Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Tuberculosis Diagnostic Delays in Indonesian Primary Care Pathways Cover

Tuberculosis Diagnostic Delays in Indonesian Primary Care Pathways

Open Access
|Jul 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Selection of presumptive tuberculosis episodes.

Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of people with presumptive tuberculosis, 2025.

CHARACTERISTICTOTAL, N (%)MALE, N (%)FEMALE, N (%)P VALUE
Total503 (100.0)282 (56.1)221 (43.9)
Age, median (IQR), years42 (27–58)45 (30–60)39 (24–55)0.018
0–14 years48 (9.5)25 (8.9)23 (10.4)
15–24 years72 (14.3)36 (12.8)36 (16.3)
25–44 years147 (29.2)78 (27.7)69 (31.2)
45–64 years158 (31.4)95 (33.7)63 (28.5)
>=65 years78 (15.5)48 (17.0)30 (13.6)0.041
Pulmonary disease438 (87.1)250 (88.7)188 (85.1)
Extrapulmonary disease65 (12.9)32 (11.3)33 (14.9)0.214
Self‑presenting226 (44.9)137 (48.6)89 (40.3)
Community cadre referral137 (27.2)70 (24.8)67 (30.3)
Other health facility referral96 (19.1)52 (18.4)44 (19.9)
Private provider referral44 (8.7)23 (8.2)21 (9.5)0.032
Diabetes mellitus recorded67 (13.3)42 (14.9)25 (11.3)0.236
Inside catchment area421 (83.7)238 (84.4)183 (82.8)0.638

[i] IQR = interquartile range. Percentages use column denominators unless otherwise indicated. P values compare male and female participants using Mann‑Whitney U, chi‑square, or Fisher exact tests.

Table 2

Diagnostic delay by demographic and clinical characteristics.

CHARACTERISTICNMEDIAN DAYS (IQR)>14 DAYS, N (%)>30 DAYS, N (%)P VALUE
Total4864 (1–11)94 (19.3)37 (7.6)
Male2735 (1–12)58 (21.2)24 (8.8)
Female2133 (1–9)36 (16.9)13 (6.1)0.086
0–14 years462 (0–7)5 (10.9)2 (4.3)
15–24 years693 (1–8)9 (13.0)3 (4.3)
25–44 years1434 (1–10)24 (16.8)8 (5.6)
45–64 years1535 (2–13)35 (22.9)15 (9.8)
>=65 years757 (2–16)21 (28.0)9 (12.0)0.011
Pulmonary disease4244 (1–10)75 (17.7)27 (6.4)
Extrapulmonary disease628 (3–18)19 (30.6)10 (16.1)0.004
Self‑presenting2193 (1–8)31 (14.2)10 (4.6)
Community cadre referral1334 (1–10)24 (18.0)8 (6.0)
Other health facility referral927 (2–16)25 (27.2)12 (13.0)
Private provider referral428 (3–19)14 (33.3)7 (16.7)0.002

[i] IQR = interquartile range. Diagnostic delay was measured from presumptive tuberculosis registration to the first recorded diagnostic result. P values compare subgroup distributions of delay.

Table 3

Negative binomial regression analysis of factors associated with diagnostic delay (n = 486).

VARIABLECRUDE IRR95% CIP VALUEADJUSTED IRR*95% CIP VALUE
Sex
 Male1.180.98–1.420.0811.120.93–1.360.229
 FemaleReferenceReference
Age group (years)
 0–140.740.51–1.080.1190.780.53–1.150.205
 15–240.820.61–1.100.1840.850.63–1.150.292
 25–44ReferenceReference
 45–641.241.01–1.530.0441.210.98–1.500.077
 ≥651.531.18–1.980.0011.461.12–1.900.005
Anatomical disease site
 Extrapulmonary disease1.711.33–2.20<0.0011.581.21–2.070.001
 Pulmonary diseaseReferenceReference
Referral source
 Community cadre referral1.180.91–1.520.2101.130.87–1.470.360
 Other health facility referral1.491.12–1.980.0061.351.01–1.820.045
 Private provider referral1.671.15–2.430.0071.440.98–2.110.064
 Self‑presentingReferenceReference

[i] Adjusted for age group, sex, anatomical disease site, referral source, diabetes mellitus status, and residential area. Negative binomial regression was used because diagnostic delay (days) was a count outcome with evidence of overdispersion. Diagnostic delay was defined as the interval between presumptive tuberculosis registration and the first recorded diagnostic result.

Table 4

Adjusted logistic regression analysis of prolonged diagnostic delay (n = 486).

VARIABLE>14‑DAY DELAY aOR*95% CIP VALUE>30‑DAY DELAY aOR*95% CIP VALUE
Sex
 Male1.190.74–1.920.4731.310.66–2.610.438
 FemaleReferenceReference
Age group (years)
 0–140.640.23–1.790.3940.770.16–3.700.742
 15–240.730.31–1.710.4680.750.19–2.910.674
 25–44ReferenceReference
 45–641.420.80–2.520.2291.580.67–3.710.296
 ≥651.881.02–3.470.0432.030.82–5.030.126
Anatomical disease site
 Extrapulmonary disease2.141.15–3.980.0162.631.16–5.950.020
 Pulmonary diseaseReferenceReference
Referral source
 Community cadre referral1.220.69–2.160.4941.180.46–3.000.730
 Other health facility referral1.861.03–3.350.0392.210.94–5.220.069
 Private provider referral2.090.98–4.450.0562.470.86–7.080.094
 Self‑presentingReferenceReference

[i] Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

[ii] Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with prolonged diagnostic delay. The primary analysis defined prolonged delay as >14 days, while a >30‑day threshold was examined in sensitivity analyses. Models were adjusted for age group, sex, anatomical disease site, referral source, diabetes mellitus status, and residential area. Reference categories were female sex, age 25–44 years, pulmonary disease, and self‑presentation.

Table 5

Distribution of tuberculosis diagnostic outcomes and treatment initiation.

OUTCOMEN (%)
Among all presumptive tuberculosis episodes (n = 503)
Tuberculosis diagnosis176 (35.0)
Not tuberculosis295 (58.6)
Inconclusive or unknown32 (6.4)
Among diagnosed tuberculosis cases (n = 176)
Bacteriologically confirmed drug‑susceptible tuberculosis118 (67.0)
Bacteriologically confirmed drug‑resistant tuberculosis9 (5.1)
Clinically diagnosed tuberculosis49 (27.8)
Treatment initiation among diagnosed patients (n = 176)
Treatment initiation documented158 (89.8)
No documented treatment initiation18 (10.2)

[i] Abbreviation: TB, tuberculosis.

Table 6

Predictors of tuberculosis diagnosis.

VARIABLEADJUSTED OR95% CIP VALUE
Male sex1.390.96–2.010.081
Extrapulmonary disease0.580.32–0.960.035
Table 7

Predictors of treatment initiation among patients diagnosed with tuberculosis (n = 176).

VARIABLEADJUSTED OR95% CIP VALUE
Male sex0.830.30–2.270.713
Diagnostic delay >14 days0.460.16–1.350.158

[i] Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

[ii] Note: Models were adjusted for age group, sex, anatomical disease site, referral source, diabetes mellitus status, and residential area, as appropriate. The treatment initiation model was restricted to participants with a confirmed tuberculosis diagnosis (n = 176).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.5369 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Page range: 68 - 68
Submitted on: May 29, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 25, 2026
Published on: Jul 16, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Suherman Jaksa, Muhammad Fachri, Risky Akaputra, Nurmalia Lusida, Irna Hasanah, Raghib Filhaq, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.