Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Spatial (in)justice shaping the home as a space of work Cover

Spatial (in)justice shaping the home as a space of work

Open Access
|Feb 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Literature search strings and databases organised by topic/disciplines.

TOPICDATABASE(S)SEARCH STRINGEXCLUSION CRITERIA
Architecture (general)Andor, Google Scholar, Scopus(‘home-based work’ OR ‘work from home’ OR ‘WFH’ OR ‘working from home’ OR ‘home-based working’ OR ‘work at home’) AND (Architect*)‘Computer Science’
Urban planning (access to nature)Andor, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus(Work AND Home OR living OR housing OR ‘third spaces’ OR ‘locationless work’ OR ‘digital space’ OR ‘home-workplace’ OR ‘home-workspace’ OR ‘home workplace environment’ OR ‘Telecommuters’ OR ‘residential environment’ OR ‘home working environment’ OR ‘home office’ OR ‘sheltering-in-place’ OR ‘WFH’) AND (Digital OR ‘e-work’ OR ‘tele-work’ OR mobile OR remote OR hybrid) AND (Nature OR green* OR courtyard* Or forest* OR lake* Or garden* OR tree* OR park* OR patio* OR terrace* OR balcon*) AND (Motivation* OR incentive* OR reason* OR condition* OR explanation* OR well-being)‘Nature of work’
Transport and mobilityTransport Research Board, Scopus(mobility OR transport* Or transit OR tourism OR travel) AND (Home OR living OR hous* OR third spaces OR digital space OR ‘summer cottage’) AND (‘digital work’ OR ‘e-work’ OR ‘tele-work’ OR ‘remote work’ OR ‘hybrid work’ OR ‘work from home’ OR ‘WFH’ OR ‘locationless work’) AND (socio-economic OR gender OR sexuality OR ethnicity OR disadvantaged OR marginali* OR class OR demographic* OR accessibil* OR disability OR minority)
Political sciencesProQuest, Sage Journals, Google Scholar(‘remote work’ OR ‘work from home’ OR ‘home-based work’ OR ‘telework’) AND (culture OR built environment OR land use OR history OR labour OR capitalism)
Table 2

Key issues of spatial injustice in terms of (A) process and distribution and (B) the spatial dialectics of injustice.

A. FEATURES OF SPATIAL (IN)JUSTICE RELATED TO WORK AT HOME AND THE HOME AS A SPACE OF WORK
A1. PROCESSES OF SPATIAL FORMATION AND PRODUCTION THAT GENERATE AND CONSOLIDATE UNJUST DISTRIBUTIONAL PATTERNS AND UNEQUAL SOCIAL RELATIONSA2. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND ACCESS TO BENEFITS AND SOCIALLY VALUED RESOURCES
The home, an ideological and material space, is the product of a historical process that separated work and home; divided work into productive and reproductive work, gendered this work, and valued it differently; positioned reproductive work at home, feminised this work and the home, and ideologically positioned the home in the private sphere. This process of spatial formation shaped the home as a space of non-work with justice implications, where the home becomes:
  • a gendered space that consolidates such injustices (e.g. the exploitation of social reproductive work, strongly dependent on women)

  • a class-based space that consolidates such injustices when its design reflects privileged social groups’ spatial needs (e.g. nuclear middle-class family) and hinders the possibility of less privileged social groups to work at home

Spatial policies that prohibit work at home can perpetuate unequal social relations, especially if these are targeted towards a particular type of work at home.
Some types of work at home are associated with higher wages and mobility possibilities, thus generating unequal spatial distributional patterns of and access to:
  • housing that supports diverse forms of work and that enables a healthy and balanced co-existence between productive and reproductive work

  • nature and green and blue urban infrastructures to support work and/or for restorative and health benefits

  • public spaces and social infrastructures for collective engagement, reducing isolation and enabling solidarity

  • other nearby services to support work at home (e.g. as affordable public transport, supermarkets, schools, health centres, third spaces)

B. SPATIAL DIALECTICS OF INJUSTICE
B1. SOCIAL INJUSTICES BECOME SPATIALISEDB2. SPACE SERVES TO PRODUCE AND SUSTAIN SOCIAL INJUSTICES
The processes that led to contemporary homes to be defined and designed as spaces of non-work led to social injustices becoming spatialised in the home (see A1).
The feminisation of social reproductive work, its devaluation and exploitation, and the social inequalities that underpin this work (e.g. outsourced paid domestic work) becomes spatialised, e.g. so-called maid’s and servant’s rooms, without good qualitative living standards.
Because productive work at home reproduces work-related inequalities, some types of productive work, typically forms of work that enable flexible worker mobility (e.g. telework), are better remunerated than others. These inequalities become spatialised in the form of:
  • suburbanisation and urban sprawl, often generated by those seeking and being able to afford better living environments, in turn creating unequal and unjust distributional patterns and access to better quality work–home environments (see A2)

Due to its atomism and being positioned in the so-called private sphere, the home serves to produce and sustain injustices:
  • when positioned at home, work can be obscured and devalued, exacerbating social and gendered inequalities

  • the homeworker and their working conditions are rendered invisible, enabling their exploitation and violence

  • homeworkers are spatially separated, creating a sense of powerlessness, enabling their marginalisation and hindering possibilities to build networks of solidarity to seek better working conditions

The home being defined as a feminised space belonging to the private sphere leads to:
  • work of social reproduction, strongly dependent on women and much of it done at home, is devalued, not remunerated with money, and exploited

Suburbanisation can produce and sustain hierarchical spatial relations between city cores and peripheries exacerbating unequal social relations between different social groups (based on class, gender, race).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.733 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 2, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jan 21, 2026
|
Published on: Feb 9, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Milián Bernal Dalia, Laitinen Jasmin, Shevchenko Hannah, Ivanova Oxana, Pelsmakers Sofie, Nisonen Essi, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.