Table 1
International standards that calculate room air-conditioner (RAC) performance metrics.
| CONTINENT/COUNTRY | RAC STANDARD |
|---|---|
| US | AHRI 210/240-2008 |
| Australia | AS/NZS 3823.2-2013 |
| China | GB/T 7725-2004 |
| Europe | EN 14825-2012 |
| India | ISO 16358-1-2013 (CSPF) |
| Japan | JISC 9612:2013, JRA 4046 |
[i] Note: CSPF = cooling seasonal performance factor.
Table 2
Summary of objectives, methods and outcomes.
| LITERATURE REVIEW | DATA COLLECTION | CALCULATIONS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Objective | To identify metrics to quantify thermal comfort, energy efficiency and the environmental impact of RACs | To prepare a database of variables affecting RAC performance and to analyse their relationships | To propose a method to quantify the metrics of thermal comfort, energy efficiency and environmental impact and to establish a correlation between them |
| Methods |
|
|
|
| Outcome |
|
|
|
[i] Note: For definitions, see the list of abbreviations.
Table 3
Specifications of the five room air-conditioner (RAC) cases.
| CASE | SOURCE | MANUFACTURER | REFRIGERANT | CAPACITY (TONS OF REFRIGERATION) | ENERGY PERFORMANCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kumar et al. (2018b) | C | R410a | 1.5 | 3.65 (EER) |
| 2 | Kumar et al. (2018b) | A | R32 | 1.5 | 5.20 (ISEER) |
| 3 | Coolselector2 | B | R410a | 1.5 | 3.68 (COP) |
| 4 | Coolselector2 | B | R410a | 1.5 | 3.69 (COP) |
| 5 | Coolselector2 | B | R410a | 1.5 | 3.58 (COP) |
[i] Note: For definitions, see the list of abbreviations.

Figure 1
Calculating cooling seasonal performance factor (CSPF) (also known as the Indian seasonal energy efficiency ratio—ISEER) as per ISO 16358-1 (2013).
Table 4
Assumptions for the calculation of total equivalent warming impact (TEWI).
| PARAMETER | ASSUMPTION | REFERENCE |
|---|---|---|
| Leakage rate | 10% | Chaturvedi et al. (2015) |
| Recovery factor | 5%, 10% and 15% | Chaturvedi et al. (2015) |
| 15% | Kumar et al. (2018b) | |
| System operating life | 10 years | Zhao et al. (2015) |
| 8–10 years | Wu et al. (2019) | |
| Refrigerant charge | 0.21 kg/kW | Kumar et al. (2018b) |
| Indirect emission factor | 0.82 kg CO2/kWh | Central Electricity Authority (2018) |
Table 5
Rated energy performance and standard room air-conditioner (RAC) metrics for the five cases.
| CASE | RATED ENERGY PERFORMANCE | ISEER | CSEC (kWh) | TEWI (CO2e) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.65 (EER) | 1.92 | 987 | 13,382 |
| 2 | 5.20 (ISEER) | 2.48 | 899 | 9,686 |
| 3 | 3.68 (COP) | 3.51 | 703 | 9,982 |
| 4 | 3.69 (COP) | 3.82 | 648 | 9,529 |
| 5 | 3.58 (COP) | 3.73 | 663 | 9,654 |

Figure 2
Variation of standard cooling seasonal energy consumption (CSEC) and total equivalent warming impact (TEWI).

Figure 3
Variation of outdoor temperature bin hours.

Figure 4
Localised Indian seasonal energy efficiency ratio (ISEER).

Figure 5
Localised cooling seasonal energy consumption (CSEC).

Figure 6
Localised total equivalent warming impact (TEWI).
Table 6
Variation of Indian seasonal energy efficiency ratio (ISEER) for five room air-conditioner (RAC) cases for selected cities compared against the ISEER calculated using the standard methodology.
| CASE | STANDARD ISEER | MAXIMUM ISEER | MINIMUM ISEER | ISEER VARIATION |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.92 | 2.30 | 1.59 | 0.71 |
| 2 | 2.48 | 3.10 | 1.96 | 1.14 |
| 3 | 3.51 | 4.10 | 2.95 | 1.16 |
| 4 | 3.82 | 4.36 | 3.27 | 1.10 |
| 5 | 3.73 | 4.26 | 3.20 | 1.06 |
Table 7
Variation of cooling seasonal energy consumption (CSEC) for five room air-conditioner (RAC) cases across 55 Indian cities.
| CASE | MAXIMUM CSEC (kWh) | MINIMUM CSEC (kWh) | CSEC VARIATION (kWh) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5,149 | 2,232 | 2,917 |
| 2 | 4,615 | 2,124 | 2,491 |
| 3 | 3,616 | 1,568 | 2,048 |
| 4 | 3,336 | 1,416 | 1,920 |
| 5 | 3,415 | 1,447 | 1,968 |
Table 8
Variation of total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) for five room air-conditioner (RAC) cases across 55 Indian cities.
| CASE | MAXIMUM TEWI (CO2e) | MINIMUM TEWI (CO2e) | TEWI VARIATION (CO2e) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46,443 | 22,522 | 23,921 |
| 2 | 39,204 | 18,781 | 20,423 |
| 3 | 33,867 | 17,075 | 16,792 |
| 4 | 31,572 | 15,832 | 15,740 |
| 5 | 32,220 | 16,081 | 16,139 |

Figure 7
Comparison of Indian model for adaptive comfort (IMAC) air-conditioned (AC) and mixed-mode (MM) comfort bands against the static setpoint of 24°C.
Table 9
Reduction in cooling seasonal energy consumption (CSEC) and total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) due to adaptive methodology.
| SETPOINT | CSEC (kWh) | REDUCTION | TEWI (CO2e) | REDUCTION |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static | 1,416–5,149 | – | 15,832–46,443 | – |
| Adaptive (AC) | 1,126–4,745 | 4–23% | 13,450–43,126 | 3–22% |
| Adaptive (MM) | 753–4,018 | 12–50% | 10,018–37,167 | 10–47% |

Figure 8
Variation of room air-conditioners (RAC) performance parameters for static and adaptive (air-conditioned, AC; and mixed-mode, MM) setpoints.
| AC | air-conditioned |
| BEE | Bureau of Energy Efficiency |
| CDM | Clean Development Mechanism |
| CO2e | carbon dioxide equivalent |
| COP | coefficient of performance |
| CSEC | cooling seasonal energy consumption |
| CSPF | cooling seasonal performance factor |
| CSTL | cooling seasonal total load |
| ECBC | Energy Conservation Building Code |
| EER | energy efficiency ratio |
| EUI | energy use intensity (kWh/m2/year) |
| GHG | greenhouse gas |
| GWP | global warming potential |
| HFCs | hydrofluorocarbons |
| HVAC | heating, ventilation and air-conditioning |
| IMAC | Indian model for adaptive comfort |
| ISEER | Indian seasonal energy efficiency ratio |
| LCCP | life cycle climate performance |
| MEPS | minimum energy performance standards |
| MM | mixed mode |
| NBC | National Building Code |
| NV | naturally ventilated |
| RAC | room air-conditioner |
| RH | relative humidity |
| S&L | standards and labelling |
| SEER | seasonal energy efficiency ratio |
| TEWI | total equivalent warming impact |
| TMY | typical meteorological year |
| TR | tons of refrigerationa |
| TSI | tropical summer index |
