Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Environmental impacts of reclaimed bricks: comparing different deconstruction methods Cover

Environmental impacts of reclaimed bricks: comparing different deconstruction methods

By: Emmi Salmio and  Satu Huuhka  
Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Addis, B. (2006). Building with reclaimed components and materials: A design handbook for reuse and recycling. Earthscan.
  2. Al-Fakih, A., Mohammed, B. S., Liew, M. S., & Nikbakht, E. (2019). Incorporation of waste materials in the manufacture of masonry bricks: An update review. Journal of Building Engineering, 21, 3754. 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.023
  3. Al-Najjar, A., & Malmqvist, T. (2025). EPDs for reclaimed building components: Methodological review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1554, 012010. 10.1088/1755-1315/1554/1/012010
  4. Andersen, C. E., Kanafani, K., Zimmerman, R. K., Rasmussen, F. N., & Birgisdóttir, H. (2020). Comparison of GHG emissions from circular and conventional building components. Buildings & Cities, 1(1), 379392. 10.5334/bc.55
  5. Andersen, R., Ravn, A. S., & Ryberg, M. W. (2022). Environmental benefits of applying selective demolition to buildings: A case study of the reuse of façade steel cladding. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 184, 106430. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106430
  6. Andreasi Bassi, S., Biganzoli, F., Ferrara, N., Amadei, A., Valente, A., Sala, S., & Ardente, F. (2023). Updated characterisation and normalisation factors for the Environmental Footprint 3.1 method. Publications Office of the European Union. 10.2760/798894
  7. Brukspecialisten. (n.d.). FAQ: Återbrukat tegel. https://brukspecialisten.se/faq-aterbrukat-tegel/
  8. Brukspecialisten i Sverige. (2023). Environmental product declaration: Rebrick—Rödmix & Gulmix (EPD No. S-P-07558). EPD International. https://brukspecialisten.se/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Brukspecialisten-EPD.pdf
  9. CEN. (2021). EN 15804:2012+A2:2019 Sustainability of construction works—Environmental product declarations—Core rules for the product category of construction products. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). https://www.en-standard.eu/bs-en-15804-2012-a2-2019-sustainability-of-construction-works-environmental-product-declarations-core-rules-for-the-product-category-of-construction-products/
  10. Cheng, H. (2013). Reuse research progress on waste clay brick. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 31, 218226. 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.02.029
  11. Devos, K., Devlieger, L., Laeremans, I., Masschelein & Steeman, M. (2025). Evaluating the financial viability of building material reuse: Insights from a contemporary case study. In Huuhka, S. (Ed.), Circularity in the built environment: Proceedings of the 2025 conference held in Tampere, Finland, September 16–18 2025. Tampere University. 10.5281/zenodo.17092525
  12. Devos, K., Devlieger, L., & Steeman, M. (2024). Reclaimed or new? Life cycle assessment of ceramic bricks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 476, 143764. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143764
  13. European Pallet Association. (n.d.). EPAL Euro pallet. https://www.epal-pallets.org/eu-en/load-carriers/epal-euro-pallet
  14. FINLEX. (2023). Rakentamislaki 21.4.2023/751 [Building Act]. https://finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2023/20230751
  15. Fořt, J., & Černý, R. (2020). Transition to circular economy in the construction industry: Environmental aspects of waste brick recycling scenarios. Waste Management, 118, 510520. 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.004
  16. Gamle Mursten. (2023). Environmental product declaration: Reused bricks (whole and half) (EPD No. MD-23003-EN_rev1). EPD Danmark. https://gamlemursten.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/md-23003-en_rev1.pdf
  17. Gamle Mursten. (n.d.). How we clean bricks. https://gamlemursten.dk/en/new-life-for-reclaimed-bricks/
  18. Genbrugssten. (2023). Environmental product declaration: Used bricks (whole and half) (EPD No. MD-23007-EN). EPD Danmark. md-23007-en.pdf
  19. Genbrugssten. (n.d.). Ofte stillede spørgsmål. https://genbrugssten.dk/faq/
  20. Gregory, R. J., Hughes, T. G., & Kwan, A. S. K. (2004). Brick recycling and reuse. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, 157(3), 155161. 10.1680/ensu.2004.157.3.155
  21. Hobbs, G., & Hurley, J. (2001). Deconstruction and the reuse of construction materials. In Chini, A. R. (Ed.), Deconstruction and materials reuse: Technology, economic, and policy (Publication No. 266). CIB. https://www.iip.kit.edu/downloads/CIB_Publication_266.pdf
  22. Hopkinson, P., Chen, H. M., Zhou, K., Wang, Y., & Lam, D. (2019). Recovery and reuse of structural products from end-of-life buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, 172(3), 119128. 10.1680/jensu.18.00007
