References
- Alter, Alexandra. “Curtis Sittenfeld Is No Jane Austen, but She’s O.K. With That.” The New York Times, 14 April 2016.
www.nytimes.com/2016/04/15/books/curtis-sittenfeld-is-no-jane-austen-but-shes-ok-with-that.html . - Austen, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. Gutenberg Project. Ebook 1342. 2011.
www.gutenberg.org . - Azerêdo, Genilda. “Intermediality, Intertextuality and Parody: Resonances of Jane Austen in John Fowles’s The French Lieutenant’s Woman.” Ilha do Desterro vol. 74, no.1, 2021, pp. 41–59. DOI: 10.5007/2175-8026.2021.e75477
- Bailey, Martha. “The Marriage Law of Jane Austen’s World.” Persuasions on-line vol. 36, no.1, 2015.
jasna.org/publications/persuasions-online/vol36no1/bailey/ . - Beer, Frances. “‘The three Sisters’: A ‘little bit of Ivory.’” Persuasions vol. 28, 2006, pp. 238–250.
- Bentley, G. E.
Jr. . “Genteel Finances in Jane Austen’s Novels.” Notes and Queries vol. 63, no. 2, 2016, pp. 230–233. DOI: 10.1093/notesj/gjw076 - Bolton, Mary. “The Other Bennet Sister: Mary Bennet in Pride and Prejudice.” The Onyx Review. The Interdisciplinary Research Journal at Agnes Scott College vol. 1, 2015–2016.
http://onyxreview.agnesscott.org/2015-2016/the-other-bennet-sister-mary-bennet-in-pride-and-prejudice-by-mary-bolton/ - Breuer, Rolf.
“Jane Austen etc.: An Essay on the Poetics of the Sequel.” EESE Resources.webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/edoc/ia/eese/breuer/essay.html . Erfurt Electronic. Studies in English (1998). Erfurt Electronic Studies in English. - Butler, Marilyn. Jane Austen, Oxford University Press, 2007.
- Chalupová, Jana.
“Happily Ever After? Or the Condition of Marriage in Jane Austen’s Novels.” B.A. thesis, Masaryk University, 2012. - Dabundo, Laura.
“The Feminist Critique and Five Styles of Women’s Roles in Pride and Prejudice.” Critical Insights: Jane Austen, edited by Jack Lynch, Salem Press, 2011, pp. 39–53. - Dobošiová, Michaela.
“Marriage and Human Relationships in the Eighteenth-century Britain.” B.A. thesis, Masaryk University, 2006. - Dole, Carol M.; DuChene, Courtney. “‘Oh, Lydia!’: Sexual Mores in Twenty-first-Century Updates” Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal On-Line vol. 40, no. 2, 2020.
www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/oh-lydia-sexual-mores-twenty-first-century/docview/2385900157/se-2?accountid=14609 - Eeckhout, Hannah.
“Female Homosocial Bonds in English Literature: Romantic Friendship in Jane Austen and Austen-based Femslash.” M.A. thesis, Ghent University, 2002. - Gomez-Galisteo, M. Carmen.
A Successful Novel Must Be in Want of a Sequel: Second Takes on Classics from The Scarlet Letter to Rebecca . McFarland, 2018. - Hardy, Barbara. A Reading of Jane Austen. Bloomsbury, 2000.
- Hopkins, Lisa. “Jane Austen and Money.” The Wordsworth Circle vol. 25, no. 2 (1994), pp. 76–78. DOI: 10.1086/TWC24043082
- Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. Taylor & Francis Group, 2012. DOI: 10.4324/9780203095010
- Kica, Eljvira. “Unmarried and Married in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice.” International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL) vol. 5, no.11, 2017, pp. 4–13. DOI: 10.20431/2347-3134.0511002
- Lake, Rebecca. “What Is the Average Age of Marriage In the U.S.?: When You Get Married Can Make a Difference Financially.” The Balance 17 October 2019.
www.thebalance.com/what-is-the-average-age-of-marriage-in-the-u-s-4685727 . - Langland, Elizabeth.
“Pride and Prejudice: Jane Austen and Her Readers.” Companion to Jane Austen Studies, edited by Laura Cooner Lambdin Robert Thomas Lambdin, Greenwood, 2000, pp. 41–56. - Leeds, Jennifer Anne.
