Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Population and Individual-Level Double Burden of Malnutrition Among Adolescents in Two Emerging Cities in Northern and Southern Nigeria: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study Cover

Population and Individual-Level Double Burden of Malnutrition Among Adolescents in Two Emerging Cities in Northern and Southern Nigeria: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Open Access
|Dec 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Comparison of participants by various sociodemographic characteristics among 2,100 adolescents in Gombe City and Uyo City in northern and southern Nigeria respectively.

VariableUyo CityGombe CityTotal (Overall)P Value
1733 (%)367 (%)2,100 (%)
Age group
Early (10–13)595 (34.33)89 (24.25)684 (32.57)
Middle (14–16)876 (50.55)180 (49.05)1,056 (50.29)
Late (17–18)262 (15.12)98 (26.70)360 (17.14)0.000
Sex
Male736 (42.47)191 (52.04)927 (44.14)
Female997 (57.53)176 (47.96)1,173 (55.86)0.001
Religion
Christianity1,724 (99.48)153 (41.69)1,877 (89.38)
Islam9 (0.52)214 (58.31)223 (10.62)0.000
Ethnicity
Ibibio1,410 (81.36)0 (0.00)1,410 (67.14)
Igbo109 (6.29)3 (0.82)112 (5.33)
Annang60 (3.46)0 (0.00)60 (2.86)
Oro44 (2.54)0 (0.00)44 (2.10)
Efik46 (2.65)0 (0.00)46 (2.19)
Hausa12 (0.69)85 (23.16)97 (4.62)
Fulani0 (0.00)122 (33.24)122 (5.81)
Tangale0 (0.00)69 (18.80)69 (3.29)
Waja0 (0.00)20 (5.45)20 (0.95)
Yoruba19 (1.10)15 (4.09)34 (1.62)
Tera0 (0.00)13 (3.54)13 (0.62)
Others33 (1.90)40 (10.90)73 (3.48)0.000
Family Setting
Monogamous1,488 (85.86)243 (66.21)1,731 (82.43)
Polygamous245 (14.14)124 (33.79)369 (17.57)0.000
Family Socioeconomic status
1 (Wealthiest)493 (28.45)39 (10.63)532 (25.33)
2536 (30.93)70 (19.07)606 (28.86)
3465 (26.83)152 (41.42)617 (29.38)
4221 (12.75)83 (22.62)304 (14.48)
5 (Poorest)18 (1.04)23 (6.27)41 (1.95)0.000
Age (years), Mean (95%CI)14.27 (14.17, 14.28)14.92 (14.71, 15.11)14.38 (14.29, 14.47)0.000
Weight (kg), Mean (95%CI)48.79 (48.32, 49.31)49.65 (48.40, 50.90)48.94 (48.49, 49.39)0.156
Height (cm), Mean (95%CI)157.72 (157.27, 158.16)157.70 (156.70, 158.71)157.72 (157.31, 158.12)0.967
Waist (cm), Mean (95%CI)69.47 (68.69, 70.25)68.73 (67.71, 69.72)69.34 (68.68, 70.01)0.404
BMI, Mean (95%CI)19.48 (19.34, 19.63)19.85 (19.42, 20.27)19.55 (19.41, 19.69)0.053
WHtR, Mean (95%CI)0.44 (0.44, 0.45)0.44 (0.43, 0.44)0.44 (0.44, 0.44)0.423
BMI for age Z score, Mean (95%CI)–0.24 (–0.30, –0.19)–0.37 (–0.52, –0.24)–0.27 (–0.32, –0.21)0.049
Height for Age Z scores, Mean (95%CI)–0.46 (–0.52, –0.41)–0.37 (–0.98, –0.75)–0.53 (–0.58, –0.48)0.000

[i] + All confidence intervals and P Values from mean age to mean height for age z scores were generated after performing an independent sample t test comparing north and south.

agh-86-1-3093-g1.png
Figure 1

Prevalence rate of population-level thinness, overweight/obesity, stunting, and truncal obesity among adolescents in Gombe, Uyo and the overall study population. Note: Thinness = BAZ < –2SD, overweight/obesity = BAZ > 1SD, stunting = HAZ < –2SD, and truncal obesity = WHtR ≥ 0.5. BAZ (BMI-for-age Z-scores), HAZ (Height-for-age Z-scores) and WHtR (Weight-to-Height-Ratio).

agh-86-1-3093-g2.png
Figure 2

The prevalence rate of population-level malnutrition (truncal obesity, overweight/obesity, thinness and stunting) by socioeconomic status among adolescents in Gombe, Uyo and the overall study population. Note: Within-group prevalence rates are computed (i.e. the prevalence of over- or undernutrition within each socioeconomic class). Thinness = BAZ < –2SD, overweight/obesity = BAZ > 1SD, stunting = HAZ < –2SD, and truncal obesity = WHtR ≥ 0.5.

