Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Emergency Transportation Interventions for Reducing Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Cover

Emergency Transportation Interventions for Reducing Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Open Access
|Nov 2020

Figures & Tables

agh-86-1-2934-g1.png
Figure 1

Conceptual framework for the review, based on the three-delay model.

agh-86-1-2934-g2.png
Figure 2

Literature Search Process and Results.

Table 1

Characteristics of included studies.

Author (year)ObjectivesStudy DesignStudy PopulationIntervention and Follow-upOutcomes MeasuredKey ResultsCritical Appraisal
Lungu et al. (2000)To evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions (bicycle ambulances and established transport plans) in decreasing home delivery ratesCase-control studyWomen of childbearing age who delivered in Nsanje District of Malawi
  • Two villages provided with bicycle ambulances and two developed community transport plans

  • Control group (no intervention)

  • Follow-up period = 6 months

Home deliveriesBicycles ambulances: 51.2%
Transport plan: 9.8%
Home deliveries in case villages decreased from 37% to 18%
  • No pre- and post-home deliveries data for control group

ReferralsControl: 39%
Bicycle ambulances: 20% of referrals to the health facilities were for obstetric reasons.
  • No pre- and post-home referrals data for all three groups

  • No during intervention data of referrals for transport plan intervention and control group

Transport time
  • Approximately 90 minutes required for travel with both interventions.

  • No significant difference between all three groups

  • No pre- and post-transport time results for all three groups

Cost-effectivenessBicycles ambulances: MK15 Transport plan: MK 0.30
Control: MK 0
  • No pre- and post-cost-effectiveness results for all three groups

De Costa et al. (2009)To evaluate the effectiveness of financial support for transportation in reducing maternal deathsControl before-after studyWomen 15–45 years of age from scheduled castes and tribes as well as those who live below the poverty line in central India
  • Financial support for referrals needed by pregnant mothers and incentives for early registration of pregnancy

  • Training of all health care paramedical staff and traditional birth attendants

  • Control group (no intervention

  • Follow-up period = 12 months

Maternal deathIntervention: pre (27); post (12)
Control: intervention year (46)
  • No pre- and post-maternal deaths, live births, maternal mortality rations, and maternal death occurring at home

Live birthsIntervention: pre (5,084); post (5,221)
Control: intervention year (7,662)
Maternal mortality ratiosIntervention: pre (531); post (249)
Control: intervention year (600)
Maternal death occurring at homeIntervention: pre (55.6%); post (25%)
Control: intervention year (58.7%)
89% of deliveries occurred at home in intervention block
Post-partum deathIntervention: pre (55.6%); post (25%)
Control: intervention year (58.7)
  • No pre- and post- post-partum death data for control group

Referral supportIntervention: 23.8% advised referral availed the referral benefits.
  • No pre- and post-referral data for both groups

  • No intervention year data of referrals for control group

Mucunguzi et al. (2014)To evaluate the effectiveness of a free-of-charge 24-hour ambulance and communication services intervention on emergency obstetric care outcomesControl before-after studyPregnant women from two districts of Northern Uganda
  • A 4 × 4 wheel ambulance available 24-hours and 7 days a week.

  • Mobile phone and airtime to communicate with the ambulance team and the referral facility

  • Control group (no intervention)

  • Follow-up period = 36 months

Hospital stillbirths per 1000 birthsIntervention: pre (46.6%); post (37.5%)
  • No pre- and post-stillbirth’s data for control group

Hospital deliveriesIntervention: pre (1090); post (1646)
Control: pre (1776); post (1810)
Hospital deliveries increased by over 50% in intervention district
Caesarean sections ratesIntervention: pre (0.57%); post (1.21%)
Control: pre (0.51%); post (0.58%)
No significant increase in the control district
Cost of interventionUSD 1,875 per month.
Prinja et al. (2014)To assess the extent and pattern of NAS utilization, and whether NAS service has improved the utilization of public sector facilities for institutional deliveriesquasi-experimental design uncontrolled before-and-afterPregnant women from Ambala, Hisar, and Narnual districts in Haryana state, IndiaHaryana Swasthya Vaahan Sewa (HSVS), now known as National Ambulance Service (NAS) – a government managed referral transport system with its administration decentralized to district levelInstitutional deliveriesAmbala (OR = 137, 95% CI = 22.4–252.4); Hisar (OR = 215, 95% CI = 88.5–341.3) districts; Narnaul (OR = 4.5, 95% CI = –137.4 to 146.4)
Institutional deliveries in Haryana rose significantly after the introduction of HSVS service, however, no significant increase was observed in Narnaul district.
  • No pre- and post-institutional delivery actual numbers; just an interrupted time series analysis.

