Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites Cover

Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites

Open Access
|Jul 2024

References

  1. 1Atkinson, R. (2016). Limited exposure: Social concealment, mobility and engagement with public space by the super-rich in London. Environment and Planning, 48(7), 13021317. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X15598323
  2. 2Atkinson, R. (2018). Necrotecture: Lifeless dwellings and London’s super-rich. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(1), 213. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12707
  3. 3Atkinson, R., Parker, S., & Burrows, R. (2017). Elite formation, power and space in contemporary London. Theory, Culture and Society, 34(5–6), 179200. DOI: 10.1177/0263276417717792
  4. 4Bärnthaler, R., & Gough, I. (2023). Provisioning for sufficiency: Envisaging production Corridors. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 19(1). DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2023.2218690
  5. 5Barone, G., & Moretti, S. (2020). Intergenerational mobility in the very long run: Florence 1427–2011. Review of Economic Studies, 88(4), 18631893. DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdaa075
  6. 6Bellezza, S. (2022). Distance and alternative signals of status: A unifying framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 50(2), 322342. DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucac049
  7. 7Bierwirth, A., & Thomas, S. (2019). Estimating the sufficiency potential in buildings: The space between underdimensioned and oversized. ECEEE Summer Study Proceedings. https://epub.wupperinst.org/frontdoor/index/index/docId/7332
  8. 8Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of judgement and taste. Harvard University Press.
  9. 9Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility. Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781503615427
  10. 10Brecht, B. (1934/1976). ‘Five children’s songs: “Alphabet”’ [1934]. In J. Willet & R. Manheim (Eds.), Bertolt Brecht: Plays, poetry, prose (pp. 239242). Eyre Methuen.
  11. 11Burrows, R., & Knowles, C. (2019). The ‘HAVES’ and the ‘HAVE YACHTS’: Socio-spatial struggles in London between the ‘merely wealthy’ and the ‘super-rich’. Cultural Politics, 15(1), 7287. DOI: 10.1215/17432197-7289528
  12. 12Cass, N., Büchs, M., & Lucas, K. (2023). How are high-carbon lifestyles justified? Exploring the discursive strategies of excess energy consumers in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 97, 102951. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.102951
  13. 13Chancel, L., & Piketty, T. (2015). Carbon and inequality: From Kyoto to Paris. 01-Study-PSE-4decNUMERIQUE-1.pdf (ens.fr)
  14. 14Chancel, L., & Piketty, T. (2021). Global income inequality, 1820–2020: The persistence and mutation of extreme inequality. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(6), 30253062. DOI: 10.1093/jeea/jvab047
  15. 15Cousin, B., Khan, S., & Mears, A. (2018). Theoretical and methodological pathways for research on elites. Socio-Economic Review, 16(2), 225249. DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwy019
  16. 16Credit Suisse. (2021). Global wealth databook 2021. https://www.credit-suisse.com/about-us/en/reports-research/studies-publications.html
  17. 17Darby, S., & Fawcett, T. (2018). Energy sufficiency—An introduction: A concept paper for ECEEE. https://www.energysufficiency.org/static/media/uploads/site-8/library/papers/sufficiency-introduction-final-oct2018.pdf
  18. 18Davis, A., Stone, J., Blackwell, C., Padley, M., Shepherd, C., & Hirsch, D. (2022). A minimum income standard for the United Kingdom in 2022 (Report). Loughborough University. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/21206114.v1
  19. 19de Vries, R., & Reeves, A. (2022). What does it mean to be a cultural omnivore? Conflicting visions of omnivorousness in empirical research. Sociological Research Online, 27(2), 292312. DOI: 10.1177/13607804211006109
  20. 20Denord, F., Palme, M., & Reau, B. (Eds.) (2020). Researching elites and power. Theory, methods, analyses. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45175-2
  21. 21Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-21500-3
  22. 22Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2022). How does affluent consumption come to consumers? A research agenda for exploring the foundations and lock-ins of affluent consumption. Consumption & Society, 1(1), 3150. DOI: 10.1332/UHIW3894
  23. 23Engelstad, F., Gulbrandsen, T., Mangset, M., & Teigen, M. (2019). Elites and people: Challenges to democracy. Comparative Social Research, 34, 113. DOI: 10.1108/S0195-631020190000034001
  24. 24Faber, D. (2008). Capitalizing on environmental injustice. The polluter–industrial complex in an age of globalization. Rowman & Littlefield.
  25. 25Featherstone, M. (2013). Super-rich lifestyles. In T. Birtchnell & J. Caletrío (Eds.), Elite mobilities (pp. 99135). Routledge.
