Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Parody as a Fair Use of Freedom of Speech Cover

Parody as a Fair Use of Freedom of Speech

By:
Open Access
|Sep 2023

References

  1. Blūmfelds, A. (2004). Noraida Rušenieka prasību pret Viesturu Dūli. Available: https://www.apollo.lv/4684477/noraidarusenieka-prasibu-pret-viesturu-duli
  2. Britannica Dictionary (2023). Parody literature. Available: https://www.britannica.com/art/parody-literature
  3. Code de la propriété intellectuelle (2020). L 122-5. Article 4°. Available: https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/569956
  4. Constitutional Assembly of Latvia (1922). Latvijas Republikas Satversme. Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/57980-latvijas-republikas-satversme
  5. Constitutional Court of Latvia (2003). Satversmes tiesas nolēmums 2003.gada 03.jūnijā lietā Nr. 2003-02-0106 par komerciālo raidorganizāciju tiesības raidīt svešvalodā. Available: https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/cases/?case-filter-years=&case-filter-status=&case-filter-types=&case-filter-result=&searchtext=2003-02-0106
  6. Constitutional Court of Latvia (2005). Satversmes tiesas spriedums 2005.gada 22.decembrī lietā Nr.2005-19-01. Available: https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/web/viewer.html?file=/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2005-19-01_spriedums.pdf
  7. Constitutional Court of Latvia (2020). Satversmes tiesas spriedums 2021.gada 27.maijā lietā Nr.2020-49-01. Available: https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/web/viewer.html?file=https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2020_49_01_Spriedums.pdf
  8. Constitutional Court of South Africa (2005). Laugh It Off Promotions CC v South African Breweries International (Finance) B.V. t/a Sabmark International, CCT 42/04, Decided on: 27 May 2005. Available: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2005/7media.pdf
  9. Council of Europe (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/4d93501a9.pdf
  10. Court of Justice of the European Union (2010). Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2010 Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE). Available: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=83635&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir= &occ=first&part=1&cid=496261
  11. Court of Justice of the European Union (2014). Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 3 September 2014, Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others. Available: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-201/13
  12. European Convention (2000). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Available: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/LV/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12016P/TXT&from=ES
  13. European Court of Human Rights (1994). Casado Coca v Spain. 15450/89. 26.01.1994. Point 35. Available: https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:ihrl/2958echr94.case.1/law-ihrl-2958echr94
  14. European Court of Human Rights (1976). Handyside v. the United Kingdom. Available: https://legallibrary.crin.org/handyside-v-the-united-kingdom/
  15. European Court of Human Rights (2005). Vereinigung Bildendert Künstler v. Austria. Available: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-69805%22]}
  16. European Parliament and Council (2001). Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LV/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32001L0029&from=EN
  17. German Federal Constitutional Court (2007). The judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court of 13 June 2007 in Case No 1 BvR 1783.05 Esra and Adam v. Beschwerdefuhrerin. Available: https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv119001.html
  18. Kučs, A. (2016). Latvijas Republikas Satversmes komentāri. VIII nodaļa. Cilvēka pamattiesības. 100. Ikvienam ir tiesības uz vārda brīvību, kas ietver tiesības brīvi iegūt, paturēt un izplatīt informāciju, paust savus uzskatus. Cenzūra ir aizliegta. Available: http://blogi.lu.lv/tzpi/files/2016/10/100pants.pdf
  19. Latviešu literārās valodas vārdnīca. 4.sējums (1980). Rīga: izdevniecība Zinātne 770 lpp.
  20. Latvijas Republikas Satversmes komentāri VIII nodaļa. Cilvēka pamattiesības. Sagatavojis autoru kolektīvs prof. R. Baloža zinātniskā vadībā. (2011). Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 864 lpp.
  21. Lagarde, L., Ang, C. (2016). Parody in the UK and France: defined by humour? Available: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/9-625-2313?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true
  22. Ledru, O. (2020). Lorsque Tintin s’émancipe par la parodie. Available: https://www.avocat-ledru.com/lorsque-tintinsemancipe-par-la-parodie/
  23. Levits, E. (2022). Valsts prezidenta Egila Levita uzruna Satversmes 100. jubilejas gada atklāšanā Saeimā. Available: https://www.president.lv/lv/jaunums/valsts-prezidenta-egila-levita-uzrunasatversmes-100-jubilejas-gada-atklasana-saeima
  24. Macdonald, D. (1960). Tag: Historical Drama. Available: https://willyorwonthe.wordpress.com/tag/historical-drama/
  25. Mattila, H. (2019) Parody and Copyright in the European Union Law. Available: https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/118104
  26. Mouron, Ph. (2021). L’usage transformatif de Tintin “validé” au titre de l’exception de parodie. Availanle: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03446991/document
  27. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (2023). Definition of parody verb from the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Available: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/parody_2
  28. Parliament of the Republic of Latvia (Saeima) (2000). Copyright Law. Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/5138
  29. Pleps, J., Pastars, E., Plakane, I. (2014). Konstitucionālās tiesības. Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 448 lpp.
  30. Supreme Court Senate of Latvia (2012). Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Senāta Civillietu departamenta 2012.gada 12.septembra spriedums lietā Nr. SKC-482/2012. Available: https://www.at.gov.lv/lv/judikaturas-nolemumu-arhivsold/senata-civillietu-departaments/2012-klasifikators-pec-lietu-kategorijam
  31. Terminology Commission of the Latvian Academy of Sciences (2003). Lēmums Nr. 18 Par termina „vārda brīvība“ izpratni un atbilsmi angļu valodas terminam „freedom of expression“. Available: https://termini.gov.lv/komisija/lemums-nr-18-par-termina-varda-briviba-izpratni-un-atbilsmi-anglu-valodas-terminam-freedom
  32. United Kingdom Parliament (1988). Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Available: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/introduction
  33. United Nations (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/lv/starptautiskie-ligumi/id/705
  34. United Nations General Assembly (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Available: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/lat.pdf
  35. United States Congress (1978). Copyright Act of 1976. Available: https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1072/copyright-act-of-1976
  36. United States Supreme Court (1993). Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994). Available: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/510/569/
  37. United States Supreme Court (2023). Case No. 22-148, Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC. Available: https://www.inta.org/amicus-brief/case-no-22-148-jack-daniels-properties-inc-v-vip-products-llc/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37804/1691-6077-2023-14-186-196 | Journal eISSN: 3044-7259 | Journal ISSN: 1691-6077
Language: English
Page range: 186 - 196
Published on: Sep 20, 2023
Published by: Turiba University Ltd
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2023 Liene Vindele, Renate Cane, published by Turiba University Ltd
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.