Goudar et al. (2015)To assess whether community mobilization and interventions to improve emergency obstetric and newborn care reduced perinatal and neonatal mortality ratesCluster-randomized controlled trialPregnant women from 20 geogra-phically defined clusters in Belgaum, India
  • The intervention engaged and mobilized community, strengthened community-based stabilization, referral, and transportation, and improved quality of care at facilities in 10 clusters.

  • Control group (no intervention)

  • Follow-up period = 24 months

Neonatal mortality rateIntervention: pre (26.7); post (18.4)
Control: pre (21.2); post (24.1)
Perinatal mortality rateIntervention: pre (52.7); post (37.8)
Control: pre (47.9); post (44.2)
No statistical significance was reached for both mortality outcomes.
TransportationIntervention: pre (74.9%); post (87.1%)
Control: pre (77.9%); post (98%)
Caesarean sectionIntervention: pre (8.6%); post (13.1%)
Control: pre (8.2%); post (13.4%)
No significant difference between both groups
Facility birth ratesIntervention
pre (87%); post (94%)
Control
pre (85%); post (93%)
Patel et al. (2016)To evaluate the impact of community-engaged emergency referral system in improving survival in impoverished rural Ghanaian communitiesControl before-after studyIndividuals living in the Upper East Region in Ghana
  • A fleet of 3-wheeled motorcycles known as Motorkings served as emergency transport vehicles

  • Dual-SIM mobile phones distributed to health facilities, health workers, and volunteer drivers

  • Control group (no intervention)

  • Follow-up period = 24 months

Maternal mortality ratioIntervention: pre (618); post (201)
Control: pre (326); post (261)
  • No pre- and post-data on referrals and deliveries as well as caesarian delivery rates data for both groups. Only differences-in differences estimates were provided.

Referrals into district hospitals from health centersIntervention: Increase referrals into district hospitals from health centers by > 12 patients per month (P < 0.005)
Hospital deliveriesIntervention: No significant effect on the number of hospital deliveries (P > 0.05)
Cesarean delivery rateIntervention: No significant effect on the cesarean delivery rate (P > 0.05)
Fournier et al. (2009)To evaluate the effect of a national referral system that aims to reduce maternal mortality rates through improving access to and the quality of emergency obstetric care in rural Mali (sub-Saharan Africa)Quasi-experimental uncontrolled before-and-afterWomen with obstetric complications who are referred by community health centres and have benefited from all components of the system, and women who are self-referred to the district health centre.Intervention: The maternity referral system aimed to:
  • Improve communication and transport opportunities to eliminate delays in the delivery of emergency obstetric services

  • Alternative funding options, including community cost-sharing schemes, are accessed to eliminate financial barriers to obstetric care

  • Training and equipment provided to improve the clinical management of obstetric emergencies

Follow-up: The effect was evaluated in these time periods: P-1: year before the intervention; P0: year of the intervention; P1: 1 year after the intervention P2: 2 years after the intervention
Institutional deliveriesInstitutional deliveries over expected deliveries:
P-1: 9871/52045 (19%)
P0: 15576/58453 (27%)
P1: 16573/51868 (32%)
P2: 19235/48846 (39%)
Obstetric emergencies treatedReferred Obstetric Emergencies treated over all obstetric emergencies:
P-1: 143/475 (30%)
P0: 273/658 (41%)
P1: 246/571 (43%)
P2: 452/913 (50%)
Hoffman et al. (2008)To assess whether motorcycle ambulances are more effective method of reducing referral delay for obstetric emergencies than a car ambulance, and to compare investment and operating costs with those of a 4-wheel drive car ambulanceUncontrolled before-and-afterWomen with obstetric complications in Mangochi district, MalawiIntervention: Three motorcycle ambulances, consisting of a 250 cc Yamaha motorcycle with sidecar, which could carry 2 adults, were stationed at three remote rural health centers (Makanjira, Mase, and Phirilongwe) in Mangochi district, Malawi.
Follow-up: Intervention occurred over a 12-month period from October 2001 to September 2002.
Reduction of 2nd delayMedian referral delay was reduced by 2–4.5 hours (35%–76%).
  • No pre- or post- data on facility deliveries before or after intervention as a result in reduction of 2nd delay

