References
- 1Adams, A. 2010. Ladies in the Field: Early Women Archaeologists and Their Search for Adventure. Vancouver: Greystone Books.
- 2Allen, J. 1986.
Evidence and Silence: Feminism and the Limits of History . In: Pateman, C and Gross, E (eds.), Feminist Challenges: Social and Political Theory. Boston: Northeastern University Press. pp. 173–189. - 3Ballesteros-Danel, A. 2020. Trans-Pacific Contact: A History of Ideas on the Oceania- Americas Connection. Unpublished thesis (PhD), Australian National University.
- 4Balme, J and Beck, W. 1995. Gendered archaeology: the second Australian Women in Archaeology Conference. Canberra:
ANH Publications, Australian National University . - 5Beck, W. 1994.
Women and Archaeology in Australia . In: Claassen, C (ed.), Women in Archaeology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 210–218. - 6Beck, W and Head, L. 1990. Women in Australian Prehistory. Australian Feminist Studies, 11: 29–48. DOI: 10.1080/08164649.1990.9961673
- 7Bowdler, S and Clune, G. 2000. That Shadowy Band: the role of women in the development of Australian Archaeology. Australian Archaeology, 50: 27–35. DOI: 10.1080/03122417.2000.11681663
- 8Carroy, J, Edelman, N, Ohayon, A and Richard, N. 2005. Les femmes dans les sciences de l’Homme (XIX-XXe siècles). Inspiratrices, collaboratrices ou créatrices. Paris: Seli Arslan.
- 9Charron, H. 2013. Les formes de l’illégitimité intellectuelle. Les femmes dans les sciences sociales françaises 1890–1940. Paris: CNRS éditions.
- 10Claassen, C. 1994. Women in Archaeology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- 11Cohen, G and Joukowsky, M. 2004. Breaking Ground: Pioneering Women Archaeologists. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.17654
- 12Conkey, M. 2003. Has Feminism Changed Archaeology? Signs, Gender and Science, 28(3): 867–880. DOI: 10.1086/345322
- 13Conkey, M. 2007. Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(3): 285–310. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-007-9039-z
- 14Conklin, A. 2002. Civil Society, Science, and Empire in Late Republican France: The Foundation of Paris’s Museum of Man. Osiris, Science and Civil Society, 17: 255–290. DOI: 10.1086/649366
- 15Daniel, G. 1950. A hundred years of archaeology. London: Duckworth. DOI: 10.2307/3886529
- 16Daniel, G. 1981. A Short History of Archaeology. London: Thames and Hudson.
- 17de Dombasle, A. 1851. Promenade à Noukouhiva. Visite à la Grande Prêtresse. La Politique Nouvelle, 3: 506–525.
- 18de Ginoux, E. 1844. La Reine Pomaré, les femmes de Taiti et des Marquises. Nouvelles Annales des voyages, 4: 350–374.
- 19de la Grandville, F. 2001. Edmond de Ginoux. Ethnologue en Polynésie Française dans les années 1840. Paris: l’Harmattan.
- 20Delpuech, A, Laurière, C and Peltier-Caroff, C (eds.). 2017. Les Années folles de l’ethnographie. Trocadéro. Paris: Publications scientifiques du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle. pp. 28–37.
- 21Díaz-Andreu, M. 2007. A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology. Nationalism, colonialism and the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199217175.001.0001
- 22Diaz-Andreu, M and Sorensen, M. 1998. Excavating Women: A History of Women in European Archaeology. New York: Routledge.
- 23Dotte-Sarout, E. 2021.
Maurice – et Jeanne – Leenhardt et l’archéologie calédonienne: une histoire de connections . In: D. Barbe, C. Graille, G. Murphy (eds), Maurice Leenhardt (1878–1954). Contextes et héritages. Nouméa: TROCA. pp. 64–86.https://troca.unc.nc/maurice-leenhardt-1878-1954-contextes-et-heritages/ . - 24Dotte-Sarout, E and Howes, H. 2019. Lapita before Lapita: the story of the Meyer/O’Reilly Watom Island archaeological collection. Journal of Pacific History, 54(3): 354–378. DOI: 10.1080/00223344.2018.1561254
- 25Dotte-Sarout, E, Di Piazza, A, Valentin, F and Spriggs, M. 2020. Pour une histoire de la préhistoire océanienne: approches historiographiques de l’archéologie francophone dans le Pacifique. Marseille: Pacific-credo Publications. DOI: 10.4000/books.pacific.1103 (also see the English translation here:
http://www.mshp.upf.pf/fr/news/edition-msh-p-ndeg-2-towards-history-pacific-prehistory-historiographical-approaches ). - 26Dotte-Sarout, E, Maric, T and Molle, G. forthcoming.
Aurora Natua and the motu Paeao site: Unlocking French Polynesia’s islands for Pacific archaeologists . In: Jones, T, Howes, H and Spriggs, M (eds.), Uncovering Pacific Pasts: Histories of archaeology in Oceania. Acton: ANU Press. - 27Dotte-Sarout, E and Spriggs, M (eds). 2017. The History of Archaeology in the Pacific. Journal of Pacific Archaeology, 8(1).
