Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Trends in Mechanical Intestinal Obstruction: A 30‑Year Comparative Analysis Between Developing and Developed Nations Cover

Trends in Mechanical Intestinal Obstruction: A 30‑Year Comparative Analysis Between Developing and Developed Nations

Open Access
|Dec 2025

Full Article

1. Introduction

Mechanical intestinal obstruction (MIO) is a life‑threatening surgical condition accounting for 20% of acute abdominal emergencies worldwide [1]. Traditional narratives attribute MIO etiology to divergent patterns: postoperative adhesions dominate in developed nations, while obstructed hernias prevail in developing regions due to limited surgical access [2, 3]. However, recent evidence suggests these distinctions may be fading, driven by improved healthcare infrastructure and rising surgical volumes in developing economies [4, 5].

Jordan’s healthcare system, a model for rapid development in the Middle East, provides an ideal setting to investigate these shifts. Over the past three decades, Jordan has achieved > 90% hospital delivery rates and expanded laparoscopic surgery access [6], yet no studies have examined how these changes impact MIO patterns.

We aimed to analyze 30‑year trends in MIO etiology and outcomes in Jordan and to compare these trends with global data to assess convergence between developed and developing nations. We also intend to identify modifiable drivers of disparities, including socioeconomic and cultural factors.

By addressing these aims, we contribute to the World Health Organization’s Global Surgery 2030 agenda [7] and inform targeted interventions for MIO prevention.

2. Methodology

2.1 Study design

This study employed a dual approach combining retrospective cohort analysis with a systematic literature review. Data were collected for patients aged ≥ 13 years diagnosed with MIO at King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH), Jordan, between 2020 and 2023. The hospital is the largest medical structure in the north of the country, serving nearly two million citizens from four governorates and being a good source for a representative sample.

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria required confirmation of MIO through imaging or surgical findings in patients aged 13 or older who were admitted and managed at KAUH between 2020 and 2023. Patients were excluded if they had nonmechanical causes of intestinal blockage, such as electrolyte imbalance, paralytic ileus, or pseudo‑obstruction, or if they were 12 years old or younger.

2.3 Data preparation

The datasets used in this research were gathered by reviewing electronic as well as paper‑based medical records. The following clinical and demographic data were extracted after reviewing each patient’s chart: gender, age, date of admission, main presenting symptom, associated symptoms, duration of symptoms, duration of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, comorbidities, past surgical history, the etiology of MIO, management, and outcomes.

For the global comparison, we conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect databases for studies published before and after 2000, focusing on reports detailing MIO etiology and outcomes from both developed and developing nations. The literature search followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‑Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with particular attention to studies providing comparative data across different economic settings; Figure 1 shows the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for the systematic review of MIO etiology (pre‑and post‑2000). The year 2000 was used as a cutoff point since it has been considered a transition for advancement in medical technologies, including imaging modalities, and the beginning of the widespread use of the internet in healthcare for research and communication. Moreover, in the late 1990s and early 2000s, clinical practice shifted to utilize minimally invasive techniques in surgery and relied more on the rising evidence‑based medicine and data from systematic research. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, with categorical variables expressed as percentages and continuous variables as means ± standard deviation.

aogh-91-1-4782-g1.png
Figure 1

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for the systematic review of MIO etiology (pre‑and post‑2000).

2.4 Definitions

For study purposes, MIO was defined as a blockage in the intestine that is caused by an intrinsic or extrinsic physical barrier [1].

The Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) III score was utilized in this study as a validated tool that can accurately predict mortality risk in patients admitted to critical care units [8].

We used the statistical annex from the 2024 World Economic Situation and Prospects (WESP) report to classify countries. The statistical annex includes data used by the WESP to identify trends in many aspects of the global economy. It was created by the Economic Analysis and Policy Division (EAPD) of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs at the United Nations Secretariat. The WESP report classifies countries into one of three broad categories: developed, economies in transition, and developing economies [9].

2.5 Ethical considerations

Patients’ confidentiality was protected in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki provisions. This study was approved by the ethics committee at our institution (reference number: 20230279).

