References
- 1Bandura, A., & McClelland, D. C. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
- 2BEIS. (2019). Business population estimates for the UK and regions 2019. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS).
- 3Brady, T., & Davies, A. (2004). Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1601–1621. DOI: 10.1177/0170840604048002
- 4Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2015). The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 202–222. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2014.955224
- 5CCC. (2019). UK housing: Fit for the future? Committee on Climate Change (CCC).
- 6Clarke, L., Sahin-Dikmen, M., & Winch, C. (2020). Transforming vocational education and training for nearly zero-energy building. Buildings & Cities, 1(1), 650–661. DOI: 10.5334/bc.56
- 7Davies, A., & Brady, T. (2016). Explicating the dynamics of project capabilities. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 314–327. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.04.006
- 8De Long, D. W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(4), 113–127. DOI: 10.5465/ame.2000.3979820
- 9Dixon, T., & Eames, M. (2013). Scaling up: The challenges of urban retrofit. Building Research & Information, 41(5), 499–503. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2013.812432
- 10Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: Implications for productivity and innovation. Construction Management & Economics, 20(7), 621–631. DOI: 10.1080/01446190210163543
- 11Fawcett, T., & Topouzi, M. (2020). Residential retrofit in the climate emergency: The role of metrics. Buildings & Cities, 1(1), 475–490. DOI: 10.5334/bc.37
- 12Foxon, T. J. (2011). A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2258–2267. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.014
- 13Gann, D. M., Wang, Y., & Hawkins, R. (1998). Do regulations encourage innovation? The case of energy efficiency in housing. Building Research & Information, 26(5), 280–296. DOI: 10.1080/096132198369760
- 14Gorse, C., Glew, D., Johnston, D., Fylan, F., Miles-Shenton, D., Smith, M., Brooke-Peat, M., Farmer, D., Stafford, A., Parker, J., Fletcher, M., & Thomas, F. (2017). Core cities Green Deal monitoring project. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC).
- 15Grabher, G., & Ibert, O. (2011).
Project ecologies: A contextual view on temporary organizations . In The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 175–198). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199563142.003.0008 - 16Gross, R., Wade, F., Hanna, R., & Heptonstall, P. (2020). The Green Homes Grant is a great start. What next? (UKERC Review of Energy Policy). UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC). DOI: 10.5286/ukerc.edc.00094
- 17Ince, R., & Marvin, S. (2019). Constructing domestic retrofit as a new urban infrastructure: Experimentation, equitability and contested priorities. Local Environment, 24(9), 825–842. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2019.1648401
- 18Jagger, N., Foxon, T., & Gouldson, A. (2013). Skills constraints and the low carbon transition. Climate Policy, 13(1), 43–57. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2012.709079
- 19Janda, K., Killip, G., & Fawcett, T. (2014). Reducing carbon from the ‘middle-out’: The role of builders in domestic refurbishment. Buildings, 4, 911–936. DOI: 10.3390/buildings4040911
- 20Janda, K. B., & Parag, Y. (2013). A middle-out approach for improving energy performance in buildings. Building Research & Information, 41(1), 39–50. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2013.743396
- 21Karvonen, A. (2013). Towards systemic domestic retrofit: a social practices approach. Building Research & Information, 41(5), 563–574. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2013.805298
- 22Kersh, N. (2017). Developing knowledge through different spaces in work-related settings: Insights from the United Kingdom. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 29, 62–75. DOI: 10.5944/reec.29.2017.17248
- 23Khalfan, M. M., McDermott, P., & Swan, W. (2007). Building trust in construction projects. Supply Chain Management, 12(6), 385–391. DOI: 10.1108/13598540710826308
- 24Killip, G. (2013). Products, practices and processes: Exploring the innovation potential for low-carbon housing refurbishment among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the UK construction industry. Energy Policy, 62: 522–530. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.024
- 25Killip, G., Owen, A., Morgan, E., & Topouzi, M. (2018). A co-evolutionary approach to understanding construction industry innovation in renovation practices for low-carbon outcomes. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 19(1), 9–20. DOI: 10.1177/1465750317753933
- 26King, N. (2004).
Using templates in the thematic analysis of text . In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). SAGE. DOI: 10.4135/9781446280119.n21 - 27Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT Press.
- 28Komendantova, N. (2021). Transferring awareness into action: A meta-analysis of the behavioral drivers of energy transitions in Germany, Austria, Finland, Morocco, Jordan and Iran. Energy Research & Social Science, 71,
101826 . DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101826 - 29Lobo, S., & Whyte, J. (2017). Aligning and reconciling: Building project capabilities for digital delivery. Research Policy, 46(1), 93–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.005
- 30Lowe, R., & Chiu, L. F. (2020). Innovation in deep housing retrofit in the United Kingdom: The role of situated creativity in transforming practice. Energy Research & Social Science, 63,
101391 . DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101391 - 31Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, Article 42. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
- 32Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning—A systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
- 33Murtagh, N., Owen, A. M., & Simpson, K. (2021). What motivates building repair–maintenance practitioners to include or avoid energy efficiency measures? Evidence from three studies in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 73,
101943 . DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101943 - 34Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 913–923. DOI: 10.1177/0146167208316691
- 35ONS. (2018). Construction statistics annual tables (Data extrapolated from column W: 2018, Table 3.1a). Construction firms: Number of Firms, by size of Firm (number employed). Office for National Statistics (ONS).
- 36Osmani, M., & O’Reilly, A. (2009). Feasibility of zero carbon homes in England by 2016: A house builder’s perspective. Building and Environment, 44(9), 1917–1924. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.01.005
- 37Owen, A. (2015). Missing the point—The challenge of creating policies and programmes that tap into the motivations of the builders and installers. In ECEEE 2015 Summer study proceedings: First fuel now, Leeds, UK.
- 38Owen, A., Mitchell, G., & Gouldson, A. (2014). Unseen influence—The role of low carbon retrofit advisers and installers in the adoption and use of domestic energy technology. Energy Policy, 73, 169–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.013
- 39Topouzi, M., Owen, A., & Killip, G. (2017). Retrofit ‘daemons’ in the process of low-carbon housing stock renovation. In ECEEE 2017 Summer study on energy efficiency: Consumption, efficiency and limits.
- 40Wade, F., Hitchings, R., & Shipworth, M. (2016). Understanding the missing middlemen of domestic heating: Installers as a community of professional practice in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 19, 39–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.05.007
- 41Winch, G. (1998). Zephyrs of creative destruction: Understanding the management of innovation in construction. Building Research & Information, 26(5), 268–279. DOI: 10.1080/096132198369751