  23. Huuhka, S., & Lahdensivu, J. (2016). A statistical and geographical study on demolished buildings. Building Research & Information, 44(1), 7396. 10.1080/09613218.2014.980101
  24. ISO. (2006a). ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and frameworks. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html
  25. ISO. (2006b). ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html
  26. Klang, A., Vikman, P.-Å., & Brattebø, H. (2003). Sustainable management of demolition waste: An integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 38(4), 317334. 10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00167-2
  27. Møller, J., Damgaard, A., & Astrup, T. (2013). LCA af genbrug af mursten. Miljøprojekt nr. 1512, 2013. Miljøstyrelsen. https://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publikationer/2013/11/978–87–93026-60–5.pdf
  28. Nordby, A. S., Berge, B., Hakonsen, F., & Hestnes, A. G. (2009). Criteria for salvageability: The reuse of bricks. Building Research & Information, 37(1), 5567. 10.1080/09613210802476023
  29. Nußholz, J. L. K., Rasmussen, F. N., & Milios, L. (2019). Circular building materials: Carbon saving potential and the role of business model innovation and public policy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 308316. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.036
  30. Olsson, J. A., Hafez, H., Miller, S. A., & Scrivener, K. L. (2025). Greenhouse gas emissions and decarbonization potential of global fired clay brick production. Environmental Science & Technology, 59(4), 19091920. 10.1021/acs.est.4c08994
  31. One Click LCA. (2022). Construction carbon regulations in Europe: Review & best practises. https://oneclicklca.com/resources/ebooks/construction-carbon-regulation-europe
  32. Peachtree Waste. (n.d.). How to calculate your debris weight. https://peachtreewaste.com/how-to-calculate-your-debris-weight/
  33. Räsänen, A., Huuhka, S., Pakkala, T., & Lahdensivu, J. (2022). Methods for evaluating the technical performance of reclaimed bricks. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, e01504. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01504
  34. Sala, S., Cerutti, A. K., & Pant, R. (2018). Development of a weighting approach for the environmental footprint. Publications Office of the European Union. 10.2760/945290
  35. Thormark, C. (2000). Environmental analysis of a building with reused materials. International Journal of Low Energy and Sustainable Buildings, 1. https://portal.research.lu.se/files/5868382/1671772
  36. Tiileri. (2021). Environmental product declaration: Red clay brick (EPD No. RTS_118_21). Building Information Foundation RTS. https://tiileri.fi/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/RTS-EPD_118-21_Tiileri_RedClayBrick.pdf
  37. Üçer Erduran, D., Elias-Ozkan, S. T., & Ulybin, A. (2020). Assessing potential environmental impact and construction cost of reclaimed masonry walls. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25, 116. 10.1007/s11367-019-01662-2
  38. Utomhus Østfold Gress. (2024). Environmental product declaration: Reclaimed bricks (EPD No. NEPD-5884-5158-EN). Norwegian EPD Foundation. NEPD-5884-5158_Reclaimed-Bricks.pdf
  39. Wienerberger. (2025). Environmental product declaration: Punainen retro clay bricks and brick slips product-EPD (EPD No. RTS_384.20_25). Building Information Foundation RTS. https://ylermistorage.blob.core.windows.net/externalfilesprod/RTS_384.20_25_Product_EPD_Wienerberger_Punainen%20Retro.pdf
  40. Wong, C. L., Mo, K. H., Yap, S. P., Johnson Alengaram, U., & Ling, T.-C. (2018). Potential use of brick waste as alternate concrete-making materials: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 226239. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.193
  41. Yeap, K. S., Yacoob, N. M., Rao, S. P., & Hashim, N. R. (2012). Incorporating waste into an experimental school prototype: Lessons regarding materials reclamation opportunities. Waste Management & Research, 30(12), 12511260. 10.1177/0734242X12465459
  42. Zhang, L. (2013). Production of bricks from waste materials—A review. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 643655. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.043
  43. Zhou, K., Chen. H.-M., Wang, Y., Lam, D., Ajayebi, A., & Hopkinson, P. (2020). Developing advanced techniques to reclaim existing end of service life (EoSL) bricks—An assessment of reuse technical viability. Developments in the Built Environment, 2, 100006. 10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.651 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: May 23, 2025
|
Accepted on: Feb 22, 2026
|
Published on: Mar 18, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Emmi Salmio, Satu Huuhka, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.