3. Results

The study cohort comprised 177 patients with a mean age of 54.4 ± 19 years, of whom 55% were male. Table 1 demonstrates the baseline characteristics of patients with MIO.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with mechanical intestinal obstruction (n = 177).

VARIABLEVALUE
Mean age (years)54.4 ± 19 (Range: 13–81)
GenderMale: 97 (55%)
Female: 80 (45%)
Presenting symptomsVomiting: 139 (79%)
Abdominal pain: 136 (77%)
Constipation: 98 (56%)
Nausea: 46 (26%)
ComorbiditiesHypertension: 67 (39%)
Diabetes: 45 (26%)
Malignancy: 43 (25%)
Heart failure: 13 (7%)
IBD: 9 (5%)
Previous abdominal/pelvic surgery142 (81%)
Mean duration of symptoms (days)6.5 ± 4.7 (Range: 1–60)
Mean hospital stay (days)5.6 ± 3.5 (Range: 1–30)
ICU admissions15 (8%)
SAPS III scorea (ICU patients)Mean: 62 (Range: 42–76)
ICU mortality6/15 (40%)
Overall mortality (all patients)18 (10%)
Causes of deathSepsis: 17 (94%)
Aspiration pneumonia: 1 (6%)
Outcomes (within 3 months)Full recovery: 119 (68%)
Recurrence: 30 (17%)
Death: 18 (10%)
Complications (incl. re‑op): 7 (4%)

[i] a: SAPS: Simplified acute physiologic score, for patients admitted to ICU.

Postoperative adhesions were identified as the leading cause (64%), followed by gastrointestinal malignancies (20%) and obstructed hernias (5%). Less common causes included inflammatory bowel disease (3%), sigmoid volvulus (1.5%), and diverticular disease (1%). Conservative therapy was effective in 64% of cases, while 36% warranted surgical intervention, primarily adhesiolysis (37% of procedures). Tables 2a and 2b summarize etiology and management modalities of MIO.

Table 2a

Etiology of mechanical intestinal obstruction (n = 177).

ETIOLOGYNO. OF PATIENTS (%)
Adhesions112 (64%)
Malignancy36 (20%)
Hernia9 (5%)
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)7 (3%)
Sigmoid volvulus3 (1.5%)
Diverticular disease2 (1%)
Intussusception2 (1%)
Malrotation2 (1%)
Table 2b

Management modalities and surgical procedures.

MANAGEMENT APPROACH/SURGICAL PROCEDURENO. OF PATIENTS/CASES
Conservative treatment113 (64%)
Surgical intervention62 (36%)
Adhesiolysis23 (37%)
Colectomy16 (26%)
Small bowel resection4 (6%)
Colostomy4 (6%)
Sigmoidectomy (Hartmann’s)3 (5%)
Ileostomy1 (1.6%)
Ladd’s procedure2 (3%)
Hernia repair2 (3%)
Meckel diverticulectomy1 (1.6%)
Gastrojejunostomy1 (1.6%)

The overall mortality rate was 10%, but increased to 40% among ICU‑admitted patients (n = 15), with sepsis accounting for 94% of deaths. SAPS III scores for ICU patients averaged 62 (range 42–76), with a predicted mortality rate of 41%. The main clinical outcomes are illustrated in Table 1, as well.

Comparative analysis of global data revealed adhesions as the leading cause of MIO in both developed (85.7% of post‑2000 studies) and developing nations (57.1%), though hernia‑related obstructions remained more prevalent in low‑resource settings (28.6% in post‑2000 studies versus 42.9% pre‑2000). Longitudinal data from Jordan demonstrated a striking increase in adhesion‑related MIO, from 25% in 1993 to 64% in 2023, paralleling increased access to abdominal surgeries and laparoscopic procedures. Figure 2 demonstrates the main causes of mechanical bowel obstruction in North Jordan between 1993 and 2023. Notably, recurrence rates were higher in surgically managed patients (17%) compared to those treated conservatively (12%). Table 3 demonstrates a global comparison of MIO etiology and mortality by region and time period.

aogh-91-1-4782-g2.png
Figure 2

Percentage of the main causes of MIO in North Jordan (1993, 2012, and 2023).

