Usługi Kulturowe W Mikroskali Miasta. Analiza Danych Generowanych Przez Użytkowników Dotyczących Parków Kieszonkowych W Krakowie

Natalia Kopeć

doi:10.48128/pisg-2026-71.1-01

Abstract

The aim of this article is to evaluate the cultural services (CES) provided by pocket parks in Cracow based on an analysis of user-generated content on Google Maps. The spatial scope covered 32 pocket parks in Cracow, and the temporal scope referred to the status of ratings and comments from December 2024. The study used a quantitative qualitative approach, including sentiment analysis (positive, neutral, negative emotions) and content clustering (K-Means) to identify the main thematic motifs in the comments. In addition, a linear regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of individual emotions on the final Google rating. Analysis of the content of Google Maps user comments revealed a predominance of positive and neutral emotions. The most common themes concerned park infrastructure, aesthetic experiences and greenery.

References

Benati G., Calcagni F., Martellozzo F., Ghermandi A., Langemeyer J., 2024, Unequal access to cultural ecosystem services of green spaces within the city of Rome – A spatial social media-based analysis, Ecosystem Services, 66, 101594, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101594.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blake A., 2013, Pocket Parks – https://depts.washington.edu/open2100/pdf/2_OpenSpaceTypes/Open_Space_Types/pocket_parks.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Busch C., Specht K., Inostroza L., Falke M., Zepp H., 2024, Disentangling cultural ecosystem services coproduction in urban green spaces through social media reviews, Ecosystem Services, 70, 101675, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101675.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cao H., Wang M., Su S., Kang M., 2022, Explicit quantification of coastal cultural ecosystem services: A novel approach based on the content and sentimental analysis of social media, Ecological Indicators, 137, 108756, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108756.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cheng X., Van Damme S., Li L., Uyttenhove P., 2019, Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods, Ecosystem Services, 37, 100925, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cohen D.A., Marsh T., Williamson S., Han B., Derose K.P., Golinelli D., McKenzie T.L., 2014, The potential for pocket parks to increase physical activity, American Journal of Health Promotion, 28(3), 19–26, DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.130430-QUAN-213.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cureau R.J., Bou-Zeid E., Pigliautile I., Pisello A.L., 2024, Crowdsourced data as a strategic approach to include the human dimension in outdoor environmental quality assessments, Science of the Total Environment, 953, 175925, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175925.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Currie M.A., 2017, A design framework for small parks in ultra-urban, metropolitan, suburban and small town settings, Journal of Urban Design, 22(1), 76–95, DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2016.1234334.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dong J., Guo R., Guo F., Guo X., Zhang Z., 2023, Pocket parks-a systematic literature review, Environmental Research Letters, 18(8), 083003, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ace7e2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dunkel A., 2015, Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata, Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 173–186, DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.022.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
El-Mandouh A.M., Abd-Elmegid L.A., Mahmoud H.A., Haggag M.H., 2019, Optimized K-means clustering model based on gap statistic, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(1), 183–188, DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100124.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fox N., Graham L.J., Eigenbrod F., Bullock J.M., Parks K.E., 2021, Enriching social media data allows a more robust representation of cultural ecosystem services, Ecosystem Services, 50, 101328, DOI: 10.1016/j. ecoser.2021.101328.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ghahramani M., Galle N.J., Ratti C., Pilla F., 2021, Tales of a city: Sentiment analysis of urban green space in Dublin, Cities, 119, 103395, DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103395.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ghermandi A., Camacho-Valdez V., Trejo-Espinosa H., 2020, Social media-based analysis of cultural ecosystem services and heritage tourism in a coastal region of Mexico, Tourism Management, 77, 104002, DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Haines-Young R., Potschin M., 2018, Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services – CICES V5.1. Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure, Fabis Consulting Ltd., Nottingham.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hauke J., Kossowski T., 2011, Comparison of Values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data, Quaestiones Geographicae, 30(2), 87–93, DOI: 10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaplan R., Kaplan S., 1989, The experience of nature. A psychological perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kulczyk S., Matczak P., Derek M., Gerlée A., Mączka K., 2021, Rozpoznanie i ocena kulturowych warto ś ci us ł ug ekosystemowych w Polsce. Krytyczny przegl ą d literatury dotycz ą cej kulturowych warto ś ci us ł ug ekosystemowych. Raport z zadania nr 1 sporz ą dzony dla koordynatora projektu, Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Poznań.