References
- Andrews, Neil H.
“Publicity and Open Justice.” In Andrews on Civil Processes: Court Proceedings, 764–780. Intersentia, 2017. - Associazione Nazionale Magistrati. Codice etico. ANM, 2010.
https://www.associazionemagistrati.it/codice-etico . - Bentham, Jeremy.
“Draught of a Code for the Organization of the Judicial Establishment in France.” In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, edited by John Bowring, vol. 4, 316–317. William Tait, 1843.https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/bowring-the-works-of-jeremy-bentham-vol-4 . - Benvenuti, Simone. “The Italian System of Judicial Governance: An Arena of Confronting Informal Practices and the Push towards Formalization.” German Law Journal 24, no. 8 (2023): 1379–1402. DOI: 10.1017/glj.2023.67
- Bernard, Hon. Julie J., and Keith R. Fisher. “Some Pitfalls and Perils of Judicial Social Media Use.” Boston Bar Journal 67, no. 4 (
Fall 2023).https://bostonbar.org/journal/some-pitfalls-and-perils-of-judicial-social-media-use/ . - Browning, John G. “Why Can’t We Be Friends? Judges’ Use of Social Media.” University of Miami Law Review 68, no. 2 (2014): 487–534.
https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol68/iss2/9 . - Bundesverfassungsgericht, judgment of June 14, 1983, 2 BvR 602/83, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1983, 2691.
- Bundesverwaltungsgericht, judgment of November 24, 2005, 2 C 32.04, ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2005:241105U2C32.04.0.
https://www.bverwg.de/de/241105U2C32.04.0 . - Bundesverwaltungsgericht, judgment of October 17, 1984, BVerwG 2 C 15.83, BVerwGE 78, 216, 220.
- Bundesverwaltungsgericht, order of August 28, 2018, 2 B 4.18, ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:280818B2B4.18.0.
https://www.bverwg.de/280818B2B4.18.0 . - Bustillo, Ximena.
“Report on Justice Thomas’s Travel and Gifts Renews Calls for a Supreme Court Code of Ethics.” NPR, April 6, 2023.https://www.npr.org/2023/04/06/1168414781/report-on-justice-thomass-trips-renews-calls-for-a-supreme-court-code-of-ethics . - Campbell, Enid, and Victoria H. P. Lee.
“Extra-Judicial Activities of Judges.” In The Australian Judiciary, edited by H. P. Lee, 186–206. Cambridge University Press, 2012. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139028431 - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 2012 O.J. C 326/391.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:C2012/326/02 . - Chis, Andrea.
“Public Expressions of Judges: Navigating between Freedom and Responsibility.” UNODC, 2021.https://www.unodc.org/dohadeclaration/en/news/2021/27/public-expressions-of-judges_-navigating-between-freedom-and-responsibility.html . - Code de l’organisation judiciaire.
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006071164 . - Conseil supérieur de la magistrature. “Avis de la formation plénière du 13 décembre 2023.” December 13, 2023.
https://www.conseil-superieur-magistrature.fr/actualites/avis-de-la-formation-pleniere-du-conseil-superieur-de-la-magistrature-du-13-decembre-2023 . - Conseil supérieur de la magistrature. Rapport d’activité 2023. Paris: CSM, 2024.
https://www.conseil-superieur-magistrature.fr/actualites/rapport-annuel-dactivite-2023 . - Conseil supérieur de la magistrature. Recueil des obligations déontologiques des magistrats. CSM, 2019.
https://www.conseil-superieur-magistrature.fr/publications/recueil-des-obligations-deontologiques-0 . - Constitution of the Republic of Poland. April 2, 1997.
https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm . - Consultative Council of European Judges. Opinion No. 25 (2022) on Freedom of Expression of Judges. Council of Europe, 2022.
https://rm.coe.int/opinion-no-25-2022-final/1680a973ef . - Cooper, Benjamin P. “Judges and Social Media: ‘Friends’ with Costs and Benefits.” The Professional Lawyer 22, no. 3 (2014).
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2451094 . - Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers. Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Judges: Independence, Efficiency and Responsibilities. November 17, 2010.
https://rm.coe.int/16807096c1 . - Danileţ v. Romania. Application no. 16915/21. European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber, December 15, 2025.
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-247839 . - Deutsches Richtergesetz. April 19, 1972, Bundesgesetzblatt I 1972, 713, last amended by art. 4 of the Act of August 16, 2021, Bundesgesetzblatt I 2021, 3582.
