Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Emergency Department Design in Low- and Middle-Income Settings: Lessons from a University Hospital in Haiti Cover

Emergency Department Design in Low- and Middle-Income Settings: Lessons from a University Hospital in Haiti

Open Access
|Jan 2020

Figures & Tables

agh-86-1-2568-g1.png
Figure 1

The existing HUM ED. The original ED featured only 15 beds (pink and red above). To expand capacity an observation area with seven beds (blue) and central chairs where patients can be seen were added.

Table 1

Factors to consider when planning ED size. ED patient census is affected by ED throughput (internal factors), determinants that impact arrivals (input factors) and those that impact disposition (output factors). For example, in settings where patient volumes markedly fluctuate by season or time of day, it may be necessary to have areas of the ED that can open and close as needed.

Input factorsInternal FactorsOutput Factors
Demand
  • Availability of other EDs

  • Patient fees at others EDs

  • Perturbations in the healthcare system such as strikes limiting access to other facilities

Variable Patient Volumes
  • Reduced patient arrival at night due to limited transportation

  • Seasonal variation in disease burden

  • Mass casualty incidents (MCIs)

Staff
  • Training and capacity

  • Staff to patient ratios

Patients
  • Average patient complexity and acuity

  • Delayed presentations compared to high-income settings

System
  • Extended wait times for radiology and laboratory tests

  • Limited access to specialty consultation

Admitting capacity
  • Hospital crowding

  • Hospital policies to manage throughput

Discharge capacity
  • Few skilled nursing facilities and rehab hospitals as alternatives to admission

  • Structural factors: poverty and limited water and sanitation limit home care and impact safe discharge

  • Large catchment areas and transport costs make return visits for follow-up difficult

  • Limited nighttime transportation may prevent evening discharges

Table 2

Overview of the advantages and limitations of oxygen systems. Options with wall-access are clinically convenient, but require more maintenance, while any choice involving O2 cylinders is laborious and requires mechanisms to refill and replace cylinders. Cylinders may run out without being noticed and may fall over.

Oxygen SystemWall-accessedHigh-flow O2 (15 L/min)Requires O2 CylindersRequires electricityRequires space at bedsideCapital costOperational costMaintenance effortOverall Recommendation
Piped from centralized O2 concentrator+++$$$$++++****
Piped from a local manifold of O2 cylinders++++$$$++***
Individual bedside concentrators++$$++**
Bedside cylinders+++$$+*
Table 3

Overview of construction and operating costs of different ventilation options. Energy costs are based on HUM ED size and electricity costs in Haiti.

Ventilation Strategy OptionsDescriptionConstruction*Annual Energy + MaintenanceProjected 10-year cost
1) Passive ventilation
  • Flat roof

  • Air flows from low-height intakes to elevated louvers

$0$0$0
2) Improved passive ventilation with elevated roof
  • Elevated, vented roof allows hot air to exit

  • Cooler air flows from low-height intakes, up to sloped roof

    agh-86-1-2568-g4.png

$32,000$0$32,000
3) Mechanical Ventilation
  • Flat roof

  • Air is forced through mechanical whirly birds

    agh-86-1-2568-g5.png

$8,500$3,750$46,000
4) Air Conditioning
  • Flat roof

  • Climate control achieved through ED-wide air conditioning

$25,000$12,000$145,000

[i] * Costs above baseline of a traditional passive ventilation scheme for an ED the size of HUM based on construction costs in Haiti.

agh-86-1-2568-g2.png
Figure 2

Negative pressure is achieved in an isolation room using mechanical ventilation and unidirectional airflow.

agh-86-1-2568-g3.png
Figure 3

HUM ED Redesign. The dashed box indicates new construction, whereas the remainder of the space reflects redesign within the existing footprint of the HUM ED. Patients move from the waiting area to dedicated triage space into the appropriate fast-track, acute, sub-acute, or observation areas. Staff workspace is positioned to prioritize line-of-site to critical patients.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2568 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Jan 20, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Regan H. Marsh, Kristen D. Chalmers, Keegan A. Checkett, Jim Ansara, Linda Rimpel, Marie Cassandre Edmond, Robert W. Freni, Joshua K. Philbrook, Kimberly Stanford, Shada A. Rouhani, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.