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lis A., Zalewska K., Iwankowski P., Betkier K., Bilska P., Dudar V., Łągiewka A., 2024, Evaluation of sense of safety and privacy in parks in relation to the topography, the presence of dense vegetation and other people in the area, Landscape and Urban Planning, 242, 104948, DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104948.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu R., Xiao J., 2021, Factors Affecting Users’ Satisfaction with Urban Parks through Online Comments Data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 253, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010253.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lorek E., Lorek A., Słupik S., 2018, Ocena roli usług ekosystemów miejskich w zrównoważonym rozwoju lokalnym, Kwartalnik Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Spo ł ecznego Studia i Prace, 1, 145–162.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nowotny A., Strzemińska A., 2010, Po co ziele ń w mie ś cie?, Cetrum Sztuki Współczesnej Łaźnia, Gdańsk. Razzaghi A.S., Pearsall H., 2022, How Do Different Modes of Governance Support Ecosystem Services/Disservices in Small-Scale Urban Green Infrastructure? A Systematic Review, Land, 11(8), 1247, DOI: 10.3390/land11081247.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rousseeuw P.J., 1987, Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis, Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 20, 53–65.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schoenmueller V., Netzer O., Stahl F., 2020, The polarity of online reviews: Prevalence, drivers and implications, Journal of Marketing Research, 57(5), 853–877.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Selivanov E., Hlaváčková P., 2021, Methods for monetary valuation of ecosystem services: A scoping review, Journal of Forest Science, 67(11), 499–511.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Straumann R.K., Cöltekin A., Andrienko G., 2014, Towards (re)constructing narratives from georeferenced photographs through visual analytics, The Cartographic Journal, 51(2), 152–165.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Strohbach M.W., Lerman S.B., Warren P.S., 2013, Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston, Landscape and Urban Planning, 114, 69–79, DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.02.007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Syakur M.A., Khotimah B.K., Rochman E.M., Satoto B.D., 2018, Integration k-means clustering method and elbow method for identification of the best customer profile cluster, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 336, 012017, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/336/1/012017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Szołucha N., Żelejko A., Sawczyc B., Radwańska K., 2023, Ziele ń miejska – ciekawe urozmaicenie teren ó w zabudowy, [w:] D. Dąbrowski, E. Niźnikowska (red.), Ko ł a naukowe – szko łą tw ó rczego dzia ł ania. Edycja dziewi ą ta, Akademia Bialska im. Jana Pawła II, Biała Podlaska, 59–71.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Szulczewska B., 2018, Zielona infrastruktura – czy koniec historii?, Polska Akademia Nauk Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju, Warszawa.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TEEB, 2011, Jak w łą czy ć us ł ugi ekosystem ó w do polityki procesu decyzyjnego. Etapowe podej ś cie TEEB, [w:] Ekonomia ekosystem ó w i bior óż norodno ś ci w polityce lokalnej i regionalnej. Poradnik TEEB dla miast: us ł ugi ekosystem ó w w gospodarce miejskiej, Fundacja Sendzimira, Kraków, 11–30.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tokarska-Osyczka A., Osyczka D., 2017, Parki kieszonkowe – trend w kształtowaniu przestrzeni miejskiej, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Zielonog ó rskiego. In ż ynieria Ś rodowiska, 48, 83–89.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
United Nations, 2024, World Population Prospects 2024: Data Sources, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Villamagna A.M., Angermeier P.L., Bennett E.M., 2013, Capacity, Pressure, Demand, and Flow: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Ecosystem Service Provision and Delivery, Ecological Complexity, 15, 114–121, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wolch J.R., Byrne J., Newell P.J., 2014, Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244, DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang H., Han M., 2021, Pocket parks in English and Chinese literature: a review, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 61, 127080, DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127080.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang H., Huang R., Zhang Y., Buhalis D., 2020, Cultural ecosystem services evaluation using geolocated social media data: a review, Tourism Geographies, 24(4–5), 646–668, DOI: 10.1080/14616688.2020.1801828.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zheng X., Yang J., 2023, Urban road network design for alleviating residential exposure to traffic pollutants: Super-block or Mini-block?, Sustainable Cities and Society, 89, 104327.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhou C., Xie M., Zhao J., An Y., 2022, What affects the use flexibility of pocket parks? Evidence from Nanjing, China, Land, 11(9), 1419, DOI: 10.3390/land11091419.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/bdl/start (dostęp: 07.10.2025).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
https://www.esvd.net/ (dostęp: 02.07.2025).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Usługi Kulturowe W Mikroskali Miasta. Analiza Danych Generowanych Przez Użytkowników Dotyczących Parków Kieszonkowych W Krakowie

Abstract

Paradigm

My account