Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Co-creating urban transformation: a stakeholder analysis for Germany’s heat transition Cover

Co-creating urban transformation: a stakeholder analysis for Germany’s heat transition

Open Access
|Dec 2025

Figures & Tables

bc-6-1-613-g1.png
Figure 1

Classification of real-world experiments within the dimensions of knowledge application and generation, and controllability of boundary conditions.

Note: Simplified representation based on Groß et al. (2015).

bc-6-1-613-g2.png
Figure 2

Actors in the Three-Circle Model.

Note: The core area includes the actors responsible for design and implementation. The inner circle consists of those actors who are at least partially involved in real-world laboratory (RWL) activities. In contrast, the actors in the outer circle are only marginally engaged. The environment contains actors who are not actively involved in the project. The model based on Seebacher et al. (2018).

CAIS = Center of Advanced Internet Studies (CAIS); DDI = Digital Democratic Innovations; SCIU = Smart City Innovation Unit; WW = Wärmewende Unit.

Table 1

Key dates and timeline of project activity.

DATEACTIVITYACTORS
2022Early encounters at conferencesResearch programme, innovation unit
14 March 2023Ideation sprintResearch programme, innovation unit
19 September 2023Submission of a project proposalResearch programme, innovation unit, research institute, funding foundation
1 April 2024Formal start: Taskforce Pop-up Citizen Co-LabResearch programme, innovation unit
7–8 September 2024RWE: Lindener MeileResearch programme, innovation unit, independent evaluation institute
11 October 2024RWE: Science Festival Press PlayResearch programme, innovation unit, independent evaluation institute
10 December 2024Presentation at StadtwerkeResearch programme, energy transition unit
29 January 2025Evaluation meetingResearch programme, independent evaluation institute
19 March 2025Stadtlabor WärmewendeResearch programme, innovation unit, energy transition unit
Table 2

Research questions, clustered during the development of the urban real-world experiment.

CONTENT-RELATED QUESTIONS (URBAN LIVING LABS AND SMART CITIES)PROCESS-RELATED QUESTIONS (‘HOW DOES A LIVING LAB FUNCTION?’)
Do urban living labs provide access to novel urban data streams? (‘How do data come to the city?’)What roles do researchers adopt in a living lab setting (e.g. co-creation, consultation, embedded research)?
Can urban living labs enhance communication about and engagement for smart city initiatives?How are citizens integrated into the working process?
Which smart city narratives are particularly well-suited for living lab environments?What characterises living labs that engage with digital transformation?
Are there smart city topics where living labs may not be an appropriate tool?What is a suitable life-cycle for a living lab?
Can urban living labs contribute to more informed and better legitimatised policy decisions?What legal considerations must be accounted for in the design process of a real-world lab?
Do living labs in smart cities necessarily require a digital focus?
Are urban living labs inherently political spaces?
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.613 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 12, 2025
Accepted on: Nov 19, 2025
Published on: Dec 10, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Pauline Heger, Christoph Bieber, Mennatullah Hendawy, Aryan Shooshtari, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.