- 28Ducros, H and Smith, L. 1993. Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique. Canberra: Australian National University.
- 29Ernot, E. 2011. Voyageuses occidentales et impérialisme: l’Orient à la croisée des représentations (XIXe siècle). Genre et Histoire, 8. URL:
http://journals.openedition.org/genrehistoire/1272 - 30Estelmann, F, Moussa, S and Wolzettel, F (eds.). 2012. Voyageuses européennes au XIXe siècle. Identités, genres, codes. Paris: Presses Universitaires Paris-Sorbonne.
- 31Fraisse, G and Pérot, M. 1991. Histoire des Femmes en Occident. Le XIXe siècle. Paris: Plon.
- 32Gran-Aymeric, E and Gran-Aymeric, J. 1991. Jane Dieulafoy: une vie d’homme. Paris: Perrin.
- 33Griffiths, B. 2018. Deep Time Dreaming: Uncovering Ancient Australia. Carlton: Black Inc.
- 34Gunnarsson, L. 2011. A defence of the category ‘women’. Feminist Theory, 12(11): 23–37. DOI: 10.1177/1464700110390604
- 35Hassett, BR, Pilaar-Birch, S, Herridge, V and Wragg-Sykes, B. 2017.
TrowelBlazers: Accidentally crowd-sourcing an archive of women in archaeology . In: Apaydin, V (ed.), Shared Knowledge, Shared Power. Engaging Local and Indigenous Heritage. New York: Springer. pp. 124–142. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68652-3_9 - 36Henson, P. 2002. Invading Arcadia: Women Scientists in the Field in Latin America, 1900–1950. The Americas, 58(4): 577–600. DOI: 10.1353/tam.2002.0045
- 37Héritier, F. 1996. Masculin/féminin. La pensée de la différence. Paris: Odile Jacob
- 38Howes, H. forthcoming.
Their Indonesian forefathers’: Indonesia as the Austronesian homeland in German-language theories of ancient Pacific migrations . In: Anderson, W and Roque, R (eds.), Imagined Laboratories: Comparative Racialisations in Southeast Asia. Leiden: Brill. - 39Howes, H and Spriggs, M (eds.). 2019. Writing the history of archaeology in the Pacific: voices and perspectives. Journal of Pacific History, 54(3). DOI: 10.1080/00223344.2019.1617682
- 40Howes, H and Spriggs, M (eds.). 2020. Historical Records of Australian Science, Histories of archaeology in Australasia and the Pacific.
https://www.publish.csiro.au/hr#OnlineEarly - 41Jones, T, Howes, H and Spriggs, M (eds.) forthcoming. Uncovering Pacific Pasts: Histories of archaeology in Oceania. Acton: Canberra press.
- 42Kaeser, M-A. 2003. La science vécue. Les potentialités de la biographie en histoire des sciences. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines, 8: 139–160. DOI: 10.3917/rhsh.008.0139
- 43Kaeser, M-A. 2008.
Biography as Microhistory. The Relevance of Private Archives for Writing the History of Archaeology . In: Schlanger, N and Nordbladh, J (eds.), Archives, Ancestors, Practices. Archaeology in the Light of its History, 9–20. New York: Berghahn Books. - 44Knapman, C. 1997. Western Women’s Travel Writing About the Pacific Islands. Pacific Studies, 20(2): 31–51.
- 45Kuhn, T. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- 46Kuklick, H and Kohler, E. 1996. Introduction. Osiris, Science in the Field, 11: 1–14. DOI: 10.1086/368752
- 47Laming-Emperaire, A. 1964. Origines de l’archéologie préhistorique en France. Des superstitions Médiévales à la découverte de l’Homme Fossile. Paris: Picard.
- 48Latour, B and Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. New York: Sage Publications.
- 49Laurière, C. 2014. L’Odyssée pascuane. Mission Métraux-Lavachery, Île de Pâques, 1934–1935. Carnet de Bérose 3. Paris: Lahic/DPRPS.
- 50McBryde, I. 1993.
‘In her right place’: Women in archaeology . In: Smith, L and du Cros, H (eds.), Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique. Acton: ANU Press. pp. xi–xv. - 51McDonald, L. 2004. Women Founders of the Social Sciences. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
- 52McNiven, I and Russell, L. 2005. Appropriated Pasts: Indigenous Peoples and the Colonial Culture of Archaeology. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
- 53Milam, EL and Nye, R. 2015. An Introduction to Scientific Masculinities. Osiris, Scientific Masculinities, 30(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1086/682953
- 54Mills, S. 1991. Discourse of Difference: An Analysis of Women’s Travel Writing and Colonialism. London and New York: Routledge.
- 55Molle, G. 2017.
Poteau anthropomorphe aux Iles Marquises . In: Hiquily, T and Vieille-Ramseyer, C (eds.), Catalogue de l’exposition Tiki. Puna’auia: Musée de Tahiti et des Iles. pp. 97–104. - 56Monicat, B. 1996. Itinéraire de l’écriture au féminin. Voyageuses du XIXesiècle. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.
