Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners’ Subjective Experience and Attitude on Compulsory Family Mediation in Australia Cover

Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners’ Subjective Experience and Attitude on Compulsory Family Mediation in Australia

Open Access
|Jul 2023

References

  1. Beck, C., Walsh, M., Mechanic, M., Figueredo, A. J., & Chen, M. K. (2011). Intimate partner abuse in divorce mediation: Outcomes from a longterm multicultural study. Report prepared for U.S. Department of Justice. (Award Number. 2007-WG-BX-0028). https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/236868.pdf
  2. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
  3. Clarke, G. & Davies, I. (1991). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Argument for and against use of the mediation process particularly in family and neighbourhood disputes. Queensland University of Technology Law Journal, 6(81), 81–96. http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/QUTLawJl/1991/6.html
  4. Cooper, D., & Field, R. (2008). The Family Dispute Resolution of Parenting Matters in Australia: An Analysis of the Notion of an 'Independent’ Practitioner. Queensland Unversity of Technology Law and Justice Journal, 8(1), 159–174. http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/QUTLawJJl/2008/8.html
  5. Douglas, K. (2012). The Teaching of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Selected Australian Law School: Towards Second Generation Practice and Pedagogy. ThesisRMIT Universoty, 1–349. https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/eserv/rmit:160218/Douglas.pdf
  6. Edwards, L., Baron, S., & Ferrick, G. (2008). A comment on William J. Howe and Hugh McIssaac's article “finding the balance” published in the January 2008 issue of family court review. Family Court Review, 46 (4), 586–591
  7. Ferrick, G., Baron, S., & Edwards, L. (2008). Surreply. Family Court Review, 46 (4), 595–597.
  8. Field, R., & Crowe, J. (2007). The Construction of Rationality in Australian Family Dispute Resolution: A Feminist Analysis. The Australian Feminist Law Journal, 27, 98–122
  9. Gewurz, I. (2001). (Re)Designing mediation to address the nuances of power imbalance. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 19, 135–136
  10. Hedeen, T., Raines, S., & Barton, A. (2010). Foundation of mediation training: A literature review of adult education and training design. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 28, 157–182
  11. Kaspiew, R. et al. (2009). Evaluation of the 2006 Family Law reforms. Australian Institute of Family Studies, 105–108
  12. Kelly, J. B. (1996). A Decade of Divorce Mediation Research. Family and Conciliation Courts Review. 34(3), 373. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.1996.tb00427.x
  13. Lahey, K. (2010). Women, substantive equality, and fiscal policy: Genderbased analysis of taxes, benefits, and budgets Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 22, 27–28
  14. Larsen, D. (2018). Working with Cognitive Errors Caused by Heightened Emotions in Employment Mediations. 1–18
  15. Lietuvos Respublikos civilinių ginčų taikinamojo tarpininkavimo įstatymo Nr. X-1702 pakeitimo įstatymas (2017). https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/95539982609f11e7a53b83ca0142260e
  16. Lundberg, D., & Moloney, L. (2010). Being in the room: Family Dispute Resolution practitioners’ experience of high conflict family dispute resolution. Journal of Family Studies, 16(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.16.3.209
  17. Moore, K. J. (2014). The reflective observer model. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 31, 403–419
  18. Molė, S., Sondaitė, J. (2019). Teismo mediatorių požiūris į teisminės mediacijos praktiką = Attitudes of court mediators toward judicial mediation practice // Socialinis darbas. Vilnius : Mykolo Romerio universitetas. ISSN 1648-4789. eISSN 2029-2775, Vol. 17, No. 2, 191–208. DOI: 10.13165/SD-19-17-2-05
  19. Pearson, J. (1994). Family Mediation. In S. Keilitz (Ed.), National Symposium on Court-Connected Dispute Resolution Research: A Report on Current Research Findings – Implications for Courts and Future Research Needs (Report No. R-152). State Justice Institute
  20. Raines, S. (2018). Becoming the change we wish to see: The unexpected benefits of conflict resolution work. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 35, 319–327
  21. Raines, S., Pokhrel, S. K., & Poitras, J. (2013). Mediation as a profession: Challenges that professional mediators face. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 31 (1), 79–97
  22. Regher, C. (1994). The use of empowerment in child custody mediation: A feminist critique. Mediation Quarterly, 11, 361–364
  23. Relationships Australia, Inc. (2017). Family dispute resolution process. Retrieved February 20, 2021 from https://www.relationships.org.au/what-we-do/services/family-disputeresolution/family-dispute-resolution-process
  24. Rhoades, H. (2010). Mandatory mediation of family dispute: Reflections from Australia. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 32, (2), 183–194
  25. Roulston, K. (2014). Asking Questions and Individual Interviews. Reflective Interviewing: A Guide to Theory and Practice, 9–32. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288009.n2
  26. Semple, N. (2012). Mandatory family mediation and the settlement mission: A feminist critique. CJWL/RFD, 24, 207–239
  27. Shaffer, M. (1988). Divorce mediation: A feminist perspective. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review, 46, 162–181. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/utflr46&i=168
  28. Zarankin, A., Wall Jr, J. A., & Zarankin, T. G. (2014). Mediators' Cognitive Role Schema. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 7(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12030
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37804/1691-6077-2022-13-90-112 | Journal eISSN: 3044-7259 | Journal ISSN: 1691-6077
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 112
Published on: Jul 26, 2023
Published by: Turiba University Ltd
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Jurgita Milišauskaitė, Jolanta Sondaitė, published by Turiba University Ltd
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.