Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Gambian Mothers Lack Obstetric Danger Sign Knowledge, But Educational Intervention Shows Promise Cover

Gambian Mothers Lack Obstetric Danger Sign Knowledge, But Educational Intervention Shows Promise

Open Access
|May 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Obstetric danger signs included in questionnaire, based on the WHO Guide for Essential Practice.

PREGNANCYLABOR AND DELIVERYPOSTPARTUM (<48H AFTER DELIVERY)
Vaginal Bleeding
Vomiting
Severe Abdominal Pain
Swelling of Face or Legs
Blurry Vision
No Fetal Movement
High Blood Pressure
Convulsions (seizure)
Severe Headache
High Fever
Difficulty Breathing
Heavy Bleeding
Vaginal Bleeding
Labor for >12 hours
Abnormal Fetal Position
Shoulder Dystocia
Severe Headache
Retained Placenta
High Fever
Vaginal Bleeding
Abdominal Pain
Blurred Vision
High Fever
Too Weak to Get Out of Bed
Smelly Vaginal Discharge
Fast or Difficult Breathing
Convulsions
Breasts Swollen, Red, or Sore
Table 2

Sociodemographic characteristics and factors related to most recent pregnancy of surveyed women (n = 100).

TOTAL (n)
NationalityGambian Citizen91
Non-Gambian Citizen8
Age<180
18–2425
25–2928
30–3939
40–498
>500
Marital StatusSingle, never married4
Married92
Divorced3
Widowed1
Education LevelDo not read or write13
Less than high school33
Completed high school15
Arabic School22
College17
Professional School7
Graduate School1
Monthly IncomeLess than D 5,00027
D 5,000–D 10,00059
D 10,001–D 15,0009
More than D 15,0004
ResidenceUrban72
Rural28
GravidityG119
G213
G319
G418
G514
G > 517
Delivery LocationHospital56
Health Center34
At home with healthcare supervision6
Traditional Birth Attendant3
At home unsupervised1
Delivery MethodVaginal Delivery74
Elective C-Section25
Emergency C-Section1
Table 3

Reported barriers to healthcare access reported by women, and percentage of women experiencing barrier.

REPORTED BARRIERS TO HEALTHCARE ACCESSPERCENTAGE OF PARTICIPANTS EXPERIENCING BARRIER
Time7%
Location (Healthcare facility too far away)56%
Lack of transportation method20%
Lack of money for taxi26%
Lack of health insurance/referral91%
Inability to afford the obstetrics visit16%
agh-90-1-3930-g1.png
Figure 1

Recall of danger signs during (a.) pregnancy (n = 100), (b.) labor and delivery (n = 100), (c.) postpartum (n = 100).

agh-90-1-3930-g2.png
Figure 2

Percentage of women who could not spontaneously recall any danger signs.

agh-90-1-3930-g3.png
Figure 3

Knowledge of danger signs during a) pregnancy (n = 100); b) labor and delivery (n = 100); and c) postpartum (n = 100), and d) Overall cross-category danger sign awareness of surveyed women (n = 100).

Table 4

Sociodemographic factors associated with cross-category knowledge of danger signs and overall awareness score.

np VALUE (OVERALL DANGER SIGN RECALL)SPEARMAN RANK COEFFICIENT (ρ) (OVERALL DANGER SIGN RECALL)p VALUE (OVERALL AWARENESS LEVEL)SPEARMAN RANK COEFFICIENT (ρ) (OVERALL AWARENESS LEVEL)
Age<1800.1790.1360.1980.123
18–2425
25–2928
30–3939
40–498
>500
Education LevelDo not read or write130.015*0.2430.008*0.265
Less than high school33
Completed high school/Arabic School37
College/Professional School/Graduate School17
Monthly IncomeLess than D 5,000270.1360.1510.002*0.311
D ≥ 5,00072
GravidityG1190.3160.1010.6150.051
G213
G3+68

[i] * Significant values indicated by boldface type and asterisk.

Some categories were combined for logistical regression based on category size and observed outcomes.

Table 5

Odds of having awareness based on sociodemographic factors.

nOR (95% CI) FOR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT DANGER SIGNS OF PREGNANCYOR (95% CI) FOR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT DANGER SIGNS OF LABOR & DELIVERYOR (95% CI) FOR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT DANGER SIGNS OF POSTPARTUMOR (95% CI) FOR OVERALL KNOWLEDGE ABOUT DANGER SIGNS
Age<1801.01.01.01.0
18–2425********
25–2928********
30–3939********
40–498********
>500N/AN/AN/AN/A
Education LevelDo not read or write131.01.01.01.0
Less than high school333.84 (0.60, 75.46)****1.66 (0.22, 34.17)
Completed high school/Arabic school379.14 (1.55, 175.35)*****5.76 (0.96, 111.12)
College/Professional/Graduate School1710.67 (1.55, 217.04)*****6.55 (0.92, 134.21)
Monthly IncomeLess than D 5,000271.01.01.01.0
D ≥5,000723.88 (1.32, 14.26)*****5.14 (1.36, 33.78)*
GravidityG1191.01.01.01.0
G21313.60 (2.49, 112.83)*******
G3+684.13 (1.03, 27.88)*******

[i] * Significant at p < 0.05.

Indicates almost significant tendency, p = 0.052.

** P-value of the variable was greater than 0.05 which was not a candidate for logistic regression.

Some categories were combined for logistical regression analysis based on category size and observed outcomes.

agh-90-1-3930-g4.png
Figure 4

Danger sign education delivery method preferences among surveyed women.

agh-90-1-3930-g5.png
Figure 5

Self-perception of danger sign awareness vs. reality of graded awareness on danger sign recall. (a.) Breakdown of self-rating of “sufficient” awareness on Likert scale of question “I believe that I have sufficient knowledge of the danger signs that can occur during pregnancy.” (b.) Graded awareness for women who responded, “strongly agree” and “agree.”

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3930 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 11, 2022
Accepted on: Jan 2, 2024
Published on: May 20, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Kara Shannon, Jocelyn Burridge, Brodus Franklin, Sheena Bhushan, Susan Hilsenbeck, Elena V. Petrova, James N’Dow, Ibezimako Iwuh, Sharmila Anandasabapathy, Jeffrey P. Wilkinson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.