Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Equity and justice in urban coastal adaptation planning: new evaluation framework Cover

Equity and justice in urban coastal adaptation planning: new evaluation framework

Open Access
|Mar 2024

References

  1. 1Abbott, G., & Chapman, M. (2018). Addressing the new normal: 21st century disaster management in British Columbia. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/public-safety-and-emergency-services/emergency-preparedness-response-recovery/embc/bc-flood-and-wildfire-review-addressing-the-new-normal-21st-century-disaster-management-in-bc-web.pdf
  2. 2Agyeman, J., Schlosberg, D., Craven, L., & Matthews, C. (2016). Trends and directions in environmental justice: From inequity to everyday life, community, and just sustainabilities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 321340. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090052
  3. 3Almassi, B. (2017). Climate change and the need for intergenerational reparative justice. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 30(2), 199212. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-017-9661-z
  4. 4Amorim-Maia, A. T., Anguelovski, I., Chu, E., & Connolly, J. (2022). Intersectional climate justice: A conceptual pathway for bridging adaptation planning, transformative action, and social equity. Urban Climate, 41, 101053. DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053
  5. 5Anguelovski, I., Shi, L., Chu, E., Gallagher, D., Goh, K., Lamb, Z., Reeve, K., & Teicher, H. (2016). Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation: Critical perspectives from the global north and south. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(3), 333348. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X16645166
  6. 6Barry, J., & Agyeman, J. (2020). On belonging and becoming in the settler-colonial city: Co-produced futurities, placemaking, and urban planning in the United States. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City, 1(1–2), 2241. DOI: 10.1080/26884674.2020.1793703
  7. 7BayCAN. (2020). Equitable adaptation resource guide. BayCAN. https://www.baycanadapt.org/resource-guide
  8. 8BC Ministry of the Environment. (2013). Sea level rise adaptation primer. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/climate-change/adaptation/resources/slr-primer.pdf
  9. 9brown, adrienne maree. (2017). Emergent strategy. AK Press. https://www.akpress.org/emergentstrategy.html
  10. 10Bulkeley, H., Edwards, G. A. S., & Fuller, S. (2014). Contesting climate justice in the city: Examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments. Global Environmental Change, 25, 3140. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.009
  11. 11Bullard, R. D. (2005). The quest for environmental justice: Human rights and the politics of pollution. Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 35(2), 257258. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-006-9093-2
  12. 12Bush, J., & Doyon, A. (2023). Planning a just nature-based city: Listening for the voice of an urban river. Environmental Science & Policy, 143, 5563. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.023
  13. 13BYP Group. (2020, December 15). Evaluation resources. BYP Group. https://www.bypgroup.com/resources
  14. 14Byskov, M. F., & Hyams, K. (2022). Epistemic injustice in climate adaptation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 25(4), 613634. DOI: 10.1007/s10677-022-10301-z
  15. 15California Adaptation Forum. (2023). Call for session proposals (CFSP) guidelines. https://www.californiaadaptationforum.org/caf/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/CAF23-CFSP-Guidelines.pdf
  16. 16California Coastal Commission. (2019). Environmental justice policy. https://documents.coastal.ca.gov/assets/env-justice/CCC_EJ_Policy_FINAL.pdf
  17. 17California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. (2022). CalEnviroScreen [Text]. OEHHA. https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen
  18. 18Chu, E. K., & Cannon, C. E. (2021). Equity, inclusion, and justice as criteria for decision-making on climate adaptation in cities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 51, 8594. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.02.009
  19. 19Chu, E., & Michael, K. (2019). Recognition in urban climate justice: Marginality and exclusion of migrants in Indian cities. Environment and Urbanization, 31(1), 139156. DOI: 10.1177/0956247818814449
  20. 20City of Baltimore. (2021, April 26). The Baltimore City Community Resiliency Hub Program | Baltimore Office of Sustainability. https://www.baltimoresustainability.org/baltimore-resiliency-hub-program/
  21. 21City of Oakland. (2020). Oakland 2030 Equitable Climate Action Plan (ECAP). City of Oakland. https://www.oaklandca.gov/projects/2030ecap
  22. 22City of Vancouver. (2022). Getting our house in order: The City of Vancouver’s equity framework. https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/equity-framework.pdf
  23. 23Climate Equity Working Group. (2022). A climate justice charter for Vancouver. City of Vancouver.
