References
- 1Aagaard, L. K. (2021). The meaning of convenience in smart home imaginaries: Tech industry insights. Buildings & Cities, 2(1), 568–582. DOI: 10.5334/bc.93
- 2Aagaard, L. K. (2022). When smart technologies enter household practices: The gendered implications of digital housekeeping. Housing, Theory and Society. DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2022.2094460
- 3Allison, J. E., McCrory, K., & Oxnevad, I. (2019). Closing the renewable energy gender gap in the United States and Canada: The role of women’s professional networking. Energy Research & Social Science, 55(September), 35–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.011
- 4Bell, S. E., Daggett, C., & Labuski, C. (2020). Toward feminist energy systems: Why adding women and solar panels is not enough. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101557
- 5Berg, A. J. (1994).
A gendered socio-technical construction: The smart house . In C. Cockburn & R. Furst Dilic (Eds.), Bringing technology home: Gender and technology in changing Europe (pp. 165–180). Open University Press. - 6Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Ripa Juliá, I., & Röhr, U. (2010). Unequal representation of women and men in energy company boards and management groups: Are there implications for mitigation? Energy Policy, 38(8). DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.072
- 7Cockburn, C. (1997). Domestic technologies: Cinderella and the engineers. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(3), 361–371. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00020-4
- 8Dahlgren, K., Pink, S., Strengers, Y., Nicholls, L., & Sadowski, J. (2021). Personalization and the Smart Home: Questioning techno-hedonist imaginaries. Convergence, 27(5), 1155–1168. DOI: 10.1177/13548565211036801
- 9Damgaard, C. S., McCauley, D., & Reid, L. (2022). Towards energy care ethics: Exploring ethical implications of relationality within energy systems in transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 84. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102356
- 10Darby, S. J. (2018). Smart technology in the home: Time for more clarity. Building Research & Information, 46(1), 140–147. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2017.1301707
- 11Furszyfer Del Rio, D. D., Sovacool, B. K., & Martiskainen, M. (2021). Controllable, frightening, or fun? Exploring the gendered dynamics of smart home technology preferences in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 77, 1–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102105
- 12Gram-Hanssen, K., & Darby, S. J. (2018). ‘Home is where the smart is’? Evaluating smart home research and approaches against the concept of home. Energy Research & Social Science, 37 (Suppl. C), 94–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.037
- 13Groves, C., Henwood, K., Shirani, F., Butler, C., Parkhill, K., & Pidgeon, N. (2016). The grit in the oyster: Using energy biographies to question socio-technical imaginaries of ‘smartness’. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 3(1), 4–25. DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1178897
- 14Hargreaves, T., & Wilson, C. (2013). Who uses smart home technologies? Representations of users by the smart home industry. ECEEE Summer Study Proceedings, 6, 1769–1780.
https://www.eceee.org/library/conference_proceedings/eceee_Summer_Studies/2013/6-appliances-product-policy-and-ict/who-uses-smart-home-technologies-representations-of-users-by-the-smart-home-industry/ - 15Hargreaves, T., & Wilson, C. (2017). Smart homes and their users. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68018-7
- 16Hargreaves, T., Wilson, C., & Hauxwell-Baldwin, R. (2018). Learning to live in a smart home. Building Research & Information, 46(1), 127–139. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2017.1286882
- 17Johnson, C. (2020). Is demand side response a woman’s work? Domestic labour and electricity shifting in low income homes in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 68,
101558 . DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101558 - 18Kennedy, J., Nansen, B., Arnold, M., Wilken, R., & Gibbs, M. (2015). Digital housekeepers and domestic expertise in the networked home. Convergence, 21(4), 408–422. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.019
- 19Khalid, R., & Razem, M. (2022). The nexus of gendered practices, energy, and space use: A comparative study of middleclass housing in Pakistan and Jordan. Energy Research & Social Science, 83, 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102340
- 20Khalid, R., & Sunikka-Blank, M. (2017). Homely social practices, uncanny electricity demands: Class, culture and material dynamics in Pakistan. Energy Research & Social Science, 34, 122–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.038
- 21Lieu, J., Sorman, A. H., Johnson, O. W., Virla, L. D., & Resurrección, B. P. (2020). Three sides to every story: Gender perspectives in energy transition pathways in Canada, Kenya and Spain. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101550
- 22Listo, R. (2018). Gender myths in energy poverty literature: A critical discourse analysis. Energy Research & Social Science, 38, 9–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.010
- 23Lopez-Neira, I., Patel, T., Parkin, S., Danezis, G., & Tanczer, L. (2019). ‘Internet of Things’: How abuse is getting smarter. Safe—The Domestic Abuse Quarterly, 63, 22–26. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3350615
- 24McDade, S., & Clancy, J. (2003). Editorial. Energy for Sustainable Development, 7(3), 3–7. DOI: 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60360-9
- 25Mechlenborg, M., & Gram-Hanssen, K. (2020). Gendered homes in theories of practice: A framework for research in residential energy consumption. Energy Research & Social Science, 67, 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101538
- 26Nicholls, L., & Strengers, Y. (2019). Robotic vacuum cleaners save energy? Raising cleanliness conventions and energy demand in Australian households with smart home technologies. Energy Research & Social Science, 50, 73–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.019
- 27Perez, C. C. (2019). Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Random House.
