Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A estética do medo no poema-workshop gótico “A shovel of his ashes took” (1816), de Percy Bysshe Shelley Cover

A estética do medo no poema-workshop gótico “A shovel of his ashes took” (1816), de Percy Bysshe Shelley

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Aiken, John e Anna Barbauld. Miscellaneous Pieces in Prose. J. Johnson, 1755.
  2. Behrendt, Stephen. “‘His left hand held the lyre’: Shelley’s Narrative Fiction Fragments.” The Neglected Shelley. Coordenado por Alan Winberg e Timothy Webb, Ashgate, 2015, pp. 95117. DOI: 10.4324/9781315555294-6
  3. Behrendt, Stephen. “Introduction.” Percy B. Shelley. Zastrozzi and St. Irvyne. Broadview Press, 2002, pp. 953.
  4. Bieri, James. Percy Bysshe Shelley: A Biography. U of Delaware P, 2004.
  5. Botting, Fred. Gothic. Routledge, 1996.
  6. Bradshaw, Michael. “Hedgehog Theory: How to Read a Romantic Fragment Poem.” Literature Compass, vol. 5, no. 1, 2008, pp. 7389.
  7. Bradshaw, Michael. “Reading as Flight: Fragment Poems from Shelley’s Notebooks.” The Unfamiliar Shelley. Coordenado por Alan Winberg e Timothy Webb, Ashgate, 2015, pp. 2140. DOI: 10.4324/9781315236681-2
  8. Brookshire, David, ed. P. B. Shelley and the Delimitations of the Gothic. Romantic Circles. U of Colorado. 2015. www.romantic-circles.org/praxis/gothic_shelley.
  9. Burke, Edmund. Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Oxford UP, 1990.
  10. Carroll, Noël. The Philosophy of Horror or Paradoxes of the Heart. Routledge, 1990.
  11. Coleridge, Samuel. “The Mysteries of Udolpho, A Romance.” The Critical Review, vol. 11, 1794, pp. 361372.
  12. Crook, Nora, ed. Mary Shelley. The Novels and Selected Works of Mary Shelley 1. William Pickering, 1996.
  13. Donovan, Jack. “The Storyteller.” The Cambridge Companion to Shelley. Coordenado por Timothy Morton, Cambridge UP, 2006, pp. 85103. DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521826047.006
  14. Duffy, Cian. Shelley and the Revolutionary Sublime. Cambridge UP, 2005. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511550546
  15. Evans, Denise e Mary L. Onorato, eds. Nineteenth-Century Literature Criticism: Criticism 59. Gale, 1997.
  16. Eyriès, Jean Baptiste. Fantasmagoriana. Chez F. Schoell, 1812.
  17. Garrett, Martin. The Palgrave Literary Dictionary: Shelley. Palgrave, 2013. DOI: 10.1057/9781137328519
  18. Godwin, William. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and its Influence on Morals and Happiness. U of Toronto P, 1946.
  19. Haekel, Ralf. “Towards the Soul: Percy Bysshe Shelley’s Epipsychidion.” European Romantic Review, vol. 22, no. 5, 2011, pp. 667684. DOI: 10.1080/10509585.2011.601681
  20. Halberstam, Judith. Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters. Duke UP, 1995. DOI: 10.1515/9780822398073
  21. Hertz, Robert. Death and the Right Hand. Cohen and West, 1960.
  22. Hoeveler, Diane. Gothic Riffs: Secularizing the Uncanny in the European Imaginary, 1780–1820. Ohio State UP, 2010.
  23. Hoeveler, Diane. “Prose Fiction.” The Oxford Handbook of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Coordenado por M. O’Neill e A. Howe, Oxford UP, 2013, pp. 193207.
  24. Hogle, Jerrold. “The ‘Gothic Gomplex’ in Shelley: From Zastrozzi to The Triumph of Life.” P. B. Shelley and the Delimitations of the Gothic. Romantic Circles. Coordenado por David Brookshire, U of Colorado. 2015. www.romantic-circles.org/praxis/gothic_shelley.
  25. Hotz, Mary Elizabeth. Literary Remains: Representations of Death and Burial in Victorian Literature. SUNY P, 2009.
  26. Hume, Robert D. The English Gothic Novel I. Coordenado por Thomas Harwell, Institut fur Anglistik und Amerikanistik, U Salzburg, 1986.
  27. Janowitz, Anne. “The Romantic Fragment.” A Companion to Romanticism. Coordenado por D. Wu, Blackwell, 1999, pp. 479488. DOI: 10.1002/9781405165396.ch44
  28. Keach, William. Shelley’s Style. Methuen, 1984.
  29. Lansdown, Richard. “Beginning Life: Mary Shelley’s Introduction to Frankenstein.” The Critical Review, vol. 35, 1995, pp. 8194.