Cost-effectivenessPurchase price of a motorcycle ambulance was 19 times cheaper than for a car ambulance.
Annual operating costs of a motorcycle ambulance were US $508, which was almost 24 times cheaper than for a car ambulance.
Ngoma et al. (2019)Addresses how Saving Mothers Giving Life (SMGL) Initiative in Uganda and Zambia implemented strategies specifically targeting the second delay, including decreasing the distance to facilities capable of managing emergency obstetric and newborn complications, ensuring sufficient numbers of skilled birth attendants, and addressing transportation challengesUncontrolled before-and-afterPre-natal women in SMGL districts in Uganda and ZambiaIntervention: A key element of the SMGL initiative was the creation of an integrated communication and transportation system that functions 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to encourage and enable pregnant women to access delivery care facilities. Both Uganda and Zambia led several efforts to facilitate transportation to and between facilities.
Follow-up: The SMGL initiative in both Uganda and Zambia operated within 3 phases:
Phase 0: Design and start-up (June 2011 to May 2012)
Phase 1: Proof of concept (June 2012 to December 2013)
Phase 2: scale-up and scale-out (January 2014 to October 2017).
During Phase 2, SMGL expanded its presence in Uganda from 4 districts to 13 districts, and in Zambia from 6 to 18 districts.
Facility deliveriesUganda observed a +45% and Zambia +12% relative change in deliveries in Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) facilities between Jun 2012 and Dec 2016.
Uganda observed a +200% and Zambia +167% relative change in the number of basic EmONC facilities Jun 2012 and Dec 2016.
Uganda observed a +143% and Zambia +25% relative change in the number of comprehensive EmONC facilities Jun 2012 and Dec 2016.
Zambia observed a +31% and Uganda -3% relative change in health facilities that reported having available transportation (motor vehicle or motorcycle). However, Uganda had a different transport intervention Institutional delivery supported by Baylor transportation vouchers that observed a +258% increase Jun 2012 and Dec 2016.
Table 2

Intervention components implemented by included studies to improve transportation and reduce delay for obstetric emergencies.

StudyIntervention ComponentsDescription of Intervention Components
TransportationCommunicationCost-SharingCommunity Mobilization
De CostaNoNoYesYesFinancial support was provided for transportation of emergency referral cases and any accompanying health worker. Incentives also existed for early registration of pregnancy, receipt of antenatal care, and detection of high-risk pregnancies. Transportation (tractors, vans, other modes of transport) was arranged through informal contacts (mobilized community).
FournierYesYesYesNoA non-descript ambulance service was improved through intervention between health facilities only. Communication was improved with radios. Costs for transportation were shared by local government, local health services, community health associations, and a co-pay from the pregnant women.
GoudarNoYesYesYesCommunity-based workers were trained to effectively communicate with transportation facilitators and hospital staff. Emergency funds were created using personal savings or local resources. Community Action Cycle was used to empower communities to identify, prioritize, and act on maternal and neonatal health problems. This included establishing birth plans and arranging alternative emergency local transportation.
HofmanYesNoYesNoThree motorcycle ambulances with sidecars were stationed at remote rural health centers. The ambulances were operated by trained Health Surveillance Assistants. They picked women up from their homes and transported them between health facilities (only transportation between health facilities was evaluated in this study). Transportation was provided free-of-charge.
LunguYesNoYesNoTwo communities used bicycle ambulances and two communities developed transport plans. Communities fundraised to create a maintenance reserve, as determined by financial committees in each site. Communities with transport plans implemented a MK 10 flat rate charge for each trip to the health center.
NgomaYesYesYesYesVarious ambulances were procured for different study communities: 4 × 4 ambulances (Uganda and Zambia), motorized tricycle ambulances (Uganda), bicycle ambulances (Zambia), and motorcycle ambulances (Zambia). Transportation was available 24/7, for transport to facilities and referral between facilities. District transportation committees were established or strengthened to coordinate ambulances (Uganda and Zambia). Two-way radios (Zambia) and cell phones and airtime (Zambia) were supplied to facilitate communication. Transportation vouchers and village-level savings programs were used to alleviate cost barriers (Zambia). Village health teams and action groups were trained to encourage birth preparedness and to escort women to facility.
MucunguziYesYesYesNoOne 4 × 4 ambulance was stationed at the district hospital and provided transportation free-of-charge, 24/7, between health facilities only. Mobile phones and airtime were provided to each health facility to facilitate communication.
PatelYesYesYesYes24 three-wheeled motorcycles with structural modifications for patient safety and comfort were stationed at health centers, health posts, and at homes of chiefs or assembly men in communities with no health facilities. They transported all pregnant women (emergency and normal cases) free of charge. Dual-SIM mobile phones and airtime were distributed to health facilities, health workers, and drivers. A phone line dedicated to receiving incoming calls was established at the tertiary referral point in each ward. Community meetings were held to distribute emergency phone numbers, share information about the ambulance service, and distribute posters to be hung at health facilities and community gathering places.
PrinjaYesYesYesNo240 traditional ambulances were stationed at community health centers and primary health centers. Transport was free for pregnant women, neonates, and postnatal cases. A 24/7 call center, with a toll-free emergency number, dispatched ambulances using GIS.
Table 3

