Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The contested privileging of zero carbon: plausibility, persuasiveness and professionalism Cover

The contested privileging of zero carbon: plausibility, persuasiveness and professionalism

Open Access
|Aug 2020

References

  1. Ade, R., & Rehm, M. (2020). The unwritten history of green building rating tools: A personal view from some of the ‘founding fathers’. Building Research & Information, 48(1), 117. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2019.1627179
  2. Alvesson, M. (2010). Self-doubters, strugglers, storytellers, surfers and others: Images of self-identities in organization studies. Human Relations, 63(2), 193217. DOI: 10.1177/0018726709350372
  3. Bartel, C. A., & Garud, R. (2009). The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization Science, 20(1), 107117. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0372
  4. Boje, D. M. (2011). Storytelling and the future of organizations: An antenarrative handbook. Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9780203830642
  5. Blyth, A., & Worthington, J. (2010). Managing the brief for better design, 2nd ed. Spon. DOI: 10.4324/9780203857373
  6. Bonham, M. B. (2013). Leading by example: New professionalism and the government client. Building Research & Information, 41(1), 7794. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2013.743251
  7. Bordass, B., & Leaman, A. (2013). A new professionalism: Remedy or fantasy? Building Research & Information, 41(1), 17. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2012.750572
  8. Bordass, B., & Leaman, A. (2015). Building performance evaluation in the UK: So many false dawns. In W. F. E. Prieser, A. T. Davis, A. M. Salama, & A. Hardy (Eds.), Architecture beyond criticism: Expert judgement and performance evaluation (pp. 160170). Routledge.
  9. Brand, S. (1997). How buildings learn. Phoenix Illustrated.
  10. Brown, A. D. (2006). A narrative approach to collective identities. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 731753. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00609.x
  11. Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our common future: Report of the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press.
  12. Bulkeley, H., Edward, G. A. S., & Fuller, S. (2014). Contesting climate justice in the city: Examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments. Global Environment Change, 25, 3140. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.009
  13. Cairns, G. (2008). Advocating an ambivalent approach to theorizing the built environment. Building Research & Information, 36(3), 280289. DOI: 10.1080/09613210801928164
  14. Collins, E. (2014). Architects and research-based knowledge: A literature review. RIBA. Retrieved from https://www.architecture.com/research
  15. Currie, G., & Brown, A. (2003). A narratological approach to understanding processes of organizing in a UK hospital. Human Relations, 56(5), 563586. DOI: 10.1177/0018726703056005003
  16. Darke, J. (1979). The primary generator and the design process. Design Studies, 1(1), 3644. DOI: 10.1016/0142-694X(79)90027-9
  17. De Cock, C., Nyberg, D., & Wright, C. (2019). Disrupting climate change futures: Conceptual tools for lost histories. Organization. DOI: 10.1177/1350508419883377
  18. de Wilde, P. (2014). The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation. Automation in Construction, 41, 4049. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.02.009
  19. Denning, S. (2005). Transformational innovation: A journey by narrative. Strategy and Leadership, 33(3), 1116. DOI: 10.1108/10878570510700119
  20. Denning, S. (2007). The secret language of leadership: How leaders inspire action through narrative. Jossey-Bass. DOI: 10.1108/sd.2009.05625aae.001
  21. Dillon, P., & Howe, T. (2003). Design as narrative: objects, stories and negotiated meaning. International Journal of Art & Design, 22(3), 289296. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5949.00366
  22. Dixon, T., Eames, M., Hunt, M., & Lannon, S. (Eds.). (2014). Urban retrofitting for sustainability. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315850184
  23. Duffy, F. (1998). Architects and the social sciences [orig. ‘Architect, developer, user, government, manufacturer and the office building. Building Research, July 1968]. In F. Duffy & L. Hutton (Eds.), Architectural knowledge: The idea of a profession (pp. 821). Routledge.