  24. 24Coulthard, G. S. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  25. 25Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242261. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
  26. 26Doberstein, B., Fitzgibbons, J., & Mitchell, C. (2018). Protect, accommodate, retreat or avoid (PARA): Canadian community options for flood disaster risk reduction and flood resilience. Natural Hazards (Dordrecht), 98(1), 3150. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-018-3529-z
  27. 27Doyon, A., Boron, J., & Williams, S. (2021). Unsettling transitions: Representing Indigenous peoples and knowledge in transitions research. Energy Research & Social Science, 81, 102255. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102255
  28. 28Dutta, U., Azad, A. K., & Hussain, S. M. (2021). Counterstorytelling as epistemic justice: Decolonial community-based praxis from the global south. American Journal of Community Psychology, 69(1–2), 5970. DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12545
  29. 29Equitable Evaluation Initiative. (n.d.). Shifting the evaluation paradigm: The equitable evaluation framework. Equitable Evaluation Initiative, Grantmakers for Effective Organizations. https://www.equitableeval.org/framework
  30. 30Erfan, A., & Hemphill, J. (2013). Indigenizing and decolonizing: An alliance story. Plan Canada, 53(2). https://www.cip-icu.ca/Issues/Indigenous-Planning/PlanCanada_Vol-53No-2_2013Summer.aspx
  31. 31Fitzgerald, J. (2022). Transitioning from urban climate action to climate equity. Journal of the American Planning Association, 88(4), 508523. DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2021.2013301
  32. 32Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition: Overcoming displacement and reification in cultural politics. New Left Review, 3(May/June), 107120.
  33. 33Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/sfu-ebooks/detail.action?docID=694009
  34. 34Gilio-Whitaker, D. (2019). As long as grass grows: The Indigenous fight for environmental justice, from colonization to Standing Rock. Beacon Press.
  35. 35González, R., Facilitating Power, & National Association of Climate Resilience Planners. (2018). Spectrum of community engagement to ownership. Urban Sustainability Directors Network. https://www.usdn.org/uploads/cms/documents/community_engagement_to_ownership_-_tools_and_case_studies_final.pdf
  36. 36Grabowski, Z. J., Wijsman, K., Tomateo, C., & McPhearson, T. (2022). How deep does justice go? Addressing ecological, indigenous, and infrastructural justice through nature-based solutions in New York City. Environmental Science & Policy, 138, 171181. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.09.022
  37. 37Hardy, R. D., Milligan, R. A., & Heynen, N. (2017). Racial coastal formation: The environmental injustice of colorblind adaptation planning for sea-level rise. Geoforum, 87, 6272. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.005
  38. 38Hernandez, J. (2019). Indigenizing environmental justice: Case studies from the Pacific Northwest. Environmental Justice, 12(4), 175181. DOI: 10.1089/env.2019.0005
  39. 39Hughes, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2020). Just urban transitions: Toward a research agenda. WIREs Climate Change, 11(3), e640. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.640
  40. 40ICLEI Canada. (2020). Considering sea level rise and cultural heritage. https://icleicanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Considering-Sea-Level-Rise-and-Cultural-Heritage_FINAL.pdf
  41. 41Jang, N., & Doyon, A. (2023). Equitable implementation of green infrastructure: An analysis of the City of Vancouver. Canadian Planning and Policy / Aménagement et politique au Canada. DOI: 10.24908/cpp-apc.v2023i1.15552
  42. 42Juhola, S., Heikkinen, M., Pietilä, T., Groundstroem, F., & Käyhkö, J. (2022). Connecting climate justice and adaptation planning: An adaptation justice index. Environmental Science & Policy, 136, 609619. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.024
  43. 43JustLead Washington. (2020). REJI organizational race equity toolkit. https://justleadwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/REJI-Toolkit-v2-Final-2020-3.pdf
  44. 44Kaba, M., Murakawa, N., & Nopper, T. K. (2021). We do this ’til we free us: Abolitionist organizing and transforming justice. Haymarket Books.
  45. 45Klinenberg, E. (2002). Heat wave: A social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
  46. 46Kuhl, L., Rahman, M. F., McCraine, S., Krause, D., Hossain, M. F., Bahadur, A. V., & Huq, S. (2021). Transformational adaptation in the context of coastal cities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46(1), 449479. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-045211
  47. 47Leonard, K. (2021). WAMPUM adaptation framework: Eastern coastal tribal Nations and sea level rise impacts on water security. Climate and Development, 13(9), 842851. DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2020.1862739
  48. 48Lorde, A. (1984). ‘The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.’ Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press.
  49. 49Mabon, L., Barkved, L., de Bruin, K., & Shih, W.-Y. (2022). Whose knowledge counts in nature-based solutions? Understanding epistemic justice for nature-based solutions through a multi-city comparison across Europe and Asia. Environmental Science & Policy, 136, 652664. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.025
  50. 50Marx, R., & Morales-Burnett, J. (2022). Centering equity to address extreme heat. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/centering-equity-to-address-extreme-heat_1.pdf
  51. 51Maynard, R., & Simpson, L. B. (2022). Rehearsals for living. Haymarket Books.
