Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reframing disaster recovery through spatial justice: an integrated framework Cover

Reframing disaster recovery through spatial justice: an integrated framework

Open Access
|Feb 2026

Figures & Tables

bc-7-1-701-g1.png
Figure 1

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flowchart for review document selection.

bc-7-1-701-g2.png
Figure 2

Subthemes identified based on the systematic coding of the literature.

bc-7-1-701-g3.png
Figure 3

Systematic mapping of the interconnections between the three thematic strands (T1–T3) of the literature reviewed in this paper and their subthemes.

bc-7-1-701-g4.png
Figure 4

Space, justice and disaster: the constitutive dimensions of the SJ-Disaster framework.

bc-7-1-701-g5.png
Figure 5

The SJ-Disaster framework operationalised as an integrative matrix: mapping justice dimensions across spatial scales and disaster phases.

Table 1

Justice pathways developed from the application of the SJ-Disaster framework based on the existing literature.

JUSTICE PATHWAYSCORE INSIGHTSSCALE IMPLICATIONSPHASE IMPLICATIONSTRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIAL
Procedural
  • Agency, participation and accountability through community groups, transparent governance, co-production and multi-scalar linkages

  • Individual/household: agency and access

  • Community: grassroots participation, solidarity

  • City/state: accountability, co-production

  • Transnational: solidarity networks

  • M: Use local knowledge in risk-mapping

  • P: Inclusive training

  • R: Transparent relief and accountability

  • Rc: Participatory rebuilding and multi-scalar governance

  • Shifts recovery from top-down control to decentralised, participatory governance where citizens act as decision-makers

Distributive
  • Requires the fair distribution of resources, land, housing, aid and environmental benefits, with special attention paid to vulnerable groups and collective rights

  • Individual/household: equal access to essentials

  • Community: land trusts, solidarity networks

  • City/state: resource allocation and ecosystem equity

  • M: Rights-based standards and vulnerability-mapping

  • P: Tailored preparedness for marginalised groups

  • R: Fair aid and resource delivery

  • Rc: Equitable housing, land and ecological recovery

  • Turns disasters into opportunities for the redistribution of power and resources, creating long-term equity in land, aid and environment

Recognition
  • Acknowledging diverse vulnerabilities, lived experiences, cultural dignity, plural knowledge systems and transnational solidarities

  • Individual/household: intersecting vulnerabilities, elders, minorities

  • Community: solidarity, cultural dignity, mutual aid

  • City/state: responsibility and inclusion in planning

  • International: diaspora and cross-border recognition

  • M: Intersectional risk-mapping and knowledge diversity

  • P: Compassion-based, culturally rooted preparedness

  • R: Recognition of vulnerable groups and local knowledge

  • Rc: Challenge hierarchies; empower marginalised voices

  • Moves disaster governance toward inclusive empowerment that values difference, cultural dignity and global solidarity

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.701 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 4, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jan 29, 2026
|
Published on: Feb 19, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Mehmet Ali Gasseloğlu, Juliana E. Gonçalves, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.