Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The social value of public spaces in mixed-use high-rise buildings Cover

The social value of public spaces in mixed-use high-rise buildings

Open Access
|Aug 2023

References

  1. Aked, J., Marks, N., Cordon, C., & Thompson, S. (2011). Five ways to wellbeing. New Economics Foundation (NEF). https://neweconomics.org/uploads/files/five-ways-to-wellbeing-1.pdf
  2. Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Polity.
  3. Blanc, F., Scanlon, K., & White, T. (2020). Living in a denser London: How residents see their homes. London School of Economics and Political Science. lse.ac.uk/lse-cities-density-homes/assets/documents/LSE-Density-Report-digital.pdf
  4. Blokland, T. (2017). Community as urban practice (Urban Futures Series UK). Polity.
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77101. http://science.uwe.ac.uk/psychology/DrVictoriaClarke_files/ThematicAnalysis%20.pdf. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  6. Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.
  7. Coles, R., Costa, S., & Watson, S. (Eds.). (2018). Pathways to well-being in design: Examples from the arts, humanities and the built environment. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351170048
  8. Corcoran, R., & Marshall, G. (2017). Narratives of loneliness. Routledge.
  9. Coupland, A. (1997). Reclaiming the city: Mixed use development. E&FN Spon.
  10. Delanty, G. (2003). Community. Routledge.
  11. Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall.
  12. Denzin, N. K. (Ed.). (1970). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. Butterworths.
  13. Evans, W., Wells, N., & Moch, A. (2003). Housing and mental health: A review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. Journal of Social Issues, 59(3), 475500. DOI: 10.1111/1540-4560.00074
  14. Frank, L. D. (1994). Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: Single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transportation Research Record, 1466, 44. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1994/1466/1466-007.pdf
  15. Frantzeskaki, N. (2016). Urban resilience: A concept for co-creating cities of the future. Resilient Europe, European Programme for Sustainable Urban Development, European Union.
  16. Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island.
  17. Gifford, R. (2007). The consequences of living in high-rise buildings. Architectural Science Review, 50(1), 217. DOI: 10.3763/asre.2007.5002
  18. Good Design Australia. (2020). Good Design Award winner. Uniting communities ‘UCity’—A vertical village. https://good-design.org/projects/uniting-communities-u-city-avertical-Village/
  19. Grant, J. (2002). Mixed use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1), 7184. DOI: 10.1080/01944360208977192
  20. Holl, S., Musiatowicz, M., Mozas, J., & Fernandez Per, A. (2014). This is hybrid: An analysis of mixed-use buildings. a+t architecture. https://aplust-net.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/full/This-is-Hybrid/
  21. Hopper, P. (2003). Rebuilding communities in an age of individualism. Ashgate.
  22. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Pimlico.
  23. Jacobs, J., & Lees, L. (2013). Defensible space on the move: Revisiting the urban geography of Alice Coleman. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 15591583. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-2427.12047. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12047
  24. McDonald, C. (2008). Destination: MUD (mixed use developments): [As development space in Australia’s capital cities becomes increasingly scarce, developers are looking skywards and piling up existing buildings with mixed uses.]. Property Australia, 22(11), 2628. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.200809265
  25. Montgomery, C. (2013). Happy city: Transforming our lives through urban design. Penguin, Random House.
  26. Peace, S., Holland, C., & Kellaher, L. (2006). Environment and identity in later life. Open University Press.
  27. Planning Portal. (2009). Planning Portal United Kingdom. http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/england/genpub/en/
  28. Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94110. DOI: 10.1177/0038022920970318
  29. RIBA. (2019). Sustainable outcomes guide. The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA). https://www.architecture.com/knowledge-and-resources/resources-landing-page/sustainable-outcomes-guide
  30. Rowley, A. (1996). Mixed-use development: Concept and realities. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). DOI: 10.1080/02697459650036477
  31. Samuel, F. (2020). Social value toolkit for architecture. The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) and University of Reading. https://www.architecture.com/knowledge-and-resources/resources-landing-page/social-value-toolkit-for-architecture
  32. Samuel, F. (2023). Housing for hope and wellbeing. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003031888
  33. Samuel, F., & Hattleskog, E. (Eds). (2020). Social value in architecture. Wiley. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/journal/15542769
  34. Schwanke, D. (2003). Mixed-use development handbook. Urban Land Institute.
  35. Social Value Portal. (2019). National TOMS framework. https://socialvalueportal.com/national-toms/
  36. Tonkiss, F. (2013). Cities by design: The social life of urban form. Polity.
  37. Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
  38. UK Public General Acts. (2012). Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/3
  39. UN-Habitat. (2020). The new urban agenda. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). https://unhabitat.org/about-us/new-urban-agenda
  40. Williams, J. (2005). Designing neighbourhoods for social interaction: The case of cohousing. Journal of Urban Design, 10(2), 195227. DOI: 10.1080/13574800500086998
  41. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods, 4th ed. SAGE.
  42. Yin, R. (2014). Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6th ed. SAGE.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.339 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 15, 2023
|
Accepted on: Aug 3, 2023
|
Published on: Aug 31, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Helen Barrie, Kelly McDougall, Katie Miller, Debbie Faulkner, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.