Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparing technical disassembly potential methods for concrete and timber buildings Cover

Comparing technical disassembly potential methods for concrete and timber buildings

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Attia, S., Al-Obaidy, M., Mori, M., Campain, C., Giannasi, E., van Vliet, M., & Gasparri, E. (2024). Disassembly calculation criteria and methods for circular construction. Automation in Construction, 165, 105521. 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105521
  2. Bompa, D. V., Ungureanu, V., Elghazouli, A. Y., & Afsal, A. (2024, May). Disassembly and structural reuse potential of steel–timber shear connections with screws. In 4th International Conference ‘Coordinating Engineering for Sustainability and Resilience’ & Midterm Conference of Circular B ‘Implementation of Circular Economy in the Built Environment’ (pp. 231242). Springer Nature Switzerland. 10.1007/978-3-031-57800-7_21
  3. Boverket. (n.d.). Climate database from Boverket. Version 02.07.000. https://klimatdatabasen.boverket.se/
  4. Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. Viking.
  5. BREEAM. (2021). BREEAM International New Construction Version 6.0. Technical Manual—SD250. Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM). https://breeam.com/breeam-infrastructure/technical-manuals/version-6
  6. Building Control Turku. (n.d.). https://www.turku.fi/Toimipaikat/Rakennusvalvonta
  7. Casagrande, D., Sinito, E., Izzi, M., Pasetto, G., & Polastri, A. (2021). Structural performance of a hybrid timber wall system for emergency housing facilities. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101566. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101566
  8. Cerema. (2011). Arrêté du 19 décembre 2011 relatif au diagnostic portant sur la gestion des déchets issus de la démolition de catégories de bâtiments [Decree of 19 December 2011 concerning the diagnostic assessment of the management of waste arising from the demolition of certain categories of buildings]. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000025145228
  9. Crowther, P. (2018). A taxonomy of construction material reuse and recycling: Designing for future disassembly. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(3), 355363. 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n3p355
  10. DGBC. (2021). Circular buildings—Disassembly potential measurement method version 2.0. Dutch Green Building Council (DGBC). https://www.dgbc.nl/publicaties/circular-buildings-een-meetmethodiek-voor-losmaakbaarheid-v2-0/
  11. DGNB. (2024). DGNB building resource passport, Document Key information on all life cycle phases of a building. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB). https://www.dgnb.de/en/nachhaltiges-bauen/zirkulaeres-bauen/building-resource-passport
  12. Dodd, N., Donatello, S., & Cordella, M. (2020). Level(s) Indicator 2.4: Design for deconstruction. User manual: Overview, instructions and guidance (Publication Version 1.0). https://susproc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/product-bureau/sites/default/files/2020-10/20201013%20New%20Level(s)%20documentation_2.4%20Deconstruction_Publication%20v1.0.pdf
  13. Durmisevic, E. (2006). Transformable building structures. Technische Universiteit Delft.
  14. EC. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A new circular economy action plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe (52020DC0098). European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_420
  15. EC. (2022). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and repealing Regulation (EU) 305/2011. European Commission https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/49315
  16. EC. (2023). Transition pathway for construction. European Commission https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/53854
  17. EC. (2024a). Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives (text with EEA relevance) (32008L0098). European Commission. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/98/oj
  18. EC. (2024b). Directive (EU) 2024/1275 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on the energy performance of buildings (recast) (text with EEA relevance) (32024L1275). European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401275&pk_keyword=Energy&pk_content=Directive
  19. Ecochain Technologies. (2025). Environmental cost indicator: ECI overview. https://ecochain.com/blog/environmental-cost-indicator-eci/
  20. FEI & MEF. (n.d.). CO2data—Emissions database for construction. Version 1.01.002. Finnish Environment Institute (FEI) & Ministry of the Environment Finland (MEF). https://co2data.fi/rakentaminen/.