Table 3

Global comparison of MIO etiology and mortality by region and time period.

STUDY (YEAR)COUNTRYPERIODECONOMIC STATUSMOST COMMON CAUSEMORTALITY RATE
Ti et al. (1976) [11]Malaysia5 yrs pre‑2000DevelopingAdhesions9–13%
Pal et al. (1982) [12]India5 yrs pre‑2000DevelopingVentral hernias28%
Steityeh et al. (1993) [4]Jordanpre‑2000DevelopingVentral herniasNA
Hasnain et al. (1994) [2]Pakistan1987–1991DevelopingAdhesions 43%NA
Mohamed et al. (1997) [13]Saudi Arabia10 yrs pre‑2000DevelopingAdhesions 45%, then hernia3.5%
Ntakiyiruta & Mukarugwiro (2009) [14]Rwanda2003–2007DevelopingVentral herniasNA
Obaid (2011) [15]Malaysia2003–2007DevelopingVentral hernias4.3%
Kapan et al. (2012) [16]Turkey2005–2010DevelopingAdhesionsNA
Jiang et al. (2019) [17]China2004–2013DevelopingAdhesionsNA
Yusuf et al. (2014) [18]Pakistan2012–2013DevelopingStricturesNA
Jena et al. (2021) [19]India1996–2019DevelopingAdhesions ↑ from 23% to 51.6%NA
Fekadu et al. (2022) [20]Ethiopia2022DevelopingSmall bowel volvulusNA
Idrobo et al. (2020) [21]Colombia2012–2013DevelopingAdhesions1%
Wasim Yusuf et al. (2014) [18]Pakistan2012DevelopingObstruction/perforation (histopathology)NA
Tondelli et al. (1983) [22]Switzerland5 yrs pre‑2000DevelopedAdhesions14%
Cross & Johnston (1987) [23]Ireland1947–1982DevelopedVentral herniaNA
da Silva et al. (1994) [24]Portugal1981–1991DevelopedHernia 44%, then adhesions 15%10.8%
Miller et al. (2000) [25]Canada1986–1996DevelopedAdhesions (then Crohn’s)NA
Markogiannakis et al. (2007) [26]Greece2001–2002DevelopedAdhesions0.8%
Stephenson & Singh (2011) [27]UK2011DevelopedAdhesions10–25%
Trivedi et al. (2012) [28]USA2005–2011DevelopedAdhesionsNA
Beardsley et al. (2014) [29]Australia2009–2013DevelopedAdhesionsNA
Paul et al. (2022) [30]Germany2009–2019DevelopedAdhesions4.9–15.9%

4. Discussion

Our center’s data have shown that over the past 30 years, adhesions have become more prevalent as a cause of intestinal obstruction, rising from 25% in 1993 to 52% in 2012 up to 64% in 2023, as shown in Figure 2. Data from developed and developing countries revealed similar predominance of adhesions as a leading cause of MIO prior to and after 2000, as also shown in Table 3 [35].

Many authors argued that hernias are more predominant as a cause of MIO in developing countries, accounting for socioeconomic status and hence the shortage in medical resources. In populations with poor economic status, lack of access to healthcare services and thereby delayed presentation, as well as the inability to quantify the danger of delayed hernia repair, were blamed for hernia being a leading cause of MIO in these communities [3, 10, 31, 32].

In fact, several factors may explain why adhesions have become a more predominant cause of MIO; these include the considerable rise in the number of abdominal surgeries performed—including transabdominal hernia repairs—which can all lead to the formation of adhesions. In other words, it is our surgical interventions for abdominal diseases that resulted in a large increase in the number of MIOs [10, 11, 33, 34].

Furthermore, in many countries, individual life expectancy has grown, and elderly adults are more likely to have had many abdominal procedures, which increases the cumulative risk of developing adhesions over time [10].

It is worth noting that many hernias (mainly inguinal) complicated by MIO are classified upon admission as complicated hernias rather than MIO—particularly where Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding is not used—which results in fewer hernias being held accountable for intestinal blockage. Moreover, the success in managing hernias shifts the statistical balance, making adhesions appear more significant as a cause of obstruction [34].