- 57Moro Abadía, O. 2009. Thinking about ‘presentism’ from a historian’s perspective: Herbert Butterfield and Hélène Metzger. History of Science, XIVII: 55–77. DOI: 10.1177/007327530904700104
- 58Moro-Abadia, O. 2020.
L’idée de ‘progrès’ en archéologie: Réflexions du point de vue de l’épistémologie et l’histoire des sciences . In: Dotte-Sarout, E, Di Piazza, A, Valentin, F and Spriggs, M (eds.), Pour une histoire de la préhistoire océanienne: approches historiographiques de l’archéologie francophone dans le Pacifique. Marseille: Pacific-credo publications. pp. 21–40. DOI: 10.4000/books.pacific.1302 (also see the English translation here:http://www.mshp.upf.pf/fr/news/edition-msh-p-ndeg-2-towards-history-pacific-prehistory-historiographical-approaches ). - 59Moser, S. 2007. On Disciplinary Culture: Archaeology as Fieldwork and Its Gendered Associations. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(3): 235–263. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-007-9033-5
- 60Murray, T. 1999.
Epilogue: The Art of Archaeological Biography . In: Murray, T (ed.), Encyclopedia of Archaeology, The Great Archaeologists. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio. pp. 869–883. - 61Murray, T. 2002. Epilogue: why the history of archaeology matters. Antiquity, 76(291): 234–238. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00090037
- 62Murray, T and Spriggs, M. 2017. The historiography of archaeology: exploring theory, contingency and rationality. World Archaeology, 49(2): 151–157. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2017.1334583
- 63Muñoz, R. 2017. Amelia Edwards in America – A Quiet Revolution in Archaeological Science. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, 27(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.5334/bha-598
- 64Natua, AT. 1992. Te Marae Rahi I Atahuru. Pape’ete: Haere Po Editions.
- 65Noël, D. 2004. Les femmes peintres dans la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle. Clio. Femmes, Genre, Histoire, 19. DOI: 10.4000/clio.646
- 66Oreskes, N. 1996. Objectivity or Heroism? On the Invisibility of Women in Science. Osiris, 11: 87–116. DOI: 10.1086/368756
- 67Pomeroy, J. (ed). 2017. Intrepid Women. Victorian Artists Travel. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315092461
- 68Porr, M and Doohan, K. 2017. From Pessimism to Collaboration: The German Frobenius-Expedition (1938–1939) to Australia and the representation of Kimberley art and rock art. Journal of Pacific Archaeology, 8(1): 88–99.
- 69Ravetz, J. 1971. Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 70Richard, N. 2008. Inventer la préhistoire. Débuts de l’archéologie préhistorique. Paris: Vuibert.
- 71Robinson, J. 1991. Wayward Women: A Guide to Women Travellers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 72Rossiter, M. 1982. Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. DOI: 10.1063/1.2915710
- 73Rossiter, M. 1993. The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science. European Journal of International Relations, 23(2): 86–107. DOI: 10.1177/030631293023002004
- 74Rostain, S. 2020. Amazonie, l’archéologie au féminin. Paris: Belin.
- 75Schiebinger, L. 2014. Women and Gender in Science and Technology. New York: Routledge.
- 76Schlanger, N and Nordbladh, J. 2008. Archives, Ancestors, Practices. Archaeology in the Light of its History. New York: Berghahn Books.
- 77Schnapper, B. 1978. La séparation de corps de 1837 à 1914. Essai de sociologie juridique. Revue Historique, 259(2): 453–466.
- 78Spriggs, M. 2017. The Hidden History of a Third of the World: the Collective Biography of Australian and International Archaeology in the Pacific (CBAP) Project. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, 27(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.5334/bha-583
- 79Spriggs, M. 2019. Covert Control? Indigenous Agency in Edward Winslow Gifford’s Fijian Archaeological Expedition of 1947. The Journal of Pacific History, 54(3): 397–416. DOI: 10.1080/00223344.2018.1556089
- 80Tetu, J-F. 1979.
Remarques sur le statut juridique de la femme au 19e siècle . In: La femme au 19e siècle: Littérature et idéologie. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon. DOI: 10.4000/books.pul.363 - 81Thébaud, F. 1992. Histoire des Femmes en Occident. Le XXe siècle. Paris: Plon.
- 82Trigger, B. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 83Trouillot, M-R. 1995. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Boston: Beacon Press.
- 84Van Tilburg, J-A. 2003. Among stone giants: the life of Katherine Routledge and her remarkable expedition to Easter Island. New York: Scribner.
- 85Watts, R. 2007. Women in Science. A Social and Cultural History. New York: Routledge.
- 86Wylie, A. 1997. The Engendering of Archaeology. Refiguring Feminist Science Studies. Osiris, Women, Gender, and Science: New Directions, 12: 80–99. DOI: 10.1086/649268
- 87Yan, C and Offen, K. 2018. Women’s History at the Cutting Edge: a joint paper in two voices. Women’s History Review, 27(1): 6–28. DOI: 10.1080/09612025.2016.1250531