“Jane Austen’s Open Secret: Same-Sex Love in Pride and Prejudice, Emma, and Persuasion.” M.A. thesis, Washington State University, 2011. - Margolis, Harriet.
“Janeite culture: what does the name ‘Jane Austen’ authorize?” Jane Austen on Screen. Ed. by Gina McDonald and Andrew F. McDonald. Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–43, 2003. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139164702.003 - Martin, Elaine. “Intertextuality: An Introduction.” The Comparatist vol.35, 2011, pp. 148-151. DOI: 10.1353/com.2011.0001
- McCawley, Dwight. “Assertion and Aggression in the Novels of Jane Austen.” Persuasions vol. 11, 1989.
www.jasna.org/persuasions/printed/number11/mccawley.htm . - McDermid, Val. Northanger Abbey. London: The Borough Press, 2014.
- Melz, Sarah.
“Ideal Gender Roles and Individual Self-Expression in the Novels Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility.” B. A. thesis, University of Missouri-Columbia, 2011. - Miller, Sydney. “How Not to Improve the Estate: Lopping & Cropping Jane Austen.” Studies in the Novel vol. 49, no. 4,
Winter 2017, pp. 431–452. DOI: 10.1353/sdn.2017.0041 - Moe, Melina. “Charlotte and Elizabeth: Multiple Modernities in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice.” ELH vol. 83, 2016, pp. 1075–1103. DOI: 10.1353/elh.2016.0040
- Nachumi, Naomi and Oppenheim, Stephanie. “Sex, Love, and Austen: Was It Good forYou?” Persuasions On-Line vol. 38, no. 1, 2017.
https://jasna.org/publications-2/persuasions-online/vol38no1/nachumi/ . - Nelson, Camilla. “The Mary Bennet Makeover: Postfeminist Media Culture and the Rewriting of Jane Austen’s Neglected Female Character.” Persuasions vol. 40, no. 2, 2020.
https://jasna.org/publications-2/persuasions-online/volume-40-no-2/nelson/ - Perry, Ruth.
“Sleeping with Mr. Collins.” Jane Austen and Co: Remaking the Past in Contemporary Culture, edited by Suzanne R. Pucci, and James Thompson, State University of New York Press, 2003, pp. 213–259. - Siegel, Carol and Bryce Campbell.
“Empire of the Sensible: Disciplining Love and the 1990s Austen Craze.” Jane Austen and Masculinity, edited by Michael Kramp, Bucknell University Press, 2017, pp. 131–149. - Smith, Alexander McCall. Emma. London: The Borough Press, 2015.
- Sittenfeld, Curtis. Eligible. London: The Borough Press, 2016.
- Souter, Kay Torney. “Heads and Arms and Legs Enough: Jane Austen and Sibling Dynamics.” Persuasions vol. 2, 2004, pp. 176–187.
- Sturrock, June. “Mrs. Bennet’s Legacy: Austen’s Mothers in Film and Fiction.” Persuasions vol. 29, no. 1, 2008.
https://jasna.org/persuasions/on-line/vol29no1/sturrock.html - Todd, Janet. The Cambridge Introduction to Jane Austen. Cambridge University Press, 2006. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511607325
- Trollope, Joanna. Sense & Sensibility. London: The Borough Press, 2013.
- Vorachek, Laura. “Intertextuality and Ideology: Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice and James Fordyce’s Sermons to Young Women.” English Faculty Publications vol. 1, 2005.
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/eng_fac_pub/1 - Witt, Elsbeth.
“Austen’s Power: Four Contemporary Chick Lit Novels Compared to the Works of Jane Austen.” M.A. thesis, University of Utretch, 2007. - Wright, Andrew. “Jane Austen Adapted.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction vol. 30, no. 3, 1975, pp. 421–453. DOI: 10.1525/ncl.1975.30.3.99p0371i
- Zengin, Mevlüde. “An Introduction to Intertextuality as a Literary Theory: Definitions, Axioms and the Originators.” Pamukkale Üniversitesi Journal of Social Sciences vol. 50, 2016, pp. 299–327. DOI: 10.5505/pausbed.2016.96729