  24. Duffy, F., & Worthington, J. (1972). Designing for changing needs. Built Environment, 1(7), 458463.
  25. Fleming, D. (2001). Narrative leadership: Using the power of stories. Strategy and Leadership, 29(4), 2634. DOI: 10.1108/sl.2001.26129dab.002
  26. Frandsen, S., Kuhn, T., & Lundholt, W. (2017). Counter-narratives and organization. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315681214
  27. Gabriel, Y. (2004). Narratives, stories, texts. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 6179). Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781848608122.n3
  28. Galvin, R. (2015). The rebound effect in home heating: A guide to policymakers and practitioners. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315696942
  29. Garud, R. (2014). Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective. Research Policy, 43(7), 11771188. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.015
  30. GlobalABC. (2019). 2019 Global status report for buildings and construction: Towards a zero-emissions, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction, International Energy Agency and United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved from https://globalabc.org/our-work/tacking-progress-global-status-report
  31. Goodhart, C. A. E. (1984). Problems of monetary management: The UK experience. In Monetary theory and practice (pp. 91121). Palgrave. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_4
  32. Green, S. D., & Schweber, L. (2008). Theorizing in the context of professional practice: The case for middle-range theories. Building Research & Information, 36(6), 649654. DOI: 10.1080/09613210802423512
  33. Hillier, W., Musgrove, J., & O’Sullivan, P. (1972). Knowledge and design. In W. J. Mitchell (Ed.), Environmental design: Research and practice (pp. 2933). University of California.
  34. Hughes, W., & Hughes, C. (2013). Professionalism and the professional institutions in a time of change. Building Research & Information, 41(1), 2838. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2013.737096
  35. IRENA. (2019). Future of solar photovoltaic: Deployment, investment, technology, grid integration and socio-economic aspects (Global Energy Transformation Paper). International Renewable Energy Agency.
  36. Latour, B., & Yaneva, A. (2008). Give me a gun and I will make all the buildings move: An ANT’s view on architecture. In A. Yaneva, B. Latour, & R. Geiser (Eds.), Explorations in architecture: Teaching, design, research (pp. 8089). Birkhäuser.
  37. Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Science, 45, 123152. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
  38. Mackinder, M., & Marvin, H. (1982). Design decision making in architectural practice (Research Paper 19). Institute of Advanced Architectural Studies, University of York.
  39. Martiskainen, M., & Kivima, P. (2018). Creating innovative zero carbon homes in the United Kingdom: Intermediaries and champions in building projects. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 1531. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2017.08.002
  40. McLaren, D., & Markussen, N. (2020). The co-evolution of technological promises, modelling, policies and climate change targets. Nature Climate Change, 10, 392397. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-0740-1
  41. Menezes, C., Cripps, A., Bouchlaghem, D., & Buswell, R. (2012). Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap. Applied Energy, 97, 355364. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.075
  42. Murtagh, N., Roberts, A., & Hind, R. (2016). The relationship between motivations of architectural designers and environmentally sustainable construction design. Construction Management & Economics, 34(1), 6175. DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1178392
  43. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2003). Introduction: Toward a practice-based view of knowing and learning in organizations. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 331). ME Sharpe.
  44. Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249273. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776
  45. Pan, W., & Ning, Y. (2015). A socio-technical framework of zero-carbon building policies. Building Research & Information, 43(1), 94110. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2015.955759
  46. Patel, H., & Green, S. D. (2020). Beyond the performance gap: Reclaiming building appraisal through archival research. Building Research & Information, 48(5), 469484. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2019.1672517
  47. Patel, H., & Tutt, D. (2018). This building is never complete: Studying adaptations of a library building over time. In D. Sage & C. Vitry (Eds.), Societies under construction (pp. 5185). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73996-0_2
  48. Raberneck, A. (2008). A sketch-plan for construction of built environment theory. Building Research & Information, 36(3), 269279. DOI: 10.1080/09613210801928115
  49. Rantakari, A., & Vaara, E. (2017). Narratives and processuality. In A. Langley & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), The Sage handbook of process organisation studies (pp. 271285). Sage.
