Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Populism as Counter-Theory in Greek Architectural Discourse Cover

Populism as Counter-Theory in Greek Architectural Discourse

Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. 1Arditi, B. ‘Populism as an Internal Periphery of Democratic Politics’. In: Panizza, F (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. Verso; 2005: 7299.
  2. 2Frampton, K. ‘Towards a Critical Regionalism’. In: Foster, H (ed.), The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture. Bay Press; 1983: 1631.
  3. 3Vidler, A. Histories of the Immediate Present: Inventing Architectural Modernism. The MIT Press; 2008. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/7699.001.0001
  4. 4Lootsma, B. ‘From Pluralism to Populism: Architectural criticism in times of the internet’. Serbian Architectural Journal. 2011; 3: 254266.
  5. 5Fausch, D. ‘She Said, He Said: Denise Scott Brown and Kenneth Frampton on Popular Taste’. Footprint. 2011; 5(1/8): 7789.
  6. 6Tzonis, A and Lefaivre, L. ‘In The Name Of The People: The populist movement in architecture’. In: Shamiyeh, M (ed.), What People Want: Populism in Architecture and Design. Birkhäuser; 2005: 288305. DOI: 10.1007/3-7643-7673-2_23
  7. 7Lefaivre, L. ‘Populism redux?’ In: Shamiyeh, M (ed.), What People Want: Populism in Architecture and Design. Birkhäuser; 2005: 270287. DOI: 10.1007/3-7643-7673-2_22
  8. 8Koolhaas, R. Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan. The Monacelli Press; 1978.
  9. 9Laclau, E. ‘Populism: What’s in a Name?’ In: Panizza, F (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. Verso; 2005: 3250.
  10. 10Laclau, E. ‘Why Constructing a People is the Main Task of Radical Politics’. Critical Inquiry. 2006; 32(4): 646680. DOI: 10.1086/508086
  11. 11Moffitt, B. ‘Guess who’s coming to dinner? Populism as the awkward dinner guest of democracy’. Paper presented at the Australian Political Science Association; 2010.
  12. 12Shamiyeh, M. ‘The Process That Changed Architecture’. In: Shamiyeh, M (ed.), What People Want; Populism in Architecture and Design. Birkhäuser; 2005: 116131. DOI: 10.1007/3-7643-7673-2
  13. 13Fowler, J. ‘The Prince: Bjarke Ingels’s Social Conspiracy’. Thresholds. 2012; 40: 225233. DOI: 10.1162/thld_a_00148
  14. 14Kraus, K. Half-Truths and One-And-A-Half Truths: Selected aphorisms. University of Chicago Press; 1990.
  15. 15Ingels, B. Yes is More. Taschen; 2009.
  16. 16Lægring, K. ‘Bjarke Ingels and the Return of Representation: A Challenge to the Post-Critical’. Architecture and Culture. 2017; 5(2): 315340. DOI: 10.1080/20507828.2017.1328206
  17. 17Koolhaas, R. S, M, L, XL. 010 Publishers; 1995.
  18. 18Freud, S. ‘Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego’. In: The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XVIII). Hogarth Press; 1953: 67143.
  19. 19Giacumacatos, A. ‘From Conservatism to populism, pausing at modernism’. In: Condaratos, S and Wang, W (eds.), Greece: 20th Century Architecture. Prestel; 1999: 2738.
  20. 20Tzonis, A and Lefaivre, L. ‘The Grid and the Pathway: An Introduction to the Work of Dimitris and Susana Antonakakis, with Prolegomena to a History of the Culture of Modern Greek Architecture’. Architecture in Greece. 1981; 15: 164178.
  21. 21Pikionis, D. ‘Ē laïkḗ mas téchnē ki emeís’. Filiki Etaireia. 1925; A(4). Republished in: Pikionis, A and Parousis, M (eds.), D. Pikioni, Keímena. National Bank of Greece Cultural Foundation; 1999: 5357.
  22. 22Giacumacatos, A. ‘“Our folk art”: Dimitris Pikionis and the fallacy of modern Greek architecture’. Architecture in Greece. 1987; 21: 1720.
  23. 23Pikionis, D. Gýrō apó éna synédrio. Technika Chronika year B’. 1933; 4(39): 775776 [written as a comment on the 4th CIAM of 1933]. Republished in: Pikionis, A and Parousis, M (eds.) D. Pikioni, Keímena. National Bank of Greece Cultural Foundation, 1999: 168171.