  21. Figueira, D., Ashour, A., Yıldırım, G., Aldemir, A., & Şahmaran, M. (2021). Demountable connections of reinforced concrete structures: Review and future developments. Structures, 33, 34473461. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.053
  22. Fink, G., Jockwer, R., & Cabrero, J. M. (Eds.). (2025). Holistic design of taller timber buildings. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-032-02098-7
  23. Geldermans, R. J. (2016). Design for change and circularity—Accommodating circular material & product flows in construction. Energy Procedia, 96(September), 301311. 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.153
  24. Grüter, C., Gordon, M., Muster, M., Kastner, F., Grönquist, P., Frangi, A., Langenberg, S., & De Wolf, C. (2023). Design for and from disassembly with timber elements: Strategies based on two case studies from Switzerland. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, 1307632. 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1307632
  25. Guy, B., & Ciarimboli, N. (2008). DfD—Design for disassembly in the built environment: A guide to closed-loop design and building. https://www.lifecyclebuilding.org/docs/DfDseattle.pdf
  26. Halding, P. S. (2023). Design for disassembly of concrete slabs with mortar joints. Buildings, 13(8), 1957. 10.3390/buildings13081957
  27. Huuhka, S., Köliö, A., Annila, P., & Poti, A. (2018). Puurakenteiden uudelleenkäyttömahdollisuudet [Reuse possibilities of timber structures] (Built Environment in Transition No. 4: Structural Engineering. Research Report No. 165). Tampere University of Technology. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-15-4075-2
  28. ISO. (2020). ISO 20887: Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works—Design for disassembly and adaptability—Principles, requirements and guidance. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). https://www.iso.org/standard/69370.html
  29. Järvelä, H., Lehto, A., Pirilä, T., & Kuittinen, M. (2025). Metrics for building component disassembly potential: A practical framework. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), 634653. 10.5334/bc.556
  30. Krausmann, F., Lauk, C., Haas, W., & Wiedenhofer, D. (2018). From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: The socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900–2015. Global Environmental Change, 52(September), 131140. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.003
  31. Laasonen, S., & Pajunen, S. (2023). Assessment of load-bearing timber elements for the design for disassembly. Buildings, 13(7), 1878. 10.3390/buildings13071878
  32. LEED. (2019). LEED, v4.1: New construction. Building life-cycle impact reduction, materials and resources, 2019. https://www.usgbc.org/credits/new-construction-core-and-shell-schools-new-construction-retail-new-construction-data-27
  33. Li, Z., Tsavdaridis, K. D., & Katenbayeva, A. (2024). Reusable timber modular buildings, material circularity and automation: The role of inter-locking connections. Journal of Building Engineering, 98(December), 110965. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110965
  34. Mañes-Navarrete, D., Redón-Santafé, M., & Paya-Zaforteza, I. (2025). Integrating design for disassembly in hybrid building structures: A case study of an administrative building. Energy and Buildings, 340, 115765. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115765
  35. Ostapska, K., Rüther, P., Loli, A., & Gradeci, K. (2024). Design for disassembly: A systematic scoping review and analysis of built structures designed for disassembly. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 48, 377395. 10.1016/j.spc.2024.05.014
  36. Ottenhaus, L., Hernández-Aldaz, M., Davies, A., & Cabrero, J. M. (2025). Evaluating the disassembly potential of timber buildings: Development of calculation tool and proof of concept. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 20(4), 881909. 10.1080/17480272.2025.2510562
  37. Ottenhaus, L., Yan, Z., Brandner, R., Leardini, P., Fink, G., & Jockwer, R. (2023). Design for adaptability, disassembly and reuse—A review of reversible timber connection systems. Construction and Building Materials, 400, 132823. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132823
  38. Ottosen, L. M., Kunther, W., Ingeman-Nielsen, T., & Karatosun, S. (2024). Non-destructive testing for documenting properties of structural concrete for reuse in new buildings: A review. Materials, 17(15), 3814. 10.3390/ma17153814
  39. Overheid.nl. (2012). Bouwbesluit 2012. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0030461/2019-07-01/
  40. Pozzi, L. E. (2019). Design for disassembly with structural timber connections—Analysis and assessment of different connection systems used in engineered timber building structures to maximise demountability and reuse of the elements. Faculty of Architecture & the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology. https://repository.tudelft.nl/file/File_b91e4fc3-f7f1-4d5d-acae-4c2d37178dbe
  41. Räsänen, A., & Lahdensivu, J. (2023). Quality assurance process for reuse of building components. In Life-cycle of structures and infrastructure systems (pp. 142148). CRC Press. 10.1201/9781003323020-14
  42. Skaar, C., Solem, B., & Rüther, P. (2017). Composite floors in urban buildings: Options for a low carbon building design. In 6th Forum Wood Building Nordic Trondheim 17 (pp. 116).
  43. Södra. (2026). Technical specifications: Cross-laminated timber. https://www.sodra.com/_download/sp/technical-specifications-clt.pdf
  44. Stora Enso. (2024). CLT (cross laminated timber) (EPD-IES-0009949:003, S-P-09949). The International EPD® System. https://www.storaenso.com/-/media/documents/download-center/certificates/wood-products-approvals-and-certificates/epd/stora-enso-epd-clt---may-2024.pdf
  45. Thormark, C. (2007). Motives for design for disassembly in building construction. In Portugal SB07: Sustainable Construction, Materials and Practices, Lisbon, Portugal, 2007. https://ebooks.iospress.nl/book/portugal-sb07-sustainable-construction-materials-and-practices
  46. UNEP. (2020). Global resources outlook 2019: Natural resources for the future we want. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 10.18356/689a1a17-en
  47. UNEP & Yale Center for Ecosystems + Architecture. (2023). Building materials and the climate: Constructing a new future. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105244
  48. Yan, Z., Ottenhaus, L., Leardini, P., & Jockwer, R. (2022). Performance of reversible timber connections in Australian light timber framed panelised construction. Journal of Building Engineering, 61, 105244. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105244
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.763 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Page range: 633 - 652
Submitted on: Dec 5, 2025
Accepted on: May 3, 2026
Published on: May 28, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Ninni Westerholm, Antti Tuure, Sami Pajunen, Matti Kuittinen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.