Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Great Eolith Debate and the Anthropological Institute Cover

The Great Eolith Debate and the Anthropological Institute

By: Angela Muthana and  Roy Ellen  
Open Access
|May 2020

References

  1. Anon. 1900. Anthropological reviews and miscellanea. 1. Man. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 30: 13. DOI: 10.2307/2842636
  2. Anon. 1926. 24. Anthropological notes: exhibit of a set of models illustrating the study of flint flaking. Man, 26: 40.
  3. Abbott, WJL. 1911. On the classification of the British stone age industries, and some new and little known, well-marked horizons and cultures. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 41: 458481. DOI: 10.2307/2843183
  4. Balfour, H. 1907. Review of ‘The stone implements of South Africa’, JP. Johnson. Man, 7: 109110. DOI: 10.2307/2787610
  5. Barnes, AS and Reid Moir, J. 1926. 49. A misleading exhibit. Man, 26: 789. https://www-jstor-org.chain.kent.ac.uk/stable/2788228
  6. Bell, AM. 1894. Remarks on the flint implements from the chalk plateau of Kent. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 23(4): 266284. DOI: 10.2307/2842079
  7. Boule, M. 1905. L’origine des éolithes. L’Anthropologie, 14: 702704; 16: 257–267.
  8. Brabrook, EW. 1896. Anniversary address. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 25: 379405. DOI: 10.2307/2842037
  9. Brabrook, EW. 1897. Anniversary address. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 26: 416432. DOI: 10.2307/2842012
  10. Brabrook, EW. 1898. Anniversary address. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 27: 546565. DOI: 10.2307/2842776
  11. Brown, JA. 1893. On the continuity of Palaeolithic and Neolithic periods. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 22: 6698. DOI: 10.2307/2842113
  12. Busk, G. 1875. President’s address. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 4: 476502. DOI: 10.2307/2840991
  13. Clarke, G. 1989. Prehistory at Cambridge and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Dawkins, WB. 1894. Series of palaeolithic implements from the cave-earth in the Creswell Caves, illustrating the association of forms. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 23: 252253. DOI: 10.2307/2842225
  15. Ellen, R. 2011. The eolith debate, evolutionist anthropology and the Oxford connection between 1880 and 1940. History and Anthropology, 22(3): 277306. DOI: 10.1080/02757206.2011.595007
  16. Ellen, R. 2013. ‘These rude implements’: competing claims for authenticity in the Eolithic controversy. Anthropology Quarterly, 86(2): 445480. DOI: 10.1353/anq.2013.0029
  17. Ellen, R and Muthana, A. 2010. Classifying ‘eoliths’: how cultural cognition featured in arguments surrounding claims for the earliest human artefacts as these developed between 1880 and 1900. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10: 341375. DOI: 10.1163/156853710X531221
  18. Evans, J. 1878. Present state of the question of the antiquity of man. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 7: 149151. DOI: 10.2307/2841382
  19. Forde, D. 1944. Integration of anthropological studies. Man, 44: 79.
  20. Forde, D. 1948. The integration of anthropological studies. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 78(1–2): 110. DOI: 10.2307/2844521
  21. Haddon, AC. 1930. Introduction. In Tylor, EB Anthropology: An introduction to the study of man and civilization, vix. Volume 1. London: Watts.
  22. Harris, M. 1969. The rise of anthropological theory: A history of theories of culture. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  23. Harrison, B. 1892. On certain rude implements from the North Downs. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 21: 263276. DOI: 10.2307/2842552
  24. Harrison, ER. (ed.) 1928. Harrison of Ightham: A book about Benjamin Harrison, of Ightham, Kent, made up principally of extracts from his notebooks and correspondence. London: Oxford University Press.
  25. Knowles, WJ. 1880. Portstewart and other flint factories in the north of Ireland. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 9: 320328. DOI: 10.2307/2841922
  26. Kuklick, H. 1991. The savage within: The social history of British anthropology, 1885–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Lave, J. 1993. Situated learning in communities of practice. In: Resnick, LB, et al. (eds), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 6382. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/10096-003
  28. Leith, G. 1899. On the caves, shell-mounds and stone implements of South Africa. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 28(3–4): 258274. DOI: 10.2307/2842876
  29. Lubbock, J. 1873. President’s address. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 2: 429443. DOI: 10.2307/2841466
  30. McNabb, J. 2012. Dissent with modification: Human origins, Palaeolithic archaeology and evolutionary anthropology in Britain 1859–1901. Oxford: Archaeopress.
  31. Marett, RR. 1914 [1912]. Anthropology. London: Thornton Butterworth.
  32. Mills, JP. 1953. Anthropology as a hobby. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 83(1): 18. DOI: 10.2307/2844150
  33. Moir, JP. 1900. On stone implements from Tasmania. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 30: 257262. DOI: 10.2307/2842631
  34. Moir, JR. 1935a. The age of the pre-Crag flint implements. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 65: 343374. DOI: 10.2307/2844066
  35. Moir, JR. 1935b. 43. The age of the pre-Crag flint implements. Man, 35: 45. DOI: 10.2307/2790857
  36. Oakley, KP. 1955. The composition of the Piltdown hominoid remains. Bulletin of the British Museum Natural History. Geological Series, 2(6): 25461. DOI: 10.2307/2842551
  37. Prestwich, J. 1892. On the primitive characters of the flint implements of the chalk plateau of Kent, with reference to the question of their glacial or pre-glacial age. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 21: 246276. DOI: 10.2307/2843767
  38. Rivers, WHR. 1922. The unity of anthropology. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 52: 1225. DOI: 10.2307/2843767
  39. Rudler, FW. 1899. Address delivered at the anniversary meeting of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, January 24th 1899. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 28: 312327. DOI: 10.2307/2842884
  40. Spurrell, FJC. 1884. On some Palaeolithic knapping tools and modes of using them. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 13: 109118. DOI: 10.2307/2842002
  41. Stocking, GW, Jr. 1968. Race, culture and evolution. Chicago: University Press.
  42. Stocking, GW, Jr. 1971. What’s in a Name? The Origins of the Royal Anthropological Institute (1837–71). Man, 6(3): 369390. DOI: 10.2307/2799027
  43. Stocking, GW, Jr. 1987. Victorian anthropology. New York: The Free Press.
  44. Stocking, GW, Jr. 1995. After Tylor: British social anthropology 1888–1951. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  45. Stopes, H. 1899. On the discovery of Neritina fluviatilis with a Pleistocene fauna and worked flints in high terrace gravels of the Thames valley. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 29: 302303. DOI: 10.2307/2843013
  46. Trautman, TR. 1992. The revolution in ethnological time. Man 27: 379397. DOI: 10.2307/2804059
  47. Tylor, EB. 1871. Primitive culture. Volume 1. London: Murray.
  48. Tylor, EB. 1892. Anniversary address. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 21: 396412. DOI: 10.2307/2842437
  49. Tylor, EB. 1894. On the Tasmanians as representatives of Palaeolithic man. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 23: 141152. DOI: 10.2307/2842449
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bha-623 | Journal eISSN: 2047-6930
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 17, 2019
|
Accepted on: Jan 26, 2020
|
Published on: May 8, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Angela Muthana, Roy Ellen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.