
Inquest procedure: medical officers’ point of view
Abstract
When an average medical student or a postgraduate student is questioned as to why a medical officer must request an inquest for certain type of death, for example, a sudden death, the most likely answer is that ‘a sudden death is included in section 370 of the CPC among the deaths for which an inquest should be held and therefore an inquest must be ordered”. However, the above most common answer is not factually accurate from the medical officer’s point of view. Section 370(1) of the CPC is essentially meant for inquirers and not to be regarded as instructions given for medical officers pertaining to deaths for which an inquest should be requested. Death investigation system of Sri Lanka does not place a medical officer in a special position as an informant. A medical officer carries the same responsibility as an ordinary person. The responsibility of an ordinary person regarding certain types of death is stipulated in section 21 (b) of the CPC. This fact may be of crucial importance in a case where a medical officer’s decision to request or not to request an inquest for a certain type of death is questioned. However, there is no punitive action described for noncompliance of section 21(b) in CPC.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/mljsl.v5i2.7356 | Journal eISSN: 2012-5887
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 4
Published on: Dec 28, 2017
Published by: College of Forensic Pathologists of Sri Lanka
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2017 Ravindra Samaranayake, published by College of Forensic Pathologists of Sri Lanka
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.