Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Improving the Caesarean Decision by Robson Classification: A Population-Based Study by 5,323,500 Livebirth Data Cover

Improving the Caesarean Decision by Robson Classification: A Population-Based Study by 5,323,500 Livebirth Data

Open Access
|Aug 2020

References

  1. 1World Health Organization. Indicators to monitor maternal health goals. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/60261/WHO_FHE_MSM_94.14.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed June 11, 2018.
  2. 2WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates (2015); Executive summary WHO reference number: WHO/RHR/15.02 April 2015. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/161442/1/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed June 11, 2018.
  3. 3Gibbons L, Belizán J, Lauer J, Betrán A, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: Overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Report Background Paper. 2010; 30.
  4. 4Althabe F, Sosa C, Belizan JM, Gibbons L, Jacquerioz F, Bergel E. Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: An ecological study. Birth. 2006; 33(4): 2707. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00118.x
  5. 5Koteshwara S, Sujatha MS. Analysis of caesarean section rates using Robsons ten group classification: The first step. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug; 6(8): 34813485. DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20173468
  6. 6Pilar Betrán A, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2): e0148343. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
  7. 7OECD Caesarean sections. https://data.oecd.org/healthcare/caesarean-sections.htm.
  8. 8Lefèvre M. Physician induced demand for C-sections: does the convenience incentive matter? https://www.york.ac.uk/media/economics/documents/hedg/workingpapers/1408.pdf. Accessed June 11, 2018.
  9. 9ACOG. American College of Obstetrics & Gynecology Committee Opinion, No 559, Cesarean delivery on maternal request Obstetrics & Gynecology. April 2013; 121(4): 904907. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000428647.67925.d3
  10. 10Vogel JP, Pilar Betrán A, Vindevoghel N, et al. On behalf of the WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network; Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: A secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015; 3: e26070. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X
  11. 11TSI. Turkish Statistical Institute, Basic fertility indicators, 2001–2016. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1060. Accessed June 11, 2018.
  12. 12GDHR. General Directorate of Health Research Health Statistic Yearbook. 2016. https://dosyasb.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/13160,sy2016enpdf.pdf?0. Accessed June 11, 2018.
  13. 13TMCHI Report. Turkish Maternity Child and Adolescent Health Institute Doğum Şekli Tercihinin Multidisipliner İrdelenmesi Çalıştayı Sonuç Raporu. http://www.tuseb.gov.tr/tacese/yuklemeler/ekitap/TACESErapor/Dogum%20Sekli%20Tercihinin%20Multidisipliner%20Irdelenmesi%20Calistayi%20Sonuc%20Raporu.pdf. Accessed June 11, 2018.
  14. 14SOGC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE. Induction of Labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013; 35(9): 840857. DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30842-2
  15. 15WHO. Robson Classification Implemented Manual. 2017. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259512/9789241513197-eng.pdf?sequence=1.
  16. 16Warner WL. Arriving at the appropriate ceserean delivery rate. District Newsletter. ACOG. July 2013
  17. 17Nijagal MA, Kuppermann M, Nakagawa S, et al. Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: Association with cesarean delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: 491.e18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.014
  18. 18Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the First Cesarean Delivery: Summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 November; 120(5): 11811193. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182704880
  19. 19Khawaja M, Kabakian-Khasholian T, Jurdi R. Determinants of caesarean section in Egypt: Evidence from the demographic and health survey. Health Policy. 2004; 69(3): 27381. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.05.006
  20. 20Koblinsky M, Anwar I, Mridha MK, Chowdhury ME, Botlero R. Reducing maternal mortality and improving maternal health: Bangladesh and MDG 5. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition. 2008; 26(3): 280. DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v26i3.1896
  21. 21Souza J, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: The 2004–2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010; 8: 71. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-71
  22. 22Triunfo S, Ferrazzani S, Lanzone A, Scambia G. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jun; 189: 915. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.030
  23. 23Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; 3: CD003766. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766
  24. 24Chaillet N, Dumont A. Evidence-Based Strategies for Reducing Cesarean Section Rates: A Meta-Analysis. Birth. March 2007; 34(1): 5364. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00146.x
  25. 25Chaillet N, Dubé E, Dugas M, et al. Identifying barriers and facilitators towards implementing guidelines to reduce caesarean section rates in Quebec. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. Oct 2007; 85(10): 79. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.06.039289
  26. 26Rubinstein B. Pacific Business Group on Health, Transform Maternity Care (TMC), Advancing high-value maternity care. http://www.pbgh.org/storage/documents/TMC_Program_Summary1214.pdf.
  27. 27Bermúdez-Tamayo C, Johri M, Perez-Ramos FJ, et al. Evaluation of quality improvement for cesarean sections caesarean section programmes through mixed methods. Implement Sci. 2014 Dec 11; 9: 182. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0182-0
  28. 28Blomberg M. Avoiding the first cesarean section–results of structured organizational and cultural change. AOGS- Acta obstetricia at Gynocologica Scandinavica. 15 MAR 2016. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12872
  29. 29Molina G, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR, et al. Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality. JAMA. 2015; 314(21): 22632270. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.15553
  30. 30Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy AM, et al. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 513523. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566
  31. 31ACOG. American College of Obstetrics & Gynecology Committee Opinion, Number 765, Avoidance of Nonmedically Indicated Early-Term Deliveries and Associated Neonatal Morbidities, February 2019. https://www.acog.org/Clinical-Guidance-and-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Obstetric-Practice/Avoidance-of-Nonmedically-Indicated-Early-Term-Deliveries-and-Associated-Neonatal-Morbidities. Accessed July 17, 2019.
  32. 32Habak PJ, Kole M. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery (VBAC) [Updated 2020 Jun 26]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507844/.
  33. 33NICE. Caesarean section Clinical guideline CG132. Published date: November 2011 Last updated: April 2019. 2019; https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg132/chapter/1-Guidancepregnancy-and-childbirth-after-cs. Accessed June 17, 2019.
  34. 34Kazandjian, VA1, Chaulk CP, Ogunbo S, Wicker K. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery? J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb; 13(1): 1620. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00690.x
  35. 35He Z, Cheng Z, Wu T, et al. The Costs and Their Determinant of Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery: An Exploratory Study in Chongqing Municipality, China. BioMed Research International. 2016: 5685261. DOI: 10.1155/2016/5685261
  36. 36Toussaint JS, Correia K. Why Process Is U.S. Health Care’s Biggest Problem. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/03/why-process-is-u-s-health-cares-biggest-problem. Accessed July 17, 2019.
  37. 37Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, et al. Classifications for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE. 6(1): e14566. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014566
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2615 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Aug 17, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 H. Omer Tontus, Saniye Nebioglu, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.