  50. Rhodes, C., & Brown, A. (2005). Narrative, organizations and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3), 167188. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00112.x
  51. Ricoeur, P. (1983). Time and narrative, trans. K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer. University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226713519.001.0001
  52. Rinkinen, J., Shove, E., & Torriti, J. (Eds.). (2019). Energy fables: Challenging ideas in the energy sector. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429397813
  53. Samuel, F. (2017). Supporting research in practice. Journal of Architecture, 22(1), 410. DOI: 10.1080/13602365.2017.1280288
  54. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  55. Seidel, V. P., & O’Mahony, S. (2014). Managing the repertoire: Stories, metaphors, prototypes and concept coherence in product innovation. Organization Science, 25(3), 691712. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2013.0879
  56. Sergeeva, N., & Green, S. D. (2019). Managerial identity work in action: Performative narratives and anecdotal stories of innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 37(10), 604623. DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2019.1566625
  57. Short, A. (2017). The recovery of natural environments in architecture: Air, comfort and climate. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315765853
  58. Shove, E. (2018). What is wrong with energy efficiency? Building Research & Information, 46(7), 779789. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2017.1361746
  59. Shrubsole, C., Macmillan, A., Davies, M., & May, N. (2014). 100 unintended consequences of policies to improve the energy efficiency of the UK housing stock. Indoor and Built Environment, 23(3), 340352. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X14524586
  60. Simon, H. A. (1981). The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd ed. MIT Press.
  61. Sorrell, S. (2007). The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UK Energy Research Centre.
  62. Stevenson, F. (2019). Embedding building performance evaluation in UK architectural practice and beyond. Building Research & Information, 47(3), 305317. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2018.1467542
  63. Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2005). Theorising the micro-politics of resistance: Discourses of change and professional identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26(5), 683706. DOI: 10.1177/0170840605051821
  64. Triantafyllakos, G., Palaigeorgiou, G., & Tsoukalas, I. (2008). Collaborative design as narrative. Indiana University Conference Proceedings, Participatory Design Conference (pp. 210213). Indiana University/ACM Press.
  65. UKGBC. (2019). Net zero carbon buildings: A framework definition. UK Green Building Council.
  66. Vaara, E., Sonenshein, S., & Boje, D. (2016). Sources of stability and change in organizations: Approaches and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 495560. DOI: 10.5465/19416520.2016.1120963
  67. Van Marrewijk, A., & Yanow, D. (2010). The spatial turn in organizational studies. In A. Van Marrewijk, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Organizational spaces: Rematerializing the workaday world (pp. 116). Edward Elgar. DOI: 10.4337/9781849804912
  68. Van Poeck, K., Östman, L., & Block, T. (2019). Opening up the black box of learning-by-doing in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 298310. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.006
  69. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Addison-Wesley.
  70. Wood, A. (2018). The politics of post occupancy evaluation: The example of schools. In S. Alterator & C. Deed (Eds.), School space and its occupation: Conceptualising and evaluating innovative learning environments (pp. 121134). Brill/Sense. DOI: 10.1163/9789004379664_008
  71. WorldGBC. (2013). The business case for green buildings. World Green Building Council.
  72. WorldGBC. (2019). Annual report 2018/2019: Building a better future. World Green Building Council.
  73. Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. (2015). Climate change, capitalism and corporations: Processes of creative self-destruction. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139939676
  74. Wright, C., Nyberg, D., & Grant, D. (2012). ‘Hippies on the third floor’: Climate change, narrative identity and the micro-politics of corporate environmentalism. Organization Studies, 33(11), 14511475. DOI: 10.1177/0170840612463316
  75. Yao, R., Li, B., Steemers, K., & Short, A. (2009). Assessing the natural ventilation cooling potential of office buildings in different climate zones in China. Renewable Energy, 34(12), 26972705. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.05.015
  76. Zeisel, J. (1981). Inquiry by design. Brooks/Cole.
  77. Zhao, X., Pan, W., & Lu, W. (2016). Business model innovation for delivering zero carbon buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society, 27, 253262. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2016.03.013
  78. Zou, P. X. W., Xu, X., Sanjayan, J., & Wang, J. (2018). Review of 10 years research on building energy performance gap: Lifecycle and stakeholder perspectives. Energy and Buildings, 178, 165181. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.040
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.49 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 7, 2020
|
Accepted on: Jul 10, 2020
|
Published on: Aug 11, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Stuart D. Green, Natalya Sergeeva, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.