Other factors that may also contribute to the variation in causes of MIO between nations include ethnic backgrounds. However, data regarding racial disparities are scarce. In a study from Malaysia, 261 patients from different ethnic groups were operated on between 1968 and 1972 for MIO. The pattern of intestinal obstruction in Chinese was similar to that in Caucasians, where adhesions account for the largest number of cases. This pattern was ascribed to the high rate of abdominal operations performed on Chinese who commonly suffer from peptic ulcers, gastric cancers, colon cancer, and other pathologies that need surgeries. The occurrence in Malays, Indians, Pakistanis, and Ceylonese was comparable to that in other developing countries where external hernia is commonest; this was explained by two reasons: cultural, which makes surgery not readily acceptable, and economic, which makes surgery unavailable as a medical service [34].

Before 2000, patients in Jordan typically did not seek surgical intervention as their first option for treating surgical conditions. A valid cultural belief that “the last remedy is cauterization” emphasized the preference for exhausting all conservative treatments before considering surgery. However, misuse of this approach was associated with a higher incidence of complicated hernias presenting with MIO. Over recent decades, local and global advancements in healthcare services and education, coupled with heightened public awareness about the significance of promptly seeking medical attention, have influenced the management and outcomes of health issues. There seems to be an increased awareness toward elective hernia repair, which may have led to a decline in the incidence of hernia‑related bowel obstructions yet an increase in the proportion of postoperative adhesions [4, 5].

Minimally invasive abdominal surgeries have become increasingly widespread over the past 20–30 years. Although studies have consistently shown that minimally invasive abdominal procedures are associated with a lower incidence of adhesion formation compared to conventional open techniques, adhesions have remained on top of the list as a leading cause for mechanical bowel obstruction. This is likely explained by the complex process of adhesion formation, which is affected by multiple other factors, similar to genetic predisposition, the extent of manipulation and handling of the intestine, and the individual healing characteristics [34, 35].

This study had some limitations. First, it was a retrospective design and involved data from a single center. Second, the sample size of patients with MIO was relatively small to evaluate risk factors with statistical significance. Further multi‑center prospective studies and meta‑analyses are required to better investigate variations in patterns between different countries and validate trends.

5. Conclusion

Adhesions have become the leading cause of MIO globally, reflecting increased surgical access and aging populations. Socioeconomic advancements in developing nations may explain the converging trends with developed countries. Standardized global reporting and adhesion prevention strategies are urgently needed. Despite the improvement in diagnosis and management of MIO, the mortality rate associated with MIO remains relatively high. Some MIO cases are inherently severe, and even with awareness, timely management may not always prevent adverse outcomes. Older patients with comorbidities face higher risks, contributing to mortality rates.

Abbreviations

MIO = mechanical intestinal obstruction, MR = mortality rate, KAUH = King Abdullah University Hospital, ICU = intensive care unit, SAPS = Simplified Acute Physiology Score, EAPD = Economic Analysis and Policy Division, IBD = inflammatory bowel disease, WESP = World Economic Situation and Prospects, CPT = Current Procedural Terminology.

Author Contributions

Abdel Rahman Al Manasra: writing original draft, conceptualization, and methodology; Alyaman Mohammad: writing original draft, project administration, and validation; Hamzeh Alsamarah: writing review and editing, and formal analysis; Leen Alshobaki: review and editing, formal analysis, and data curation; Shefaa Alenezi: review and editing and formal analysis; Ula Altorman: methodology and review and editing; Tameem Shotar: data curation, software, and review and editing; Salma Alrousan: review and editing, methodology, and data curation; and Anas Aljaiuossi: review and editing, conceptualization, and formal analysis.

All authors approved this version for publication and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4782 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 24, 2025
Accepted on: Nov 23, 2025
Published on: Dec 16, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Abdel Rahman Al Manasra, Alyaman Mohammad, Hamzeh Alsamarah, Leen Alshobaki, Shefaa Alenezi, Ula Altorman, Tameem Shotar, Salma Alrousan, Anas Aljaiuossi, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.