- Di Federico, Giuseppe.
“Independence and Accountability of the Judiciary in Italy: The Experience of a Former Transitional Country in a Comparative Perspective.” In Judicial Integrity, edited by András Sajó, 181–206. Brill, 2004. DOI: 10.1163/9789047413714_010 - Dubeck, Lawrence. “Understanding ‘Judicial Lockjaw’: The Debate over Extrajudicial Activity.” New York University Law Review 82 (2007): 569–601.
https://nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/NYULawReview-82-2-Dubeck.pdf . - European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). Report on the Independence of the Judicial System, Part I: The Independence of Judges. CDL-AD(2010)004. Council of Europe, 2010.
https://www.coe.int/documents/268333607/300678634/CDL-AD%282010%29004-e.pdf/8dd8ce5f-0ce3-f4c2-82f3-19b8fc582a7e?t=1779972265488 . - European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. Guidelines on the Role of Court Presidents. CEPEJ(2008)3. Council of Europe, 2008.
https://rm.coe.int/cepej-guidelines/16809f007a . - European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. November 4, 1950, ETS No. 5.
https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENG . - European Network of Councils for the Judiciary. 2016–2017 Report: Independence, Accountability and the Quality of the Judiciary. ENCJ, 2017.
https://www.encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/workinggroups/independence/encj_report_ia_ga_adopted_ga_13_6.pdf . - European Network of Councils for the Judiciary. Distillation of ENCJ Guidelines, Recommendations and Minimum Standards 2012–2023. ENCJ, 2023.
https://pgwrk-websitemedia.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/production/pwk-web-encj2017-p/Reports/ENCJ_Distillation_Report_2004_2017.pdf . - European Network of Councils for the Judiciary. Justice, Society and the Media: Report 2019–2020. ENCJ, 2020.
https://pgwrk-websitemedia.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/production/pwk-web-encj2017-p/Reports/ENCJ%20PT%20IoJ%20Report%202019-2020%20adopted%20GA%2010%20June.pdf . - European Network of Councils for the Judiciary. Minimum Standards for the Selection and Appointment of Judges. ENCJ, 2012.
https://www.encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/GA/Dublin/final_report_standards_ii.pdf . - European Network of Councils for the Judiciary. Report 2019–2020: Independence and Accountability of the Judiciary. ENCJ, 2020.
https://pgwrk-websitemedia.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/production/pwk-web-encj2017-p/Reports/ENCJ%20report%20IAQ%202019-2020%20adopted%20GA%202020.pdf . - Garoupa, Nuno, and Tom Ginsburg. “The Comparative Law and Economics of Judicial Councils.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 27, no. 1 (2009): 53–83.
https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1965&context=journal_articles . - Garoupa, Nuno, and Tom Ginsburg. Judicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory. University of Chicago Press, 2015.
https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo21516068.html . - Garoupa, Nuno, and Tom Ginsburg. “Judicial Roles in Nonjudicial Functions.” Washington University Global Studies Law Review 12, no. 4 (2013): 755–782.
https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol12/iss4/6 . - Gollnisch v. France. Application no. 48135/08, European Court of Human Rights, decision, June 7, 2011.
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105440 . - Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany]. May 23, 1949, Bundesgesetzblatt I, 1, last amended by art. 1 of the Act of November 22, 2023, Bundesgesetzblatt 2023 I no. 328.
- Hamřík, Lukáš. “Actors of Informal Judicial Institutions and Practices.” German Law Journal 24, no. 8 (2023): 1520–1535. DOI: 10.1017/glj.2023.91
- Hickman, Tom. Public Law after the Human Rights Act. Hart Publishing, 2010.
- International Commission of Jurists. Bologna and Milan Global Code of Judicial Ethics. 2015.
https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Bologna-and-Milan-Global-Code-of-Judicial-Ethics.pdf . - International Law Association Study Group on the Practice and Procedure of International Courts and Tribunals. The Burgh House Principles on the Independence of the International Judiciary. 2004.