  26. 26Forrest, R., Koh, S. Y., & Wissink, B. (2017). In search of the super-rich: Who are they? Where are they? In Forrest, R., Koh, S., & Wissink, B. (Eds.), Cities and the super-rich. The contemporary city (pp. 229252). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-54834-4
  27. 27François, M., Mertens de Wilmars, S., & Maréchal, K. (2023). Unlocking the potential of income and wealth caps in post-growth transformation: A framework for improving policy design. Ecological Economics, 208, 107788. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107788
  28. 28Freeland, C. (2012). Plutocrats: The rise of the new global super rich and the fall of everyone else. Allen Lane.
  29. 29Friedman, S., O’Brien, D., & McDonald, I. (2021). Deflecting privilege: Class identity and the intergenerational self. Sociology, 55(4), 716733. DOI: 10.1177/0038038520982225
  30. 30Friedman, S., & Reeves, A. (2020). From aristocratic to ordinary: Shifting modes of elite distinction. American Sociological Review, 85(2), 323350. DOI: 10.1177/0003122420912941
  31. 31Fromm, E. (2013). To have or to be? Bloomsbury.
  32. 32Fuchs, D., Sahakian, M., Gumbert, T. et al. (2021). Consumption corridors: Living a good life within sustainable limits. Routledge.
  33. 33Gössling, S., & Humpe, A. (2023). Millionaire spending incompatible with 1.5°C ambitions. Cleaner Production Letters, 4, 100027. DOI: 10.1016/j.clpl.2022.100027
  34. 34Gough, I. (2017). Heat, greed and human need. Edward Elgar. DOI: 10.4337/9781785365119
  35. 35Guillén-Royo, M. (2016). Sustainability and wellbeing: Human scale development in practice. Routledge.
  36. 36Hecht, K., Burchardt, T., & Davis, A. (2022). Richness, insecurity and the welfare state. Journal of Social Policy, 53(3), 573594. DOI: 10.1017/S0047279422000617
  37. 37IPBES. (2022). Methodological assessment report on the diverse values and valuation of nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat.
  38. 38IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. ipcc.ch
  39. 39Jarness, V., & Friedman, S. (2017). ‘I’m not a snob but ….’ Class boundaries and the downplaying of difference. Poetics, 61, 1425. DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2016.11.001
  40. 40Johansson, H., & Uhlin, A. (2020). Civil society elites. A research agenda. Politics and Governance, 8(3), 8285. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i3.3572
  41. 41Jungell-Michelsson, J., & Heikkurinen, P. (2022). Sufficiency: A systematic literature review. Ecological Economics, 195, 107380. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107380
  42. 42Kapeller, J., Leitch, S., & Wildauer, R. (2023). Can a European wealth tax close the green investment gap? Ecological Economics, 209, 107849. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107849
  43. 43Kenner, D. (2019). Carbon inequality: The role of the richest in climate change. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351171328
  44. 44Khan, J., Emilsson, K., Fritz, M., Koch, M., Hildingsson, R., & Johansson, H. (2023). Ecological ceiling and social floor: Public support for eco-social policies in Sweden. Sustainability Science, 18, 15191532. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-022-01221-z
  45. 45Khan, S. R. (2012). The sociology of elites. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 361377. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145542
  46. 46Koch, M. (2018). The naturalisation of growth: Marx, the regulation approach and Bourdieu. Environmental Values, 27(1), 927. DOI: 10.3197/096327118X15144698637504
  47. 47Koch, M., Büchs, M., & Lee, J. (2023). Towards a new generation of social policy: Commonalities between sustainable welfare and the IPCC. Politiche Sociali/Social Policies, 1, 2742. DOI: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.7389/107137
  48. 48Korsnes, O., Heilbron, J., Hjellbrekke, J., Bühlmann, F., & Savage, M. (Eds.). (2017). New directions in elite studies. Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9781315163796
  49. 49Krauz-Lahav, N., & Kemp, A. (2020). Elite without elitism? Boundary work and the Israeli elite philanthropy in a changing field of power. Social Problems, 67(2), 324341. DOI: 10.1093/socpro/spz015
  50. 50Kuusela, H. (2020). The hyperopia of wealth: The cultural legitimation of economic inequalities by top earners. Socio-Economic Review, 20(2), 515538. DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwaa047
  51. 51Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals, manners. University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226922591.001.0001
  52. 52Lee, J., Koch, M., & Alkan-Olsson, J. (2023). Deliberating a sustainable welfare–work nexus. Politische Vierteljahresschrift/German Political Science Quarterly, 64, 825844. DOI: 10.1007/s11615-023-00454-6
  53. 53Lierse, H., Sachweh, P., & Waitkus, N. (2022). Introduction: Wealth, inequality and redistribution in capitalist societies. Social Justice Research, 35, 367378. DOI: 10.1007/s11211-022-00402-6
  54. 54Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Energy sufficiency through social innovation in housing. Energy Policy, 126, 287294. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.026
  55. 55Maclean, M., Harvey, C., Yang, R., & Mueller, F. (2021). Elite philanthropy in the United States and United Kingdom in the new age of inequalities. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(3), 330352. DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12247
  56. 56Mills, C. W. (1956/2000). The Power Elite. Oxford University Press.
