Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparing Vector-Borne Disease Surveillance and Response in Beijing and the Netherlands Cover

Comparing Vector-Borne Disease Surveillance and Response in Beijing and the Netherlands

Open Access
|Jul 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Vector-borne disease contexts based on the current presence (√) or absence (–) of endemic (human) disease, pathogen and vector (Braks et al., 2011) with (non-exhaustive) disease examples.

CONTEXTAUTOCHTHONOUS DISEASE CASE(S)PATHOGEN (AUTOCHTHONOUS/IMPORTED)VECTOR (ESTABLISHED)EXAMPLES BEIJINGEXAMPLES THE NETHERLANDS
1Lyme disease, Japanese encephalitisLyme disease, tick-borne encephalitis
2vivax-malaria, tick-borne encephalitisvivax-malaria
3West Nile fever, chikungunya, dengueRift Valley fever
4yellow fever, ZikaYellow fever, dengue, chikungunya, Zika
5Crimean Congo haemorrhagic feverJapanese encephalitis, Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3672 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 16, 2021
Accepted on: Jun 29, 2022
Published on: Jul 26, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Charlotte Onstwedder, Jerome Lock-Wah-Hoon, Sigrid van Dorp, Marieta Braks, Liselotte van Asten, Yang Zheng, Thomas Krafft, Ying Tong, Wim van der Hoek, Qi-Yong Liu, Eva Pilot, Quanyi Wang, Ewout Fanoy, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.