Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A One-Year Retrospective Observational Study of an Occupational Medicine Outpatient Clinic in a City Hospital Cover

A One-Year Retrospective Observational Study of an Occupational Medicine Outpatient Clinic in a City Hospital

Open Access
|Oct 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Distribution of continuous variables of the study population.

VARIABLENUMBER (N)MEAN (95% CI)MEDIANMIN‑MAXP‑VALUE
Age (years)Total n = 32648.1 (46.7–49.6)47.518–80
“Women (n = 35)39.0 (35.5–42.4)40.020–69<0.001
Men (n = 291)49.2 (47.7–50.8)49.018–80
*With OD (n = 138)46.2 (43.8–48.6)44.019–760.007
Without OD (n = 168)50.4 (48.5–52.3)51.023–80
Work Duration (years)Total n = 32624.1 (22.6–25.6)25.01–60
“Women (n = 35)9.1 (6.8–11.5)7.01–26<0.001
Men (n = 291)25.9 (24.4–27.4)27.01–60
With OD (n = 138)20.3 (18.0–22.6)18.01–60<0.001
Without OD (n = 168)27.8 (25.9–29.7)30.01–57
**Smoking (pack‑years)Total n = 22726.8 (24.0–29.4)22.01–100
With OD (n = 98)23.2 (19.4–27.0)20.01–1000.031
Without OD (n = 119)29.1 (25.3–32.9)25.01–100
Body Mass Index (kg/m²)Total n = 32626.8 (26.4–27.3)26.617.5–41.5
“Women (n = 35)26.8 (25.1–28.4)26.020–370.941
Men (n = 291)26.9 (26.4–27.3)26.717.5–41.5
With OD (n = 138)26.5 (25.8–27.1)26.618.1–37.70.124
Without OD (n = 168)27.2 (26.5–27.9)26.717.5–41.5
***Post‑Retirement Duration (years)Total n = 8010.2 (8.4–12.1)9.01–36
“With OD (n = 30)12.1 (8.4–15.7)10.01–360.151
“Without OD (n = 47)9.3 (7.2–11.4)8.01–32
Age at Workforce Entry (years)Total n = 32618.3 (17.7–18.8)18.08–50
“Women (n = 35)26.2 (23.3–29.1)25.015–50<0.001
Men (n = 291)17.3 (16.9–17.8)17.08–39
With OD (n = 138)18.8 (17.8–19.9)18.08–500.076
Without OD (n = 168)17.7 (17.1–18.4)18.010–39

[i] *OD: Occupational Disease. Patients who did not complete the OD evaluation process (n = 20) were excluded from the analysis. Analyses were conducted only between patients diagnosed with an OD and those not diagnosed.

[ii] **Total number of current and former smokers: 227. After excluding patients who discontinued the diagnostic process, the total number of smokers in the groups with and without OD diagnosis was 217 (with OD/without OD = 98/119).

[iii] ***The number of patients presenting after retirement was 80, all male. No further analysis was conducted. The total number of individuals with and without an OD diagnosis was 77 (three patients discontinued the diagnostic process). The distribution was 30 with and 47 without an OD diagnosis.

[iv] “Estimates for very small subgroups (n < 50) should be interpreted with caution due to limited sample size.

Table 2

Odds ratios of factors associated with occupational disease risk according to multivariable logistic regression analysis.

INDEPENDENT VARIABLEBS.E.WALD χ²OR [%95 CI]P‑VALUE
Work Duration (years)0.060.0212.511.06 [1.03–1.09]<0.001
Smoking (pack‑years)0.010.011.071.01 [0.99–1.03]0.300
BMI (kg/m²)0.000.040.001.00 [0.93–1.07]0.990
Age at Workforce Entry (years)0.020.040.271.02 [0.95–1.10]0.599
Gender (Female/Male)−1.360.882.430.26 [0.05–1.42]0.119
Workplace Size5.670.129
Reference Category: Self‑Employed2–10 Workers1.150.732.463.15 [0.75–13.17]0.117
11–50 Workers0.740.383.682.09 [0.99–4.43]0.055
> 50 Workers0.720.412.972.04 [0.91–4.60]0.084
Income Level6.000.050
Reference Category: Minimum WageAbove Minimum Wage0.930.473.832.52 [1.00–6.37]0.050
Below Minimum Wage1.030.435.652.79 [1.20–6.49]0.017
Education Level1.760.623
Reference Category: Primary School*Middle School0.230.820.071.26 [0.25–6.28]0.779
High School−0.340.930.140.71 [0.11–4.39]0.708
University−0.090.820.010.91 [0.18–4.56]0.905
Marital Status (Married/Single)−1.880.687.590.16 [0.04–0.58]0.006

[i] B: Beta coefficient, S.E.: Standard Error, Wald: Wald statistic (tests each variable’s contribution to the model), OR: Odds Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval.

[ii] Note: The overall model significance was determined by the Omnibus Test (p < 0.001) and the Hosmer–Lemeshow Test (p = 0.241).

[iii] *Primary school was selected as the reference category. The group with no formal education (n = 6) was not used as a reference due to the small sample size.

aogh-91-1-4978-g1.png
Figure 1

Distribution of mask usage status, ear protection usage status, and protective eyewear usage status by workplace size.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4978 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 18, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 3, 2025
Published on: Oct 27, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Yusuf Samir Hasanli, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.