  52. 52McKoy, D., Eppley, A., & Buss, S. (2022). Planning cities with young people and schools: Forging justice, generating joy. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Planning-Cities-With-Young-People-and-Schools-Forging-Justice-Generating/McKoy-Eppley-Buss/p/book/9780367694333
  53. 53Meerow, S., Pajouhesh, P., & Miller, T. R. (2019). Social equity in urban resilience planning. Local Environment, 24(9), 793808. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
  54. 54Meyer, L. H., & Pölzler, T. (2022). Basic needs and sufficiency: The foundations of intergenerational justice. In S. M. Gardiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergenerational ethics. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.23sa
  55. 55Mohnot, S., Bishop, J., & Sanchez, A. (2019). Making equity real in adaptation planning. The Greenlining Institute.
  56. 56Mohtat, N., & Khirfan, L. (2021). The climate justice pillars vis-à-vis urban form adaptation to climate change: A review. Urban Climate, 39, 100951. DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100951
  57. 57Movement Generation. (2017). From banks and tanks to cooperation and caring: A strategic framework for a just transition. https://movementgeneration.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/JT_booklet_English_SPREADs_web.pdf
  58. 58National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. (2015). Equity in building resilience in adaptation planning. https://climateaccess.org/system/files/NAACP_Equity in Resilience.pdf
  59. 59National Association of Climate Resilience Planners. (2017). Community-driven climate resilience planning: A framework. National Association of Climate Resilience Planners.
  60. 60Newell, P., Srivastava, S., Naess, L. O., Torres Contreras, G. A., & Price, R. (2021). Toward transformative climate justice: An emerging research agenda. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change, 12(6). DOI: 10.1002/wcc.733
  61. 61NorCal Resilience Network. (2023). Resilience hub initiative. https://norcalresilience.org/resilient-hub-initiative/
  62. 62Oulahen, G., & Ventura, J. (2022). Planning use values or values-based planning? ‘Rolling with’ neoliberal flood risk governance in Vancouver, Canada. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 25148486221140878. DOI: 10.1177/25148486221140878
  63. 63Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions. (2023). Living with water. Living with Water. https://www.livingwithwater.ca
  64. 64Perrin-Martinez, J. (2022). Adaptation roadmap: A practitioner’s guide to plan and implement a collaborative, equitable, integrative, and flexible approach for sea level rise adaptation. San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. https://www.adaptingtorisingtides.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/AdaptationRoadmap_A-Practitioner-Guide-Sea-Level-Rise-Adaptation_BCDC_ART_March2022_Final_ADA.pdf
  65. 65Porter, L., Rickards, L., Verlie, B., Bosomworth, K., Moloney, S., Lay, B., Latham, B., Anguelovski, I., & Pellow, D. (2020). Climate justice in a climate changed world. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(2), 293321. DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2020.1748959
  66. 66Porter, L., Roy, A., & Legacy, C. (2021). Planning solidarity? From silence to refusal. Planning Theory & Practice, 22(1), 111138. DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2021.1872952
  67. 67Race Forward. (2009). Racial equity impact assessment toolkit. https://www.raceforward.org/practice/tools/racial-equity-impact-assessment-toolkit
  68. 68Rees, A., & Doyon, A. (2023). Unsettling NbS: A pathway towards shifting colonial power relations in nature-based solutions research and practice, PLOS Climate. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000307
  69. 69Rozance, M. A., Denton, A., Marissa Matsler, A., Grabowski, Z., & Mayhugh, W. (2019). Examining the scalar knowledge politics of risk within coastal sea level rise adaptation planning knowledge systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 99, 105114. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.024
  70. 70San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. (2020). Adapting to Rising Tides (ART) Bay Area: Short report summary of regional sea level rise vulnerability and adaptation study. https://www.adaptingtorisingtides.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ARTBayArea_Short_Report_Final_March2020_ADA.pdf
  71. 71San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. (2021). ART Bay shoreline flood explorer. https://explorer.adaptingtorisingtides.org/home
  72. 72Sanson, A. V., & Burke, S. E. L. (2020). Climate change and children: An issue of intergenerational justice. In N. Balvin & D. J. Christie (Eds.), Children and peace: From research to action (pp. 343362). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22176-8_21
  73. 73Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press.