  57. 57Nelson, A. (2019). Housing for growth narratives. In Nelson, A., & Schneider, F. (Eds.), Housing for degrowth (pp. 313). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315151205-1
  58. 58O’Brien, D., & Ianni, L. (2023). New forms of distinction: How contemporary cultural elites understand ‘good’ taste. Sociological Review, 71(1), 201220. DOI: 10.1177/00380261221128144
  59. 59Otto, I. M., Kim, K. M., Dubrovsky, N., & Lucht, W. (2019). Shift the focus from the super-poor to the super-rich. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 8284. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-019-0402-3
  60. 60Padley, M., & Hirsch, D. (2017). A minimum income standard for the UK in 2017. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  61. 61Paulsen, K. E., & Stuber, J. (2022). On place and privilege: Varieties of affluence in cities and neighborhoods. Sociology Compass, 16(6), e12981. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12981
  62. 62Pellow, D. W. (2017). What is critical environmental justice? Polity. DOI: 10.1017/9781316418369.020
  63. 63Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2023). Rethinking capital and wealth taxation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39, 575591. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grad026
  64. 64Rees, W. E. (2009). The ecological crisis and self-delusion: Implications for the building sector. Building Research & Innovation, 37(3), 300311. DOI: 10.1080/09613210902781470
  65. 65Robeyns, I. (2017). Having too much. Nomos, 58, 144. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26785948. DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9781479827008.003.0001
  66. 66Robeyns, I. (2022). Why limitarianism? Journal of Political Philosophy, 30(2), 149270. DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12275
  67. 67Robeyns, I., Buskens, V., van de Rijt, A., Vergeldt, N., & van der Lippe, T. (2021). How rich is too rich? Measuring the riches line. Social Indicators Research, 154, 115143. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-020-02552-z
  68. 68Robinson, W. (2004). A theory of global capitalism. Production, class, and state in a transnational world. JHU Press. DOI: 10.56021/9780801878848
  69. 69Sahakian, M. (2018). Constructing normality through material and social lock-in: The dynamics of energy consumption among Geneva’s more affluent households. In Hui, A., Day, R., & Walker, G. (Eds.) Demanding energy: Space, time and change (pp. 5171). Palgrave. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61991-0_3
  70. 70Savage, M., & Hjelbrekke, J. (2021). The sociology of elites: A European stocktaking and call for collaboration (Working Papers). International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
  71. 71Schimpfössl, E. (2018). Rich Russians: From oligarchs to bourgeoisie. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190677763.001.0001
  72. 72Schneider, F. (2019). Housing for degrowth narratives. In Nelson, A., & Schneider, F. (Eds.), Housing for degrowth (pp. 1430). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315151205-2
  73. 73Scott, J. (2008). Modes of power and the re-conceptualization of elites. Sociological Review, 56(Suppl. 1), 2543. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00760.x
  74. 74Sherman, R. (2018). ‘A very expensive ordinary life’: Consumption, symbolic boundaries, and moral legitimacy among New York elites. Socio-Economic Review, 16(2), 411433. DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwy011
  75. 75Sklair, L. (2001). The transnational capitalist class. Oxford University Press.
  76. 76Spengler, L. (2016). Two types of ‘enough’: Sufficiency as minimum and maximum. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 921940. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2016.1164355
  77. 77Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 139). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199280452.003.0001
  78. 78Toulouse, E., Sahakian, M., Bohnenberger, K., Bierwirth, A., Lorek, S., & Leuser, L. (2019). Energy sufficiency: How can research better help and inform policy-making? https://epub.wupperinst.org/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/7399/file/7399_Toulouse.pdf
  79. 79Trainer, T. (2019). The simpler way: Housing, living and settlements. In Nelson, A., & Schneider, F. (Eds.), Housing for degrowth (pp. 120131). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315151205-10
  80. 80Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study. Allen & Unwin.
  81. 81Vogel, L., Gebauer, R., & Salheiser, A. (2019). The contested status of political elites: At the crossroads. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315211916
  82. 82Walker, G. (2012). Environmental justice: Concepts, evidence and politics. Routledge.
  83. 83Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T. et al. (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11, 3107. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.439 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 12, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 5, 2024
Published on: Jul 19, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Max Koch, Kajsa Emilsson, Jayeon Lee, Håkan Johansson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.