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/sites/laws/files/burgh_final_21204.pdf . - Johnston, Jane. “Courts’ New Visibility 2.0.” In The Courts and the Media, edited by Patrick Keyzer, Jane Johnston, and Mark Pearson, 41–54. Halstead Press, 2012.
https://research.bond.edu.au/en/publications/the-courts-and-the-media-challenges-in-the-era-of-digital-and-soc/ . - Johnston, Jane. “Three Phases of Courts’ Publicity: Reconfiguring Bentham’s Open Justice in the Twenty-First Century.” International Journal of Law in Context 14, no. 4 (2018): 525–538. DOI: 10.1017/S1744552318000228
- Koschyk, Markus. “How Independent Are German Judges?” Deutsche Welle, August 5, 2017.
https://www.dw.com/en/how-independent-are-german-judges/a-39980017 . - Malleson, Kate. The New Judiciary: The Effects of Expansion and Activism. Ashgate Dartmouth, 1999.
https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/12942 . - McKay, Robert B. “The Judiciary and Nonjudicial Activities.” Law and Contemporary Problems 35, no. 1 (
Winter 1970): 9–36.https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol35/iss1/3 . - McMurdo, Margaret. “Should Judges Speak Out?” Paper presented at the Judicial Conference of Australia, Uluru, April 2001.
https://www.ajoa.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/mcmurdo.pdf . - Moses, Lord Justice.
“Hitting the Balls out of Court: Are Judges Stepping over the Line?” Creaney Memorial Lecture, Judiciary of England and Wales, February 26, 2014.https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Speeches/moses-lj-speech-creaney-lecture-2014.pdf . - Myronenko, Valentyna, Anzhela Kaliniuk, Oksana Rakul, Oksana Onyshko, Andrii Klychkov, and Diana Voron. “Transparency and Openness of the Judicial Process as Components of Access to Justice in Civil Cases.” Lex Humana 16, no. 1 (2023): 358–374.
https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2915 . - Neuberger, Lord.
“Where Angels Fear to Tread” . Holdsworth Club 2012 Presidential Address, March 2, 2012.https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Speeches/mr-speech-holdsworth-lecture-2012.pdf . - Olszanowski, Jan. “Zgoda na dodatkowe zatrudnienie sędziego – element systemu gwarancji niezawisłości?” Forum Prawnicze 61, no. 6 (2020): 36–48. DOI: 10.32082/fp.v0i5(61).273
- Ordonnance no. 58-1270 du 22 décembre 1958 portant loi organique relative au statut de la magistrature.
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000339259 . - Pocius v. Lithuania. Application no. 35601/04. European Court of Human Rights, Second Section, July 6, 2010.
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99821 . - Postema, Gerald.
“The Soul of Justice: Bentham on Publicity, Law, and the Rule of Law.” In Bentham’s Theory of Law and Public Opinion, edited by Xiaobo Zhai and Michael Quinn, 40–41. Cambridge University Press, 2014.https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/benthams-theory-of-law-and-public-opinion/soul-of-justice/CB038F6BB792CD3272B0B1C0BA75366E . - Staats, Johann-Friedrich. “Mit dem Richteramt unvereinbare Mitwirkung an der gesetzgebenden und der vollziehenden Gewalt.” Deutsche Richterzeitung (2001): 103–105.
- Steininger, Sylvia. “Talks, Dinners, and Envelopes at Nightfall: The Politicization of Informality at the Bundesverfassungsgericht.” German Law Journal 24, no. 8 (2023): 1311–1314. DOI: 10.1017/glj.2023.72
- Sumption, Jonathan. The Reith Lectures 2019: Law and the Decline of Politics. BBC Radio 4, 2019.
https://downloads.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2019/Reith_2019_Sumption_lecture_1.pdf . - Sumption, Jonathan. Trials of the State: Law and the Decline of Politics. London: Profile Books, 2019.
- The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct. Adopted by the Judicial Group on Strengthening Judicial Integrity, November 2002.
https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Bangalore-Principles-of-Judicial-Conduct-instrument-2002-eng.pdf . - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct. Vienna: UNODC, 2007.
https://www.unodc.org/conig/uploads/documents/publications/Otherpublications/Commentry_on_the_Bangalore_principles_of_Judicial_Conduct.pdf . - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). Use of Social Media by Judges: Discussion Guide for the Expert Group Meeting,
5–7 November 2018 , Vienna.UNODC , 2018.https://www.unodc.org/res/ji/import/policy_papers/social_media_discussion_guide/discussion_guide_social_media.pdf . - Ustawa z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. – Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych. Dz.U. 2023, poz. 1094, as amended.
https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20010981070/U/D20011070Lj.pdf .
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.799 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 6
Published on: Jul 28, 2026
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Jan Olszanowski, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.