References
- Al-Harithy, H. (Ed.). (2010). Lessons in post-war reconstruction: Case studies from Lebanon in the aftermath of the 2006 war. Routledge.
- Alexander, D. E. (2019). Civil protection in Italy: Coping with multiple disasters. Contemporary Social Science, 14(3–4), 492–507. 10.1080/23248823.2018.1544354
- Aliste, E. (2013). La reconstrucción del Gran Concepción: Territorio y catástrofe como permanencia histórica. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 54, 199–218. 10.4067/S0718-34022013000100011
- Amaratunga, D., & Haigh, R. (Eds.). (2011). Post-disaster reconstruction of the built environment: Rebuilding for resilience. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444344943
- Arefian, F. F. (2018). Organising post-disaster reconstruction processes: Housing reconstruction after the Bam Earthquake. Springer.
- Barakat, S. (Ed.). (2005). After the conflict: Reconstruction and development in the aftermath of war. I. B. Tauris.
- Bartolomucci, C. (2021).
Historical town centres and post-seismic reconstructions: Between functional recovery and heritage value awareness . In Arefian, F. F., Ryser, J., Hopkins, A., & Mackee, J. (Eds.), Historic cities in the face of disasters (pp. 227–244). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-77356-4_13 - Chang, Y., Wilkinson, S., Potangaroa, R., & Seville, E. (2010). Resourcing challenges for post-disaster housing reconstruction: A comparative analysis. Building Research & Information, 38(3), 247–264. 10.1080/0961321100369394
- Charles, S. H., Chang-Richards, A. Y., & Wing Yiu, T. W. (2021). A systematic review of factors affecting post-disaster reconstruction projects resilience. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13(1), 113–132. 10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2020-0109
- Charlesworth, E., & Ahmed, I. (2015). Sustainable housing reconstruction: Designing resilient housing after natural disasters. Routledge.
- Chmutina, K., Cheek, W., & von Meding, J. (2022). ‘Critique is not a verb’: Is peer review stifling the dialogue in disaster scholarship? Disaster Prevention and Management, 31(4), 387–397. 10.1108/DPM-09-2021-0266
- Chrysanthakopoulos, C., & Tagkalakis, A. (2026). Natural disasters and the effects of reconstruction expenditure on output. Economic Modelling, 156, 107458. 10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107458
- Duyne Barenstein, J. E., & Leemann, E. (Eds.). (2013). Post-disaster reconstruction and change: Communities’ perspectives. CRC Press.
- Farghaly, K., Soman, R. K., & Zhou, S. A. (2023). The evolution of ontology in AEC: A two-decade synthesis, application domains, and future directions. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 36, 100519. 10.1016/j.jii.2023.100519
- Floridi, L. (2012). Semantic information and the network theory of account. Synthese, 184, 431–454. 10.1007/s11229-010-9821-4
- Gao, Y., & Shaw, R. (2026). Paradigm evolution and tension dynamics in disaster recovery research: A theoretical synthesis (1980–2025). Journal of Risk Research, 29(6), 768–790. 10.1080/13669877.2026.2660363
- Girod, D. M. (2015). Explaining post-conflict reconstruction. Oxford University Press.
- Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR). (2024). GFDRR annual report 2024. World Bank.
https://www.gfdrr.org/en/publication/gfdrr-annual-report-2024 - Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220. 10.1006/knac.1993.1008
- Hines, E., Mathews, M., & Peek, L. (2020). Global list and interactive web map of university-based hazards and disaster research centers. Natural Hazards Review, 21(2), 06020001. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000371
- IRP. (2026). International recovery platform strategic framework 2026–2030. International Recovery Platform (IRP).
https://www.undrr.org/strategic-framework-2026-2030 - Johnson, L. A., & Olshansky, R. B. (2017). After great disasters: An in-depth analysis of how six countries managed community recovery. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
- Lizarralde, G., Johnson, C., & Davidson, C. (Eds.). (2010). Rebuilding after disasters: From emergency to sustainability. Spon. 10.4324/9780203892572
- Lu, Y., & Xu, J. (2015). Comparative study on the key issues of postearthquake recovery and reconstruction planning: Lessons from the United States, Japan, Iran, and China. Natural Hazards Review, 16(3), 04014033. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000172
- Maly, E., Kondo, T., & Gerster, J. (2024). Tensions between Tradition and Innovation in Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Action, and Reconstruction. Disaster Prevention and Management, [Special issue] 33(5). 10.1108/DPM-11-2024-427
- Mazzoleni, D., & Sepe, M. (2004). Safeguarding of urban and landscape identity in post-earthquake reconstructions in Italy. Methodology for the analysis and first results. In Multidisciplinary approach to seismic risk problem conference proceedings, Abbazia del Goleto, Sant’Angelo dei Lombardi,
September 2003 (pp. 183–191). - Mulligan, M., & Nadarajah, Y. (2012). Rebuilding local communities in the wake of disaster: Social recovery in Sri Lanka and India. Routledge.
- Mushtaha, A. W., & Alaloul, W. S. (2025). Sustainability factors influencing post-disaster reconstruction projects: Critical review and bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Futures, 10, 100930. 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100930
- Rabbat, N., & Sharp, D. (Eds.). (2025). Reconstruction as violence in Assad’s Syria. American University in Cairo Press.
- Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163–180. 10.1177/0165551506070706
- Sandoval, V. (2023). The disaster research journals list 2023. Disaster Research Unit (DRU), Freie Universität Berlin. 10.17169/refubium-40035
- Schatzberg, E. (2018). Technology: Critical history of a concept. University of Chicago Press.
- Serter, M., & Gumusburun Ayalp, G. (2024). A holistic analysis on risks of post-disaster reconstruction using RStudio Bibliometrix. Sustainability, 16(21), 9463. 10.3390/su16219463
- Sorkin, M., & Sharp, D. (Eds.). (2021). Open Gaza: Architectures of hope. American University in Cairo Press with Terreform.
- Stiglitz, J. E. (1999).
Knowledge as a global public good . In Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. A. (Eds.), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century (pp. 308–325). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0195130529.003.0015 - Sun, W., Bocchini, P., & Davison, B. D. (2020). Applications of artificial intelligence for disaster management. Natural Hazards, 103, 2631–2689. 10.1007/s11069-020-04124-3
- Tumini, I., Villagra-Islas, P., & Herrmann-Lunecke, G. (2017). Evaluating reconstruction effects on urban resilience: A comparison between two Chilean tsunami-prone cities. Natural Hazards, 85, 1363–1392. 10.1007/s11069-016-2630-4
- UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO recommendation on open science. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 10.54677/MNMH8546
- Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 93–136. 10.1017/S0269888900007797
- Vahanvati, M., Maly, E., & Sararit, T. (2025). Resilient recovery from disasters: The long-term outcomes of post-disaster housing reconstruction in India, Thailand and Japan. Springer. 10.1007/978-981-97-8047-1
- Vale, L. J., & Campanella, T. J. (Eds.). (2005). The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195175844.001.0001
- Xu, F., Ma, J., Li, N., & Cheng, J. C. P. (2025). Large language model applications in disaster management: An interdisciplinary review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 127, 105642. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105642
- Yi, H., & Yang, J. (2014). Research trends of post disaster reconstruction: The past and the future. Habitat International, 42, 21–29. 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.10.005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.937 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Page range: 1052 - 1067
Submitted on: Sep 16, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 16, 2026
Published on: Oct 7, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Paolo Tombesi, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.