Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Living knowledge labs: creating community and inclusive nature-based solutions Cover

Living knowledge labs: creating community and inclusive nature-based solutions

Open Access
|Jan 2026

References

  1. Bajgier, S. M., Maragah, H. D., Saccucci, M. S., Verzilli, A., & Prybutok, V. R. (1991). Introducing students to community operations research by using a city neighborhood as a living laboratory. Operations Research, 39(5), 701709. 10.1287/opre.39.5.701
  2. Baker, S., & Mehmood, A. (2015). Social innovation and the governance of sustainable places. Local Environment, 20(3), 321334. 10.1080/13549839.2013.842964
  3. Bardi, U., & Alvarez Pereira, C. (2022). Limits and beyond: 50 Years on from the Limits to Growth, what did we learn and what’s next? A Report to the Club of Rome. Exapt.
  4. Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. Mariner.
  5. Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). 10.17169/fqs-13.1.1801
  6. Boal, A. (1980). Teatro del oprimido. Nueva imagen.
  7. Bulkeley, H., Marvin, S., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2018). Urban living labs: Conducting the experimental city? European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 317335. 10.1177/0969776418787222
  8. Caitana, B., & Canto, G. (2024). Co-production boundaries of nature-based solutions for urban regeneration: The case of a healthy corridor. Urban Planning, 9(1), 112. 10.17645/up.7306
  9. Callorda, E., Lemaître, A., Llobera, F., Cuende, M., Fernández-Pacheco Sáez, J. L., Rasskin-Gutman, I., Umantseva, A., & Egmose, J. (2024). A reference framework for learning to unlearn in (transdisciplinary) ‘Nature-based Solutions’ settings: Conceptual foundations, living theory and praxis (Research Report). TRANS-lighthouses.
  10. Canto, G., Andersson, I., Hilding-Hamann, K. E., Mateus, A., & Nunes, N. (2022). Inclusive urban regeneration with citizens and stakeholders: From living labs to the URBiNAT CoP. In Mahmoud, I. H., Morello, E., Lemes de Oliveira, F., & Geneletti, D. (Eds.), Nature-based solutions for sustainable urban planning. Contemporary urban design thinking. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-89525-9_5
  11. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201234. 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
  12. Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology.
  13. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
  14. Diputación de Cáceres. (2023). Datos municipales. https://ide.dip-caceres.es/descarga-de-datos/
  15. Dudley, N., Stolton, S., Belokurov, A., Krueger, L., Lopoukhine, N., MacKinnon, K., Sandwith, T., & Sekhran, N. (Eds.) (2010). Natural solutions: Protected areas. Helping people cope with climate change. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), World Bank & World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2009-045-Summ.pdf
  16. EEA. (2024). Urban adaptation in Europe: What works? European Environment Agency (EEA). https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2800/50996
  17. Eggermont, H., Balian, E., Azevedo, J. M., Beumer, V., Brodin, T., Claudet, J., Fady, B., Grube, M., Keune, H., Lamarque, P., Reuter, K., Smith, M., van Ham, C. Weisser, W.W., & Le Roux, X. (2015). Nature-based solutions: New influence for environmental management and research in Europe. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24(4), 243248 10.14512/gaia.24.4.9
  18. European Commission. (2015). Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities: Final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on Nature-based Solutions and Re-naturing Cities. Publications Office of the EU. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/765301
  19. European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A new circular economy action plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2020%3A98%3AFIN
  20. European Union. (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste. https://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/851/oj
  21. Faivre, N., Fritz, M., Freitas, T., de Boissezon, B., & Vandewoestijne, S. (2017). Nature-based solutions in the EU: Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges. Environmental Research, 159, 509518. 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032
  22. Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. Apex.
  23. Farhidi, F., Madani, K., & Crichton, R. (2022). How the US economy and environment can both benefit from composting management. Environmental Health Insights, 16. 10.1177/11786302221128454
  24. Fernández-Pacheco Sáez, J. L. (2017). Estrategias de desarrollo local frente a la crisis en entornos rurales vulnerables: una comparativa de casos entre Sudáfrica y España (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid). https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/16341
  25. Ferreira, I., Lupp, G., & Mahmoud, I. (Eds.). (2023). Guidelines for co-creation and co-governance of nature-based solutions. Insights from EU-funded projects. European Commission. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/157060
  26. Figueiredo, E., & Raschi, A. (2013). Fertile links? Connections between tourism activities, socioeconomic contexts and local development in European rural areas. Florence University Press.
  27. Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage.
  28. Frantzeskaki, N., Castán, V., Coenen, L., & Loorbach, D. (Eds.). (2017). Urban sustainability transitions. Routledge.
  29. Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., Collier, M. J., Kendal, D., Bulkeley, H., Dumitru, A., Walsh, C., Noble, K., van Wyk, E., Ordóñez, C., Oke, C., & Pintér, L. (2019). Nature-based solutions for urban climate change adaptation: Linking science, policy, and practice communities for evidence-based decision-making. BioScience, 69(6), 455466. 10.1093/biosci/biz042
  30. Freire, P. (1970/2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
  31. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
  32. Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 6675. https://doi.org/cwtd76
  33. Hajer, M. A. (2003). A frame in the fields: Policymaking and the reinvention of politics. In Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 88110). Cambridge University Press.
  34. Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge.
  35. Izdebska, O., & Knieling, J. (2020). Citizen involvement in waste management and circular economy in cities: Key elements for planning and implementation. European Spatial Research and Policy, 27(2), 115129. https://doi.org/pkbt
  36. Junta de Extremadura. (2022). Estrategia Extremadura 2030: Desarrollo sostenible y lucha contra el despoblamiento. Mérida. https://www.juntaex.es/documents/77055/406857/Actuacion-+Plan+de+Accion+de+la+Junta+de+Extremadura+2030.pdf
