Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessing the Professional Evaluation of Italian Judges and Prosecutors Cover

Assessing the Professional Evaluation of Italian Judges and Prosecutors

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Benvenuti, Simone. “The Italian System of Judicial Governance: An Arena of Confronting Informal Practices and the Push Towards Formalization.” German Law Journal 24, no. 8 (2023): 13731392. DOI: 10.1017/glj.2023.67
  2. Catino, Maurizio, Cristina Dallara, and Sara Rocchi. “The Organizational Reasons for Wrongdoing: The Case of Italy’s Superior Council of the Judiciary (CSM).” Crime, Law and Social Change 79, no. 4 (2023): 453472. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-022-10064-9
  3. Cavallini, Daniela. “Judicial Discipline: Different Approaches in Five EU Member States.” In Handbook on Judicial Politics, edited by Ramona Coman and Cristina Dallara. Iași: Editura Institutul European, 2010.
  4. Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura. Circolare sui nuovi criteri di valutazione di professionalità dei magistrati. Circolare P. 21578/2024, deliberation of November 13, 2024.
  5. Consultative Council of European Judges. Opinion No. 17 (2014) on the Evaluation of Judges’ Work, the Quality of Justice and Respect for Judicial Independence. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2014. https://www.coe.int/en/web/ccje/opinion-n-17-on-the-evaluation-of-judges-work-the-quality-of-justice-and-respect-for-judicial-independence.
  6. Consultative Council of European Judges. Summary of Replies to the Questionnaire for the Preparation of Opinion No. 17. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2014.
  7. Contini, Francesco, Davide Carnevali, Marco Fabri, and Nadia Carboni. “The Evaluation and Development of the Quality of Justice in Italy.” In Handle with Care: Assessing and Designing Methods for Evaluation and Development of the Quality of Justice, edited by Francesco Contini. Bologna: IRSIG-CNR, 2017.
  8. Contini, Francesco, ed. Handle with Care: Assessing and Designing Methods for Evaluation and Development of the Quality of Justice. Bologna: IRSIG-CNR, 2017. https://publications.cnr.it/api/v1/documents/download/168390.
  9. De Vito, Riccardo. “Soggetti soltanto alla legge. I magistrati e le carriere.” Questione giustizia, no. 4 (2017). https://www.questionegiustizia.it/data/rivista/articoli/471/qg_2017-4_08.pdf.
  10. Di Federico, Giuseppe. “Judicial Independence in Italy.” In Judicial Independence in Transition, edited by Anja Seibert-Fohr, 357401. Heidelberg: Springer, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_10
  11. Di Federico, Giuseppe. “Recruitment, Professional Evaluation, Career and Discipline of Judges and Prosecutors in Italy.” In Recruitment, Professional Evaluation and Career of Judges and Prosecutors in Europe: Austria, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain, edited by Giuseppe Di Federico. Bologna: Lo Scarabeo, 2005.
  12. Di Federico, Giuseppe. “Riforma delle valutazioni di professionalità e delle disfunzioni ad essa connesse, in prospettiva comparata.” Diritto di Difesa, March 30, 2022. https://dirittodidifesa.eu/riforma-delle-valutazioni-di-professionalita-e-delle-disfunzioni-ad-essa-connesse-in-prospettiva-comparata-di-giuseppe-di-federico/.
  13. Fabri, Marco. “Metodi per la pesatura dei procedimenti giudiziari in Europa.” Questione giustizia, November 23, 2020.
  14. Garoupa, Nuno, and Tom Ginsburg. “Guarding the Guardians: Judicial Councils and Judicial Independence.” John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 444. Chicago: University of Chicago Law School, 2008. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics/222/. Published version: American Journal of Comparative Law 57, no. 1 (2009): 103134. DOI: 10.5131/ajcl.2008.0004
  15. Italy. Law No. 71 of June 17, 2022.
  16. Italy. Legislative Decree No. 160 of April 5, 2006.
  17. Italy. Legislative Decree No. 44 of March 28, 2024. DOI: 10.61205/S160565900030437-4
  18. Kosař, David. “Beyond Judicial Councils: Forms, Rationales and Impact of Judicial Self-Governance in Europe.” German Law Journal 19, no. 7 (2018): 15671612. DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200023178
  19. Magi, Raffaello, and Daniele Cappuccio. “La delega Cartabia in tema di valutazioni di professionalità del magistrato: considerazioni a prima lettura.” Questione giustizia, no. 2–3 (2022): 77ff.
  20. Ministry of Justice (Marta Cartabia). Statement during Parliamentary Question Time, Chamber of Deputies, October 20, 2021.
  21. Pauliat, Hélène, Caroline Foulquier-Expert, Mátyás Bencze, Laurent Berthier, Caroline Boyer-Capelle, Ágnes Kovács, Pauline Lagarde, et al. “Comparing the Evaluation and Development of the Quality of Justice in Finland, France, Hungary, Italy and the Netherlands.” In Handle with Care: Assessing and Designing Methods for Evaluation and Development of the Quality of Justice, edited by Francesco Contini, 277326. Bologna: IRSIG-CNR, 2017.
  22. Riedel, Johannes. “Judicial Review of Judicial Appointments in Germany.” International Journal for Court Administration 11, no. 1 (2020): 2. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.296
  23. Serrao d’Aquino, Pasquale. “Le valutazioni di professionalità dei magistrati. Parte seconda. I nodi problematici: le fonti di conoscenza, il rapporto con il disciplinare, gli sfasamenti temporali, le modalità espressive.” Giustizia Insieme, September 23, 2020. https://www.giustiziainsieme.it/it/ordinamento-giudiziario/1241-le-valutazioni-di-professionalita-dei-magistrati-parte-seconda-i-nodi-problematici-le-fonti-di-conoscenza-il-rapporto-con-il-disciplinare-gli-sfasamenti-temporali-le-modalita-espressive.
  24. Tomasi di Lampedusa, Giuseppe. The Leopard. Translated by Archibald Colquhoun. New York: Pantheon, 1960.
  25. United Nations. Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary. Adopted by the Seventh United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (1985) and endorsed by General Assembly Resolutions 40/32 of November 29, 1985, and 40/146 of December 13, 1985.
  26. Vinceti, Silvio Roberto. “Innovating Judicial Performance Evaluations: Toward Academic-Style Peer Review?” International Journal for Court Administration 15, no. 1 (2024): 2. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.576
  27. Vinceti, Silvio Roberto. “L’efficienza come categoria della responsabilità disciplinare del giudice nel diritto comparato.” In Riforma dell’ordinamento giudiziario ed efficienza del sistema giustizia, edited by Francesca Biondi and Francesco Dal Canto. Turin: Giappichelli, 2025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.795 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Published on: Jul 28, 2026
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Daniela Cavallini, Eleonora Ferrari, Silvio Roberto Vinceti, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.