-D)
Multifamily educational support (ES)
12 sessions over 6 monthsFamily-focusedPsychologist or social worker/medicalBFST-D was superior to ES and standard care in the effects on HbA1c.
A significantly higher percentage of BFST-D youth achieved moderate or greater improvement in treatment adherence compared with the standard care group at each follow-up and the ES group at 6 and 18 months.
There was a consistent reduction in family conflict and improved adherence, favoring BFST-D over ES and SC.
For these outcomes, there were significant main effects for groups, but the group-by-time interaction effects were not significant.
50Wysocki et al. (2008)104 families
(36/36/32)
11–16 yearsRCTBehavioural Family Systems Therapy for Diabetes (BFST-D)
Multifamily educational support (ES)
12 sessions over 6 monthsFamily-focusedPsychologist or social worker/medicalImprovement in adolescents’ communication was significantly associated with improvements in HbA1c scores at 6 months, as well as improved adherence at 6 and 12 months.BFST-D improved individual communication of adolescents and mothers, but not fathers.
BFST-D significantly improved quality of family interaction compared to ES and standard care.
Changes in family communication were associated with changes in family conflict.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cie.28 | Journal eISSN: 2631-9179
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 20, 2020
|
Accepted on: Apr 3, 2021
|
Published on: Jul 15, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Lana Bergmame, Steven Shaw, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.