  37. Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Pauleit, S., Naumann, S., Davis, M., Artmann, M., Haase, D., Knapp, S., Korn, H., Stadler, J., Zaunberger, K., & Bonn A. (2016). Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: Perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 39. https://doi.org/f8v5qf
  38. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Critical participatory action research. Springer.
  39. Knowles, K. (2006). Learning to change and changing learning in environmental management: A case study of the Kaw Nature Reserve in French Guiana. Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers, 617.
  40. Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 2543. https://doi.org/gd4wfs
  41. Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225248. https://doi.org/d4cjps
  42. Leminen, S. (2015). Q&A. What are living labs? Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9), 2935. https://doi.org/pkbs
  43. Ley 7/2022, de 8 de abril, de residuos y suelos contaminados para una economía circular. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 85, de 09 de abril de 2022.
  44. Lucchesi, G. P., & Rutkowski, E. W. (2019). Living labs: Science, society and co-creation. In Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., & Wall, T. (Eds.), Industry, innovation and infrastructure. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer. https://doi.org/pkbr
  45. Lupp, G., Zingraff-Hamed, A., Huang, J. J., Oen, A., & Pauleit, S. (2021). Living labs—A concept for co-designing nature-based solutions. Sustainability, 13(1), 188. https://doi.org/gnnf9m
  46. Malan, S., Antonich, B., Finnegan, L., Goldberg, T., Hestad, D., Lebada, A. M., Nyingi, D. W., & Penniman, T. (2016). Summary report, 1–10 September 2016: 2016 IUCN World Conservation Congress—Planet at the Crossroads. IUCN Congress Bulletin, Earth Negotiations Bulletin. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). https://enb.iisd.org/events/2016-international-union-conservation-nature-iucn-world-conservation-congress-planet/summary
  47. Malik, A., Sharma, P., Pereira, V., & Temouri, Y. (2021). From regional innovation systems to global innovation hubs: Evidence of a Quadruple Helix from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 128, 587598. https://doi.org/gjtc8m
  48. Manea, E. E., Bumbac, C., Dinu, L. R., Bumbac, M., & Nicolescu, C. M. (2024). Composting as a sustainable solution for organic solid waste management: Current practices and potential improvements. Sustainability, 16(15), 6329. https://doi.org/pkbq
  49. MAPA. (2020). Análisis de la cadena de valor del sector agrario en España. Gobierno de España. https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/alimentacion/temas/observatorio-cadena/
  50. Meadows, D. H., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. L. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update. Chelsea Green.
  51. Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: How does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 275293. https://doi.org/cg8xb6
  52. Nunes, N., Björner, E., & Hilding-Hamann, K. E. (2021). Guidelines for citizen engagement and the co-creation of nature-based solutions: Living knowledge in the URBiNAT Project. Sustainability, 13(23), 13378. https://doi.org/grd6f3
  53. Nygren, N. V., Jokinen, A., & Nikula, A. (2017). Unlearning in managing wicked biodiversity problems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 167, 473482. https://doi.org/gcgdj8
  54. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
  55. Rao, J. N., & Parsai, T. (2023). A comprehensive review on the decentralized composting systems for household biodegradable waste management. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118824. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118824
  56. Raymond, C. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Berry, P., Breil, M., Nita, M. R., Geneletti, D., & Calfapietra, C. (2017). A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 1524. https://doi.org/gbtxtp
  57. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, 2nd ed. SAGE.
  58. Riechmann, J. (2006). Biomímesis ensayos sobre imitación de la naturaleza, ecosocialismo y autocontención. Catarata.
  59. Santos, B. D. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
  60. Schaffers, H., & Turkama, P. (2012). Living labs for cross-border systemic innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 2530. 10.22215/timreview/605
  61. Schäpke, N., Stelzer, F., Caniglia, G., Bergmann, M., Singer-Brodowski, M., Loorbach, D., Olsson, P. Baedeker, C., & Lang, D. J. (2018). Jointly experimenting for transformation?: Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them. GAIA, 27(Suppl. 1), 8596. https://doi.org/gdq3md
  62. Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Abrol, D., Atela, J., Charli-Joseph, L., Eakin, H., Adrian, E., Olsson, P., Pereira, L., Priya, R., van Zwanenberg, P., & Yang, L. (2020). Transformations to sustainability: Combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 6575. https://doi.org/ghgfmw
  63. Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A. J., Smith, A., & Turner, B. (2020). Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375, 20190120. https://doi.org/ghzjzt
  64. Serrano, A., & Gordo, Á. J. (Eds.). (2009). Prácticas de investigación cualitativa. Síntesis.
  65. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
  66. Turnhout, E., Dewulf, A., & Hulme, M. (2016). What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 6572. https://doi.org/f8hnzn
  67. UNEA. (2022). Resolution on nature-based solutions for supporting sustainable development. United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA). https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/39864
  68. van Oers, L., Feola, G., Runhaar, H., & Moors, E. (2023). Unlearning in sustainability transitions: Insight from two Dutch community-supported agriculture farms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 46, 100693. https://doi.org/pkbp
  69. Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., & Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 4554. https://doi.org/f8nr3b
  70. Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. (2011). Managing the challenges of becoming an open innovation company: Experiences from living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(1), 1925. 10.22215/timreview/489
  71. Wüstenhagen, R. (Ed.). (2008). Sustainable innovation and entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.647 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: May 6, 2025
|
Accepted on: Dec 9, 2025
|
Published on: Jan 27, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Jose Luis Fernández-Pacheco Sáez, Irina Rasskin-Gutman, Nieves Martín-Bermúdez, Ana Pérez-del-Campo, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.