  74. 74Shi, L., Chu, E., Anguelovski, I., Aylett, A., Debats, J., Goh, K., Schenk, T., Seto, K. C., Dodman, D., Roberts, D., Roberts, J. T., & VanDeveer, S. D. (2016). Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research. Nature Climate Change, 6(2), 131137. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2841
  75. 75Shi, L., & Moser, S. (2021). Transformative climate adaptation in the United States: Trends and prospects. Science, 372(6549), eabc8054. DOI: 10.1126/science.abc8054
  76. 76SHIFT Collaborative & Ursus Resilient Strategies. (2022). Lived experience of extreme heat in B.C. B.C. Climate Action Secretariat. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/climate-change/adaptation/resources/lived_experience_of_extreme_heat_in_bc_final_report.pdf
  77. 77Shonkoff, S. B., Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M., & Sadd, J. (2011). The climate gap: Environmental health and equity implications of climate change and mitigation policies in California—a review of the literature. Climatic Change, 109(Suppl 1), 485503. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0310-7
  78. 78Siders, A. R. (2022). The administrator’s dilemma: Closing the gap between climate adaptation justice in theory and practice. Environmental Science & Policy, 137, 280289. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.08.022
  79. 79Siders, A. R., & Keenan, J. M. (2020). Variables shaping coastal adaptation decisions to armor, nourish, and retreat in North Carolina. Ocean & Coastal Management, 183, 105023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105023
  80. 80Sogbanmu, T. O., Gordon, H. S. J., El Youssfi, L., Obare, F. D., Duncan, S., Hicks, M., Bello, K. I., Ridzuan, F., & Aremu, A. O. (2023). Indigenous youth must be at the forefront of climate diplomacy. Nature (London), 620(7973), 273276. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-02480-1
  81. 81Spiegel, S. J., Thomas, S., O’Neill, K., Brondgeest, C., Thomas, J., Beltran, J., Hunt, T., & Yassi, A. (2020). Visual storytelling, intergenerational environmental justice and indigenous sovereignty: Exploring images and stories amid a contested oil pipeline project. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2362. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072362
  82. 82Stern, A., Guckenburg, S., Persson, H., & Petrosino, A. (2019). Reflections on applying principles of equitable evaluation. The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
  83. 83Stroble, J., Rahman, S., & Climate Equity Community Task Force. (2020). Section II: Sustainable & resilient frontline communities—A community-driven plan for climate justice in King County. In King County 2020 Strategic Climate Action Plan (p. 71). King County, Washington.
  84. 84Temper, L. (2019). Blocking pipelines, unsettling environmental justice: From rights of nature to responsibility to territory. Local Environment, 24(2), 94112.
  85. 85Tsleil-Waututh Nation. (2021). Tsleil-Waututh Nation—Climate change resilience plan. https://twnation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/2021_TWN_Climate-Change-Resilience-Plan.pdf
  86. 86UBC Equity & Inclusion Office. (2022). Equity & inclusion glossary of terms. UBC Equity & Inclusion Office. https://equity.ubc.ca/resources/equity-inclusion-glossary-of-terms/
  87. 87Urban Sustainability Directors Network. (2017). Guide to equitable community-driven climate preparedness planning. https://www.usdn.org/uploads/cms/documents/usdn_guide_to_equitable_community-driven_climate_preparedness-_high_res.pdf
  88. 88Ville de Montréal. (2020). Montréal climate plan: Objective carbon-neutral by 2050. https://montreal.ca/en/articles/montreal-climate-plan-objective-carbon-neutral-2050-7613
  89. 89Wade, T. (2022). Community-based adaptation approaches to sea level rise and health. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health. https://ncceh.ca/resources/evidence-reviews/community-based-adaptation-approaches-sea-level-rise-and-health
  90. 90West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project. (2022). Oakland Shoreline Leadership Academy. West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project. https://woeip.org/featured-work/oakland-shoreline-leadership-academy/
  91. 91Whyte, K. (2017). Indigenous climate change studies: Indigenizing futures, decolonizing the Anthropocene. English Language Notes, 55(1–2), 153162. DOI: 10.1215/00138282-55.1-2.153
  92. 92Whyte, K. (2018). Settler colonialism, ecology, and environmental injustice. Environment and Society, 9(1), 125144. DOI: 10.3167/ares.2018.090109
  93. 93Wijsman, K., & Berbés-Blázquez, M. (2022). What do we mean by justice in sustainability pathways? Commitments, dilemmas, and translations from theory to practice in nature-based solutions. Environmental Science & Policy, 136, 377386. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.06.018
  94. 94Woodruff, S. C., & Stults, M. (2016). Numerous strategies but limited implementation guidance in US local adaptation plans. Nature Climate Change, 6(8), article 8. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3012
  95. 95Zapata, M. A., & Bates, L. K. (2021). Planning just futures. Planning Theory & Practice, 22(4), 613642, DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2021.1956815
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.377 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 10, 2023
Accepted on: Feb 21, 2024
Published on: Mar 28, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Tira Okamoto, Andréanne Doyon, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.