  30. Levinson, Marjorie. The Romantic Fragment Poem. U of North Carolina P, 1986.
  31. Lovecraft, H. P., The Annotated Supernatural Horror in Literature. Coordenado por S. T. Joshi, Hippocampus Press, 2000.
  32. Mcfarland, Thomas. Romanticism and the Forms of Ruin: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and the Modalities of Fragmentation. Princeton UP, 1981. DOI: 10.1515/9781400855964
  33. Miles, Robert. Gothic Writing 1750–1820. Manchester UP, 2002.
  34. Morton, Timothy. Shelley and the Revolution in Taste: The Body and the Natural World. Cambridge UP, 1994. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511582080
  35. Oates, Joyce Carol, “The Aesthetics of Fear.” Salmagundi, no. 120, 1998, pp. 176185.
  36. Percival, Robert. “From the Sublime to the Numinous a Study of Gothic Qualities in the Poetry and Drama of Shelley’s Italian Period.” Tese de Mestrado. U of Canterbury, 2000.
  37. Pottle, Frederick. “The Case of Shelley.” PMLA, vol. 67, no. 5, 1952, pp. 5809608. DOI: 10.1632/460018
  38. Rajan, Balachandra. The Form of the Unfinished. Princeton UP, 1985. DOI: 10.1515/9781400854776
  39. Rajan, Tilottama. “Promethean Narrative: Overdetermined Form in Shelley’s Gothic Fiction.” Shelley: Poet and Legislator of the World. Coordenado por T. Betty e Stuart Curran, Johns Hopkins UP, 1996, pp. 240252.
  40. Rieger, James, ed. Mary Shelley. Frankenstein. The U of Chicago P, 1982.
  41. Rogers, Neville, ed. Complete Poetical Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Oxford UP, 1975.
  42. Saglia, David. “Symmetrical Forms and Infuriate Paroxysms: Observing the Body in Percy Shelley’s Gothic Fiction.” The Neglected Shelley. Coordenado por Alan Winberg e Timothy Webb, Ashgate, 2015, pp. 3550. DOI: 10.4324/9781315555294-3
  43. Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. W. W. Norton, 2012.
  44. Shelley, Mary. “On Ghosts.” Gothic Documents: A Sourcebook 1700–1820. Coordenado por Emma Clery e Robert Miles, Manchester UP, 2000, pp. 280284.
  45. Shelley, Mary. The Life and Letters of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley II. Haskell House, 1970.
  46. Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Relics of Shelley. Ed. Richard Garnett. Edward Moxon, 1862.
  47. Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Poetical Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Edward Moxon, 1877.
  48. Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Prose Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Chatto and Unwin, 1897.
  49. Shelley, Percy Bysshe. “A Philosophical View of Reform.” Political Tracts of Wordsworth, Coleridge and Shelley. Coordenado por R. J. White, Cambridge UP, 1953, pp. 207262.
  50. Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Geneva Notebook of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Coordenado por Michael Erkelenz. Garland, 1992.
  51. Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Complete Poetry of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Johns Hopkins UP, 2000, 2004, 2012.
  52. Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Poems of Shelley: 1817–1819. Routledge, 2000.
  53. Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Poems of Shelley. Routledge, 2014.
  54. Smith, Barbara. Poetic Closure: A Study of how Poems End. U of Chicago P, 1968.
  55. Stott, Andrew McConnell. The Vampyre Family: Passion, Envy and the Curse of Byron. Cannongate, 2013.
  56. Thomas, Sophie. “The Fragment.” Romanticism: An Oxford Guide. Coordenado por Nicholas Roe, Oxford UP, 2005, pp. 502520.
  57. Tym, Marshall B. Horror Literature. R. R. Bowker, 1981.
  58. Utterson, Sarah. Tales of the Dead. White, Cochrane, 1913.
  59. Webb, Timothy e Alan M. Weinberg. “Introduction.” The Unfamiliar Shelley. Coordenado por Alan M. Weinberg e Timothy Webb, Ashagte, 2008, pp. 118. DOI: 10.4324/9781315236681-1
  60. Whatley, John. “‘The Ghost of a Forgotten Form of Sleep’: The Gothic in Shelley’s The Triumph of Life.” Gothic Studies, vol. 5, 2003, pp. 7193. DOI: 10.7227/GS.5.1.5
  61. Williams, Anne. Art of Darkness: A Poetics of Gothic. U of Chicago P, 1995. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226899039.001.0001
  62. Worthen, John. The Life of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Wiley Blackwell, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/9781118534014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/as.51 | Journal eISSN: 2184-6006
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 24, 2020
|
Accepted on: Jun 8, 2022
|
Published on: Jun 20, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Rogério Miguel Puga, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.