- 28Pink, S., Leder Mackley, K., Morosanu, R., Mitchell, V., & Bhamra, T. (2017). Making homes: Ethnography and design. Bloomsbury.
- 29Ransan-Cooper, H., Lovell, H., Watson, P., Harwood, A., & Hann, V. (2020). Frustration, confusion and excitement: Mixed emotional responses to new household solar–battery systems in Australia. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101656
- 30Richardson, H. J. (2008). A ‘smart house’ is not a home: The domestication of ICTs. Information Systems Frontiers, 11(5), 599–608. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-008-9137-9
- 31Rode, J. A., & Poole, E. S. (2018). Putting the gender back in digital housekeeping. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT, Heilbronn, Germany.
https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/10.1145/3196839.3196845 . DOI: 10.1145/3196839.3196845 - 32Sadowski, J., Strengers, Y., & Kennedy, J. (2021). More work for big mother: Revaluing care and control in smart homes. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, June, 1–16. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X211022366
- 33Sovacool, B. K., Furszyfer Del Rio, D., & Martiskainen, M. (2021). Can prosuming become perilous? Exploring systems of control and domestic abuse in the smart homes of the future. Frontiers in Energy Research, November, 1–18. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.765817
- 34Spigel, L. (2005). Designing the smart house: Posthuman domesticity and conspicuous production. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8(4), 403–426. DOI: 10.1177/1367549405057826
- 35Strengers, Y. (2013). Smart energy technologies in everyday life: Smart utopia? Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137267054
- 36Strengers, Y., Dahlgren, K., Pink, S., Sadowski, J., & Nicholls, L. (2022). Digital technology and energy imaginaries of future home life: Comic-strip scenarios as a method to disrupt energy industry futures. Energy Research & Social Science, 84, 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102366
- 37Strengers, Y., & Kennedy, J. (2020). The smart wife: Why Siri, Alexa and other smart home devices need a feminist reboot. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/12482.001.0001
- 38Strengers, Y., Kennedy, J., Arcari, P., Nicholls, L., & Gregg, M. (2019). Protection, productivity and pleasure in the smart home: Emerging expectations and gendered insights from Australian early adopters. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI ’19 (pp. 1–13).
Association for Computing Machinery . DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300875 - 39Strengers, Y., & Nicholls, L. (2017). Convenience and energy consumption in the smart home of the future: Industry visions from Australia and beyond. Energy Research & Social Science, 32: 86–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.008
- 40Strengers, Y., & Nicholls, L. (2018). Aesthetic pleasures and gendered tech-work in the 21st-century smart home. Media International Australia, 166(1), 70–80. DOI: 10.1177/1329878X17737661
- 41Sullivan, O. (2018).
The gendered division of household labor . In B. J. Risman, C. M. Froyum & W. J. Scarborough (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 377–392). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_27 - 42Takayama, L., Pantofaru, C., Robson, D., Soto, B., & Barry, M. (2012). Making technology homey: Finding sources of satisfaction and meaning in home automation. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 511–520).
ACM . DOI: 10.1145/2370216.2370292 - 43Tanczer, L. M., López-Neira, I., & Parkin, S. (2021). ‘I feel like we’re really behind the game’: Perspectives of the United Kingdom’s intimate partner violence support sector on the rise of technology-facilitated abuse. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 5(3), 431–450. DOI: 10.1332/239868021X16290304343529
- 44Tjørring, L. (2016). ‘We forgot half of the population!’ The significance of gender in Danish energy renovation projects. Energy Research & Social Science, 22, 115–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.008
- 45Tjørring, L., Jensen, C., Hansen, L., & Andersen, L. (2018). Increasing the flexibility of electricity consumption in private households: Does gender matter? Energy Policy, 118, 9–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.006
- 46Tolmie, P., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Greenhalgh, C., & Benford, S. (2007).
Making the home network at home: Digital housekeeping . In L. J. Bannon, I. Wagner, C. Gutwin, R. H. R. Harper, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), ECSCW 2007 (pp. 331–350). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-031-5_18 - 47Verkade, N., & Höffken, J. (2017). Is the Resource Man coming home? Engaging with an energy monitoring platform to foster flexible energy consumption in the Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, 27, 36–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.015
- 48West, S. M., Whittaker, M., & Crawford, K. (2019). Discriminating systems: Gender, race and power in AI. AI Now Institute.
https://ainowinstitute.org/discriminatingsystems.pdf - 49Wilson, C., Hargreaves, T., & Hauxwell-Baldwin, R. (2014). Smart homes and their users: A systematic analysis and key challenges. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 19(February), 463–476. DOI: 10.1007/s00779-014-0813-0