Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Explaining Different Conviction Rates Across Different Legal Systems: A Comparative Exercise Cover

Explaining Different Conviction Rates Across Different Legal Systems: A Comparative Exercise

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Alge, Daniele “Plea Bargaining in England and Wales: Some Comparisons with the USA,” paper presented 2014.
  2. Alge, Daniele “Pressures to Plead Guilty or Playing the System? An Exploration of the Causes of Cracked Trials,” PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 2009.
  3. Artinger, F. M., S. Artinger, and G. Gigerenzer. “C.Y.A.: Frequency and Causes of Defensive Decisions in Public Administration.” Business Research 12 (2019): 925. DOI: 10.1007/s40685-018-0074-2
  4. Birrell, Andrew et al. The Trial Penalty. NACDL, 2018.
  5. Boffey, Daniel “Rise of Plea-Bargaining Coerces Young Defendants into Guilty Pleas,” The Guardian, October 6, 2022.
  6. Caianiello, Michele, and Jacqueline Hodgson, eds. Discretionary Criminal Justice in a Comparative Context. Carolina Academic Press, 2015.
  7. CEPEJ, European Judicial Systems: Efficiency and Quality of Justice (2016)
  8. Clark, D. “Conviction Rates for Magistrates’ Courts and Crown Court in England and Wales.” Statista, 2023.
  9. Council of Europe. “Special File: CEPEJ.”
  10. Curzio, Pietro. Relazione sull’amministrazione della giustizia nell’anno 2022. 2023.
  11. DataReportal. “Italy Population Data.”
  12. Davis, Kenneth Culp ‘Discretionary Justice’ Journal of Legal Education Vol. 23, No. 1 (1970), 5662.
  13. Dui Hua Human Rights Journal, “China’s Acquittal Rate Lowest in Two Decades,” September 12, 2023.
  14. European Commission EU Justice Scoreboard 2021.
  15. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). European Judicial Systems. 2016.
  16. Foscolo, Ugo Sepulchres (trans. J. G. Nichols, 2015), vv. 9193.
  17. Herrmann, Joachim ‘The Rule of Compulsory Prosecution and the Scope of Prosecutorial Discretion in Germany’ The University of Chicago Law Review Vol. 41, No. 3 (Spring, 1974), 468505. DOI: 10.2307/1599176
  18. Hobbes, Thomas Leviathan (1651), ch. 17.
  19. India Court Conviction Rate data 2022. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/india/crime-statistics/court-conviction-rate#:~:text=India%20Court%20Conviction%20Rate%20data,to%202022%2C%20with%2023%20observations. accessed 2 January 2025
  20. Italian Code of Criminal Procedure, artt. 274, 407, 444.
  21. Italy, Law 27 September 2021, no. 134
  22. Lexology. “Principles of Immediacy and Evidence Evaluation.”
  23. Morgan, Rod Summary Justice: Fast, but Fair? (Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, King’s College London, 2008).
  24. PBS. Research the System.
  25. Rasmusen, Eric, Manu Raghav, and J. Mark Ramseyer. “Convictions versus Conviction Rates.” American Law and Economics Review.
  26. Stella, Valentina. “Pagelle ai magistrati.” Il Dubbio, 2022.
  27. UK Government, “Criminal Court Statistics Quarterly: April to June 2023,” published September 28, 2023, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-court-statistics-quarterly-april-to-june-2023
  28. UK Government, Criminal Procedure Rules and Practice Directions 2020 (2023), https://www.gov.uk/guidance/rules-and-practice-directions-2020.
  29. UK Government Crown Prosecution Service, “Data Summary Quarter 1 2023–2024.”
  30. UK Government Crown Prosecution Service, “Key Measures,”.
  31. UK House of Commons Library. Georgina Sturge. “Court Statistics for England and Wales.”
  32. UK Office for National Statistics. “Population of England and Wales.”
  33. UK Sentencing Council, “Going to Court: Information for Defendants,” accessed November 7, 2023.
  34. University of the West of England, The Bar Training Course 2024–205, ‘Criminal Litigation & Sentencing an Overview of the Procedure in the Criminal Courts’
  35. UNODC. “Public Prosecutors as the Gatekeepers of Criminal Justice.”
  36. U.S. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. “Federal Judicial Caseload Statistics 2022.”
  37. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs, “Criminal Prosecutions in England and Wales,” Justice System Journal 3, no. 1 (1977): 3849.
  38. U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-04-422 (2004), 35.
  39. U.S. Office of the United States Attorneys, Steps in the Federal Criminal Procedure, U.S. Department of Justice (2022), https://www.justice.gov/usao/justice-101/steps-federal-criminal-process.
  40. Viano, Emilio C. “Plea Bargaining in the United States.” 2012.
  41. Web News ‘Mafia capitale’ [Mafia in the capitol city] 27 June 2017 accessed 3 November 2023 https://www.interris.it/roma-caput-mundi/mafia-capitale-il-legale-di-carminati-quello-del-mondo-di-mezzo-resta-un-processetto/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.681 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Published on: Jun 12, 2026
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Paolo D’Anselmi, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.