Table 2

Under-nutrition and over-nutrition measures by location, sex and age among 2,100 adolescents in Gombe and Uyo.

Various Obesity MeasuresLocationSexAge Groups
Uyo, n (%)Gombe, n (%)P ValueMale, n (%)Female, n (%)P ValueEarly, n (%)Middle, n (%)Late, n (%)P ValueTotal (%)
N= 1733N = 367N = 927N = 1,173N = 684N = 1,056N = 360N = 2,100
BMI For Age
Severe Thinness20 (1.15)6 (1.63)20 (2.16)6 (0.51)7 (1.02)14 (1.33)5 (1.39)26 (1.24)
Thinness72 (4.15)38 (10.35)74 (7.98)36 (3.07)28 (4.09)55 (5.21)27 (7.50)110 (5.24)
Normal1,445 (83.38)264 (71.93)756 (81.55)953 (81.24)518 (75.73)895 (84.75)296 (82.22)1,709 (81.38)
Overweight152 (8.77)40 (10.90)53 (5.72)139 (11.85)6 (12.57)78 (7.39)28 (7.78)192 (9.14)
Obese44 (2.54)19 (5.18)0.00024 (2.59)39 (3.32)0.00045 (6.58)14 (1.33)4 (1.11)0.00063 (3.00)
Height for Age
Severely stunted23 (1.33)8 (2.18)22 (2.37)9 (0.77)2 (0.29)23 (2.17)6 (1.67)31 (1.48)
Stunted118 (6.81)38 (10.35)113 (12.19)43 (3.67)31 (4.53)98 (9.28)27 (7.50)156 (7.43)
Normal1,585 (91.46)321 (87.47)790 (85.22)1,116 (95.14)644 (94.15)935 (88.54)327 (90.83)1,906 (90.76)
Tall7 (0.40)0 (0.00)0.0352 (0.22)5 (0.43)0.0007 (1.02)0 (0.00)0 (0.000)0.0007 (0.33)
Waist to height ratio
Normal1,622 (93.59)316 (86.10)892 (96.22)1,046 (89.17)617 (31.84)992 (51.19)329 (16.98)1,938 (92.29)
Obese (truncal)111 (6.41)51 (13.90)0.00035 (3.78)127 (10.83)0.00067 (41.36)64 (39.51)31 (19.14)0.013162 (7.71)
agh-86-1-3093-g3.png
Figure 3

The prevalence rate of individual-level double burden malnutrition among adolescents in Gombe, Uyo and the overall study population. Note: This graph shows the proportion of adolescents who were either concurrently stunted (HAZ < –2SD) and overweight/obese (BAZ > 1SD) or Stunted (HAZ < –2SD) and had truncal obesity (WHtR ≥ 0.5).

Table 3

Comparing Individual-level coexistence of stunting and obesity/overweight among adolescents in Gombe and Uyo.

HAZ category OverallHAZ category GombeHAZ category UyoP Value
*StuntedNormal*StuntedNormal*StuntedNormal
N = 187 (%)N = 1913 (%)N = 35 (%)N = 332 (%)N = 152 (%)N = 1,581 (%)
BMI
Thinness**42 (22.46)94 (4.91)7 (20.00)26 (7.83)35 (23.03)68 (4.30)
Normal130 (69.52)1,579 (82.54)24 (68.57)278 (83.73)106 (69.74)1,301 (82.29)
Overweight/Obesity15 (8.02)240 (12.55)4 (11.4)28 (8.43)11 (7.24)212 (13.41)0.410
WHtR
Normal175 (93.58)1,763 (92.16)29 (82.86)307 (92.47)146 (96.05)1,456 (92.09)
Obese (truncal)12 (6.42)150 (7.84)6 (17.14)25 (7.53)6 (3.95)125 (7.91)0.004

[i] * Stunted included adolescents who were stunted (HAZ < –2SD) and those who were severely stunted (HAZ < –3SD).

** Thinness included adolescents who were thin (BAZ < –2SD) and those with severe thinness (BAZ < –3SD).

BAZBMI-for-Age Z-score
BMIBody Mass Index
CIConfidence Interval
DBMDouble Burden of Malnutrition
HAZHeight-for-Age Z-score
LMICsLow-and Middle-Income Countries
NCDsNon-Communicable Diseases
NNHSNational Nutrition and Health Survey
SDStandard Deviation
SESSocioeconomic Status
sSAsub-Saharan Africa
U5Children Under Five Years old
WHOWorld Health Organization
WHtRWaist-to-Height-Ratio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3093 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Dec 14, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Oghenebrume Wariri, Kingsley Irelosen Akhimienho, Jacob Albin Korem Alhassan, Iliya Jalo, Iso Precious Oloyede, Eno Etim Nyong, Fidelia Bode-Thomas, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.