Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Relationship-building around a policy decision-support tool for urban health Cover

Relationship-building around a policy decision-support tool for urban health

Open Access
|Aug 2021

References

  1. Bednarek, A. T., Wyborn, C., Cvitanovic, C., Meyer, R., Colvin, R. M., Addison, P. F. E., … Leith, P. (2018). Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: The practitioners’ perspectives. Sustainability Science, 13(4), 11751183. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0550-9
  2. Best, A., & Holmes, B. (2010). Systems thinking, knowledge and action: Towards better models and methods. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 6, 145159. DOI: 10.1332/174426410X502284
  3. Birckmayer, J. D., & Weiss, C. H. (2000). Theory-based evaluation in practice. What do we learn? Evaluation Review, 24(4), 407431. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X0002400404
  4. Brundtland, G. H. (1997). The scientific underpinning of policy. Science, 277(5325), 457457. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5325.457
  5. Cairney, P., & Oliver, K. (2017). Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy? Health Research Policy and Systems, 15(1), 35. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x
  6. Cornell, S., Berkhout, F., Tuinstra, W., Tàbara, J. D., Jäger, J., Chabay, I., … van Kerkhoff, L. (2013). Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environmental Science & Policy, 28, 6070. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.008
  7. Cvitanovic, C., McDonald, J., & Hobday, A. J. (2016). From science to action: Principles for undertaking environmental research that enables knowledge exchange and evidence-based decision-making. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 864874. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.038
  8. Dannenberg, A. L. (2016). Effectiveness of health impact assessments: A synthesis of data from five impact evaluation reports. Preventing Chronic Disease, 13, E84. DOI: 10.5888/pcd13.150559
  9. Davies, M., Belesova, K., Crane, M., Hale, J., Haines, A., Hutchinson, E., … Wilkinson, P. (2021). The CUSSH programme: Learning how to support cities’ transformational change towards health and sustainability [version 1; peer review …: Awaiting peer review]. Wellcome Open Research, 6(100). DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16678.1
  10. Davies, R., Andrews, H., Farr, M., Davies, P., Brangan, E., & Bagnall, D. (2020). Reflective questions to support co-produced research. University of Bristol and University of West of England.
  11. Edwards, A. (2021). A reflection on the relational aspects of research policy interfaces. Environmental Education Research, 27(4), 513517. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2020.1739229
  12. Edwards, D. M., & Meagher, L. R. (2020). A framework to evaluate the impacts of research on policy and practice: A forestry pilot study. Forest Policy and Economics, 114, 101975. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101975
  13. Farrell, C. C., Harrison, C., & Coburn, C. E. (2019). ‘What the hell is this, and who the hell are you?’ Role and identity negotiation in research–practice partnerships. AERA Open, 5(2), 2332858419849595. DOI: 10.1177/2332858419849595
  14. Fazli, G. S., Creatore, M. I., Matheson, F. I., Guilcher, S., Kaufman-Shriqui, V., Manson, H., … Booth, G. L. (2017). Identifying mechanisms for facilitating knowledge to action strategies targeting the built environment. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 1. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3954-4
  15. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325
  16. Grant, M., Brown, C., Caiaffa, W. T., Capon, A., Corburn, J., Coutts, C., … Ward Thompson, C. (2017). Cities and health: An evolving global conversation. Cities & Health, 1(1), 19. DOI: 10.1080/23748834.2017.1316025
  17. Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., Olfert, A., Walther, J., Schiller, G., & Brunnow, B. (2021). Transforming science and society? Methodological lessons from and for transformation research. Research Evaluation. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvaa034
  18. Jagosh, J., Bush, P. L., Salsberg, J., Macaulay, A. C., Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., … Pluye, P. (2015). A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: Partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 725. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1
  19. Kothari, A., MacLean, L., Edwards, N., & Hobbs, A. (2011). Indicators at the interface: Managing policymaker–researcher collaboration. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9(3), 203214. DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2011.16
  20. Kothari, A., McCutcheon, C., & Graham, I. D. (2017). Defining Integrated Knowledge Translation and Moving Forward: A Response to Recent Commentaries. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 6(5), 299300. DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.15
  21. Le Goff, E., & Séchet, R. (2011). Les villes-santé et le développement durable: Convergence, concurrence ou écran? L’Information géographique, 75(2), 99117. DOI: 10.3917/lig.752.0099
  22. Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 95117. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
  23. Marcus, G. E. (2011). Multi-sited ethnography: Five or six things I know about it now. In S. Coleman & P. Von Hellermann (Eds.), Multi-sited ethnography: Problems and possibilities in the translocation of research methods (pp. 1634). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203810156
  24. Moore, G., Michie, S., Anderson, J., Belesova, K., Crane, M., Deloly, C., … Osrin, D. (2021). Developing a programme theory for a transdisciplinary research collaboration: Complex urban systems for sustainability and health. Wellcome Open Research, 6, 35. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16542.1