  24. 24Konstantinidis, A. Dyo “chōriá” ap’ tē Mýkono. University of Crete Publications; 2011.
  25. 25Konstantinidis, A. Stoicheía autognōsías, gia mia alēthinḗ architektonikḗ. Athens; 1971.
  26. 26Fessas-Emmanouil, H. ‘Prestige architecture in post-war Greece: 1945–1976’. Architecture in Greece. 1984; 15: 3473.
  27. 27Konstantinidis, A. ‘Étsi to théloume emeís’. Republished in: Konstantinidis, A (ed.), Gia tēn architektonikḗ. Agra; 1987.
  28. 28Stavrakakis, Y. ‘Religion and Populism in Contemporary Greece’. In: Panizza, F (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. Verso; 2005: 224250.
  29. 29Koubis, T, Moutsopoulos, T and Scoffier, R (eds.). Athens 2002: Absolute Realism. Hellenic Ministry of Culture, SADAS-PEA; 2002.
  30. 30Giacumacatos, A. ‘Ta “syn” kai ta “plēn” tēs ógdoēs Mpienále architektonikḗs’. To Vima. 10th November 2002.
  31. 31GRAtv. These videos can be viewed at https://vimeo.com/greekarchitects [accessed 30th July 2019].
  32. 32Bauman, Z. Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Polity Press; 2001.
  33. 33Tannock, S. ‘Nostalgia Critique’. Cultural Studies. 1995; 9(3): 453464. DOI: 10.1080/09502389500490511
  34. 34Taggart, P. Populism. Open University Press; 2000.
  35. 35Albertazzi, D and McDonnell, D. ‘The Sceptre and the Spectre’. In: Albertazzi, D and McDonnell, D (eds.), Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008: 111. DOI: 10.1057/9780230592100_1
  36. 36Taguieff, PA. ‘Political Science Confronts Populism: From a Conceptual Mirage to a Real Problem’. TELOS. 1995; 103: 943. DOI: 10.3817/0395103009
  37. 37Bruckner, P. La tentation de l’innocence. Grasset; 1995.
  38. 38Gerodimos, R. ‘The Ideology of Far Left Populism in Greece: Blame, Victimhood and Revenge in the Discourse of Greek Anarchists’. Political Studies. 2015; 63(3): 608625. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12079
  39. 39Abts, K and Rummens, S. ‘Populism versus Democracy’. Political Studies. 2007; 55(2): 405424. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x
  40. 40Žižek, S. First As Tragedy, Then As Farce. Verso; 2009.
  41. 41Žižek, S. ‘Against the Populist Temptation’. Critical Inquiry. 2006; 32(3): 551574. DOI: 10.1086/505378
  42. 42Beck, U. World Risk Society. Polity Press; 1999.
  43. 43Canovan, M. ‘Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy’. Political Studies. 1999; 47(1): 216. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00184
  44. 44Lipstadt, H. ‘Are Competitions Populist? A Bourdieusian Alternative Perspective’. In: Shamiyeh, M (ed.), What People Want: Populism in Architecture and Design. Birkhäuser; 2005: 132149. DOI: 10.1007/3-7643-7673-2_10
  45. 45Klotz, H. Revision der Moderne: Postmoderne Architektur 1960–1980. Prestel-DAM; 1984. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-89732-9
  46. 46Hays, KM (ed.). Architecture Theory since 1968. The MIT Press; 1998.
  47. 47Kaspori, D. ‘Towards an open-source architectural practice’. In: Shamiyeh, M (ed.), What People Want: Populism in Architecture and Design. Birkhäuser; 2005: 324334. DOI: 10.1007/3-7643-7673-2_26
  48. 48Thoenes, C. ‘Introduction’. In: Evers, B and Thoenes, C (eds.), Architectural Theory: From the Renaissance to the Present. Taschen; 2003: 19.
  49. 49Baird, G. ‘“Criticality” and Its Discontents’. Harvard Design Magazine. 2004; 21: 1621.
  50. 50Freud, S. A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. Boni and Liveright; 1920. DOI: 10.1037/10667-000
  51. 51Tsiambaos, K. ‘An Identity Crisis of Architectural Critique’. Architectural Histories. 2014; 2(1). DOI: 10.5334/ah.bi
  52. 52Spruit, L and Totaro, P (eds.) The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza’s Ethica. Brill; 2011: 318. DOI: 10.1163/9789004210578
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ajar.179 | Journal eISSN: 2397-0820
Language: English
Published on: Oct 2, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Kostas Tsiambaos, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.