Description of ambulance vehicles used by included studies, with pros and cons for each type of transportation.

Ambulance TypeDescription of VehiclePros for Mode of TransportCons for Mode of Transport
Formal ambulance [40]

agh-86-1-2934-g3.jpg

A large vehicle, such as a van, with four wheels that transports patients in a rear compartment, usually while laying down. May be stocked with life-saving equipment and medications. Usually equipped with sirens and insignia so that the vehicle is easily identified.
  • Can accommodate multiple individuals, such as a patient and their family/caregivers.

  • Patients can receive basic medical attention prior to arrival at health facility.

  • May utilize GIS to reach patients quickly.

  • Cannot reach patients in areas with rough terrain.

  • Expensive.

  • Requires a professional driver.

4 × 4 Landcruiser ambulance [4445]

agh-86-1-2934-g4.jpg

A high-clearance vehicle with four-wheel drive that transports patients in a rear compartment, either laying or sitting.
  • Can accommodate multiple individuals. May pick up health workers for emergencies at night.

  • Can handle more rugged terrain than a traditional ambulance.

  • Still not able to access narrow roads or routes with very poor road conditions. May be inoperable during rainy season or inclement weather.

  • Expensive.

  • Requires a professional driver.

  • May be misused for non-health-related activities.

Motorcycle or motorized tricycle ambulance [384245]

agh-86-1-2934-g5.jpg

A motorcycle may be fitted with an open or closed sidecar, carriage, or wheeled stretcher that carries a patient and up to one other person.
  • Can handle more rugged terrain than all other types of transportation. Able to navigate narrow passages with poor road conditions. Can therefore, operate year-round, even during rainy season or inclement weather.

  • Less expensive than other motorized vehicles.

  • Can be operated by trained volunteers or community health workers.

  • Has limited capacity to carry multiple individuals.

  • Mixed reviews from patients about comfort.

  • Leaves the driver exposed to the elements/vulnerable to weather.

  • May not be preferred by drivers for use at night, due to safety concerns.

Bicycle ambulance [4145]

agh-86-1-2934-g6.jpg

A bicycle may be fitted with an open or enclosed trailer, carriage, or wheeled stretcher that carries one patient only.
  • Inexpensive.

  • Maintenance can be performed easily.

  • Can be operated by a wide range of people.

  • Can usually only carry the patient.

  • May not be culturally acceptable.

  • May not be comfortable.

  • May not offer as much privacy to patients as other forms of transportation.

  • May not reduce time to health facility.

Table 4

Methodological quality assessment of included studies using the ROBIS-I tool.

AuthorConfoundingSelection of ParticipantsClassification of InterventionIntervention DeviationMissing DataMeasurement of outcomesSelection of result ReportedOverall
De Costa et al. 2009ModerateLowModerateLowSeriousLowLowSerious
Fournier et al. 2009ModerateModerateLowNo informationLowSeriousLowSerious
Goudar et al. 2015LowLowLowLowLowLowLowLow
Hofman et al. 2008SeriousLowLowLowSeriousModerateLowSerious
Lungu et al. 2000ModerateLowLowLowLowLowLowModerate
Mucunguzi et al. 2014CriticalLowLowLowModerateModerateLowCritical
Ngoma et al. 2019CriticalLowLowLowLowLowSeriousCritical
Patel et al. 2016LowLowLowLowLowLowLowLow
Prinja et al. 2014LowLowLowLowLowLowLowLow
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2934 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Nov 18, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Halimatou Alaofe, Breanne Lott, Linda Kimaru, Babasola Okusanya, Abidemi Okechukwu, Joy Chebet, Martin Meremikwu, John Ehiri, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.