  25. Muhonen, R., Benneworth, P., & Olmos-Peñuela, J. (2019). From productive interactions to impact pathways: Understanding the key dimensions in developing SSH research societal impact. Research Evaluation, 29(1), 3447. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvz003
  26. Naustdalslid, J. (2011). Climate change—The challenge of translating scientific knowledge into action. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 18(3), 243252. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2011.572303
  27. Oliver, K., Hopkins, A., Boaz, A., Guillot-Wright, S., & Cairney, P. (2021). What works to promote research–policy engagement? Preprint. http://transforming-evidence.org/storage/pre-print-what-works-in-academic-policy-engagement.pdf
  28. Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 2. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2
  29. Owens, S. (2005). Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(3), 287292. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3804406. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00171.x
  30. Pineo, H., Zimmermann, N., & Davies, M. (2020). Integrating health into the complex urban planning policy and decision-making context: A systems thinking analysis. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 21. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0398-3
  31. Posner, S. M., & Cvitanovic, C. (2019). Evaluating the impacts of boundary-spanning activities at the interface of environmental science and policy: A review of progress and future research needs. Environmental Science & Policy, 92, 141151. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.006
  32. Rennes Métropole. (2019–24). Plan Climat-Air-Energie Territorial 2019–2024. https://metropole.rennes.fr/sites/default/files/file-PolPub/PCAET_RM_2019-24.pdf
  33. Richardson, G. P. (2011). Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 27, 219243. DOI: 10.1002/sdr.462
  34. Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., … Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature, 534(7609), 631639. DOI: 10.1038/nature18307
  35. Sarkki, S., Tinch, R., Niemelä, J., Heink, U., Waylen, K., Timaeus, J., … van den Hove, S. (2015). Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: A novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 505512. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.016
  36. Singh, S., & Beagley, J. (2017). Health and the new urban agenda: A mandate for action. The Lancet, 389(10071), 801802. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30518-4
  37. Spaapen, J., & van Drooge, L. (2011). Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 211218. DOI: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876742
  38. Star, S., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387420. http://www.jstor.org/stable/285080. DOI: 10.1177/030631289019003001
  39. Symonds, P., Milner, J., Mohajeri, N., Aplin, J., Hale, J., Lloyd, S. J., … Davies, M. (2021). A tool for assessing the climate change mitigation and health impacts of environmental policies: The Cities Rapid Assessment Framework for Transformation (CRAFT). Wellcome Open Research, 5(269). DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16345.2
  40. Taylor, E. J., & Hurley, J. (2016). ‘Not a lot of people read the stuff’: Australian urban research in planning practice. Urban Policy and Research, 34(2), 116131. DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2014.994741
  41. Trompette, P., & Vinck, D. (2009). Retour sur la notion d’objet-frontière. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 3(1), 527. DOI: 10.3917/rac.006.0005
  42. UNFCC. (2015). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement
  43. United Nations. (2019). Global sustainable development report 2019: The future is now—Science for achieving sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/globalsdreport/2019
  44. Vinck, D. (1999). Les objets intermédiaires dans les réseaux de coopération scientifique: Contribution à la prise en compte des objets dans les dynamiques sociales. Revue française de sociologie, 40(2), 385414. DOI: 10.2307/3322770
  45. Weible, C. M. (2018). Introduction: The scope and focus of policy process research and theory. In P. A. S. Christopher & M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process, 4th edn. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429494284-1
  46. Weiss, C. H. (1977). Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis, 3(4), 531545. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42783234
  47. Weiss, C. H. (1993). Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation Practice, 14(1), 93106. DOI: 10.1177/109821409301400119
  48. Wismar, M., Blau, J., Ernst, K., & Figueras, J. (2007). The effectiveness of health impact assessment: Scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/98283/E90794.pdf; or https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effectiveness-of-Health-Impact-Assessment%3A-and-Wismar-Blau/c2149c3bf7648483e8ac73a6efa38129dd31eee8
  49. Wong-Parodi, G., Mach, K. J., Jagannathan, K., & Sjostrom, K. D. (2020). Insights for developing effective decision support tools for environmental sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 5259. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.110 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 29, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jul 26, 2021
|
Published on: Aug 23, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Clément Deloly, Anne Roué-Le Gall, Gemma Moore, Lucy Bretelle, Jame Milner, Nahid Mohajeri, David Osrin, Giuseppe Salvia, Phil Symonds, Ioanna Tsoulou, Nici Zimmermann, Paul Wilkinson, Michael Davies, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.